ABO blood type incompatibility lost the unfavorable impact on outcome in unrelated bone marrow transplantation

Effect of Donor/Recipient ABO Mismatch on Outcome of Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children: Single-Center Study

ABO blood group mismatch between donor and recipient is thought to be associated with several immunopharmacological complications but is not considered a major contraindication to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the impact of such a mismatch on overall survival, transplant-related mortality, graft-versus-host disease, and time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment seems to be conflicting. This retrospective cohort was carried out on children and adolescents who underwent allogenic HSCT between January 2016 and January 2023. ABO compatibility state was assessed and grouped into compatible, minor, major, and bidirectional incompatible groups. The effect of ABO compatibility on various transplantation outcomes was assessed. Forty-three children (25 males and 18 females) with different diagnoses were included. More than half of the patients had no ABO mismatch. Major ABO mismatch was found to be associated with a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD), whereas near significantly higher mortality was observed in the minor mismatch group. Otherwise, no association was found between ABO mismatch and platelet or neutrophil engraftment. ABO mismatch does not affect the overall survival or the posttransplant engraftment of patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. aGVHD was observed to be the only factor affected by ABO compatibility.

The impact of infused red blood cell volume on major and bidirectional ABO-mismatched bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND AIMS

ABO incompatibility does not hinder bone marrow transplantation (BMT), but it has been associated with worse outcomes and additional adverse events. This study aimed to verify the impact of incompatible red blood cells (iRBCs) in allogeneic BMT and to determine a safe number of iRBCs to be infused.

METHODS

We compared ABO-incompatible (iABO) allogeneic BMT (n = 42) with ABO-compatible allogeneic BMT (n = 44) and evaluated the impact of the number of infused iRBCs on outcomes and adverse events.

RESULTS

The iABO patients demonstrated delayed time to transfusion independence at 30 days and 60 days, increased requirement for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and greater hemolysis signals and incidence of pure red cell aplasia. Neutrophil/platelet engraftment, length of hospitalization post-transplant, platelet units required, graft-versus-host disease occurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups. Patients in the iABO group received 1.03 × 1010 iRBCs/kg (range, 0.36-3.88). Infusion of iRBCs >1.0 × 1010 /kg was related to graft failure or death before neutrophil engraftment or platelet engraftment or both as well as increased plasma requirement and increased creatinine. Our results also suggest that antibody titers impact the transplantation scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

The iABO transplantation showed some unfavorable outcomes. It is important to monitor the value of iRBCs to be infused, considering the recipient antibody titers. We propose using the number of iRBCs (iRBCs/kg) as a dose parameter with regard to infused iRBCs. Further studies are necessary to clarify the maximum safe number of iRBCs in iABO transplants.

Immuno-Hematologic Complexity of ABO-Incompatible Allogeneic HSC Transplantation

ABO incompatibility is not considered a contraindication for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Approximately 30% of transplants from related donors and up to 50% of transplants from unrelated donors are ABO incompatible. Immuno-hematologic investigations allow to estimate donor/recipient ABO mismatch and anti-A/B isohemagglutinin (IHA) titration in the pre-HSCT phase. Immediate hemolysis or delayed complications (passenger lymphocyte syndrome and pure red cell aplasia) can occur post HSCT. Some preventive measures take into consideration either decision-making algorithms based on the recipient's IHA titration or clinical protocols for the removal/reduction of IHAs through plasma exchange or immunoadsorption procedures. Product manipulation through red blood cell (RBC) and/or plasma depletion can also be taken into account. Currently, the best approach in the management of ABO-incompatible transplant is not defined in expert consensus documents or with solid evidence. In addition, the methods for IHA titration are not standardized. A transfusion strategy must consider both the donor's and recipient's blood group systems until the RBC engraftment catches on and ABO conversion (forward and reverse typing) is confirmed on two consecutive and independent samples. Therefore, ABO incompatibility in HSCT represents a demanding immuno-hematologic challenge and requires all necessary preventive measures, including the appropriate selection of ABO blood components for transfusion.

