Affective modulation of the associative-limbic subthalamic nucleus: deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Deep-Brain Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation Enhances Food-Related Motivation by Influencing Neuroinflammation and Anxiety Levels in a Rat Model of Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease

Deep-brain subthalamic nucleus stimulation (DBS-STN) has become a well-established therapeutic option for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). While the motor benefits of DBS-STN are widely acknowledged, the neuropsychiatric effects are still being investigated. Beyond its immediate effects on neuronal circuits, emerging research suggests that DBS-STN might also modulate the peripheral inflammation and neuroinflammation. In this work, we assessed the effects of DBS-STN on food-related motivation, food intake pattern, and the level of anxiety and compared them with markers of cellular and immune activation in nigrostriatal and mesolimbic areas in rats with the 6-OHDA model of early PD. To evaluate the potential mechanism of observed effects, we also measured corticosterone concentration in plasma and leukocyte distribution in peripheral blood. We found that DBS-STN applied during neurodegeneration has beneficial effects on food intake pattern and motivation and reduces anxiety. These behavioral effects occur with reduced percentages of IL-6-labeled cells in the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra pars compacta in the stimulated brain hemisphere. At the same brain structures, the cFos cell activations were confirmed. Simultaneously, the corticosterone plasma concentration was elevated, and the peripheral blood lymphocytes were reduced after DBS-STN. We believe that comprehending the relationship between the effects of DBS-STN on inflammation and its therapeutic results is essential for optimizing DBS therapy in PD.

A subthalamo-parabrachial glutamatergic pathway is involved in stress-induced self-grooming in mice

Excessive self-grooming is an important behavioral phenotype of the stress response in rodents. Elucidating the neural circuit that regulates stress-induced self-grooming may suggest potential treatment to prevent maladaptation to stress that is implicated in emotional disorders. Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been found to induce strong self-grooming. In this study we investigated the role of the STN and a related neural circuit in mouse stress-related self-grooming. Body-restraint and foot-shock stress-induced self-grooming models were established in mice. We showed that both body restraint and foot shock markedly increased the expression of c-Fos in neurons in the STN and lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPB). Consistent with this, the activity of STN neurons and LPB glutamatergic (Glu) neurons, as assessed with fiber photometry recording, was dramatically elevated during self-grooming in the stressed mice. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in parasagittal brain slices, we identified a monosynaptic projection from STN neurons to LPB Glu neurons that regulates stress-induced self-grooming in mice. Enhanced self-grooming induced by optogenetic activation of the STN-LPB Glu pathway was attenuated by treatment with fluoxetine (18 mg·kg-1·d-1, p.o., for 2 weeks) or in the presence of a cage mate. Furthermore, optogenetic inhibition of the STN-LPB pathway attenuated stress-related but not natural self-grooming. Taken together, these results suggest that the STN-LPB pathway regulates the acute stress response and is a potential target for intervention in stress-related emotional disorders.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus to improve symptoms and cognitive functions in patients with refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a longitudinal study

There are conflicting results regarding the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different regions on the cognitive functions of patients with severe refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Moreover, it is not yet clear whether the rate of improvement in obsession-compulsion symptoms and cognitive functions following DBS is interrelated. We investigated the effect of the subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS on both the severity of symptoms and cognitive functions of patients and also investigated the possible interrelationship between the two. Twelve patients (10 males and two females; 56.17 ± 4.52 years old) were assessed before and 1 month and 3 months after the DBS surgery using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the N-Back, the selective and divided attention (SDA), the Tower of London (TOL), and the Wisconsin Card Sorting (WCS) tests. We found that the severity of symptoms and cognitive functions improved significantly after DBS and this effect lasted at least up to 3 months. Furthermore, it was revealed that the severity of symptoms and cognitive profiles of patients were significantly correlated. Compulsion severity had the highest correlation with perseveration errors, while obsession severity was most correlated with the number of n-back errors. Based on our findings, it seems that the STN acts at least to some extent as a common functional/anatomical ground for the severity of symptoms and cognitive functions of patients with severe refractory OCD, and it can probably be considered as the region of interest for DBS in this group of patients.

Deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Results from meta-analysis

The aim of this work is to investigate the effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in patients with severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) who are resistant to pharmacological treatments, focusing on obsessive compulsive, depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as global function. A systematic review and meta-analysis including 25 studies (without language restrictions) from between 2003 and 2020 was performed. A total of 303 patients were evaluated twice (before and after DBS). After DBS treatment OCD patients with resistance to pharmacological treatments showed a significant improvement of obsessive-compulsive symptoms (25 studies; SMD=2.39; 95% CI, 1.91 to 2.87; P<0.0001), depression (9 studies; SMD= 1.19; 95%CI, 0.84 to 1.54; P<0.0001), anxiety (5 studies; SMD=1.00; 95%CI, 0.32 to 1.69; P=0.004) and functionality (7 studies; SMD=-3.51; 95%CI, -5.00 to -2.02; P=0.005) measured by the standardized scales: Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Global Assessment of Function (GAF). Publication bias were discarded by using funnel plot. The main conclusions of this meta-analysis highlight the statistically significant effectiveness of DBS in patients with severe OCD who are resistant to conventional pharmacological treatments, underlying its role in global functioning apart from obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome: clinical outcome and functional connectivity

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising novel approach for managing refractory Gilles de la Tourette’s syndrome (GTS). The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is the most common DBS target for treating movement disorders, and smaller case studies have reported the efficacy of bilateral STN-DBS treatment for relieving tic symptoms. However, management of GTS and treatment mechanism of STN-DBS in GTS remain to be elucidated.

Methods

Ten patients undergoing STN-DBS were included. Tics severity was evaluated using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. The severities of comorbid psychiatric symptoms of obsessive–compulsive behavior (OCB), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and depression; social and occupational functioning; and quality of life were assessed. Volumes of tissue activated were used as seed points for functional connectivity analysis performed using a control dataset.

Results

The overall tics severity significantly reduced, with 62.9% ± 26.2% and 58.8% ± 27.2% improvements at the 6- and 12-months follow-up, respectively. All three patients with comorbid OCB showed improvement in their OCB symptoms at both the follow-ups. STN-DBS treatment was reasonably well tolerated by the patients with GTS. The most commonly reported side effect was light dysarthria. The stimulation effect of STN-DBS might regulate these symptoms through functional connectivity with the thalamus, pallidum, substantia nigra pars reticulata, putamen, insula, and anterior cingulate cortices.

Conclusions

STN-DBS was associated with symptomatic improvement in severe and refractory GTS without significant adverse events. The STN is a promising DBS target by stimulating both sensorimotor and limbic subregions, and specific brain area doses affect treatment outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11266-w.

Effects of diffusion signal modeling and segmentation approaches on subthalamic nucleus parcellation

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is commonly used as a surgical target for deep brain stimulation in movement disorders such as Parkinson's Disease. Tractography-derived connectivity-based parcellation (CBP) has been recently proposed as a suitable tool for non-invasive in vivo identification and pre-operative targeting of specific functional territories within the human STN. However, a well-established, accurate and reproducible protocol for STN parcellation is still lacking. The present work aims at testing the effects of different tractography-based approaches for the reconstruction of STN functional territories. We reconstructed functional territories of the STN on the high-quality dataset of 100 unrelated healthy subjects and on the test-retest dataset of the Human Connectome Project (HCP) repository. Connectivity-based parcellation was performed with a hypothesis-driven approach according to cortico-subthalamic connectivity, after dividing cortical areas into three groups: associative, limbic and sensorimotor. Four parcellation pipelines were compared, combining different signal modeling techniques (single-fiber vs multi-fiber) and different parcellation approaches (winner takes all parcellation vs fiber density thresholding). We tested these procedures on STN regions of interest obtained from three different, commonly employed, subcortical atlases. We evaluated the pipelines both in terms of between-subject similarity, assessed on the cohort of 100 unrelated healthy subjects, and of within-subject similarity, using a second cohort of 44 subjects with available test-retest data. We found that each parcellation provides converging results in terms of location of the identified parcels, but with significative variations in size and shape. All pipelines obtained very high within-subject similarity, with tensor-based approaches outperforming multi-fiber pipelines. On the other hand, higher between-subject similarity was found with multi-fiber signal modeling techniques combined with fiber density thresholding. We suggest that a fine-tuning of tractography-based parcellation may lead to higher reproducibility and aid the development of an optimized surgical targeting protocol.

A Unified Functional Network Target for Deep Brain Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

BACKGROUND

Multiple deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets have been proposed for treating intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Here, we investigated whether stimulation effects of different target sites would be mediated by one common or several segregated functional brain networks.

