Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: management and desensitization protocol

The Role of Pre-existing Anti-HLA Antibodies in Severe Aplastic Anemia Patients Undergoing Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The objective is to underscore the significance of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for SAA. A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from 244 SAA patients who underwent allo-HSCT between January 2016 and October 2022. The patient cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the presence of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs. Out of 244 SAA patients, 82 were tested positive for anti-HLA Abs. Seventeen patients were tested with DSA in haplo-HSCT. We found that the presence of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs did not influence neutrophil engraftment (P = .600); however, it resulted in delayed platelet recovery (P = .006). Comparatively, patients with anti-HLA Abs demonstrated lower overall survival (OS) compared to their counter parts without anti-HLA Abs (P = .001), with a correspondingly elevated transplant-related mortality (TRM) in the former group (P = .002). Multivariate analysis established pre-existing anti-HLA Abs as an independent risk factor for impaired platelet recovery (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.44, P = .006) and OS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.67, P = .043). However, there were no differences between DSA and non-DSA patients after desensitization in haplo-HSCT. In summary, the presence of pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in SAA patients undergoing allo-HSCT appears to detrimentally affect platelet recovery and overall prognosis.

Impaired survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies before HLA-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

While the detrimental role of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) is well-described in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), few studies focus on non donor-specific ones and with controversial results.

METHODS

We here report our monocenter experience on 64 adult patients receiving allogeneic HSCT from a HLA-mismatched donor between 2014 and 2022 who were tested for the presence of anti-HLA antibodies before transplant, focusing on fifteen patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.

RESULTS

The survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies was inferior with respect to patients without anti-HLA antibodies and similar to patients with DSAs. Median survival of patients with non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies was 21 months (95 % CI: 9-42) vs. 61 months (95 % CI: 17-77) among the anti-HLA antibody-negative patients, with a significantly higher mortality incidence rate ratio (3.3 times-fold greater, p = 0.01). No pattern of death causes was found CONCLUSIONS: In this monocenter series of HLA-mismatched HSCTs, impaired survival was observed in adult patients having non donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies before transplant, similar to those with DSAs. Our findings support those antibodies as a negative predictive factor even if they are not directed against the donor, thus warranting further investigation on larger cohorts.

The impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibody levels on primary poor graft function and graft rejection in rituximab desensitized haploidentical stem cell transplantation

This study investigates the influence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) levels on primary poor graft function (PGF) and graft rejection (GR) after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with rituximab desensitization. A total of 155 DSA-positive haplo-SCT candidates with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) between 2000 and 10,000 were enrolled in this prospective clinical trial. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined the optimal DSA MFI cutoff for identifying high-risk patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: DSA low-level group (2000 ≤ DSA MFI < 5000, Group A) and high-level group (5000 ≤ DSA MFI ≤ 10,000, Group B). The incidence of primary PGF was 6.5% (2.6%-10.3%), while GR incidence was 0.6% (0.0%-1.9%). Group A had significantly lower primary PGF rates than Group B (2.3% [0.0%-5.7%] vs. 12.9% [4.8%-21.0%], p = 0.017). Only one patient in Group B experienced GR. High DSA levels (5000 ≤ MFI ≤ 10,000) were identified as the sole independent risk factor for primary PGF and GR after haplo-SCT with rituximab desensitization (HR = 7.282, 95% CI 1.517-34.953, p = 0.013). The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 14.7% (11.6%-17.8%), 16.3% (13.1%-19.4%), 69.0% (65.9%-76.2%), and 70.6% (66.4%-74.8%), respectively. DSA levels have an impact on efficiency of rituximab desensitization, and a DSA MFI threshold is provided for predicting primary PGF and GR.

Outcomes of patients who underwent treatment for anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies before receiving a haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant

Pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who receive many blood product transfusions, such as individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), severe aplastic anemia (SAA) or indolent hematologic malignancies, are at high risk for developing donor-specific antibodies (DSA). DSAs with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) greater than 5000 have been associated with significant graft failure, but lower MFI values between 2000 and 5000 may result in poor graft function after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Desensitization strategies have been developed to reduce the DSA burden in HCT recipients before graft infusion, but the experience with these strategies in the pediatric and AYA populations is not well described in the literature. Here, we describe our experience with successful desensitization by using a combination of treatment strategies in five pediatric and AYA patients, including a novel use of daratumumab in a young adult patient who had refractory DSAs and had suffered serious side effects from conventional desensitization strategies. The presence of elevated DSAs in pediatric and AYA recipients of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched haploidentical HCT can be overcome by a multipronged treatment strategy.

