Cryopreserved versus non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation after high-dose Melphalan in multiple myeloma: comparative analysis

Non-cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma and lymphoma in countries with limited resources: practice considerations from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation is a standard treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), Hodgkin lymphoma and various subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem cells is standard practice that allows time for delivery of conditioning regimen prior to cell infusion. The aim of this Worldwide Network for Blood & Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) work was to assess existing evidence on non-cryopreserved autologous transplants through a systematic review/meta-analysis, to study feasibility and safety of this approach. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS for studies that utilized non-cryopreserved autologous PBSC transplantation. Identified literature was reviewed for information on mobilization, apheresis, preservation and viability, conditioning regimen, engraftment, response, and survival. Results highlight collective experience from 19 transplant centers (1686 patients), that performed autologous transplants using non-cryopreserved PBSCs. The mean of infused CD34+ was 5.6 × 106/kg. Stem cell viability at transplantation was >90% in MM and >75% in lymphomas, after a storage time of 24-144 h at +4 °C. Mean time-to-neutrophil engraftment was 12 days and 15.3 days for platelets. Pooled proportion estimates of day 100 transplant-related mortality and graft failure were 1% and 0%, respectively. Non-cryopreservation of apheresed autologous PBSCs appears feasible and safe.

Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells as a safe and effective alternative for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard procedure for multiple myeloma and the grafts are usually cryopreserved. Previous studies reported advantages in the use of fresh peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) autotransplantation compared to cryopreservation of the grafts. This study compared the transplant-related outcomes of two graft preservation methods: fresh storage (4°C/72 h) and cryopreservation (-80°C).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed an analysis of 45 patients with multiple myeloma under autotransplantation (17 fresh and 28 cryopreserved) from 2017 to 2021. Fresh PBSC were maintained in the refrigerator for three days in a concentration up to 300 × 10³ TNC/μL. Cryopreserved PBSC were concentrated by plasma reduction after centrifugation (950 g/10 min/4°C) and an equal volume of cryoprotection solution was added for a final concentration of 300 × 10³ TNC/μL, 5% DMSO, 6% hydroxyethyl starch, and 3% human albumin.

RESULTS

Neutrophil engraftment was significantly faster with fresh PBSCs (10 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.045). Adverse effects were more common in cryopreserved PBSC transplantation (75% vs. 35.3% patients; p = 0.013). Post transplantation hospital stay was 20 and 22 days for fresh and cryopreserved PBSCs respectively (p = 0.091). There was no difference in platelet engraftment time (10.5 days for both; p = 0.133), number of antibiotics used after transplantation (3 for fresh and 2.5 for cryopreserved; p = 0.828), days of antibiotic use after transplantation (12.2 days for fresh and 13.3 days for cryopreserved, p = 0.579), and overall survival (p = 0.736).

CONCLUSION

The infusion of fresh PBSC refrigerated for up to three days is effective and safe for autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma, which is a useful alternative to cryopreserved PBSC.

Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Time to Transplant on the Outcome

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a standard therapy for transplant eligible patients of multiple myeloma (MM). To evaluate impact of time to transplant on subsequent outcomes, we analyzed data on consecutive MM patients who received novel agents-based induction prior to transplant.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2019, 363 MM patients underwent ASCT. Patients' median age was 52 years, ranging from 20 to 72 years, 233 (64.2%) were males. Median interval from diagnosis to transplant was 11.5 months (range, 4-67.5); 201 (55.4%) patients underwent ASCT within 12 months (early) and 162 (44.6%) beyond 12 months since diagnosis (delayed ASCT). Primary objective was progression-free survival. Secondary objectives were-response rate to transplant, overall survival (OS), and transplant-related mortality (TRM).

RESULTS

Post-ASCT complete response (CR) (77.1% vs. 64.8%; P < .025) and CR+ very good partial response rate (89% vs. 81.5%; P < .03) was higher for early ASCT cohort. Engraftment characteristics, regimen-related toxicities, and day +100 TRM (3.5% vs 3.7%; P = .564) were similar in 2 cohorts. Median OS for early versus late cohort from date of diagnosis is 127.0 (95% CI, 98.9-155.1) versus 104.5 months (95% CI, 79.3-129.6; P = .356) and from date of transplant is 119.0 (95% CI, 93.4-144.6) versus 89.5 months (95% CI, 57.4-121.6), P < .02. Median PFS is better for early transplant cohort; 69.5 (95% CI, 56.7-82.3) versus 50.0 months (95% CI, 35.6-64.4), P < .05, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early transplant for myeloma is associated with higher response rate and better progression-free survival.

