Outcomes of severe aplastic anemia patients with infection proceeding with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, versus patients without infection

Significance of absolute neutrophil count before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with aplastic anemia

The impact of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) before allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on the outcomes for patients with aplastic anemia (AA) remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between ANC before transplantation and patient outcomes, involving 883 adult Japanese patients with AA who underwent allogeneic HSCT as their first transplantation between 2008 and 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on ANC: 0/µL (n = 116); 1-199 (n = 210); and ≥ 200 (n = 557). In the low ANC groups (ANC < 200), patient age was higher, previous anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) treatments were infrequent, duration from diagnosis to transplantation was shorter, hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was higher, ATG-based conditioning was used infrequently, and peripheral blood stem cell from related donor and cord blood were used frequently. In multivariate analysis, patient age, previous ATG treatment, HCT-CI, stem cell source, and ANC before transplantation were significantly associated with 5-year overall survival (OS) ("ANC ≥ 200": 80.3% vs. "ANC 1-199": 71.7% vs. "ANC 0": 64.4%). The cumulative incidence of bacterial infection, invasive fungal disease, and early death before engraftment were significantly higher in the low ANC groups. Among patients with ANC of zero before transplantation, younger patient age, shorter duration from diagnosis to transplantation, HCT-CI of 0, and bone marrow from related donor as stem cell source were significantly associated with better OS. Consequently, ANC before allogeneic HSCT was found to be a significant prognostic factor in adult patients with AA. Physicians should pay attention to ANC before transplantation.

Comparison of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy as the first-line treatment option for patients with severe hepatitis−associated aplastic anemia

Hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia (HAAA) is a rare variant of acquired aplastic anemia characterized with a syndrome of bone marrow failure after hepatitis. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of consecutive severe HAAA patients who received immunosuppressive therapy (IST, n = 70), matched-sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT, n = 26) or haploidentical-donor (HID) HSCT (n = 11) as the first-line treatment. In the IST group, the hematologic response (HR) rate was 55.71% at 6 months. In contrast, HSCT recipients exhibited significantly more rapid and sustained hematopoiesis (HR 76.92%, 96.15% and 96.15% at 3, 6 and 12months, respectively). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was not different among IST (83.7 ± 4.9%), MSD-HSCT (93.3 ± 6.4%) and HID-HSCT group (80.8 ± 12.3%). Compared with IST, MSD and HID-HSCT demonstrated a trend of superiority in the estimated 5-year failure-free survival rates (93.3 ± 6.4% vs 64.3 ± 6.0%, p = 0.05; 80.8 ± 12.3% vs 64.3 ± 6.0%, p = 0.57). In subsequent stratified analysis on age, we found that HID-HSCT showed its efficacy and safety among young patients. In sum, MSD-HSCT remains first-line treatment choice for HAAA, whereas HID-HSCT represents an alternative treatment choice in addition to IST for young patients (&lt; 40 years) without a matched sibling donor.

Development and validation of early death risk score model for emergency status prediction in very severe aplastic anemia

This study developed and validated the Early Death Risk Score Model for early identification of emergency patients with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA). All 377 patients with VSAA receiving first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST) were categorized into training (n=252) and validation (n=125) cohorts. In the training cohort, age >24 years, absolute neutrophil count ≤0.015×10⁹/L, serum ferritin >900ng/mL and times of fever before IST >1 time were significantly associated with early death. Covariates were assigned scores and categorized as: low (score 0-4), medium (score 5-7) and high (score ≥8) risk. Early death rate was significantly different between risk groups and the validation cohort results were consistent with those of the training cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.835 (0.734,0.936) in the training cohort and 0.862 (0.730,0.994) in the validation cohort. The calibration plots showed high agreement, and decision curve analysis showed good benefit in clinical applications. The VSAA Early Death Risk Score Model can help with early identification of emergency VSAA and optimize treatment strategies. Emergency VSAA with high risk is associated with high early death rate, and alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation could be a better treatment than IST even without HLA-matching.

The prognostic impact of previously infectious complications on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with severe aplastic anemia: A single-center, retrospective study

Whether infections before transplantation impair the survival of patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to compare survival between patients with SAA who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with infection (n=66) and patients without infection (n=189) from one medical center. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, except that more patients in the infection group were diagnosed with VSAA (59.09% vs. 30.69%, P<0.001), and their grafts were more peripheral blood stem cells (89.39% vs. 76.72%, P=0.042). In addition, the percentage of patients with multidrug-resistant organism colonization or infection in the infection group was larger (16.7% vs. 0.5%, P<0.001). The median days of engraftment were similar between the two groups; however, the 28-day engraftment rates of neutrophils and platelets were lower in the infection group. No differences were observed in terms of grades II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (P=0.418), grades III–IV aGVHD (P=0.075), mild to severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (P=0.899), and moderate to severe cGVHD (P=0.342). Patients in the infection group had more bloodstream infections before engraftment (28.8% vs. 15.3%, P=0.016), and the primary cause of death was infection instead of aGVHD in contrast to patients without infection (16.7% vs. 4.2%, P=0.002). Finally, the estimated overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and GVHD-free FFS at 5 years were 63% (95% CI, 51–78), 60% (95% CI, 47–74), and 55% (95% CI, 43–70) in patients with infection before transplantation versus 86% (95% CI, 81–92) (P<0.001), 82% (95% CI, 76–88) (P<0.001), and 75% (95% CI, 69–82) (P=0.003) in patients without infection before transplantation, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified haploidentical HSCT and pre-HSCT anti-infection response, defined as partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD), as adverse factors of OS and FFS. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that SAA patients with infection defined as PR or SD but not complete remission before allo-HSCT showed inferior survival compared with patients without infection. Therefore, more attention should be paid to prophylaxis and complete control of infectious complications before transplantation among SAA patients.

Severe aplastic anemia patients with infection who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had a better chance: Long-term outcomes of a multicenter study

Background and aims

How to select the treatment is a challenge for the management of acquired patients with infections. This study aimed at comparing the outcomes of SAA with infections who had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT)with that of patients who had an infection and received non-HSCT therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients with acquired SAA and infections who had an allo-HSCT (n = 141) with that of patients who had an infection and received non-HSCT therapy (n = 186) between July 2004 and January 2020.

Results

The treatment-related mortality (TRM) of grade 1-2 infections in the HSCT and non-HSCT groups was 24.99% and 13.68%, respectively (P = 0.206), while the TRM of grade 3-4 infections was lower in the HSCT group than that observed in the non-HSCT group (18.54% vs. 33.33%, P = 0.036). At 6 months post-treatment, 91.30% patients in the HSCT group and 8.78% patients in the non-HSCT group had achieved a normal blood profile (P &lt; 0.0001). The time required to discontinue transfusions of red blood cells and platelets in the non-HSCT group was longer than in the HSCT group (P &lt; 0.0001). Estimated overall survival (OS) at 6 years was similar in the two groups (75.5% ± 3.9% vs. 76.3% ± 3.1%, P = 0.996), while the estimated failure-free survival (FFS) at 6 years was 75.2% ± 3.8% in the HSCT group and 48.9% ± 3.7% in the non-HSCT group (P &lt; 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that younger age, lower grade of infection (grade 1-2), and SAA (vs. very SAA) were favorable factors for OS (P &lt; 0.05), and that the choice of HSCT and younger age were favorable factors for FFS (P &lt; 0.0001).

Conclusion

These results suggest that allo-HSCT has a better chance of a successful outcome than non-HSCT in SAA patients with an infection.