Successful desensitization of high level donor-specific anti-HLA antibody in patients with hematological diseases receiving haploidentical allografts

Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (DSA) is associated with a higher incidence of graft failure and mortality in HLA-mismatched allograft settings. However, the optimal protocol of desensitization for patients with positive DSA remains uncertain. We investigated the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol, including rituximab, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and a single session of plasma exchange (PE), for haploidentical allograft recipients with a high mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) level of DSA (≥ 5,000). Eleven patients with hematological disease who had positive DSA (median, 11,676, range 5387-20,435) were desensitized by the protocol. All of the patients achieved hematopoietic recovery. The median times for neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 13 (range, 11-26) days and 19 (range, 11-90) days, respectively. Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was seen in one patient and was controlled completely. Chronic cutaneous GVHD was seen in eight patients. Nine patients are alive with good performance so far. One patient suffered extramedullary relapse, and one patient died of transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. The 1-year probability of overall survival was 81.8%. These results suggest that successful desensitization could be obtained by a combination of rituximab, high-dose IVIG, and PE for haploidentical allograft recipients with high MFI levels of DSA.

The Impact of Panel Reactive Antibodies and Different Desensitization Methods on Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

In highly sensitized patients who have panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, primary graft failure risk may increase. In this study, we aimed to determine the association of PRA with engraftment, and graft versus host disease (GVHD) in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three PRA-positive and 42 PRA-negative patients were taken into study. Both groups were compared in terms of graft failure, acute GVHD, viral infection and survival rates. PRA-positive group was also divided into 2 according to treatment modality (steroid-only group/combination therapy) and compared for the same parameters.

RESULTS

There was no difference in PRA-positive and negative patients in terms of graft failure, acute GVHD and viral infections. Analysis of the PRA-positive group in itself showed that there was also no difference in terms of graft failure and viral infection frequency. The only difference is that acute grade 3 to 4 GVHD was higher in the steroid-only group. The 100-day overall survival was 90.2% and 90.4% for the PRA-positive and negative groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Different treatment strategies like plasmapheresis, steroid, rituximab, or combination therapies can be used for the desensitization of PRA-positive patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patient-specific treatment modality for sensitized patients before transplant can increase the success rate.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for life-threatening pediatric disorders

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is acknowledged to be an effective treatment in life-threatening pediatric disorders. Apheresis for pediatric diseases has been poorly investigated, and most studies to date featured small numbers of patients and lacked control groups. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the tolerance of TPE in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study via a web-based electronic case report form including pediatric patients referred for TPE between January 2005 and December 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients (median [range] age: 9.8 [0.53-17.93]) and 731 TPE procedures were analyzed. The indications were antibody-mediated rejection (n = 33; 42%) and desensitization therapy (n = 5; 6%) after solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 17; 22%), pediatric inflammatory diseases (n = 16; 21%), kidney diseases (n = 6; 8%), and hyperviscosity syndrome (n = 1; 1%). On average, each patient underwent six procedures during the first session [range: 1-19]. In the 2 weeks following the start of a session, 72 patients (92%) presented a total of 311 adverse events (AEs) potentially related to TPE. The risk of AEs was not related to the indication for TPE, the intensity of care, venous access, plasma substitute use, or body weight. None of the deaths was related to the TPE.

CONCLUSION

We studied one of the largest retrospective pediatric cohorts described to date. Our experience of TPE children's TPE feasibility concerned specific, life-threatening conditions and otherwise treatment-refractory diseases.

Potential Risk Factors Associated With Graft Failure of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Sickle Cell Disease

Nonmyeloablative (NMA) haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease has significantly increased donor availability for transplant and is increasingly used as curative treatment. The authors describe 3 pediatric patients who rejected grafts after an NMA regimen, previously reported to result in good engraftment rates in the mainly adult population. In this manuscript, potential factors contributing to rejection are described and discussed. The authors emphasize the need to further optimize the NMA regimens in pediatric patients and perform haploidentical transplants for sickle cell disease on clinical trials.

Rituximab for desensitization during HLA-mismatched stem cell transplantation in patients with a positive donor-specific anti-HLA antibody

To define the efficacy of a single dose of 375 mg/m² rituximab for DSA-positive patients with 2000 ≤ MFI < 10,000, we enrolled a prospective clinical cohort including patients with positive DSA treated with rituximab (n = 55, cohort A), a matched-pair cohort including cases with negative DSA (n = 110, cohort B) and a historical cohort including subjects with 2000 ≤ MFI < 10,000 without receiving any treatment for DSA (n = 22, cohort C). The incidences of primary poor graft function (PGF) in cohort A and cohort B were 5% and 1% (P = 0.076), respectively, both of which were lower than that in cohort C (27%, P < 0.001, for all). Rituximab was associated with a reduced incidence of primary PGF (HR 0.200, P = 0.023). The 3-year nonrelapse mortality of patients in cohort A and cohort B were 23% and 24%, respectively, both of which were lower than that in the cohort C (37%), although no statistical significance was observed. These results led to a low 3-year overall survival in patients in the cohort C (58%) compared with those in the cohort A (71%) and the cohort B (73%). We suggest that a single dose of rituximab could be effectively used to prevent the onset of primary PGF. The prospective cohort of this study is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR-OPC-15006672.