Comparison of outcomes for HLA-matched sibling and haplo-identical donors in Myelodysplastic syndromes: report from the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT

Low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin plus low-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based regimen for prevention of graft-versus-host disease in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies

The low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) plus low-dose post transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) -based (low-dose ATG/PTCy-based) regimen had a promising activity in preventing of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in adult patients. However, its efficacy in pediatric patients remain to be defined. Here, we presented the findings from 35 pediatric patients undergoing haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with the new regimen for GVHD prophylaxis. The cumulative incidences (CIs) of grades II-III and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) were 34% (95% CI, 17-48%) and 11% (95% CI, 0-21%) within 180 days post-transplantation, respectively. The CIs of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and moderate-to-severe cGVHD within 2 years were 26% (95% CI, 7-41%) and 12% (95% CI, 0-25%), respectively. The 2-year probabilities of overall survival, relapse-free survival, and graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival were 89% (95% CI, 78-100%), 82% (95% CI, 68-98%) and 59% (95% CI, 43-80%), respectively. The CIs of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation by day 180 were 37% (95% CI, 19-51%) and 20% (95% CI, 6-32%) respectively. These results strongly advocate for the efficacy of the low-dose ATG/PTCy-based regimen as a robust strategy for GVHD prevention in haplo-PBSCT for pediatric patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with AML with active disease. A study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refractory to initial or reinduction chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis if they do not undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT). However, data assessing HCT outcomes from different donors are scarce. We evaluated results from a retrospective analysis on patients aged ≥70 years, with AML not in remission who received an allogeneic HCT from HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), HLA-10/10 matched unrelated donor (MUD), or T-cell replete haploidentical (Haplo) donor, from 2010 to 2021, reported to the ALWP-EBMT database. A total of 360 patients (median age 72 years, range 70-79) were included in the analysis. Median follow-up for the entire population was 35.5 months. Donors were MSD (n = 58), 10/10 HLA-MUD (n = 228), and Haplo (n = 74). A total of 213 (59.2%) patients were primary induction failures, while 147 (40.8%) were in first or subsequent relapse. Graft source was peripheral blood in 92% of the patients. Patients transplanted from Haplo donors more frequently received marrow grafts (p < 0.01) and presented the combination female donor to male recipient (p < 0.01). The overall 2-year rates of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were: 62.4% (95% CI 47.2-74.3) and 47.6% (95% CI 33.1-60.8) for MSD, 43% (95% CI 35.8-49.9), and 37.5% (95% CI 30.7-44.4) for MUD, and 25.9% (95% CI 15.8-37.2), and 26.5% (95% CI 16.3-37.8) for recipients of Haplo transplants. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) was slightly lower for Haplo recipients at 29.6% (95% CI 19-40.9), for MUD it was 30.2% (95% CI 23.9-36.7), and for MSD 34.9% (95% CI 22-48.2); counterbalanced by a higher incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 43.9% (95% CI 31.6-55.6) for Haplo recipients, 32.2% (95% CI 26-33.1) for MUD and 17.5% (95% CI 8.4-29.3) for MSD. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 35.3% (95% CI 22.3-48.5) for MSD, 29.6% (95% CI 23.2-36.2) for MUD, and 19.2% (95% CI 10.7-29.6) for Haplo patients. In the multivariate model, compared to the referent group of MSD recipients, the risk of NRM was higher among patients transplanted from Haplo donors ([hazard ratio] HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.23-11.61, p < 0.001) and MUD (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.48-0.6.94, p = 0.003). Furthermore, both Haplo and MUD were associated with inferior OS, (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.98-0.6.56, p < 0.001, and HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.37-0.3.88, p = 0.002, respectively), and LFS (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.31-0.3.84, p = 0.003, and HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-0.2.60, p = 0.034, respectively). Patients transplanted from Haplo donors were also associated with worse GFRS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, p:0.025) compared with MSD patients. Older adult AML patients with active disease transplanted from MSD experienced prolonged OS and LFS compared to 10/10 MUD and Haplo due to lower NRM. Prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Advances in the management of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: future prospects

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) are defined using a number of prognostic scoring systems that include the degree of cytopenias, percentage of blasts, cytogenetic alterations, and more recently genomic data. HR-MDS encompasses characteristics such as progressive cytopenias, increased bone marrow blasts, unfavorable cytogenetics, and an adverse mutational profile. Survival is generally poor, and patients require therapy to improve outcomes. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), such as azacitidine, decitabine, and more recently, oral decitabine/cedazuridine, are the only approved therapies for HR-MDS. These are often continued until loss of response, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Combinations including an HMA plus other drugs have been investigated but have not demonstrated better outcomes compared to single-agent HMA. Moreover, in a disease of high genomic complexity such as HR-MDS, therapy targeting specific genomic abnormalities is of interest. This review will examine the biological underpinnings of HR-MDS, its therapeutic landscape in the frontline and relapsed settings, as well as the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only known curative intervention for this disease.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center experience, 2017 to 2021

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a critical treatment for advanced or high-risk hematological malignancies, posing challenges such as finding suitable donors and managing of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This study estimates 3-year overall survival in patients who underwent HSCT at our referral service in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study involved 41 patients who received HSCT between 2017 and 2021 at the Felício Rocho Hospital. Recipients received HSCT from either haploidentical donor (Haplo), matched unrelated donor (MUD), or HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD). The study evaluated parameters that included 3-year overall survival (OS), treatment-related mortality (TRM), GvHD incidence, post-transplant relapse rate, and engraftment. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test compared the curves.

