Minimal residual disease negativity and lenalidomide maintenance therapy are associated with superior survival outcomes in multiple myeloma

MRD dynamics during maintenance therapy in 259 patients with nontransplant eligible multiple myeloma

This study explored the impact of different maintenance therapies on survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), focusing on changes in minimal residual disease (MRD) during maintenance. Conducted at a single center, this retrospective study included 259 newly diagnosed MM patients who did not undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The results indicated that patients receiving lenalidomide as maintenance therapy showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those treated with bortezomib or no maintenance therapy. However, bortezomib proved more effective in high-risk MM cases. Patients who were MRD-negative prior to starting maintenance therapy had a better prognosis than MRD-positive patients. Notably, lenalidomide was the most effective regimen irrespective of MRD status. Patients maintaining or achieving MRD-negativity within the first year of lenalidomide treatment exhibited improved prognoses, confirming lenalidomide as the optimal maintenance choice.

Prognostic Significance of the Stage at Which an MRD-Negative Status Is Achieved for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Received ASCT

Objective

To explore the prognostic significance of the stage at which a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status is achieved for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

Cases and Methods

A retrospective analysis of 186 NDMM patients who received "induction therapy-ASCT-maintenance therapy" in our center and achieved an MRD-negative status was performed. Patients were divided into three groups, A (induction therapy), B (3 months after ASCT), and C (maintenance therapy), according to the stage at which an MRD-negative status was achieved.

Results

The median time to progression (TTP) of 186 patients was not reached; the median overall survival (OS) was 113.8 months. The median TTP of the patients in three groups was not reached (P=0.013), and the median OS of the patients in three groups was not reached, not reached, and 71.2 months, respectively (P=0.026). Among patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, the median TTP of those in all three groups was not reached (P=0.121), and the median OS of the patients in three groups was not reached, not reached, and 99.6 months, respectively (P=0.091). Among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, the median TTP of those in three groups was not reached, 53.9 months, and 35.8 months (P=0.060), and the median OS was not reached, 71.2 months, and 60.2 months, respectively (P=0.625). Among patients with R-ISS stage I-II, the median TTP of those in three groups was not reached (P=0.174), and the median OS of the patients in three groups was not reached, not reached, and 99.6 months, respectively (P=0.186). Among the 29 patients with R-ISS stage III, the median TTP of those in the 3 groups were unreached, unreached, and 35.1 months (P<0.001), and the median OS was unreached, unreached, and 48.5 months, respectively (P=0.020). In all enrolled patients, the stage of reaching MRD-negative was an independent prognostic factor for TTP, rather than a prognostic factor for OS. The stage of reaching MRD-negative in patients with R-ISS III was an independent prognostic factor for OS.

Conclusion

For the same patients who are MRD-negative, the prognoses of those who achieve an MRD-negative status at different groups are different. The stage at which an MRD-negative status is achieved can predict the prognosis of patients with R-ISS stage III.

Cellular Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable due to relapse, although the use of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, CD38-targeting antibodies, and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed MM. In recent years, the introduction of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has brought hope to patients with refractory and relapsed MM. The graft-versus-myeloma effect of allogeneic SCT provides the possibility for curing a subset of MM patients. In this review, we summarize the recent advances and challenges of cellular immunotherapies for MM, focusing on auto-SCT, allogeneic SCT, and CAR T-cell approaches. We also discuss future directions, and propose a specific algorithm for cellular therapies for MM and probability of minimal residual disease-directed therapy.

Clinical implications of loss of bone marrow minimal residual disease negativity in multiple myeloma

MRD conversion occurs in 39% of MRD⁻ MM patients and reliably predicts future relapse.

MRD conversion within 10 years of diagnosis confers an inferior overall survival and progress-free survival.

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients frequently attain a bone marrow (BM) minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity status in response to treatment. We identified 568 patients who achieved BM MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and maintenance combination therapy with an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. BM MRD was evaluated by next-generation flow cytometry (sensitivity of 10⁻⁵ cells) at 3- to 6-month intervals. With a median follow-up of 9.9 years from diagnosis (range, 0.4-30.9), 61% of patients maintained MRD negativity, whereas 39% experienced MRD conversion at a median of 6.3 years (range, 1.4-25). The highest risk of MRD conversion occurred within the first 5 years after treatment and was observed more often in patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (95% vs 84%; P = .001). MRD conversion was associated with a high risk of relapse and preceded it by a median of 1.0 years (range, 0-4.9). However, 27% of MRD conversion-positive patients had not yet experienced a clinical relapse, with a median follow-up of 9.3 years (range, 2.2-21.2). Landmark analyses using time from ASCT revealed patients with MRD conversion during the first 3 years had an inferior overall and progression-free survival compared with patients with sustained MRD negativity. MRD conversion correctly predicted relapse in 70%, demonstrating the utility of serial BM MRD assessment to complement standard laboratory and imaging to make informed salvage therapy decisions.

