Determinants of survival and retrospective comparisons of 183 clinical trial patients with myelofibrosis treated with momelotinib, ruxolitinib, fedratinib or BMS- 911543 JAK2 inhibitor

New drugs in myelofibrosis: Critical assessment of additional value to monotherapy with JAK inhibitors

Ruxolitinib in combination with navitoclax or pelabresib in myelofibrosis: activity in JAKi-naïve patients.

Momelotinib in myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a hematologic disease characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. Recent years have seen the emergence of novel therapeutic agents, notably ruxolitinib and fedratinib, which target the Janus kinases (JAK) pathway. However, their myelosuppressive effect coupled with the persistence, and even worsening anemia remains a significant challenge, leading usually to treatment discontinuation.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on Momelotinib (MMB), a unique JAK inhibitor that has shown promise in MF treatment, particularly in improving anemia. MMB inhibits type 1 kinase activin A receptor or activin receptor-like kinase-2 (ACVR1/ALK2), with consequent rebalancing of the SMAD pathways and reduced transcription of hepcidin. Moreover, it seems that MMB could reduce the serum levels of several inflammatory cytokines responsible for anemia. Clinical trials have demonstrated MMB's efficacy in reducing spleen size, alleviating symptoms, and improving anemia, with a favorable safety profile compared to other JAK inhibitors, both in treatment-naïve and in pre-treated patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to its mechanism of action, MMB represents a valuable therapeutic option in MF, addressing the clinical challenge of anemia and potentially improving outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies. Ongoing research explores MMB's potential in acute myeloid leukemia and combination therapies.

The application of JAK inhibitors in the peri-transplantation period of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with a poor prognosis, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only treatment with curative potential. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, has shown promising results in improving patients' symptoms, overall survival, and quality of life, and can be used as a bridging therapy to HSCT that increases the proportion of transplantable patients. However, the effect of this and similar drugs on HSCT outcomes is unknown, and the reports on their efficacy and safety in the peri-transplantation period vary widely in the published literature. This paper reviews clinical data related to the use of JAK inhibitors in the peri-implantation phase of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for primary myelofibrosis and discusses their efficacy and safety.

Momelotinib expands the therapeutic armamentarium for myelofibrosis: Impact on hierarchy of treatment choices

The primary objective of treatment in myelofibrosis (MF) is prolongation of life, which is currently accomplished only by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Determination of optimal timing for AHSCT is facilitated by molecular risk stratification. Non-transplant treatment options in MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi): momelotinib (FDA approved on September 15, 2023), ruxolitinib (November 16, 2011), fedratinib (August 16, 2019), and pacritinib (February 28, 2022); all four JAKi are effective in reducing spleen size and alleviating symptoms, considered a drug class effect and attributed to their canonical JAK-STAT inhibitory mechanism of action. In addition, momelotinib exhibits erythropoietic effect, attributed to alleviation of ineffective erythropoiesis through inhibition of activin A receptor type-I (ACVR1). In transplant-ineligible or deferred patients, the order of treatment preference is based on specific symptoms and individual assessment of risk tolerance. Because of drug-induced immunosuppression and other toxicities attributed to JAKi, we prefer non-JAKi drugs as initial treatment for MF-associated anemia that is not accompanied by treatment-requiring splenomegaly or constitutional symptoms. Otherwise, it is reasonable to consider momelotinib as the first-line JAKi treatment of choice, in order to target the triad of quality-of-life offenders in MF: anemia, splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms/cachexia. For second-line therapy, we favor ruxolitinib, over fedratinib, based on toxicity profile. Pacritinib and fedratinib provide alternative options in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia or ruxolitinib-resistance/intolerance, respectively. Splenectomy remains a viable option for drug-resistant symptomatic splenomegaly and cytopenia.

Momelotinib (JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor): mechanism of action, clinical trial reports, and therapeutic prospects beyond myelofibrosis