RESULTS

Our study found that the engraftment time differed among groups: Haplo recipients engrafted earlier within a median of 16 days (ranging between 10 and 20 days) than MSD recipients with 18 days (ranging between 11 and 28 days), and MUD recipients with 19 days (ranging between 11 and 24 days; p = 0.019). Mild acute GvHD (grade I-II) was observed in 13 patients, progressing to chronic GvHD in 5 patients. Three-year OS rates were as follows: MSD group - 67.7%, Haplo group - 42.2%, and MUD group - 44.4% (MSD vs Haplo, p = 0.039). Three-year cumulative treatment-related mortality (TRM) rates were 17.8% for MSD group, 22.9% for Haplo group, and 22.1% for MUD group (pairwise comparisons p > 0.05). Infection-related mortality was reported in eight patients, while relapse rates at 3 years were similar across MSD, Haplo, and MUD groups (p = 0.891). Donor age influenced OS rates, showing better outcomes with donors under 45 years old, and significant differences were found in pairwise comparisons (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Donor type and donor age significantly impacted HSCT outcomes in our analysis, thus emphasizing the importance of rigorous donor selection in risk stratification and suggesting potential benefits for younger donors.

The prognosis and risk factors for patients with complex karyotype myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is the curative treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome with a complex karyotype (CK-MDS). However, only a few studies have been limited to patients with CK-MDS undergoing allogeneic HCT. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for patients with CK-MDS undergoing allogeneic HCT. We included 691 patients with CK-MDS who received their first allogeneic HCT. The overall survival (OS) was the primary end-point, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. The 3-year OS was 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.3-33.3). In the multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.11-1.88), male sex (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11-1.71), poor haematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.81), red blood cell transfusion requirement (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13-2.20), platelet transfusion requirement (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.46-2.35), not-complete remission (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.16-2.06), a high number of karyotype abnormality (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.18-2.25) and monosomal karyotype (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.05-2.12) were significantly associated with OS. Thus, the 3-year OS of allogeneic HCT was 29.8% in patients with CK-MDS, and we identified risk factors associated with poor OS.

Weight loss post-allogeneic stem cell transplant is associated with increased transplant-related mortality

PURPOSE

Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) patients are at risk of malnutrition and weight loss from impaired oral intake resulting from gastrointestinal toxicities, dysgeusia, and psychological effects.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 264 adult patients transplanted at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre who achieved relapse-free survival up to 3 months after allo-HSCT was performed.

RESULTS

Overall incidence of patients who experienced WL (WL) ≥ 10% from HSCT to 3-month post-transplant was 45.9% and from HSCT to 6 months was 56.6%. Patients with ≥ 10% WL from allo-HSCT at 3 months and 6 months had similar 2-year overall survival (OS) compared to those with < 10% WL, 55.7% vs 62.8% (HR = 1.38, p = 0.11) and 71.1% vs 77.2% (HR = 1.37, p = 0.27), respectively. Patients with ≥ 10% WL 3 and 6 months from allo-HSCT also had similar 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to those with < 10% WL, 48.1% vs 55.8% (HR = 1.26, p = 0.22), and 62.7% vs 69.8% (HR = 1.29, p = 0.31), respectively. The 2-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was higher for those with ≥ 10% WL from allo-HSCT to 3 months, 35.4% vs 16.9% (HR = 2.39, p = 0.0007) and 6 months, 22% vs 8% (HR = 3.1, p = 0.0034). Although statistical significance was not observed for OS or RFS, patients who experienced ≥ 10% WL 3- and 6-months post allo-HSCT experienced higher 2-year TRM. These results highlight the importance of early intervention and close monitoring of weight post allo-HSCT.

CONCLUSION

Approaches to WL post allo-HSCT should be multifaceted and include members of the interdisciplinary team in order to decrease TRM.

