Primary plasma cell leukemia: autologous stem cell transplant in an era of novel induction drugs

Current Status on Management of Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

Plasma Cell Leukemia (PCL) is a very rare and highly aggressive form of plasma cell dyscrasia. This review seeks to evaluate the outcomes of PCL in the context of combination novel agent therapy and stem cell transplant (SCT) protocols.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnostic criteria for PCL have now evolved to include patients with 5% circulating PC. While management remains challenging, the incorporation of novel agent-based induction regimen has significantly improved early mortality and reduced attrition of patients proceeding to SCT. In recent prospective clinical trials, patients with PCL demonstrated an overall response rates of 69% to 86%, with progression-free and overall survival ranging from 13.8 to 15.5 months and 24.8 to 36.3 months, respectively. B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors, such as venetoclax present a targeted intervention opportunity for patients with PCL with t(11;14). Dedicated clinical trials tailored to PCL are crucial, integrating newer therapies in the frontline setting to further optimize responses and enhance overall outcomes.

Sequential autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for treatment of primary plasma cell leukemia: A case report

Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive form of plasma cell disorder, which accounts for ~70% of all PCL. Survival of pPCL remains poor, and is related with early mortality. There is no standard therapy for patients with pPCL. In the present study, a 26-year-old man who was diagnosed with pPCL was reported. The patient achieved stringent complete remission to the successful treatment of intensive chemotherapy combined with sequential autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) followed by maintenance therapy with oral administration of ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD regimen). Development of complex treatment algorithms that combine novel agents, SCT and post-transplantation remission strategies may translate into survival in patients with pPCL.

Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone as Induction and Extended Consolidation Improves Outcome in Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

The multicenter OPTIMUM (MUKnine) phase II trial investigated daratumumab, low-dose cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (Dara-CVRd) before and after autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) in newly diagnosed patients with molecularly defined ultra-high-risk (UHiR) multiple myeloma (NDMM) or plasma cell leukemia (PCL). To provide clinical context, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were referenced to contemporaneous outcomes seen in patients with UHiR NDMM treated in the recent Myeloma XI (MyeXI) trial.

METHODS

Transplant-eligible all-comers NDMM patients were profiled for UHiR disease, defined by presence of ≥2 genetic risk markers t(4;14)/t(14;16)/t(14;20), del(1p), gain(1q), and del(17p), and/or SKY92 gene expression risk signature. Patients with UHiR MM/PCL were offered treatment with Dara-CVRd induction, V-augmented ASCT, extended Dara-VR(d) consolidation, and Dara-R maintenance. UHiR patients treated in MyeXI with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide, or lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide, ASCT, and R maintenance or observation were identified by mirrored molecular screening. OPTIMUM PFS at 18 months (PFS18m) was compared against MyeXI using a Bayesian framework, and patients were followed up to the end of consolidation for PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Of 412 screened NDMM OPTIMUM patients, 103 were identified as UHiR or PCL and subsequently treated on trial with Dara-CVRd; 117 MyeXI patients identified as UHiR formed the external comparator arm, with comparable clinical and molecular characteristics to OPTIMUM. Comparison of PFS18m per Bayesian framework resulted in a 99.5% chance of OPTIMUM being superior to MyeXI. At 30 months' follow-up, PFS was 77% for OPTIMUM versus 39.8% for MyeXI, and OS 83.5% versus 73.5%, respectively. Extended post-ASCT Dara-VRd consolidation therapy was highly deliverable, with limited toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that Dara-CVRd induction and extended post-ASCT Dara-VRd consolidation markedly improve PFS for UHiR NDMM patients over conventional management, supporting further evaluation of this strategy.

Improved survival of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia with VRd or daratumumab-based quadruplets: A multicenter study by the Greek myeloma study group

We evaluated the efficacy and prognostic impact of bortezomib-lenalidomide triplet (VRd) or daratumumab-based quadruplets (DBQ) versus previous anti-myeloma therapies, that is, bortezomib standard combinations (BSC) or conventional chemotherapy (CT), in a large cohort of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), including those fulfilling the revised diagnostic criteria, that is, circulating plasma cells (cPCS): ≥5%; 110 pPCL patients (M/F: 51/59; median age 65 years, range: 44-86) out of 3324 myeloma patients (3%), registered in our database between 2001 and 2021, were studied; 37% had cPCS 5%-19%; 89% received novel combinations including DBQ (21%), VRd (16%) and BSC (52%); 35% underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. 83% achieved objective responses. Treatment with VRd/DBQ strongly correlated with a higher complete response rate (41% vs. 17%; p = .008). After a median follow-up of 51 months (95% CI: 45-56), 67 patients died. Early mortality was 3.5%. Progression-free survival was 16 months (95% CI: 12-19.8), significantly longer in patients treated with VRd/DBQ versus BSC/CT (25 months, 95% CI: 13.5-36.5 vs. 13 months 95% CI: 9-16.8; p = .03). Median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI: 19.6-38.3), significantly longer in patients treated with VRd/DBQ versus BSC/CT (not reached vs. 20 months, 95% CI: 14-26; 3-year OS: 70% vs. 32%, respectively; p < .001; HzR: 3.88). In the multivariate analysis VRd/DBQ therapy, del17p(+) and PLT <100.000/μL, independently predicted OS (p < .05). Our study has demonstrated that in the real-world setting, treatment with VRd/DBQ induces deep and durable responses and is a strong prognostic factor for OS representing currently the best therapeutic option for pPCL.