METHODS

First, seeding from active electrodes of 4 OCD patient cohorts (N = 50) receiving DBS to anterior limb of the internal capsule or subthalamic nucleus zones, optimal functional connectivity profiles for maximal Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale improvements were calculated and cross-validated in leave-one-cohort-out and leave-one-patient-out designs. Second, we derived optimal target-specific connectivity patterns to determine brain regions mutually predictive of clinical outcome for both targets and others predictive for either target alone. Functional connectivity was defined using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data acquired in 1000 healthy participants.

RESULTS

While optimal functional connectivity profiles showed both commonalities and differences between target sites, robust cross-predictions of clinical improvements across OCD cohorts and targets suggested a shared network. Connectivity to the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and precuneus, among other regions, was predictive regardless of stimulation target. Regions with maximal connectivity to these commonly predictive areas included the insula, superior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and anterior thalamus, as well as the original stereotactic targets.

CONCLUSIONS

Pinpointing the network modulated by DBS for OCD from different target sites identified a set of brain regions to which DBS electrodes associated with optimal outcomes were functionally connected-regardless of target choice. On these grounds, we establish potential brain areas that could prospectively inform additional or alternative neuromodulation targets for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review of worldwide experience after 20 years

BACKGROUND

Twenty years after its first use in a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), the results confirm that deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for patients with severe and resistant forms of the disorder. Nevertheless, many unknowns remain, including the optimal anatomical targets, the best stimulation parameters, the long-term (LT) effects of the therapy, and the clinical or biological factors associated with response. This systematic review of the articles published to date on DBS for OCD assesses the short and LT efficacy of the therapy and seeks to identify predictors of response.

AIM

To summarize the existing knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of DBS in treatment-resistant OCD.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 31, 2020, using the following strategy: “(Obsessive-compulsive disorder OR OCD) AND (deep brain stimulation OR DBS).” Clinical trials and observational studies published in English and evaluating the effectiveness of DBS for OCD in humans were included and screened for relevant information using a standardized collection tool. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a main diagnosis of OCD, DBS conducted for therapeutic purposes and variation in symptoms of OCD measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (Y-BOCS) as primary outcome. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Forty articles identified by the search strategy met the eligibility criteria. Applying a follow-up threshold of 36 mo, 29 studies (with 230 patients) provided information on short-term (ST) response to DBS in, while 11 (with 155 patients) reported results on LT response. Mean follow-up period was 18.5 ± 8.0 mo for the ST studies and 63.7 ± 20.7 mo for the LT studies. Overall, the percentage of reduction in Y-BOCS scores was similar in ST (47.4%) and LT responses (47.2%) to DBS, but more patients in the LT reports met the criteria for response (defined as a reduction in Y-BOCS scores > 35%: ST, 60.6% vs LT, 70.7%). According to the results, the response in the first year predicts the extent to which an OCD patient will benefit from DBS, since the maximum symptom reduction was achieved in most responders in the first 12-14 mo after implantation. Reports indicate a consistent tendency for this early improvement to be maintained to the mid-term for most patients; but it is still controversial whether this improvement persists, increases or decreases in the long term. Three different patterns of LT response emerged from the analysis: 49.5% of patients had good and sustained response to DBS, 26.6% were non responders, and 22.5% were partial responders, who might improve at some point but experience relapses during follow-up. A significant improvement in depressive symptoms and global functionality was observed in most studies, usually (although not always) in parallel with an improvement in obsessive symptoms. Most adverse effects of DBS were mild and transient and improved after adjusting stimulation parameters; however, some severe adverse events including intracranial hemorrhages and infections were also described. Hypomania was the most frequently reported psychiatric side effect. The relationship between DBS and suicide risk is still controversial and requires further study. Finally, to date, no clear clinical or biological predictors of response can be established, probably because of the differences between studies in terms of the neuroanatomical targets and stimulation protocols assessed.

CONCLUSION

The present review confirms that DBS is a promising therapy for patients with severe resistant OCD, providing both ST and LT evidence of efficacy.