Cryopreserved versus non-cryopreserved stem cell autografts in multiple myeloma a restrospective cohort study

The use of non-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) can be an alternative to the traditional cryopreserved infusions of HSCs in autologous stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). After high-dose melphalan conditioning (HDM), we sought to compare time to engraftment, overall survival, and safety in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing a first aHSCT after high-dose melphalan conditioning (HDM). We conducted a cohort study from March 2018 to December 2019. Of all autologous transplants performed during this period, 105 were for MM as the first consolidation. Fifty-one patients received a cryopreserved graft; the remaining 54 patients received a fresh infusion. General clinical characteristics were similar between these two groups. Cell viability was higher in non-cryopreserved grafts (95% vs. 86% p < 0.01). Four deaths occurred during hospitalization in the cryopreserved group, one in the non-cryopreserved group. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment on D + 25 was higher in the non-cryopreserved compared to the cryopreserved group (98% vs 90% p < 0.01 and 96.2% vs 72.54% p < 0.01 respectively). Additionally, the hospital length of stay was reduced by 4 days for patients for the non-cryopreserved cohort. In summary, the use of non-cryopreserved HSCs after HDM is safe and effective compared to patients who received a cryopreserved graft.

Effects of cell concentration, time of fresh storage, and cryopreservation on peripheral blood stem cells: PBSC fresh storage and cryopreservation

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral blood stem cells are widely used in autologous or allogeneic transplantation. The quality of the product directly impacts clinical outcomes, and the cell quality and/or functionality may be influenced by the storage conditions as time, temperature, total nucleated cells (TNC) concentration and cryopreservation requirement.

OBJECTIVE

To verify the effects of time, cell concentration, and cryopreservation/thawing in the viability and functionality of stem cells for transplantation.

METHODS

We evaluated TNC, CD45⁺ viable cells, CD34⁺ viable cells, and cell viability and functionality of 11 samples. Measurements were performed immediately and 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h after sample collection at high and low TNC concentrations. The same parameters were also evaluated after cryopreservation and thawing of the samples.

RESULT

Duration of storage and TNC concentration exhibited a negative effect on cell quality (CD45⁺ viable cells, CD34⁺ viable cells and functionality). Moreover, the association of these parameters increased the negative effect on graft quality. Cryopreservation and thawing also negatively affected the collected sample regarding viable CD34⁺ cells (recovery 66.2 %), viable CD45⁺ cells (recovery 56.8 %), and 7-AAD viability. No significant losses in viable CD45⁺/CD34⁺ cells and functionality were observed in the first 24 h in both TNC conditions.

CONCLUSION

These results emphasize the importance to consider carefully the storage conditions until transplantation, measuring TNC/μL until 24 h after collection (diluting the product when TNC > 300 × 10³/μL) and infusing fresh graft as soon as possible.

History and Development of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This review describes the development of cryopreservation, the birth of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and its past and present use to consolidate adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). It summarizes the first autografts in patients in relapse, the experience of autografting in complete remission (CR), using bone marrow unpurged or purged in vitro with cyclophosphamide-derivatives, and the important shift to peripheral blood stem cells. The review also discusses the results of recent studies in favor of the use of ASCT to consolidate good- and intermediate-risk patients who reach CR with no detectable minimal residual disease, and those which support the inclusion of maintenance therapy post autograft with hypomethylating agents, anti-BCL-2, and, possibly, in the future, anti AML chimeric antigen receptor-T cells. Carefully applied to well-selected patients, ASCT may regain interest, because of its simplicity, its reduced toxicity, lower non-relapse mortality and better quality of life.

Non-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells in autograft patients with lymphoma: a matched-pair analysis comparing a single center experience with the use of cryopreserved stem cells reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry

BACKGROUND AIMS

Around 50 000 autologous stem cell transplantations are done each year worldwide using cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Cryopreservation is time-consuming and expensive. Since 2007, several retrospective studies have shown that PBSCs can be stored at 4°C for 2-3 days, allowing autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma receiving high-dose melphalan. Data with non-cryopreserved PBSCs in patients autografted for lymphoma following longer pre-conditioning regimens are limited. In addition, no controlled comparison has been able to detect unforeseen differences.