Validation of the revised diagnostic criteria for primary plasma cell leukemia by the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party

The International Myeloma Working Group has recently revised the diagnostic criteria for primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) to circulating plasma cells (CPCs) ≥ 5% in a peripheral blood smear. The present study validated new criteria in patients with multiple myeloma or PCL diagnosed using the previous diagnostic criteria, who were administered immunomodulatory drugs or proteasome inhibitors as induction therapy. We analyzed the medical records of 1357 patients from eight hospitals in South Korea. The median age of the all patients was 64 years, and 187 (13.8%) had CPCs at diagnosis. Only 79 (5.8%) of the patients had ≥ 5% CPCs. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with CPCs ≥ 5% and ≥ 20% was similar, but had significantly inferior median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS than those with CPCs < 5% (13.1 vs. 21.5 months, P < 0.001, and 21.5 vs. 60.9 months, P < 0.001, respectively). Primary PCL diagnosed using the revised criteria presented with higher total calcium levels and serum creatinine levels, lower platelet counts and frequent organomegaly and plasmacytoma at diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the presence of plasmacytoma and elevated serum β2-microglobulin were significantly associated with OS in primary PCL. In conclusion, the revised criterion of CPCs ≥ 5% in a peripheral blood smear is appropriate for PCL diagnosis.

Case report: Plasma cell leukemia secondary to multiple myeloma successfully treated with anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy provides an effective salvage treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. End-stage RRMM with plasma cell leukemia (PCL) transformation is highly aggressive and resistant to conventional therapy. There is an urgent need for new therapeutics and CAR-T therapy may play an important role. We report a case of PCL secondary to RRMM successfully treated with CAR-T cell therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA). A woman was diagnosed as having MM 4 years ago and progressed to secondary PCL (sPCL) of five prior lines of treatment including proteasome inhibitors, an immunomodulatory agent, cytotoxic drugs, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. After receiving a BCMA CAR-T therapy, she achieved a stringent complete response that lasted 9 months. Then, the patient irregularly took venetoclax 10 mg per day due to a slightly higher λ FLC concentration, which did not meet the criteria for progression. She maintained a complete response for the following 7 months. In conclusion, BCMA CAR-T therapy may be a promising therapeutic approach in PCL patients. More studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy in PCL patients.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900024388, Registered 9 July 2019.

Causes of death in primary plasma cell leukemia differ from multiple myeloma: A STROBE-compliant descriptive study based on SEER database

The primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare but aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM). Few studies have focused on the differences in the causes of death between pPCL and MM. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the causes of death of patients with pPCL and MM. The data were collected from the Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The demographic characteristics, survival, and causes of death in pPCL and MM patients were evaluated and compared. The competing risk regression model was performed to predict the cause of death. Between 1975 and 2009, the overall mortality rate was 96.13% and 88.71% for pPCL and MM, and the median survival was 9 and 26 months, respectively. In pPCL, leukemia caused 45.05% of the deaths, followed by myeloma (38.83%). In MM, myeloma was the leading cause of death, accounting for 74.89% of the deaths. Older age at diagnosis was a risk factor for dying of leukemia in pPCL patients (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.16-1.91), while older age at death was associated with reduced risk (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52-0.86). Although the survival of pPCL patients increased with time periods of diagnosis since 1975 to 2009, the risk of dying of leukemia increased with the periods. For MM, most of the demographic characteristics were found to have independently predicting influence on the cause of death. Patients with pPCL and MM had distinct causes of death. Leukemia was the leading and the most serious cause of death in pPCL patients. The demographic factors could not predict the causes of death in pPCL. More large-scale and multi-center studies are needed to evaluate the effect of novel agents in pPCL patients, especially for patients who have progressed to leukemia.