Impact of myelofibrosis on patients with myelodysplastic syndromes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of myelofibrosis (MF) grade in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) following an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains elusive.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 153 patients with MDS who underwent allo-HSCT and divided the patients into the MF-0/1 (N = 119) and MF-2/3 (N = 34) cohorts to explore the impact of MF on outcomes of allo-HSCT.

RESULTS

The 2-year rates of relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were 10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9%-17.7%), 16.3% (95% CI 10.2%-23.6%), 76.6% (95% CI 69.0%-85.1%), and 72.8% (95% CI 65.0%-81.5%) in the MF-0/1 cohort, and 16.9% (95% CI 5.8%-32.9%), 14.7% (95% CI 5.3%-28.7%), 71.8% (95% CI 57.6%-89.6%), and 68.4% (95% CI 53.6%-87.2%) in the MF-2/3 cohort, respectively. No significant difference in the outcomes of allo-HSCT was observed between the two cohorts. Both univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that MF-2/3 in patients with MDS had no effect on the prognosis of transplantation. In addition, major/bidirectional ABO blood type between donors and recipients was an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.55; 95% CI 1.25-5.21; P = 0.010) and PFS (HR, 2.21; 95% CI 1.10-4.42; P = 0.025) in the multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of patients diagnosed with MDS with increased blasts (MDS-IB), it was consistently demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of the MF-2/3 cohort were comparable with those of the MF-0/1 cohort. The risk factors for OS and PFS in patients with MDS-IB were non-complete remission at transplantation and major/bidirectional ABO blood type.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, MF grade had no significant effect on prognosis of allo-HSCT in patients diagnosed with MDS. Major/bidirectional ABO blood type should be carefully considered in the context of more than one available donor.

Prevalence of Pure Red Cell Aplasia Following Major ABO-Incompatible Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is one of the important complications in major ABO-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The established pathogenic factor of PRCA is the persistence of high anti-donor isohemagglutinins. As previously verified, the conditioning regimen and donor type were the factors associated with the development of PRCA in the small-sized studies. Currently, the prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of PRCA are still worth studying to provide evidence.

Methods

We conducted a prospective nested case-control study to determine the prevalence, donor-related factors, and the outcomes of PRCA following major ABO-incompatible transplantation. A total of 469 patients who underwent ABO-incompatible grafts were observed.

Results

None of the patients were diagnosed with PRCA with minor or bidirectional ABO-incompatible HSCT. Thirteen of the187 patients (7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9%–11.9%) developed PRCA following major ABO-incompatible HSCT. Eleven of the 13 patients with PRCA recovered entirely. Donor type was an independent factor associated with post-HSCT PRCA (odds ratio [OR]=0.030; 95% CI, 0.003–0.321; P=0.004). The cumulative incidence rates of post-HSCT PRCA in the context of major ABO-incompatible HSCT were 0.8%, 13.1%, and 27.2% for the haploidentical donor (HID), unrelated donor, and matched related donor, respectively. No significant influence of PRCA on transplantation outcomes was observed.

In conclusion, post-HSCT PRCA is a rare and less threatening complication in major ABO-incompatible HSCT. The majority of patients with PRCA could recover. Additionally, HIDs for recipients may have a low risk of post-HSCT PRCA. This trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (#ChiCTR2000041412).

ABO Mismatch in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Effect on Short- and Long-term Outcomes

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

The impact of ABO incompatibility (ABO-I) on hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes is still debated.

Methods.

We retrospectively investigated 432 consecutive transplants performed at our center (2012–2020). All patients but 6 were affected by hematologic malignancies. The effect of different ABO match combinations on engraftment rate, transfusion support, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease incidences, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival, and overall survival was assessed in univariate and multivariate analysis. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results.

