Mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal cancers show differential expression of chemotherapy metabolism and resistance genes

Clinicopathological features and prognosis analysis of proximal colonic mucinous adenocarcinoma

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a distinct subtype of colorectal cancer. Previous studies have confirmed the poor prognosis of rectal or left-sided colon MAC, while the prognosis and response to chemotherapy in proximal colon MAC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, response to chemotherapy, and risk prediction factors of proximal colon MAC. Patients with proximal colon MAC and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The analyzed variables included gender, age, smoking, drinking, chemotherapy, metastasis, pathological stage, and tumor size. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the impact of mucinous subtype and chemotherapy on OS. We conducted univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to determine prognosis factors for proximal colon MAC and NMAC. A total of 284 cases of proximal colon MAC and 1384 cases of NMAC were included in the study. Compared to NMAC, proximal colon MAC was diagnosed at a younger age. The proportion of synchronous and metachronous metastasis was also higher, as well as the pathological stage and tumor size. Proximal colon MAC had a worse prognosis than NMAC, especially in stage 3. Moreover, the prognosis of proximal colon NMAC improved after chemotherapy, while MAC showed no improvement in prognosis after chemotherapy. Advanced age, N1 and N2 stage were independent prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in MAC. For proximal colon adenocarcinoma, the independent predictors of adverse outcomes included mucinous subtype, order age, N1 and N2 stages, and pathological stage 4. Proximal colon MAC had a worse prognosis compared to NMAC. Chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of proximal colon mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy Is Not Necessary for Stage III Mucinous Rectal Cancer: Evidence Based on Long Survival Analysis from SEER Data

BACKGROUND

Although rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMC) is less sensitive to radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy is still recommended for RMC patients. This study aimed to explore whether adjuvant radiotherapy is necessary for stage III RMC.

METHODS

Data of patients with stage III RMC were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's SEER database (2004-2015). The survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the impact of clinicopathological parameters on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

RMC has a worse T and N stage at diagnosis than rectal adenomatous carcinoma (RAC) (all p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that histopathological type MC was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.27; 95%CI 1.14-1.41; p < 0.001) and CSS (HR 1.34; 95%CI 1.18-1.51; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis based on different treatment regimens showed no significant difference between chemotherapy group and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. After the propensity score matching, no significant difference was also found in OS and CSS between chemotherapy group and chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

RMC is an independent poor prognostic factor for OS and CSS. Adjuvant radiotherapy for RMC was not beneficial in improving survival outcomes.

Interaction analysis of high-risk pathological features on adjuvant chemotherapy survival benefit in stage II colon cancer patients: a multi-center, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to analyze the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients and the impact of high-risk factors on the prognostic effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This study is a multi-center, retrospective study, A total of 931 patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative surgery in 8 tertiary hospitals in China between 2016 and 2017 were enrolled in the study. Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the risk factors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and to test the multiplicative interaction of pathological factors and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). The additive interaction was presented using the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). The Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) was utilized to assess the interaction of continuous variables on the ACT effect.

RESULTS

A total of 931 stage II colon cancer patients were enrolled in this study, the median age was 63 years old (interquartile range: 54-72 years) and 565 (60.7%) patients were male. Younger patients (median age, 58 years vs 65 years; P < 0.001) and patients with the following high-risk features, such as T4 tumors (30.8% vs 7.8%; P < 0.001), grade 3 lesions (36.0% vs 22.7%; P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (22.1% vs 6.8%; P < 0.001) and perineural invasion (19.4% vs 13.6%; P = 0.031) were more likely to receive ACT. Patients with perineural invasion showed a worse OS and marginally worse DFS (hazardous ratio [HR] 2.166, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.282-3.660, P = 0.004; HR 1.583, 95% CI 0.985-2.545, P = 0.058, respectively). Computing the interaction on a multiplicative and additive scale revealed that there was a significant interaction between PNI and ACT in terms of DFS (HR for multiplicative interaction 0.196, p = 0.038; RERI, -1.996; 95%CI, -3.600 to -0.392) and OS (HR for multiplicative interaction 0.112, p = 0.042; RERI, -2.842; 95%CI, -4.959 to -0.725).

