The genomic profiling of high-risk smoldering myeloma patients treated with an intensive strategy unveils potential markers of resistance and progression

The role of 1q abnormalities in multiple myeloma: Genomic insights, clinical implications, and therapeutic challenges

Chromosome 1q copy number variations, collectively termed +1q, are 1 of the most common cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma. 1q abnormalities are associated with overexpression of a high-risk gene signature promoting cell proliferation, apoptosis resistance, genomic instability, and treatment resistance, and acquisition or expansion of +1q subclones mediate disease development and relapse. While there remains significant controversy as to whether the presence of +1q is itself an independent driver of poor prognosis or is simply a marker of other high-risk features, +1q has recently been incorporated into multiple prognostic scoring models as a new high-risk cytogenetic abnormality. In this review, we present possible underlying genetic mechanisms of high-risk disease in +1q myeloma, implications for subclonal development, its role in modifying the tumor microenvironment, current evidence for clinical significance in newly-diagnosed and relapsed patients, and current controversies in +1q classification and prognostication.

Smoldering multiple myeloma: Integrating biology and risk into management

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) was first described over 40 years ago yet much is still unknown including which patients will ultimately progress to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). The genetics of the premalignant clone and the immune microenvironment in which it exists is now well understood to both play a role in disease progression. However, the clinical risk models available to help identify patients at most risk of progression still rely primarily on data reflecting volume of disease rather than underlying biology. While it is of upmost importance to accurately diagnose patients with SMM to avoid over or under treatment, efforts are ongoing to tease out if early intervention is indeed warranted for a subgroup of patients with SMM. This article will review the history and biology of SMM, discuss the utility of existing risk models, and examine the efforts to date which have challenged standard management.