Infected charcot spine arthropathy

Infected charcot spine

Patients with an infected charcot spine (ICS) may experience little or no back pain despite severe vertebral destruction. Understanding the pathophysiology underlying ICS and its differential diagnoses is crucial for its accurate diagnosis. Worsening symptoms of chronic charcot spine should raise suspicions of an infection.

Diagnosis behind the mask: A rare case of infected Charcot's spine

Charcot's spine is a very uncommon long-term complication of spinal cord injury. Infection of the spine is a common pathology, but infection of a Charcot's spine is rare and is challenging to diagnose, especially in differentiating between the Charcot defect and the osteomyelitis defect. Surgical reconstruction has to be extremely individualized. A 65-year-old man with a history of thoracic spinal cord injury with paraplegia 49 years ago was admitted to our hospital with high fever and aphasia. After a thorough diagnostic process, destructive Charcot's spine and secondary infection were diagnosed. This report additionally reviews the surgical management of secondary infected destructive lumbar Charcot's spine and follows the patient's recovery and postoperative quality of life.

Surgical Management of Charcot Spinal Arthropathy in the Face of Possible Infection

BACKGROUND

The design is a retrospective cohort study. Charcot spinal arthropathy (CSA) is a rare and poorly understood progressive destructive spine condition that usually affects patients with preexisting spinal cord injury. The complexity of this condition, especially when additionally burdened by superimposed infection in the CSA zone, can potentially lead to suboptimal management such as protracted antibiotic therapy, predisposition to hardware failure, and pseudarthrosis. While in noninfected CSA primary stabilization is the major goal, staged surgical management has not been stratified based upon presence of a superinfected CSA. We compare clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment in CSA patients with and without concurrent spinal infections.

METHODS

Our single-institution database was reviewed for all patients diagnosed with CSA and surgically treated, who were subsequently divided into 2 cohorts: spinal arthropathy with superimposed infection and those without. Those were comparatively studied for complications and reoperation rate.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with CSA underwent surgical intervention; mean follow up of 15.3 months (range, 0-43). Eleven patients received stabilization with a quadruple-rod thoracolumbopelvic construct, while 4 patients with superinfected CSA underwent a staged procedure. Patients treated with a staged approach experienced fewer intraoperative complications (0% versus 18%) and fewer revision surgeries (25% versus 36%). Both cohorts had the same eventual healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management in CSA patients with primary emphasis on stability and modified surgical treatment based on presence of an active infection in the zone of neuropathic destruction will lead to similar eventual successful results with relatively few and manageable complications in this challenging patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The proposed treatment algorithm including the use of a quadruple-rod construct with lumbopelivic fixation and a staged approach in patients with superinfected CSA represents a reasonable option in the surgical treatment of CSA.

A comprehensive review of the treatment and management of Charcot spine

Charcot spine arthropathy (CSA), a result of reduced afferent innervation, is an occurrence of Charcot joint, a progressive, degenerative disorder in vertebral joints, related mostly to spinal cord injury. The repeated microtrauma is a result of a lack of muscle protection and destroys cartilage, ligaments, and disc spaces, leading to vertebrae destruction, joint instability, subluxation, and dislocation. Joint destruction compresses nerve roots, resulting in pain, paresthesia, sensory loss, dysautonomia, and spasticity. CSA presents with back pain, spinal deformity and instability, and audible spine noises during movement. Autonomic dysfunction includes bowel and bladder dysfunction. It is slowly progressive and usually diagnosed at a late stage, usually, on average, 20 years after the first initial insult. Diagnosis is rarely clinical related to the nature of nonspecific symptoms and requires imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Conservative management focuses on the prevention of fractures and the progression of deformities. This includes bed rest, orthoses, and braces. These could be useful in elderly or frail patients who are not candidates for surgical treatment, or in minimally symptomatic patients, such as patients with spontaneous fusion leading to a stable spine. Symptomatic treatment is offered for autonomic dysfunction, such as anticholinergics for bladder control. Most patients require surgical treatment. Spinal fusion is achieved with open, minimally-open (MOA) or minimally-invasive (MIS) approaches. The gold standard is open circumferential fusion; data is lacking to determine the superiority of open or MIS approaches. Patients usually improve after surgery; however, the rarity of the condition makes it difficult to estimate outcomes. This is a review of the latest and seminal literature about the treatment and chronic management of Charcot spine. The review includes the background of the syndrome, clinical presentation, and diagnosis, and compares the different treatment options that are currently available.

Antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate strut graft as a treatment of spinal osteomyelitis: case series and description of novel technique

OBJECTIVE

The surgical treatment of osteomyelitis and discitis of the spine often represents a challenging clinical entity for a multitude of reasons, including progression of infection despite debridement, development of spinal deformity and instability, bony destruction, and seeding of hardware. Despite advancement in spinal hardware and implantation techniques, these aforementioned challenges not uncommonly result in treatment failure, especially in instances of heavy disease burden with enough bony endplate destruction as to not allow support of a modern titanium cage implant. While antibiotic-infused polymethylmethacrylate (aPMMA) has been used in orthopedic surgery in joints of the extremities, its use has not been extensively described in the spine literature. Herein, the authors describe for the first time a series of patients treated with a novel surgical technique for the treatment of spinal osteomyelitis and discitis using aPMMA strut grafts with posterior segmental fusion.

METHODS

Over the course of 3 years, all patients with spinal osteomyelitis and discitis at a single institution were identified and included in the retrospective cohort if they were surgically treated with spinal fusion and implantation of an aPMMA strut graft at the nidus of infection. Basic demographics, surgical techniques, levels treated, complications, and return to the operating room for removal of the aPMMA strut graft and placement of a traditional cage were examined. The surgical technique consisted of performing a discectomy and/or corpectomy at the level of osteomyelitis and discitis followed by placement of aPMMA impregnated with vancomycin and/or tobramycin into the cavity. Depending on the patient's condition during follow-up and other deciding clinical and radiographic factors, the patient may return to the operating room nonurgently for removal of the PMMA spacer and implantation of a permanent cage with allograft to ultimately promote fusion.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were identified who were treated with an aPMMA strut graft for spinal osteomyelitis and discitis. Of these, 9 patients returned to the operating room for aPMMA strut graft removal and insertion of a cage with allograft at an average of 19 weeks following the index procedure. The most common infections were methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n = 6) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (n = 5). There were 13 lumbosacral infections and 1 each of cervical and thoracic infection. Eleven patients were cured of their infection, while 2 had recurrence of their infection; 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Three patients required unplanned return trips to the operating room, two of which were for wound complications, with the third being for recurrent infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of severe infection with considerable bony destruction, insertion of an aPMMA strut graft is a novel technique that should be considered in order to provide strong anterior-column support while directly delivering antibiotics to the infection bed. While the active infection is being treated medically, this structural aPMMA support bridges the time it takes for the patient to be converted from a catabolic to an anabolic state, when it is ultimately safe to perform a definitive, curative fusion surgery.