Haploidentical transplants deliver equal outcomes to matched sibling transplants: a propensity score-matched analysis

The success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematological malignancies is heavily dependent on the availability of suitable donors. Haploidentical donor (HID) and matched sibling donor (MSD) are two important donor options providing faster and easier sources of stem cells, however, due to confounding factors present in most retrospective studies, the validity of comparing outcomes between these two donor types remains uncertain. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial (trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; #ChiCTR-OCH-12002490; registered 22 February 2012; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=7061 ) to compare outcomes of HID versus MSD peripheral blood stem cell-derived transplants in patients with hematologic malignancies between 2015 and 2022. All HID-receiving patients had antithymocyte globulin-based conditioning. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential confounding factors between the two cohorts. A total of 1060 patients were initially reviewed and then 663 patients were ultimately included in the analysis after propensity score matching. The overall survival, relapse-free survival, non-relapse mortality rate and cumulative incidence of relapse were similar between HID and MSD cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission may have better overall survival with an HID transplant. The present demonstrated that haploidentical transplants can provide outcomes comparable to conventional MSD transplants, and HID should be recommended as one of the optimal donor choices for patients with positive measurable residual disease in first complete remission.

Hematopoietic cell transplants in resource-poor countries: challenges and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Numbers of hematopoietic cell transplants continue to increase globally but most of this activity is in resource-rich countries. Limitations to increasing transplant activity in resource-poor countries include lack of sophisticated personnel and infrastructure, complexity in identifying and accessing donors, unavailability of some new drugs and high cost.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the biomedical literature for hematopoietic cell transplants and resource-rich and resource-poor countries. Recent advances which potentially make transplants more accessible in resource-poor countries include: (1) outpatient transplants; (2) grafts stored at 4°C; (3) less intensive pretransplant conditioning; (4) use of generic drugs; (5) less complex and costly donor access; and (6) increased collaboration with transplant centers in resource-rich countries.

EXPERT OPINION

We reviewed publications on the limitations and solutions discussed above. Paradoxically, most data we analyzed originate from resource-rich countries. We found no convincing epidemiological data to support a recent increased transplant rate in resource-poor countries yet but hope to see increases soon.

Outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with haploidentical versus HLA-matched donors in patients with higher-risk MDS

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the best curative option for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. The presence of monosomal karyotype and/or complex karyotype abnormalities predicts inferior survival after allo-SCT in MDS patients. Haploidentical allo-SCT has been increasingly used in acute leukemia (AL) and has similar results as using HLA-matched donors, but data on higher-risk MDS is sparse. We compared outcomes in 266 patients with higher-risk MDS after HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 79), HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 139) and HLA haploidentical donor (HID, n = 48) from 2010 to 2019. Median donor age differed between the three groups (p < 0.001). The overall survival was significantly different between the three groups with a better OS observed in the MUD group (p = 0.014). This observation could be explained by a higher progression-free survival with MUD (p = 0.014). The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GvHD was significantly higher in the HID group (p = 0.051). However, in multivariable analysis, patients transplanted using an HID had comparable mortality to patients transplanted using a MUD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.58 [0.32-1.07]; p = 0.080) and a MSD ([sHR]: 0.56 [0.28-1.11]; p = 0.094). MUD do not remain a significant positive predictor of survival, suggesting that beyond the donor-recipient HLA matching, the donor age might impact recipient outcome.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines

The sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Here this therapeutic modality is reviewed and critically evaluated in the context of the evidence. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. A panel of MDS experts comprising transplantation and nontransplantation physicians developed consensus treatment recommendations. This review summarizes the standard MDS indications for HCT and addresses areas of controversy. Recent prospective trials have confirmed that allogeneic HCT confers survival benefits in patients with advanced or high-risk MDS compared with nontransplantation approaches, and the use of HCT is increasing in older patients with good performance status. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular mutations remain at high risk for relapse. It is unknown whether administration of novel therapies before or after transplantation may decrease the risk of disease relapse in selected populations. Ongoing and future studies will investigate revised approaches to disease risk stratification, patient selection, and post-transplantation approaches to optimize allogeneic HCT outcomes for patients with MDS.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms primarily affecting older persons, associated with dysplastic changes of bone marrow cells, peripheral cytopenias, and various risk of leukemic transformation. Although treatment with several drugs has shown improved disease control, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for MDS. The number of patients receiving a transplant, as well as survival, have increased past years because of the use of reduce-intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) as well as the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation. With treatment-related mortality as main limitation, pre-transplant evaluation is essential to assess risks for this older group of patients. In a recent randomized study, allo-HSCT with RIC for patients >50 years old with higher-risk MDS demonstrated superiority in survival compared with hypomethylating agents. Genetic mutations have been shown to significantly impact treatment outcomes including after transplant. Recently, a transplant-specific risk score (which includes age, donor type, performance status, cytogenetic category, recipient's cytomegalovirus status, percentage of blasts, and platelet count) has shown superiority in transplantation outcome prediction, compared with previous scoring systems. Survival remains low for most patients with TP53 mutations and novel treatment strategies are needed, such as administration of natural killer cells post-transplant, as there is no clear evidence that maintenance therapy after transplantation can improve outcomes.