Electrical deep neuromodulation in psychiatry

Addressing treatment refractoriness in psychiatric diseases is an essential public health objective. The last two decades have seen an increasing interest for deep brain stimulation (DBS) of several brain targets. In this chapter, we have reviewed the main DBS clinical trials in psychiatric diseases, mainly obsessive compulsive disorders (OCD) and depression, but also emerging research in other psychiatric disorders. While its efficacy and safety are confirmed, DBS is still not considered as standard therapy in psychiatry. However, advances in neuroimaging research combined to behavioral and electrophysiological data uniquely provided by DBS studies improve knowledge on physiopathology in these brain diseases. This will help define the optimal brain targets according to specific phenotype dimensions. Revealing the mechanisms of action and effects of DBS will support that its impact goes beyond a loco-regional brain stimulation and confirms that electrical neuromodulation influences brain networks. Added to the progress in neuromodulation technology, these insights will hopefully facilitate a more widespread application of this promising treatment. Future development of a personalized multimodal assessment of underlying dysfunctional brain networks will open new circuit-specific treatment perspectives that may facilitate better patient outcomes.

New Frontiers for Deep Brain Stimulation: Directionality, Sensing Technologies, Remote Programming, Robotic Stereotactic Assistance, Asleep Procedures, and Connectomics

Over the last few years, while expanding its clinical indications from movement disorders to epilepsy and psychiatry, the field of deep brain stimulation (DBS) has seen significant innovations. Hardware developments have introduced directional leads to stimulate specific brain targets and sensing electrodes to determine optimal settings via feedback from local field potentials. In addition, variable-frequency stimulation and asynchronous high-frequency pulse trains have introduced new programming paradigms to efficiently desynchronize pathological neural circuitry and regulate dysfunctional brain networks not responsive to conventional settings. Overall, these innovations have provided clinicians with more anatomically accurate programming and closed-looped feedback to identify optimal strategies for neuromodulation. Simultaneously, software developments have simplified programming algorithms, introduced platforms for DBS remote management via telemedicine, and tools for estimating the volume of tissue activated within and outside the DBS targets. Finally, the surgical accuracy has improved thanks to intraoperative magnetic resonance or computerized tomography guidance, network-based imaging for DBS planning and targeting, and robotic-assisted surgery for ultra-accurate, millimetric lead placement. These technological and imaging advances have collectively optimized DBS outcomes and allowed “asleep” DBS procedures. Still, the short- and long-term outcomes of different implantable devices, surgical techniques, and asleep vs. awake procedures remain to be clarified. This expert review summarizes and critically discusses these recent innovations and their potential impact on the DBS field.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Deep Brain Stimulations for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Update of the 2014 Guidelines

BACKGROUND

In 2020, the Guidelines Task Force conducted another systematic review of the relevant literature on deep brain stimulation (DBS) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) to update the original 2014 guidelines to ensure timeliness and accuracy for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature and update the evidence-based guidelines on DBS for OCD.

METHODS

The Guidelines Task Force conducted another systematic review of the relevant literature, using the same search terms and strategies as used to search PubMed and Embase for relevant literature. The updated search included studies published between 1966 and December 2019. The same inclusion/exclusion criteria as the original guideline were also applied. Abstracts were reviewed and relevant full-text articles were retrieved and graded. Of 864 articles, 10 were retrieved for full-text review and analysis. Recommendations were updated according to new evidence yielded by this update.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in the original guideline, reporting the use of bilateral DBS as more effective in improving OCD symptoms than sham treatment. An additional 10 studies were included in this update: 1 class II and 9 class III.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data published in the literature, the following recommendations can be made: (1) It is recommended that clinicians utilize bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS over best medical management for the treatment of patients with medically refractory OCD (level I). (2) Clinicians may use bilateral nucleus accumbens or bed nucleus of stria terminalis DBS for the treatment of patients with medically refractory OCD (level II). There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for the identification of the most effective target.The full guidelines can be accessed at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/deep-brain-stimulation-obsessive-compulsive-disord.

Acute Time-Locked Alpha Frequency Subthalamic Stimulation Reduces Negative Emotional Bias in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Emotional processing is a core cognitive process cutting across neuropsychiatric disorders. Understanding the neurophysiological features underlying depressive symptoms and their sensitivity to modulation is critical to modifying emotional bias. The subthalamic nucleus (STN), targeted in Parkinson's disease, shows a late alpha desynchronization to affective stimuli. We targeted this alpha desynchronization using a novel stimulation protocol asking if brief alpha (10 Hz) frequency stimulation time-locked to unpleasant imagery might influence subjective emotion.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited. The first study tested patients (n = 16) on affective stimuli with STN local field potential recordings assessed bilaterally without stimulation. In the second study, patients (n = 24) were tested on two affective tasks comparing negative and neutral stimuli paired with acute right-STN stimulation, with one of the negative conditions stimulated briefly for 1 second at either 130 Hz or 10 Hz. The subjects rated valence and arousal of negative and neutral stimuli.

