Efficacy of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in young, and unfit patients with newly diagnosed core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Evolution of transcriptomic profiles in relapsed inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(16) is typically associated with a favourable prognosis. However, up to 40 % of patients will eventually experience disease relapse. Herein, we dissected the genomic and transcriptomic profile of inv(16) AML to identify potential prognostic markers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Sequencing data from 222 diagnostic samples, including 44 relapse/refractory patients, revealed a median of 1 concomitant additional mutation, cooperating with inv(16) in leukemogenesis. Notably, the mutational landscape at diagnosis did not differ significantly between patients experiencing primary induction failure or relapse when compared to the rest of the cohort, except for an increase in the mutational burden in the relapse/refractory group. RNA-Seq of unpaired diagnostic(n=7) and relapse(n=6) samples allowed the identification of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) as one of the most significantly downregulated pathways at relapse. Considering that OXPHOS could be targeted by Venetoclax/Azacitidine combination, we explored its biological effects on an inv(16) cell-line ME-1, but there was no additional advantage in terms of cell death over Azacitidine alone. To enhance Venetoclax efficacy, we tested in vitro effects of Metformin as a potential drug able to enhance chemosensitivity of AML cells by inhibiting the mitochondrial transfer. By challenging ME-1 with this combination, we observed a significant synergistic interaction at least similar to that of Venetoclax/Azacitidine. In conclusions, we identified a downregulated expression of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) at relapse in AML with inv(16), and explored the in vitro effects of metformin as a potential drug to enhance chemosensitivity in this setting.

Real-world use of venetoclax in the treatment of paediatric and teenage/young adult haematological malignancies

Early-phase trials of venetoclax in children and teenagers/young adults with leukaemia have yielded promising results, but there remains a paucity of real-world data. To address this, we report a cohort of 41 children treated with venetoclax for a range of haematological malignancies, demonstrating complete remission in 43.6%, with most achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. Venetoclax was particularly effective as a bridge to transplant, with bridging successful in 75% of patients. Patients with MRD <1% at initiation of venetoclax were more likely to achieve MRD negativity (81.8% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.007) and had improved overall survival (54.5% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.004).

Homoharringtonine may help improve the outcomes of venetoclax and azacitidine in AML1-ETO positive acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

T(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/AML1-ETO positive acute myeloid leukemia (AE-AML) is sensitive to conventional chemotherapy with a favorable prognosis. However, recent small case reports suggest the limited effectiveness of venetoclax (VEN) and hypomethylating agents (HMA) in treating AE-AML. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of VEN plus AZA (VA) in AE-AML and explore whether adding homoharringtonine (HHT) to VA (VAH) could improve the response.

METHODS

Patients who received VEN plus AZA and HHT (VAH) or VEN plus AZA (VA) regimens were included in this retrospective study. The endpoints of this study were to evaluate the rate of composite complete remission (CRc), measurable residual disease (MRD), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse between VAH and VA groups.

RESULTS

A total of 32 AE-AML patients who underwent VA or VAH treatments (newly diagnosed with VA, ND-VA, n = 8; relapsed/refractory with VA, R/R-VA, n = 10; relapsed/refractory with VAH, R/R-VAH, n = 14) were included. The CR (complete remission) /CRi (CR with incomplete count recovery) rate of ND-VA, R/R-VA and R/R-VAH were 25%, 10%, and 64.3%, respectively. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negative was observed in 66.7% of R/R-VAH and none of VA-R/R patients. Co-occurring methylation mutations are associated with poor outcomes with VA but exhibit a more favorable response with VAH treatment. Additionally, patients with c-kit mutation presented inferior outcomes with both VEN-based regimens. All regimens were tolerated well by all patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed the poor response of VA in AE-AML, whether used as frontline or salvage therapy. Adding HHT to VA may improve outcomes and enhance the efficacy of VEN in this population.

