Interdisciplinary follow-up clinic for people with spinal cord injury: a retrospective study of a carousel model

Assessment of the reliability and usability of ChatGPT in response to spinal cord injury questions

OBJECTIVE

The use of artificial intelligence chatbots to obtain information about patients' diseases is increasing. This study aimed to determine the reliability and usability of ChatGPT for spinal cord injury-related questions.

METHODS

Three raters simultaneously evaluated a total of 47 questions on a 7-point Likert scale for reliability and usability, based on the three most frequently searched keywords in Google Trends ('general information', 'complications' and 'treatment').

RESULTS

Inter-rater Cronbach α scores indicated substantial agreement for both reliability and usability scores (α between 0.558 and 0.839, and α between 0.373 and 0.772, respectively). The highest mean reliability score was for 'complications' (mean 5.38). The lowest average was for the 'general information' section (mean 4.20). The 'treatment' had the highest mean scores for the usability (mean 5.87) and the lowest mean value was recorded in the 'general information' section (mean 4.80).

CONCLUSION

The answers given by ChatGPT to questions related to spinal cord injury were reliable and useful. Nevertheless, it should be kept in mind that ChatGPT may provide incorrect or incomplete information, especially in the 'general information' section, which may mislead patients and their relatives.

Effects of Adaptations in an Interdisciplinary Follow-Up Clinic for People with Spinal Cord Injury in the Chronic Phase: A Prospective Cohort Study

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) often experience secondary health conditions (SHCs), which are addressed during interdisciplinary follow-up clinics. We adapted the design of our clinic, by introducing a questionnaire concerning functioning and SHCs, additional measurements of blood pressure and saturation, and participants were seen by either a specialized nurse or rehabilitation physician. In this study, we investigated the effects of these adaptations and the experienced satisfaction of the participants. The results showed an increased number of recommendations in the adapted design, compared to the initial design. Further, the nature of the recommendations shifted from somatic issues to recommendations regarding psychosocial functioning and regarding (the use of) devices. The added measurements revealed an average high systolic blood pressure, which led to more referrals to the general practitioner. The clinical weight and pulmonary functions stayed stable over time. The current adaptations in design expanded and optimized the number and nature of recommendations regarding SHCs to participants. The questionnaire helps the participant to prepare for the clinic and the professionals to tailor their recommendations, resulting in highly satisfied participants.