ABO match distribution among transplants was as follows: 223 ABO-compatible, 94 major ABO-I, 82 minor ABO-I, and 33 bidirectional ABO-I. At univariate analysis, major ABO-I delayed the engraftment of neutrophils, platelets, and erythroid cells. At multivariate analysis, major ABO-I transplants displayed delayed erythroid engraftment (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.38-0.70; P < 0.0001) and hindered transfusion independence for both red blood cells (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.72; P = 0.0001) and platelets (0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = 0.0048). Moreover, major ABO-I transplants received greater amounts of blood products (P < 0.0001 for red blood cells and P = 0.0447 for platelets). In comparison with other ABO matches, major ABO-I was associated with an increased NRM (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.75; P = 0.0427). No effects of ABO-mismatch were found on graft-versus-host disease, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Conclusions.

Major ABO mismatch delays multilineage engraftment hinders transfusion independence and increases NRM. The prognostic impact of transfusion burden in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation deserves to be explored.

[Relevance of antibodies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Antibodies anti-HLA, anti-platelets, anti-granulocytes, anti-erythrocytes and anti-MICA. Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

The presence of allo-antibodies in the serum of a recipient awaiting hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may have an impact on transfusion efficiency and/or donor choice, especially in the absence of an identical sibling donor. Prior to transplantation, donor specific anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) antibodies (DSA) have a recognized effect on transplant outcome, correlated with the increasing MFI value and with the ability of such antibody to fix the complement fraction. Anti-platelet antibodies (anti-HLA class I and anti-HPA [Human Platelet Antigen]) are better involved in transfusion inefficiency and can be responsible for refractory status. ABO incompatibilities require a specific treatment of the graft in presence of high titer to avoid hemolytic adverse effects. Investigations of these antibodies should be carried out on a regular basis in order to establish appropriate transfusion recommendation, select an alternative donor when possible or adapt the source of cells. After transplantation, in case of delayed recovery or graft rejection, long term aplasia, persistent mixed chimerism or late release, and after elimination of the main clinical causes, a biological assessment targeted on the different type of antibodies will have to be performed in order to orient towards the cause or the appropriate therapy. Further studies should be carried out to determine the impact of anti-MICA antibodies and recipient specific anti-HLA antibodies, on the outcome of the transplantation.

Bone marrow haploidentical transplant with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide: does graft cell content have an impact on main clinical outcomes?

We analyzed data relative to cell content in 88 consecutive patients receiving HLA haploidentical bone marrow (BM) transplants with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-CY). Median age was 54.5 (range, 17-72); diagnoses were acute leukemia (n = 46), lymphoproliferative disorders (n = 24), myelofibrosis (n = 11) and myelodysplastic syndromes (n = 5). Total nucleated cell (TNC) and CD34+, CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cell doses were stratified as higher than first, second and third quartile and the dose effect on various clinical outcomes was assessed. Median time to engraftment was 17 days for neutrophils and 24 days for platelets. To receive a dose of TNC ≥3.2 x 10⁶/kg or CD34+ cells ≥2.7 x 10⁶/kg significantly shortened the time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment and reduced the blood product requirements in the 30-day period after transplantation. Overall, TNC and CD34+ cell doses had no effect on acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence, whereas patients receiving higher CD3+ and CD8+ cell doses seemed to have less chronic GVHD. No effect on non-relapse mortality, progression-free survival and overall survival was observed at different cell dose thresholds. These data suggest that in HLA haploidentical BM transplant with PT-CY, appropriate cell doses are relevant to the engraftment. The association between low CD3+/CD8+ cells and chronic GVHD deserves further investigation.

The Roles of Nurses in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Leukemia in Older Adults

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize nurses' roles in the care of the older adult undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for the treatment of leukemia.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature indexed in PubMed, CINAHL, textbooks, and clinical expertise.

CONCLUSION

Nurses are a vital component of the highly specialized care delivered before, during, and after an allogeneic HCT.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses who are prepared for the complex HCT care trajectory will be able to optimally meet the complex needs of the older adult patient and their caregiver(s).