Myelomonocytic and monocytic acute myeloid leukemia demonstrate comparable poor outcomes with venetoclax-based treatment: a monocentric real-world study

Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL-2 inhibitor, has transformed treatment strategies for elderly and unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients by significantly improving response rates and survival. However, the predictive factors for VEN efficacy differ from traditional chemotherapy. The clinical relevance of the FAB (French-American-British) monocytic subtype, including M4 and M5, has been debated as a marker for VEN resistance. This real-world study examined 162 newly diagnosed (ND) and 85 relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients who received VEN-based therapy at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from January 2019 to January 2023. We retrospectively collected clinical and treatment data from electronic medical records. The median age of the cohort was 55.5 years (range: 16.5-83.5). The composite complete remission (cCR) rate in the entire cohort was 60.7%. Specifically, among newly diagnosed (ND) patients, FAB monocytic subtypes exhibited lower cCR compared to non-monocytic subtypes (55.1% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.007). Additionally, there were no significant differences observed between M4 and M5 subtypes, both in the ND group (61.7% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.17) and the R/R group (38.2% vs. 40%, p > 0.9). Furthermore, the median follow-up was 238 (range: 7-1120) days. ND patients with monocytic subtypes had shorter overall survival compared to non-monocytic subtypes (295 days vs. not reached, p = 0.0017). Conversely, R/R patients showed no such difference (204 vs. 266 days, p = 0.72). In summary, our study suggests that the FAB monocytic subtype can predict VEN resistance and shorter survival in ND AML patients. Moreover, there is no significant distinction between M4 and M5 subtypes.

Reduced dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive or low-intensity induction: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia have high rates of relapse, especially if they are unable to complete standard consolidation strategies or allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). The phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001 study showed an overall survival benefit with oral azacitidine maintenance. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is highly active in acute myeloid leukaemia and synergistic with azacitidine. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax as maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a WHO 2016 diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia in complete remission or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery following intensive or low-intensity induction and not immediately eligible for HSCT. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had to be 3 or less. Patients were assigned to maintenance therapy with azacitidine 50 mg/m2 intravenously or subcutaneously for 5 days and venetoclax 400 mg orally for 7 days or 14 days. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival. The study was closed early due to slow accrual. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04062266).

FINDINGS

Between Sept 26, 2019, and Oct 26, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, of whom 25 (71%) were assigned to cohort 1 following intensive induction and ten (29%) to cohort 2 following low-intensity induction. Of 35 patients, 18 (51%) were male and 17 (49%) were female. The median age was 55 years (IQR 41-62). The median number of cycles given was 9 (IQR 2-22) and median follow-up time was 23·3 months (IQR 9·0-30·0). The median relapse-free survival was not reached (95% CI 20·2 to not calculable) in the full cohort, not reached (29·1 to not calculable) in cohort 1, and 30·3 months (16·5 to not calculable) in cohort 2. The 2-year relapse-free survival was 65% (95% CI 50-85) in the full cohort, 71% (53-94) in cohort 1, and 52% (27-100) in cohort 2. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=6), lung infection (n=4), leukopenia (n=4), and neutropenia (n=3). No deaths occurred during maintenance therapy.

INTERPRETATION

Low dose azacitidine plus venetoclax is a feasible maintenance strategy in acute myeloid leukaemia following intensive and low-intensity induction.

FUNDING

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, MDS/AML Moon Shot, Genentech.

Biomarkers of Response to Venetoclax Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recent progress in the use of massive sequencing technologies has greatly enhanced our understanding of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pathology. This knowledge has in turn driven the development of targeted therapies, such as venetoclax, a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for use in combination with azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine for the treatment of newly diagnosed adult patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, a significant number of AML patients still face the challenge of disease relapse. In this review, we will explore biomarkers that may predict disease progression in patients receiving venetoclax-based therapy, considering both clinical factors and genetic changes. Despite the many advances, we conclude that the identification of molecular profiles for AML patients who will respond optimally to venetoclax therapy remains an unmet clinical need.