METHODS

The authors compared outcomes of 94 consecutive adult patients with lymphoma (66 with Hodgkin lymphoma) autografted in our department in Oran (Algeria) using PBSCs stored at 4°C, from 2009 to 2018, with patients receiving cryopreserved stem cells reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Patients autografted in Oran were matched with patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs in the registry (four controls per patient in Oran).

RESULTS

Neutrophil engraftment was significantly faster with cryopreserved PBSCs (P = 0.003). By day 10, only 17% of patients receiving non-cryopreserved PBSCs engrafted versus 48% for cryopreserved PBSCs. Likewise, platelet recovery to 20 000/mm³ was significantly faster in patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs (P = 0.01). However, all patients in both groups had recovered by day 20. There were no significant differences in non-relapse mortality (9% versus 7%, P = 0.4), relapse incidence (22% versus 32%, P = 0.13), progression-free survival (70% versus 61%, P = 0.4) or overall survival (85% versus 75%, P = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that, in patients with lymphoma receiving pre-transplant regimens such as carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan, PBSCs stored at 4°C for up to 6 days can be used safely in centers with no cryopreservation facility. However, the kinetics of hematopoietic recovery showed a significant, albeit small, delay in engraftment for both neutrophils and platelets, which favors the use of cryopreservation if available.

Outcomes of Non-Cryopreserved Versus Cryopreserved Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become a standard procedure in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Cryopreservation (CRYO) of stem cells may be associated with adverse reactions of dimethyl sulfoxide. Previous studies showed that stem cell storage at 4°C (non-cryopreserved [NC] method) may have some advantages. This analysis focused on comparing the transplant-related outcomes of the 2 preservation methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a cohort study of consecutive MM patients who underwent ASCT at Chiang Mai University from 2014 to 2019. Primary outcomes were time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Key secondary outcomes were the incidence of infusion reactions, duration of hospitalization, cost, and survival. RESULTS A total of 42 MM patients underwent ASCT. Of these, 26 patients and 16 patients underwent NC and CRYO stem cell collections, respectively. There was no difference in time to neutrophil engraftment (median 12 vs. 10.5 days, P=0.203) or platelet engraftment (median 14 vs. 12 days, P=0.809) between groups. The incidence of infusion reactions and duration of hospitalization were similar in both groups. The average cost of ASCT was 10% lower in the NC group. There was no difference in progression-free survival (median 16 vs. 22 months, P=0.701) or overall survival between NC and CRYO groups. CONCLUSIONS ASCT in MM using the NC preservation method is effective and safe compared to the CRYO method in both short-term and survival outcomes.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma: Predictors of long-term outcome

Background & objectives

Survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved in the past two decades following use of novel agents and autologous stem cell transplantation. To determine predictors of long-term outcome, data of MM patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at a tertiary care centre in north India were retrospectively analyzed.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2016, 349 MM patients underwent ASCT. Patients' median age was 52 yr, ranging from 29 to 68 yr, 68.2 per cent were males. Thirty three per cent patients had international staging system (ISS) Stage III and 68.5 per cent had received novel agents-based induction. High-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) was used for conditioning; patients with renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 ml/min) received melphalan 140-150 mg/m².

Results

Post-transplant, 317 of 349 (90.8%) patients responded; complete [complete response (CR)] -213 (61%)], very good partial response (VGPR) -62 (17.8%) and PR in 42 (12%)]. Induction with novel agents, pre-transplant chemosensitive disease, transplant in first remission and serum albumin (≥3.5 g/dl) were predictors of significant response. At a median follow up of 73 months, median overall survival (OS) was 90 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 70.8-109.2], and progression-free survival (PFS) was 41 months (95% CI 33.0-49.0). On multivariate analysis, achievement of CR post-transplant, transplant in first remission, ISS Stages I and II (vs. III), absence of extramedullary disease and serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dl were predictors of prolonged OS. For PFS, achievement of post-transplant CR and transplant in first remission were predictors of superior outcome.

Interpretation & conclusions

Treatment with novel agents, achievement of complete remission post-transplant, ISS Stages I and II, absence of extramedullary disease and transplant in first remission were predictors of long-term survival for patients with MM.