Update on primary plasma cell leukemia

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and highly aggressive plasma cell neoplasm developing in 0.5?4% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The diagnostic criteria were recently revised from 20% to ≥5% of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears. PCL is classified as primary or secondary; primary PCL is when it presents in patients with no MM. Primary PCL shows clinical and laboratory features at presentation that differ from MM and exhibits a dismal prognosis even with the use of effective agents against MM. Therefore, intensive chemotherapy should be initiated immediately after diagnosis, and autologous stem cell transplantation is recommended for transplant-eligible patients. Maintenance therapy after transplantation may reduce the rate of early relapses. We reviewed the definitions of PCL, revised diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and appropriate initial treatments for primary PCL.

Plasma cell leukemia: A review of the molecular classification, diagnosis, and evidenced-based treatment

Plasma cell leukemia is a rare and aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia associated with dismal outcomes. It may arise de novo, primary plasma cell leukemia, or evolve from an antecedent diagnosis of multiple myeloma, secondary plasma cell leukemia. Despite highly effective therapeutics, survival for plasma cell leukemia patients remains poor. Molecular knowledge of plasma cell leukemia has recently expanded with use of gene expression profiling and whole exome sequencing, lending new insights into prognosis and therapeutic development. In this review, we describe the molecular knowledge, clinical characteristics, evidenced-based therapeutic approaches and treatment outcomes of plasma cell leukemia.

Outcomes with Autologous or Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of Novel Agents

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and very aggressive plasma cell disorder. The optimal treatment approach, including whether to pursue an autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not clear, given the lack of clinical trial-based evidence. This single-center retrospective study describes the outcomes of 16 patients with PCL (n = 14 with primary PCL) who underwent either autoSCT (n = 9) or alloSCT (n = 7) for PCL in the era of novel agents, between 2007 and 2019. The median age of the cohort was 58 years. High-risk cytogenetics were found in 50% of the patients. All patients received a proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug-based regimen before transplantation. At the time of transplantation, 10 patients (62%) obtained at least a very good partial response (VGPR). The response after autoSCT (3 months) was at least a VGPR in 6 patients (67%; complete response [CR] in 5). All patients undergoing alloSCT achieved a CR at 3 months. Maintenance therapy was provided to 5 patients (56%) after autoSCT. The median progression-free survival after transplantation was 6 months in the autoSCT group, compared with 18 months in the alloSCT group (P = .09), and median overall survival (OS) after transplantation in the 2 groups was 19 months and 40 months, respectively (P = .41). The median OS from diagnosis was 27 months and 49 months, respectively (P = .50). Of the 11 deaths, 10 patients (91%) died of relapsed disease. AlloSCT was not observed to offer any significant survival advantage over autoSCT in PCL, in agreement with recent reports, and relapse remains the primary cause of death in these patients.

Plasma Cell Leukemia - Facts and Controversies: More Questions than Answers?

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is an aggressive hematological malignancy characterized by an uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells (PCs) in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. PCL has been defined by an absolute number of circulating PCs exceeding 2.0 × 10⁹/L and/or >20% PCs in the total leucocyte count. It is classified as primary PCL, which develops de novo, and secondary PCL, occurring at the late and advanced stages of multiple myeloma (MM). Primary and secondary PCL are clinically and biologically two distinct entities. After the diagnosis, treatment should be immediate and should include a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator-based combination regimens as induction, followed by stem cell transplantation (SCT) in transplant-eligible individuals who have cleared the peripheral blood of circulating PCs. Due to the rarity of the condition, there have been very few clinical trials. Furthermore, virtually all of the myeloma trials exclude patients with active PCL. The evaluation of response has been defined by the International Myeloma Working Group and consists of both acute leukemia and MM criteria. With conventional chemotherapy, the prognosis of primary PCL has been ominous, with reported overall survival (OS) ranging from 6.8 to 12.6 months. The use of novel agents and autologous SCT appears to be associated with deeper response and an improved survival, although it still remains low. The PCL prognostic index provides a simple score to risk-stratify PCL. The prognosis of secondary PCL is extremely poor, with OS of only 1 month.

Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia: Real-World Retrospective Study of 46 Patients From a Single-Center Study in China

BACKGROUND

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PPCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder. The use of novel agents, together with autologous stem cell transplantation, has improved survival outcome in PPCL. However, the prognosis is still very poor, and the optimal treatment remains an unmet clinical need.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied the efficacy and prognostic impact of novel agents in 46 patients with PPCL patients at the Blood Diseases Hospital in China. We examined the impact of clinical and laboratory features, as well as therapies (bortezomib- and/or immunomodulatory drug-based therapies, chemotherapy) on survival and extent of clinical response, including progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival and OS were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival distributions were compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 46 PPCL patients, the median age at the time of diagnosis was 54 years. Overall response rate was 54% (25/46). The median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival time was 6 (0-12.5) months, and OS time was 14 (4.6-23.4) months. The OS time was significantly longer in patients treated with bortezomib-based versus non-bortezomib-based therapies (median [95% confidence interval], 19 [9-28.9] vs. 5 [4-24] months; P = .019).