Janus kinase (JAK) 2 inhibitors are now part of the therapeutic armamentarium for primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF). Patients with MF endure shortened survival and poor quality of life. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently the only treatment modality in MF with the potential to cure the disease or prolong survival. By contrast, current drug therapy in MF targets quality of life and does not modify the natural history of the disease. The discovery of JAK2 and other JAK-STAT activating mutations (i.e., CALR and MPL) in myeloproliferative neoplasms, including MF, has facilitated the development of several JAK inhibitors that are not necessarily specific to the oncogenic mutations themselves but have proven effective in countering JAK-STAT signaling, resulting in suppression of inflammatory cytokines and myeloproliferation. This non-specific activity resulted in clinically favorable effects on constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly and, consequently, approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of three small molecule JAK inhibitors: ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. A fourth JAK inhibitor, momelotinib, is poised for FDA approval soon and has been shown to provide additional benefit in alleviating transfusion-dependent anemia in MF. The salutary effect of momelotinib on anemia has been attributed to inhibition of activin A receptor, type 1 (ACVR1) and recent information suggests a similar effect from pacritinib. ACRV1 mediates SMAD2/3 signaling which contributes to upregulation of hepcidin production and iron-restricted erythropoiesis. Targeting ACRV1 raises therapeutic prospects in other myeloid neoplasms associated with ineffective erythropoiesis, such as myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts or SF3B1 mutation, especially those with co-expression of a JAK2 mutation and thrombocytosis.

Safety and efficacy of jaktinib (a novel JAK inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis who are relapsed or refractory to ruxolitinib: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2, multicenter study

Ruxolitinib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). However, substantial number of patients may not respond after 3-6 months of treatment or develop resistance over time. In this phase 2 trial, patients with a current diagnosis of intermediate or high-risk MF who either had an inadequate splenic response or spleen regrowth after ruxolitinib treatment were enrolled. All patients received jaktinib 100 mg Bid. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR 35) at week 24. The secondary endpoints included change of MF-related symptoms, anemic response, and safety profile. From July 6, 2021, to January 24, 2022, 34 ruxolitinib-refractory or relapsed patients were enrolled, 52.9% (18 of 34) were DIPSS intermediate 2 or high risk. SVR 35 at week 24 was 32.4% (11 of 34, 95% CI 19.1%-49.2%) in all patients and 33.3% (6 of 18, 95% CI 16.3%-56.3%) in the intermediate 2 or high-risk group. A total of 50% (8 of 16) transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin (HGB) <100 g/L at baseline had HGB elevation ≥20 g/L within 24 weeks. Furthermore, 46.4% (13 of 28) of patients had a ≥ 50% decrease in the total symptom score (TSS 50) at week 24. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were thrombocytopenia (32.4%), anemia (32.4%), and leukocytosis (20.6%). In total, 13 (38.2%) of 34 patients had serious adverse events (SAE), of which drug-related SAEs were found in 5 patients (14.7%). These results indicate that jaktinib can be a promising treatment option for patients with MF who have either become refractory to or relapsed after ruxolitinib treatment.

Safety and efficacy of jaktinib (a novel JAK inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis who are intolerant to ruxolitinib: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2, multicenter study

Although ruxolitinib improves splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), a substantial proportion of patients discontinue ruxolitinib because of intolerance. This phase 2 trial investigated the safety and efficacy of jaktinib, a novel JAK inhibitor in patients with ruxolitinib-intolerant MF. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) at week 24. The secondary endpoints included change of MF-related symptoms, anemic response, and safety profiles. Between December 18, 2019, and November 24, 2021, 51 patients were enrolled, 45 treated with jaktinib 100 mg bid (100 mg bid group) and six received non-100 mg bid doses (non-100 mg bid group). The SVR35 at week 24 in the 100 mg bid group was 43.2% (19/44, 95% CI 29.7%-57.8%). There were 41.9% (13/31) of transfusion-independent patients with hemoglobin (HGB) ≤100 g/L who had HGB elevation ≥20 g/L within 24 weeks. The proportion of patients with a ≥50% decrease in the total symptom score (TSS 50) at week 24 was 61.8% (21/34). The most commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the 100 mg bid group were anemia 31.1%, thrombocytopenia 22.2%, and infectious pneumonia 17.8%. A total of 16 (35.6%) in the 100 mg bid group had serious adverse events, and 4 (8.9%) were considered possibly drug related. These results indicate jaktinib can provide a treatment option for patients with MF who are intolerant to ruxolitinib.

Polycythemia vera: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a JAK2-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal erythrocytosis; other features include leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, splenomegaly, pruritus, constitutional symptoms, microcirculatory disturbances, and increased risk of thrombosis and progression into myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

DIAGNOSIS

A working diagnosis is considered in the presence of a JAK2 mutation associated with hemoglobin/hematocrit levels of >16.5 g/dL/49% in men or 16 g/dL/48% in women; morphologic confirmation by bone marrow examination is advised but not mandated.

