The effect of NIMA matching in adult unrelated mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - a joint study of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT and the CIBMTR

Clinical relevance of feto-maternal microchimerism in (hematopoietic stem cell) transplantation

Toleration of a semi-allogeneic fetus in the mother's uterus as well as tolerance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) appear to share some immunologic concepts. The existence of microchimeric cells, and the original idea of a bidirectional cell trafficking between mother and child during pregnancy have been known for decades. Today, origins and mechanisms of persistence of microchimeric cells are intensively being elucidated. Both, the translation of the phenomenon of feto-maternal immune tolerance to donor choice or prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in HSCT, and the implications of microchimeric cells in and for HSCT are highly intriguing. Yet, differences in detection methods of microchimeric cells, as well as in transplantation protocols impede the comparison of larger cohorts, and limit potential clinical advice. Still, matching of non-inherited maternal antigens (NIMA), which are expressed on maternal microchimeric cells, demonstrated a strong association with decreased risk for the development of acute GvHD in the context of various transplantation strategies. Despite the fact that advances in graft manipulation and immunosuppression ameliorated the safety and outcome after HSCT, NIMA-matching retained a beneficial role in selection of sibling, child, or maternal donors, as well as for cord blood units. Recent findings indicate the existence of a microchimeric stem cell niche, in which only one dominant microchimeric cell population of only one semi-allogeneic origin persists at a time. This implies that studies regarding the impact of (maternal and fetal) microchimerism (MC) on clinical outcome of HSCT should combine analysis of NIMA and direct detection of microchimeric cells from donor and recipient on the verge of HSCT to be efficiently conclusive.

Scoring system for optimal cord blood unit selection for single cord blood transplantation

BACKGROUND

We conducted a retrospective study to categorize the cord blood unit (CBU)s to identify the optimal units.

METHODS

A total of 8503 adults (female, n = 3592; male, n = 4911) receiving their first single cord blood transplantation (CBT) in 2000-2019 were analyzed. Factors associated with CBUs affecting overall survival (OS) and neutrophil engraftment were selected to create ranked categorization for each outcome, followed by comparison with transplantation using HLA-matched bone marrow (BMT)/peripheral blood stem cell (PBSCT) from unrelated (n = 6052) and related donors (n = 4546).

RESULTS

Sex-mismatch, CD34+ cell and CFU-GM counts were selected in the OS analysis. Considering the strong interaction between sex mismatch and CD34+ cell counts, we analyzed females and males separately. For females, female CBU with CD34+ cell counts {greater than or equal to} 0.5 × 10e5/kg and CFU-GM counts {greater than or equal to} 15 × 10e3/kg offered the best OS (Group I), followed by other groups with any (Groups II-IV) or all (Group V) of the risk factors. Group I consistently showed favorable OS (Group IV: HR1.22, P = 0.027; Group V: HR1.31, P = 0.047), comparable to those of rBMT/PBSCT (OS: HR1.02, P = 0.654) and uBM/PBSCT in patients with higher rDRI (HR1.07, P = 0.353). Male patients lacked significant factors affecting OS. Categorization for neutrophil engraftment consisting of CD34+ cell and CFU-GM counts, sex-mismatch, presence of donor-specific antibodies, and the number of HLA-mismatches was effective but not predicted OS.

CONCLUSION

Our ranked categorizations sufficiently predicted female OS and engraftment. The best-ranked CBUs offered preferable outcomes comparable to conventional BM/PB donors in female but not in male patients.

Tools for optimizing risk assessment in hematopoietic cell transplant - What can we get away with?

Unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is a critical modality to treat hematologic malignancies. The current objective of donor selection is to match donor and recipient at the HLA (human leukocyte antigen) peptide-binding region which should lower the risk of graft-versus-host disease. However, depending on the patient's ethnicity/race, finding a matched donor is challenging, especially for HLA-DPB1 which is due to the weak linkage disequilibrium between HLA-DPB1 and the other HLA class II loci. Recent evidence, on the molecular level, has shown that certain HLA mismatches carry lower clinical risk. More specifically, there is an increasing understanding of polymorphisms of the innate and adaptive immune systems and their impact on transplant outcomes, allowing us to expand our "toolkit" for optimization of donor selection in HCT. Therefore, in this review we discuss matching strategies based on comparing donor and recipient polymorphisms that may influence innate and adaptive immune response genes in allorecognition and the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in non-HLA genes that have the potential for providing additional tools to refine risk stratification.