RESULTS

We confirmed greater alpha desynchronization in both negative and positive affect relative to neutral in the right STN. Using acute stimulation of the right STN, we show a critical interaction effect between ratings, stimulation, and frequency; alpha frequency stimulation increased the subjective pleasantness of negative imagery, particularly with ventromedial contacts. Higher depression scores were associated with a positive bias to 10-Hz but not 130-Hz stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlight the potential of brief alpha frequency subthalamic stimulation to reduce negative emotional bias. This finding provides mechanistic insights underlying subjective emotional valence and has implications for the management of depression using neuromodulation.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in obsessive-compulsives disorders: long-term follow-up of an open, prospective, observational cohort

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a major cause of disability in western country and responsible for severe impairment of quality of life. About 10% of patients present with severe OCD symptoms and require innovative treatment such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Among possible targets, the non-motor subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a key node of the basal ganglia circuitry, strongly connected to limbic cortical areas known to be involved in OCD.

METHOD

We analysed, in a prospective, observational, monocentric, open label cohort, the effect of chronic non-motor STN-DBS in 19 patients with treatment-resistant OCD consecutively operated in a single centre. Severity of OCD was evaluated using the Yale and Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). YBOCS scores at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively were compared with baseline. Responders were defined by >35% improvement of YBOCS scores. Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) scale was used to evaluate the impact of improvement.

RESULTS

At a 24-month follow-up, the mean YBOCS score improved by 53.4% from 33.3±3.5 to 15.8±9.1 (95% CI 11.2-20.4; p<0.0001). Fourteen out of 19 patients were considered as responders, 5 out of 19 being improved over 75% and 10 out of 19 over 50%. GAF scale improved by 92% from 34.1±3.9 to 66.4±18.8 (95% CI 56.7-76.1; p=0.0003). The most frequent adverse events consisted of transient DBS-induced hypomania and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Chronic DBS of the non-motor STN is an effective and relatively safe procedure to treat severe OCD resistant to conventional management.

Deep brain stimulation and recordings: Insights into the contributions of subthalamic nucleus in cognition

Recent progress in targeted interrogation of basal ganglia structures and networks with deep brain stimulation in humans has provided insights into the complex functions the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Beyond the traditional role of the STN in modulating motor function, recognition of its role in cognition was initially fueled by side effects seen with STN DBS and later revealed with behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Anatomical, clinical, and electrophysiological data converge on the view that the STN is a pivotal node linking cognitive and motor processes. The goal of this review is to synthesize the literature to date that used DBS to examine the contributions of the STN to motor and non-motor cognitive functions and control. Multiple modalities of research have provided us with an enhanced understanding of the STN and reveal that it is critically involved in motor and non-motor inhibition, decision-making, motivation and emotion. Understanding the role of the STN in cognition can enhance the therapeutic efficacy and selectivity not only for existing applications of DBS, but also in the development of therapeutic strategies to stimulate aberrant circuits to treat non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease and other disorders.

Spatio-molecular domains identified in the mouse subthalamic nucleus and neighboring glutamatergic and GABAergic brain structures

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is crucial for normal motor, limbic and associative function. STN dysregulation is correlated with several brain disorders, including Parkinsonʼs disease and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), for which high-frequency stimulation of the STN is increasing as therapy. However, clinical progress is hampered by poor knowledge of the anatomical–functional organization of the STN. Today, experimental mouse genetics provides outstanding capacity for functional decoding, provided selective promoters are available. Here, we implemented single-nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNASeq) of the mouse STN followed through with histological analysis of 16 candidate genes of interest. Our results demonstrate that the mouse STN is composed of at least four spatio-molecularly defined domains, each distinguished by defined sets of promoter activities. Further, molecular profiles dissociate the STN from the adjoining para-STN (PSTN) and neighboring structures of the hypothalamus, mammillary nuclei and zona incerta. Enhanced knowledge of STN´s internal organization should prove useful towards genetics-based functional decoding of this clinically relevant brain structure.

Wallén-Mackenzie et al. investigate anatomical–functional organization of the subthalamic nucleus in mice, using single-nuclei RNA sequencing followed by histological analysis. They identify four domains distinguished by defined sets of promoter activities, providing a valuable resource for functional decoding of the subthalamic nucleus.