Treatment Strategy for Multiple Myeloma to Improve Immunological Environment and Maintain MRD Negativity

Improving the immunological environment and eradicating minimal residual disease (MRD) are the two main treatment goals for long-term survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), monoclonal antibody drugs (MoAbs), and autologous grafts for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can improve the immunological microenvironment. ASCT, MoAbs, and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) may be important for the achievement of MRD negativity. An improved immunological environment may be useful for maintaining MRD negativity, although the specific treatment for persistent MRD negativity is unknown. However, whether the ongoing treatment should be continued or changed if the MRD status remains positive is controversial. In this case, genetic, immunophenotypic, and clinical analysis of residual myeloma cells may be necessary to select the effective treatment for the residual myeloma cells. The purpose of this review is to discuss the MM treatment strategy to "cure MM" based on currently available therapies, including IMiDs, PIs, MoAbs, and ASCT, and expected immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, via improvement of the immunological environment and maintenance of MRD negativity.

A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma

The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published up to 8 June 2019, with no date limit on the indexed database. Clinical end points stratified by MRD status (positive or negative) were extracted, including hazard ratios (HRs) on PFS and OS, P values, and confidence intervals (CIs). HRs were estimated based on reconstructed patient-level data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Forty-four eligible studies with PFS data from 8098 patients, and 23 studies with OS data from 4297 patients were identified to assess the association between MRD status and survival outcomes. Compared with MRD positivity, achieving MRD negativity improved PFS (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.29-0.37; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.39-0.51; P < .001). MRD negativity was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes regardless of disease setting (newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM), MRD sensitivity thresholds, cytogenetic risk, method of MRD assessment, depth of clinical response at the time of MRD measurement, and MRD assessment premaintenance and 12 months after start of maintenance therapy. The strong prognostic value of MRD negativity and its association with favorable outcomes in various disease and treatment settings sets the stage to adopt MRD as a treatment end point, including development of therapeutic strategies. This large meta-analysis confirms the utility of MRD as a relevant surrogate for PFS and OS in MM.

Kidney transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: narrative analysis and review of the last 2 decades

There have been significant advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma in the last 2 decades. Approximately 25% of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma have some degree of kidney impairment. During the course of illness, nearly 50% of myeloma patients will develop kidney disease. Moreover, approximately 10% of myeloma patients have advanced kidney disease requiring dialysis at presentation. Hemodialysis is associated with a significantly reduced overall survival. In the setting of prolonged long-term overall survival due to the use of newer immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of myeloma, patients with myeloma and advanced kidney disease may benefit from more aggressive management with kidney transplantation. Unfortunately, most data regarding outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with myeloma come from single center case series. With the advent of novel treatment choices, it remains unclear if outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with myeloma have improved in recent years. In this descriptive systematic review, we coalesced published patient data over the last 20 years to help inform clinicians and patients on expected hematologic and kidney transplant outcomes in this complex population. We further discuss the future of kidney transplantation in patients with paraproteinemia.

Elotuzumab-based maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma deepens post-transplant responses

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant maintenance provides progression-free survival benefit in multiple myeloma (MM). Here we report our institution's experience with elotuzumab-based maintenance following autologous stem cell transplant.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of MM patients who were started on elotuzumab-based maintenance (elotuzumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone, elotuzumab/bortezomib/dexamethasone, or elotuzumab/bortezomib/methylprednisolone) following transplant (N = 7). Baseline characteristics, treatment response, survival, and adverse events were reviewed.

RESULTS

Median age was 68 (56-81) years at the time of transplant, and median lines of induction therapy was 2 (1-6). Three patients (42.9%) had high-risk cytogenetics and five (71.4%) had stage II or greater disease at diagnosis. At a median follow-up of 24 months (12-50), five patients (71.4%) had improvement of quality of response, with a combined CR or VGPR rate increasing from 57.1% to 100% (CR = 3, VGPR = 4). All patients were alive without relapse or progression at the time of this analysis. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in three (42.9%) patients. None of the patients discontinued the treatment due to intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that elotuzumab-based maintenance may deepen response post-transplant in MM and can be safely administered even in older patients. Given its unique action and rare side effects, further studies of elotuzumab in the post-transplant setting are warranted.