CONCLUSION

This large single-center study of PPCL supports the use of bortezomib-based therapies as frontline treatment in PPCL patients.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation utilization and outcomes for primary plasma cell leukemia in the current era

The outcomes of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) after undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the novel agent era are unknown. We report outcomes of 348 patients with pPCL receiving autologous (auto-) HCT (n = 277) and allogeneic (allo-) HCT (n = 71) between 2008 and 2015. Median age was 60 years and 56 years for auto- and allo-HCT respectively. For auto-HCT, the 4-year outcomes were: non-relapse mortality (NRM) 7% (4-11%), relapse (REL) 76% (69-82%), progression-free survival (PFS) 17% (13-23%), and overall survival (OS) 28% (22-35%). Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 90 and ≥very good partial response (VGPR) predicted superior OS in multi-variate analysis for auto-HCT. For allo-HCT, the 4-year outcomes were: NRM 12% (5-21%), REL 69% (56-81%), PFS 19% (10-31%), and OS 31% (19-44%). Compared with prior CIBMTR pPCL patients (1995-2006), inferior survival was noted in the current cohort (3-year OS, 39% vs. 38% in allo-HCT, and 62% vs. 35% in auto-HCT) respectively. However, we noted an increased HCT utilization, from 12% (7-21%) in 1995 to 46% (34-64%) in 2009 using SEER data (available till 2009). Despite modern induction translating to higher proportion receiving HCT, the outcomes remain poor in pPCL patients, mainly derived by high relapse rates post-HCT.

Retrospective Review of the Use of High-Dose Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) usually follows a clinical course leading to refractoriness and limited treatment options in advanced stages, which might need bridge therapies to either autologous stem cell transplantation or novel therapies. We report our experience with the high-dose chemotherapy mCBAD (modified cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) regimen in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM), relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), and plasma cell leukemia (PCL) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched our electronic records database for MM patients who received mCBAD from 2010 to 2016 for 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m² intravenously (I.V.) twice daily with mesna 400 mg/m² I.V. daily (days 1-4), bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously/I.V. (days 1, 4, 8, 11), doxorubicin 9 mg/m² daily continuous infusion (days 1-4), dexamethasone 40 mg orally daily (on days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20). International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria were used for response assessment and diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, χ², Wilcoxon rank sum, and Kaplan-Meier were used for statistical purposes.

RESULTS

One hundred forty patients met the inclusion criteria. A median of 2 cycles of therapy was administered. The overall response rate was 85% in patients with RRMM (n = 116) and 100% in NDMM (n = 13) and PCL (n = 11) patients. Respective median progression-free survival (mPFS) for NDMM, PCL, and RRMM were 19.61 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.26 to not applicable [NA]), 7.56 months (95% CI, 4.7 to NA), and 4.64 months (95% CI, 3.75-6.73). Patients with RRMM who used mCBAD as a bridge to autologous transplant (36.2%) had mPFS (11.48 months; 95% CI, 7.52-15.9 months) compared with those who did not (mPFS: 3.19 months; 95% CI, 2.4-3.75 months). Cytopenias occurred in more than 90% of patients, and febrile neutropenia was noted in 26%. All cases of treatment-related mortality (8%) occurred in patients with RRMM, except for 1 patient with PCL.

CONCLUSION

mCBAD results in high response rates in myeloma and PCL, however, with high treatment-related mortality. Its use in RRMM should be limited to patients who have immediate need for therapy without other treatment options and who have good performance status (score of 0-1) or NDMM if novel agents are not available depending on practice setting. mCBAD can be a treatment option for patients with PCL.

An update on biology, diagnosis and treatment of primary plasma cell leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PPCL) is one of the most aggressive hematological malignancies. The prognosis of PPCL patients remains poor, although some improvements have been made in recent years. Areas covered: In this review recent clinical and biological advances in PPCL are reported. Some recommendations for the practical management of these patients are provided, with a particular focus on the role of novel agents and transplant procedures. A brief description of the currently ongoing clinical trials with new drugs is also enclosed. Expert opinion: PPCL still represents a difficult challenge for all hematologists. Here the authors provide a personal view on how the current, generally unsatisfactory results in this neoplastic disorder could be improved. In particular, dedicated studies exploring alternative therapies are necessary and eagerly awaited. Such studies should possibly be based on new biological information that could be of help in identifying novel genetic biomarkers for risk stratification and new actionable molecular targets.