A unified connectomic target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Multiple surgical targets for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder with deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been proposed. However, different targets may modulate the same neural network responsible for clinical improvement. We analyzed data from four cohorts of patients (N = 50) that underwent DBS to the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC), the nucleus accumbens or the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The same fiber bundle was associated with optimal clinical response in cohorts targeting either structure. This bundle connected frontal regions to the STN. When informing the tract target based on the first cohort, clinical improvements in the second could be significantly predicted, and vice versa. To further confirm results, clinical improvements in eight patients from a third center and six patients from a fourth center were significantly predicted based on their stimulation overlap with this tract. Our results show that connectivity-derived models may inform clinical improvements across DBS targets, surgeons and centers. The identified tract target is openly available in atlas form.

Li et al. analyzed structural connectivity of deep brain stimulation electrodes in 50 patients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder operated at four centers. Connectivity to a specific tract within the anterior limb of the internal capsule was associated with optimal treatment response across cohorts, surgeons and centers.

A Systematic Review of Deep Brain Stimulation Targets for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

BACKGROUND

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complex neuropsychiatric disease characterized by obsessions and compulsions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has demonstrated efficacy in improving symptoms in medically refractory patients. Multiple targets have been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the current level and quality of evidence supporting OCD-DBS by target region with the goal of establishing a common nomenclature.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database and a patient/problem, intervention, comparison, outcome search with the terms "DBS" and "OCD." Of 86 eligible articles that underwent full-text review, 28 were included for review. Articles were excluded if the target was not specified, the focus on nonclinical outcomes, the follow-up period shorter than 3 mo, or the sample size smaller than 3 subjects. Level of evidence was assigned according to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons joint guideline committee recommendations. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Selected publications included 9 randomized controlled trials, 1 cohort study, 1 case-control study, 1 cross-sectional study, and 16 case series. Striatal region targets such as the anterior limb of the internal capsule, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, and nucleus accumbens were identified, but stereotactic coordinates were similar despite differing structural names. Only 15 of 28 articles included coordinates.

CONCLUSION

The striatal area is the most commonly targeted region for OCD-DBS. We recommend a common nomenclature based on this review. To move the field forward to individualized therapy, active contact location relative to stereotactic coordinates and patient specific anatomical and clinical variances need to be reported.

Topography of emotional valence and arousal within the motor part of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease

Clinical motor and non-motor effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's disease (PD) seem to depend on the stimulation site within the STN. We analysed the effects of the position of the stimulation electrode within the motor STN on subjective emotional experience, expressed as emotional valence and arousal ratings to pictures representing primary rewards and aversive fearful stimuli in 20 PD patients. Patients' ratings from both aversive and erotic stimuli matched the mean ratings from a group of 20 control subjects at similar position within the STN. Patients with electrodes located more posteriorly reported both valence and arousal ratings from both the rewarding and aversive pictures as more extreme. Moreover, posterior electrode positions were associated with a higher occurrence of depression at a long-term follow-up. This brain-behavior relationship suggests a complex emotion topography in the motor part of the STN. Both valence and arousal representations overlapped and were uniformly arranged anterior-posteriorly in a gradient-like manner, suggesting a specific spatial organization needed for the coding of the motivational salience of the stimuli. This finding is relevant for our understanding of neuropsychiatric side effects in STN DBS and potentially for optimal electrode placement.

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Selectively Modulates Emotion Recognition of Facial Stimuli in Parkinson's Patients

: Background: Diminished emotion recognition is a known symptom in Parkinson (PD) patients and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) has been shown to further deteriorate the processing of especially negative emotions. While emotion recognition generally refers to both, implicit and explicit processing, demonstrations of DBS-influences on implicit processing are sparse. In the present study, we assessed the impact of STN-DBS on explicit and implicit processing for emotional stimuli.

METHODS

Under STN-DBS ON and OFF, fourteen PD patients performed an implicit as well as an explicit emotional processing task. To assess implicit emotional processing, patients were tested with a lexical decision task (LTD) combined with an affective priming paradigm, which provides emotional content through the facial eye region. To assess explicit emotional processing, patients additionally explicitly rated the emotional status of eyes and words used in the implicit task.

RESULTS

DBS affected explicit emotional processing more than implicit processing with a more pronounced effect on error rates than on reaction speed. STN-DBS generally worsened implicit and explicit processing for disgust stimulus material but improved explicit processing of fear stimuli.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study demonstrating influences of STN-DBS on explicit and implicit emotion processing in PD patients. While STN stimulation impeded the processing of disgust stimuli, it improved explicit discrimination of fear stimuli.