The big freeze may be over: a contracting universe for cryopreservation?

Conducting hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in low and middle income countries

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a well-recognized therapeutic procedure; costs limit its widespread use in low and middle income countries (LMIC).

METHODS

Over a 30-year period, we have conducted HSCT in LMIC, making adaptations to the conventional procedures conducted in high-income countries (HIC).

RESULTS

These salient observations stem from our practice: (1) Start with autologous transplantations in patients with hematological malignancies, specifically multiple myeloma; cell freezing devices are not necessary. (2) Next, consider auto-HSCT in patients with autoimmune diseases. (3) Introduce allogeneic transplants, initially using reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Conducting the HSCT on an outpatient basis is cheaper and safer. (4) Do not build HEPA-filtered rooms nor laminar flow cabins. (5) Do not graft cord blood cells nor start a cord blood blank. (6) Engage in haploidentical transplantations which are more feasible and cost-effective. (7) Matched unrelated donors are extremely expensive. (8) Use generic drugs and biosimilars. (9) Blood product irradiation devices are not necessary. (10) Do not try to reproduce other HSCT programs from HIC; develop your own methods.

CONCLUSIONS

HSCT can be conducted in LMIC with reduced costs and similar efficacy, thus making this therapeutic option affordable for more persons.

Cryopreserved versus non-cryopreserved stem cell autografts in multiple myeloma a restrospective cohort study

The use of non-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) can be an alternative to the traditional cryopreserved infusions of HSCs in autologous stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). After high-dose melphalan conditioning (HDM), we sought to compare time to engraftment, overall survival, and safety in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing a first aHSCT after high-dose melphalan conditioning (HDM). We conducted a cohort study from March 2018 to December 2019. Of all autologous transplants performed during this period, 105 were for MM as the first consolidation. Fifty-one patients received a cryopreserved graft; the remaining 54 patients received a fresh infusion. General clinical characteristics were similar between these two groups. Cell viability was higher in non-cryopreserved grafts (95% vs. 86% p < 0.01). Four deaths occurred during hospitalization in the cryopreserved group, one in the non-cryopreserved group. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment on D + 25 was higher in the non-cryopreserved compared to the cryopreserved group (98% vs 90% p < 0.01 and 96.2% vs 72.54% p < 0.01 respectively). Additionally, the hospital length of stay was reduced by 4 days for patients for the non-cryopreserved cohort. In summary, the use of non-cryopreserved HSCs after HDM is safe and effective compared to patients who received a cryopreserved graft.

High dose melphalan is an adequate preparative regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

High-dose melphalan (HD-Mel) has been successfully employed in autografting patients with multiple myeloma. An advantage of this regimen is that the total dose of Mel can be delivered in a single day, being particularly useful when non-frozen hematopoietic stem cells are employed in the autograft.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients with R/R lymphomas, both HL and NHL studied and treated at two different centers were prospectively included in a study of ASCT employing a single dose of HD-Mel (200 mg/m²). A group of R/R HL or NHL autografted employing BEAM-like preparative regimens was constructed matched by diagnosis and age. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS), the secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).

RESULTS

Twenty-five R/R HL/NHL patients were prospectively accrued in the study. There were 8 (32%) females, 13 (52%) patients had at least 1 adverse effect: 7 (28%) developed mucositis, 5 (20%) neutropenic fever, and 6 (24%) grade IV nausea. In the HD-Mel group, median overall survival (OS) was not achieved and OS at 36 months was 71%, the transplant-related mortality being 0%. In the control group, median OS was not achieved and the 36-month OS was 76%, results not statistically significant (p 0.5). The EFS was also similar in both groups (p 0.5).

CONCLUSION

HD-Mel alone is non-inferior to a BEAM-like regimen as a preparative regimen for autografting patients with R/R HL and NHL. The regimen is adequate to graft persons with non-frozen stem cells.

Non-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells in autograft patients with lymphoma: a matched-pair analysis comparing a single center experience with the use of cryopreserved stem cells reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry

BACKGROUND AIMS

Around 50 000 autologous stem cell transplantations are done each year worldwide using cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Cryopreservation is time-consuming and expensive. Since 2007, several retrospective studies have shown that PBSCs can be stored at 4°C for 2-3 days, allowing autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma receiving high-dose melphalan. Data with non-cryopreserved PBSCs in patients autografted for lymphoma following longer pre-conditioning regimens are limited. In addition, no controlled comparison has been able to detect unforeseen differences.

METHODS

The authors compared outcomes of 94 consecutive adult patients with lymphoma (66 with Hodgkin lymphoma) autografted in our department in Oran (Algeria) using PBSCs stored at 4°C, from 2009 to 2018, with patients receiving cryopreserved stem cells reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Patients autografted in Oran were matched with patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs in the registry (four controls per patient in Oran).

RESULTS

Neutrophil engraftment was significantly faster with cryopreserved PBSCs (P = 0.003). By day 10, only 17% of patients receiving non-cryopreserved PBSCs engrafted versus 48% for cryopreserved PBSCs. Likewise, platelet recovery to 20 000/mm³ was significantly faster in patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs (P = 0.01). However, all patients in both groups had recovered by day 20. There were no significant differences in non-relapse mortality (9% versus 7%, P = 0.4), relapse incidence (22% versus 32%, P = 0.13), progression-free survival (70% versus 61%, P = 0.4) or overall survival (85% versus 75%, P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that, in patients with lymphoma receiving pre-transplant regimens such as carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan, PBSCs stored at 4°C for up to 6 days can be used safely in centers with no cryopreservation facility. However, the kinetics of hematopoietic recovery showed a significant, albeit small, delay in engraftment for both neutrophils and platelets, which favors the use of cryopreservation if available.