CYTOGENETICS

Abnormal karyotype is seen in 15%-20% of patients with the most frequent sole abnormalities being +9 (5%), loss of chromosome Y (4%), +8 (3%), and 20q- (3%).

MUTATIONS

Over 50% of patients harbor DNA sequence variants/mutations other than JAK2, with the most frequent being TET2 (18%) and ASXL1 (15%). Prognostically adverse mutations include SRSF2, IDH2, RUNX1, and U2AF1, with a combined incidence of 5%-10%.

SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSIS

Median survival is ⁓15 years but exceeds 35 years for patients aged ≤40 years. Risk factors for survival include older age, leukocytosis, abnormal karyotype, and the presence of adverse mutations. Twenty-year risk for thrombosis, post-PV MF, or AML are ⁓26%, 16% and 4%, respectively.

RISK FACTORS FOR THROMBOSIS

Two risk categories are considered: high (age >60 years or thrombosis history) and low (absence of both risk factors). Additional predictors for arterial thrombosis include cardiovascular risk factors and for venous thrombosis higher absolute neutrophil count and JAK2V617F allele burden.

TREATMENT

Current goal of therapy is to prevent thrombosis. Periodic phlebotomy, with a hematocrit target of <45%, combined with once- or twice-daily aspirin (81 mg) therapy, absent contraindications, is the backbone of treatment in all patients, regardless of risk category. Cytoreductive therapy is reserved for high-risk disease with first-line drugs of choice being hydroxyurea and pegylated interferon-α and second-line busulfan and ruxolitinib. In addition, systemic anticoagulation is advised in patients with venous thrombosis history.

ADDITIONAL TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

At the present time, we do not consider a drug-induced reduction in JAK2V617F allele burden, which is often incomplete and seen not only with peg-IFN but also with ruxolitinib and busulfan, as an indicator of disease-modifying activity, unless accompanied by cytogenetic and independently-verified morphologic remission. Accordingly, we do not use the specific parameter to influence treatment choices. The current review also includes specific treatment strategies in the context of pregnancy, splanchnic vein thrombosis, pruritus, perioperative care, and post-PV MF.

Discovery of N-(4-(Aminomethyl)phenyl)-5-methylpyrimidin-2-amine Derivatives as Potent and Selective JAK2 Inhibitors

The JAK2V617F mutation leads to JAK2 autophosphorylation and activation of downstream pathways, eventually resulting in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Selective inhibitors showed advantages in terms of side effects; therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel selective JAK2 inhibitors for treating MPNs. In this study, we described a series of N-(4-(aminomethyl)phenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine derivatives as selective JAK2 inhibitors. Systematic exploration through opening the tetrahydroisoquinoline based on the previous lead compound 13ac led to the discovery of the optimal compound A8. Compound A8 showed excellent potency on JAK2 kinase, with an IC50 value of 5 nM, and inhibited the phosphorylation of JAK2 and its downstream signaling pathway. Moreover, A8 exhibited 38.6-, 54.6-, and 41.2-fold selectivity for JAK1, JAK3, and TYK2, respectively. Compared to the lead compound, A8 demonstrated much better metabolic stabilities, with a bioavailability of 41.1%. These findings suggest that A8 is a relatively selective JAK2 inhibitor, deserving to be developed for treating MPNs.

Novel Janus-kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in Myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

JAK inhibitors (JAKis), used in the treatment of myelofibrosis, have entered standard treatment, providing significant improvements in spleen size and symptom burden. Although splenomegaly provides a reduction and some improvement in cytopenia, there is still a way to go. Novel JAKis are being investigated to overcome barriers to treatment access, such as therapeutic challenges, intolerance, and unresponsiveness.

AREAS COVERED

This review includes the current status of JAKi treatment for myelofibrosis, mainly focusing on investigational JAKis; jaktinib, lestaurtinib, itacitinib, gandotinib, BMS-911543, ilginatinib, TQ05105, and flonoltinib maleate. MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov were screened to identify all completed or active studies on this topic. The outcomes of the preclinical studies and clinical trials are presented and discussed for each drug.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with myelofibrosis, momelotinib was effective in treating anemia, whereas jaktinib was effective in both anemia and Total Symptom Score (TSS). More phase 3 studies are needed to provide more precise evidence. The increasing variety of JAKis will allow for more personalized treatment options for myelofibrosis in the future. The potential impact on disease progression, molecular responses, and the duration of this response will become important parameters for future evaluations of these drugs.