Reliability and minimal detectable change of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the trunk control test for individuals with spinal cord injury

Validity of the trunk assessment scale for spinal cord injury (TASS) and the trunk control test in individuals with spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

The Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the Trunk Control Test for individuals with a Spinal Cord Injury (TCT-SCI) are highly reliable assessment tools for evaluating the trunk function of individuals with SCIs. However, the potential differences in the validity of these two scales are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the criterion validity of the TASS and the construct validity of the TASS and TCT-SCI.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 30 individuals with SCIs (age 63.8 ± 10.7 yrs, 17 with tetraplegia). To evaluate criterion validity, we calculated Spearman's rho between the TASS and the gold standard (the TCT-SCI). To determine construct validity, we used the following hypothesis testing approaches: (i) calculating Spearman's rho between each scale and the upper and lower extremity motor scores (UEMS, LEMS), the Walking Index for SCI-II (WISCI-II), and the motor score of the Functional Independence Measure (mFIM); and (ii) determining the cut-off point for identifying ambulators with SCIs (≥ 3 points on item 12 of Spinal Cord Independent Measure III) by a receiver operating characteristics analysis.

RESULTS

A moderate correlation was confirmed between the TASS and the TCT-SCI (r = 0.68). Construct validity was supported by six of the eight prior hypotheses. The cut-off points for identifying ambulators with SCIs were 26 points (TASS) and 18 points (TCT-SCI).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the contents of the TASS and the TCT-SCI might reflect the epidemiological characteristics of the populations in which they were developed.

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord injury (TASS)

OBJECTIVE

To confirm the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS).

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 48 Japanese individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) (age 64.1 ± 10.4 yrs, 28 with tetraplegia) admitted to two institutions at admission, at 1 month of hospitalization, and at discharge with the TASS, the Trunk Control Test in individuals with an SCI (TCT-SCI) motor score, the Functional Independence Measure motor score (mFIM), and the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS). We assessed the TASS responsiveness by determining the correlation coefficients for the changes in the TASS' and other assessments' scores. We calculated the MCIDs by five anchor-based methods.

RESULTS

The changes in the TASS and those in the other assessments were weakly correlated at 1 month and moderately correlated at discharge. The TASS MCIDs were observed at 1 month and at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirmed that the change in TASS scores had weak-to-moderate correlations with the changes in the participants' upper- and lower-limb function and activities of daily living. Using the MCID for the TASS determined by anchor-based methods may lead to a better interpretation of changes in the trunk function of individuals with SCIs.