Pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes when ideal body weight is used to dose busulfan in obese hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation with Pharmacogenetic Insights Support the Relevance of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Myeloablative Busulfan Dosing in Adult HSCT

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan (Bu) is well-established in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but its use in adults is limited due to a lack of clear recommendations and scarcity of evidence regarding its utility. GSTA1 promoter variants are reported to affect Bu clearance in both adults and pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the value of preemptive genotyping GSTA1 and body composition (obesity) in individualizing Bu dosing in adults, through pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and simulations. A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model was developed and validated with data from 60 adults who underwent HSCT. Simulations assessed different dosing scenarios based on body size metrics and GSTA1 genotypes. Due to the limited number of obese patients in the cohort, the effect of obesity on Bu pharmacokinetics (PK) was evaluated in silico using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and relevant virtual populations from Simcyp software. Patients with at least 1 GSTA1*B haplotype had 17% lower clearance on average. PopPK simulations indicated that adjusting doses based on genotype increased the probability of achieving the target exposure (3.7 to 5.5 mg.h/L) from 53% to 60 % in GSTA1*A homozygous patients, and from 50% to 61% in *B carriers. Still, Approximately 40% of patients would not achieve this therapeutic window without TDM. A 2-sample optimal design was validated for routine model-based Bu first dose AUC0-∞ estimation, and the model was implemented in the Tucuxi user-friendly TDM software. PBPK simulations confirmed body surface area-based doses of 29 to 31 mg/m2/6h as the most appropriate, regardless of obesity status. This study emphasizes the importance of individualized Bu dosing strategies in adults to achieve therapeutic targets. Preemptive genotyping alone may not have a significant clinical impact, and routine TDM may be necessary for optimal transplantation outcomes.

Individualizing busulfan dose in specific populations and evaluating the risk of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions

INTRODUCTION

Busulfan is an alkylating agent widely used in the conditioning of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation possessing a complex metabolism and a large interindividual and intra-individual variability, especially in children. Combined with the strong rationale of busulfan PK/PD relationships, factors altering its clearance (e.g., weight, age, and GST-A genetic polymorphism mainly) can also affect clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on busulfan pharmacokinetics, its pharmacokinetics variabilities in pediatric populations, drug-drug interactions (DDI), and their consequences regarding dose individualization. This review was based on medical literature up until October 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

To ensure effective busulfan exposure in pediatrics, different weight-based nomograms have been established to determine busulfan dosage and provided improved results (65 - 80% of patients correctly exposed). In addition to nomograms, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan measuring plasmatic concentrations to estimate busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters can be used. TDM is now widely carried out in routine practices and aims to ensure the targeting of the reported therapeutic windows by individualizing busulfan dosing based on the clearance estimations from a previous dose.

Ideal body weight is useful for predicting neutrophil engraftment and platelet recovery for overweight and obese recipients in single-unit cord blood transplantation

BACKGROUND

Since cord blood (CB) units are usually selected based on the cell dose /kg, overweight (25 kg/m² ≤ body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m²) and obese (30 kg/m² ≤ BMI) recipients tend to have difficulty in getting appropriate CB units. In general, actual body weight (ABW) is used for CB unit selection. However, ideal body weight (IBW) has been reported to be more closely correlated with successful engraftment after autologous, allogeneic bone marrow, and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation than ABW.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this analysis to clarify the threshold of CD34⁺ cell doses based on ideal body weight (CD34^IBW) and to compare the outcomes among the groups stratified by the threshold according to actual body weight (CD34^ABW) and CD34^IBW for overweight and obese recipients in cord blood transplantation (CBT).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed 650 overweight and obese recipients who received single-unit CBT. To focus on the recipients who received a low CD34⁺ cell dose /kg, those who received 1.5×10⁵ CD34⁺ cells /ABW or more were excluded. Using a cut-off of 0.8×10⁵ CD34⁺ cells/kg, we compared the outcomes in 3 groups with low CD34^ABW and low CD34^IBW (CD34^Low/Low), low CD34^ABW but high CD34^IBW (CD34^Low/High), and high CD34^ABW and high CD34^IBW (CD34^High/High).

RESULTS

Hematopoietic recoveries were significantly delayed in the CD34^Low/Low group compared with those in the CD34^Low/High group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 for neutrophil, P < 0.001; HR 0.72 for platelet, P = 0.014), while those were comparable in the CD34^Low/High and CD34^High/High groups (HR 1.22 for neutrophil, P = 0.16; HR 1.29 for platelet, P = 0.088). Moreover, the CD34^Low/High group demonstrated longer overall survival than the CD34^Low/Low group (HR 1.48, P = 0.011) and comparable survival to the CD34^High/High group (HR 0.93, P = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This finding may address the lack of availability of CB units for some overweight and obese recipients for whom suitable donors are unavailable. Further investigations are warranted to evaluate the appropriateness of ABW and IBW.