Morphologic leukemia-free state in acute myeloid leukemia is sufficient for successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Maintenance Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) poses significant challenges due to its high relapse rates despite initial successful induction chemotherapy. Maintenance therapy aims to prevent disease recurrence, particularly in high-risk patients. This review explores current maintenance treatments, their impacts on patient outcomes, and ongoing studies shaping the treatment landscape for AML. Hypomethylating agents like azacitidine and decitabine have shown promise in improving relapse-free and overall survival, particularly in older patients with AML ineligible for transplantation. Combination regimens involving azacitidine and venetoclax have demonstrated encouraging outcomes post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Targeted therapies, particularly FLT3 inhibitors like midostaurin and quizartinib, have shown significant benefits in improving survival outcomes, especially in FLT3-mutated AML cases. Gilteritinib and sorafenib also exhibit the potential to reduce relapse rates post-transplant. Isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors, including ivosidenib and enasidenib, present novel options for postchemotherapy and posttransplantation maintenance. Immunotherapies, such as Wilms tumor 1 peptide-based vaccines and checkpoint inhibitors, are being explored, although results vary. Despite ongoing research, the role of maintenance chemotherapy remains uncertain, with inconsistent outcomes across trials. The approval of oral azacitidine represents a significant advancement, emphasizing the need for further investigation into personalized maintenance approaches. In conclusion, the evolving landscape of maintenance therapy and integrating targeted therapies in AML offers promising avenues for improving patient outcomes.

Characterization of a multidisciplinary team's role in hospital discharge for patients receiving hypomethylating agents with venetoclax as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

Venetoclax combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has become the standard of care for elderly/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study is aimed at characterizing the impact of an interdisciplinary team on the length of stay (LOS) of patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving venetoclax with an HMA.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients with AML who received HMA with venetoclax as an initial treatment between December 2015 and July 2021. The primary outcome was the median LOS during induction stratified by HMA. Secondary outcomes included barriers to hospital discharge, incidence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), response rates, and utilization of the institution's prescription assistance program (PAP).

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included in our analysis: 51 received azacitidine/venetoclax, and 27 received decitabine/venetoclax. The median LOS from therapy initiation was eight days (range 7-38) for the azacitidine group and six days (range 5-26) for the decitabine group. The most common barriers to discharge were transfusion dependence (33 patients, 42.3%) and insurance coverage (12 patients, 15.4%). Twelve patients (15.3%) had tumor lysis syndrome during hospital admission, and 20 (25.6%) were readmitted during induction. Twenty-three patients (29.5%) required financial assistance for AML care, and a pharmacy-led PAP generated approximately $342,646 in cost savings.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of an interdisciplinary AML team to target early hospital discharge proved to be safe and effective and led to a reduction in costs for the health system. Future research may identify select patients who may be suitable for earlier discharge or outpatient induction.

A retrospective comparison of salvage intensive chemotherapy versus venetoclax-combined regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

Background:

Evidence that a venetoclax (VEN)-combined regimen is effective in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) is emerging. However, it is unknown how VEN-combined low intensity treatment compares to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in medically fit patients with R/R AML.

Methods:

We compared AML patients who received IC (n = 89) to those who received a VEN in combination with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine (VEN combination) (n = 54) as their first- or second-line salvage after failing anthracycline-containing intensive chemotherapy.

Results:

The median age was 49 years, and significantly more patients in the VEN combination group were in their second salvage and had received prior stem cell transplantation (SCT). Overall response rates including CR, CRi, and MLFS were comparable (44.0% for IC vs. 59.3% for VEN combination, p = 0.081), but VEN combination group compared to IC group tended to show lower treatment related mortality. The rate of bridging to SCT was the same (68.5%), but the percentage of SCT at blast clearance was significantly higher in the VEN-combined group (62.3% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.010). After median follow-up periods of 22.5 (IC) and 11.3 months (VEN combination), the median overall survival was 8.9 (95% CI, 5.4-12.4) and 12.4 months (95% CI, 9.5-15.2) (p = 0.724), respectively.

Conclusion:

VEN combination provides a comparable anti-leukemic response and survival to salvage IC, and provide a bridge to SCT with better disease control in medically-fit patients with R/R AML.