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural invasion had prognostic value, and it could also influence the effect of ACT after curative surgery. However, other high-risk features showed no implication of efficacy for ACT in our study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03794193 (04/01/2019).

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with oesophageal mucinous adenocarcinoma: Post-hoc analysis of the UK MRC OE02 and OE05 trials

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma with more than 50% extracellular mucin is a relatively rare histological subtype of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. The clinical impact of extracellular mucin in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OeAC) has not been investigated in detail. We hypothesised that patients with mucinous OeAC (OeAC_mucin) do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

OeAC patients either treated by surgery alone in the OE02 trial (S-patients) or by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS-patients) in OE02 or OE05 trials were included. Cancers from 1055 resection specimens (OE02 [test cohort]: 187 CS, 185 S; OE05 [validation cohort]: 683 CS) were classified as either mucinous (more than 50% of the tumour area consists of extracellular mucin, OeAC_mucin) or non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (OeAC_non-mucin). The relationship between histological phenotype, clinicopathological characteristics, survival and treatment was analysed.

RESULTS

Overall, 7.3% and 9.6% OeAC were classified as OeAC_mucin in OE02 and OE05, respectively. In OE02, the frequency of OeAC_mucin was similar in S and CS-patients. Patients with OeAC_mucin treated with surgery alone had a poorer overall survival compared with OeAC_non-mucin patients (hazard ratio: 2.222, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-4.56, P = 0.025). Patients with OeAC_mucin treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery had similar survival as OeAC_non-mucin patients in test and validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to suggest in a post-hoc analysis of material from two independent phase III clinical trials that the poor survival of patients with mucinous OeAC can be improved by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Future studies are warranted to identify potential underlying biological, biochemical or pharmacokinetic interactions between extracellular mucin and chemotherapy.

Mucinous histology is associated with poor prognosis in locally advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with postoperative first-line adjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed surgery is the standard management for localized advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a peculiar histological subtype of CRC, but the prognosis of MAC patients is controversial. The objective of this study is to assess the implication of MAC in survival of patients treated with surgery and firs-line adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Studies describing outcomes for advanced MAC and non-specific adenocarcinoma (AC) of CRC patients treated with first-line postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed surgery were searched in PubMed, Embase, Medline, EBSCO, Wiley, and Cochrane Library (January 1963-August 2021). Hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for MAC to AC were extracted. Random-effects model was used for calculating the pooled HRs and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis is comprised of 8 studies involving a total of 124,303 CRC patients treated with first-line adjuvant chemotherapy followed surgery. The pooled HR for MAC was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.07-1.41, p < 0.01, I² = 80%), and the DFS (HR, 2.95, 95% CI, 1.22-7.14) of MAC patients were significantly poorer than AC patients. Similar results were also observed in stage III and FOLFOX regimen subgroups.

CONCLUSION

MAC was a risk factor for prognosis of localized advanced CRC patients treated with postoperative first-line adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, the role of first-line adjuvant chemotherapy regimens should be further studied in these MAC patients.

Serine-Arginine Protein Kinase 1 (SRPK1): a systematic review of its multimodal role in oncogenesis

Alternative splicing is implicated in each of the hallmarks of cancer, and is mechanised by various splicing factors. Serine-Arginine Protein Kinase 1 (SRPK1) is an enzyme which moderates the activity of splicing factors rich in serine/arginine domains. Here we review SRPK1’s relationship with various cancers by performing a systematic review of all relevant published data. Elevated SRPK1 expression correlates with advanced disease stage and poor survival in many epithelial derived cancers. Numerous pre-clinical studies investigating a host of different tumour types; have found increased SRPK1 expression to be associated with proliferation, invasion, migration and apoptosis in vitro as well as tumour growth, tumourigenicity and metastasis in vivo. Aberrant SRPK1 expression is implicated in various signalling pathways associated with oncogenesis, a number of which, such as the PI3K/AKT, NF-КB and TGF-Beta pathway, are implicated in multiple different cancers. SRPK1-targeting micro RNAs have been identified in a number of studies and shown to have an important role in regulating SRPK1 activity. SRPK1 expression is also closely related to the response of various tumours to platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents. Future clinical applications will likely focus on the role of SRPK1 as a biomarker of treatment resistance and the potential role of its inhibition.