Visions for a JACIE Quality Management System 4.0

Hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes are rarely associated with hematologic malignancies. In their rarity, lymphomas are the diseases with more frequent paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome. High-risk antibodies are absent in most lymphoma-associated paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, with the exception of antibodies to Tr/DNER in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, mGluR5 in limbic encephalitis, and mGluR1 in some cerebellar ataxias. Peripheral nervous system paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes are rare and heterogeneous, with a prevalence of demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, skin changes (POEMS) is a rare, paraneoplastic syndrome due to an underlying plasma cell disorder. The diagnosis is based on defined criteria, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), not an antibody, is considered a reliable diagnostic marker that also mirrors therapy response. As with the paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes in solid tumors, therapies rely on cancer treatment associated with immunomodulatory treatment with better response in PNS with antibodies to surface antigens. The best outcome is generally present in Ophelia syndrome/limbic encephalitis with anti-mGluR5 antibodies, with frequent complete recovery. Besides patients with isolated osteosclerotic lesions (where radiotherapy is indicated), hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is the therapy of choice in patients with POEMS syndrome. In the paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors, discontinuation of the drug together with immunomodulatory treatment is recommended.

Inter-laboratory method validation of CD34+ flow-cytometry assay: the experience of Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre

The Turin Metropolitan Transplant Centre (CIC 305) includes four flow-cytometry laboratories assessing quality control on hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with different instruments and operators. Therefore, the CD34+ enumeration assay should be validated on a regular basis. We describe here the validation plan to test the inter-laboratory reproducibility of CD34+ enumeration assay, based on the risk analysis. Stabilized blood samples were analysed using Stem-Kit reagent according to manufacturer's instructions and acquired using the Beckman Coulter Navios at Regina Margherita Children's' Hospital (305-1), Beckman Coulter FC500 at Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS (305-2), BD Biosciences FACSLyric™ at S. Luigi Hospital (305-3), and Beckman Coulter Navios EX at Mauriziano Hospital (305-4). The ISHAGE guidelines were followed for estimating % and absolute number of CD34+ cells in single-platform method. For each sample repeatability limit (r), reproducibility error, uncertainty of reproducibility error and coefficient of variation (CV) were reported. The repeated measurements from each laboratory or instrument have a variability, expressed as reproducibility error, lower than the repeatability limit for that single parameter. The corrected reproducibility error is always lower than the repeatability limit except for the percentage value of the "low" count. The analysis of inter-laboratory variance is within the maximum acceptable variance value, and the CV of all measurements for each parameter is less than 8%, indicating low measurement variability among laboratories. Evaluating the overall data, we can conclude that the four laboratories are perfectly aligned and the results are reproducible.

Automating outcome analysis after stem cell transplantation: The YORT tool

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a high-risk procedure. Auditing and yearly outcome reviews help keep optimal quality of care and come with increased survival, but also has significant recurring costs. When data has been entered in a standardized registry, outcome analyses can be automated, which reduces work and increases standardization of performed analyses. To achieve this, we created the Yearly Outcome Review Tool (YORT), an offline, graphical tool that gets data from a single center EBMT registry export, allows the user to define filters and groups, and performs standardized analyses for overall survival, event-free survival, engraftment, relapse rate and non-relapse mortality, complications including acute and chronic Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD), and data completeness. YORT allows users to export data as analyzed to allow you to check data and perform manual analyses. We show the use of this tool on a two-year single-center pediatric cohort, demonstrating how the results for both overall and event-free survival and engraftment can be visualized. The current work demonstrates that using registry data, standardized tools can be made to analyze this data, which allows users to perform outcome reviews for local and accreditation purposes graphically with minimal effort, and help perform detailed standardized analyses. The tool is extensible to be able to accommodate future changes in outcome review and center-specific extensions.

Benchmarking of survival outcomes following Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): an update of the ongoing project of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE)

From 2016 EBMT and JACIE developed an international risk-adapted benchmarking program of haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) outcome to provide individual EBMT Centers with a means of quality-assuring the HSCT process and meeting FACT-JACIE accreditation requirements relating to 1-year survival outcomes. Informed by previous experience from Europe, North America and Australasia, the Clinical Outcomes Group (COG) established criteria for patient and Center selection, and a set of key clinical variables within a dedicated statistical model adapted to the capabilities of the EBMT Registry. The first phase of the project was launched in 2019 to test the acceptability of the benchmarking model through assessment of Centers' performance for 1-year data completeness and survival outcomes of autologous and allogeneic HSCT covering 2013-2016. A second phase was delivered in July 2021 covering 2015-2019 and including survival outcomes. Reports of individual Center performance were shared directly with local principal investigators and their responses were assimilated. The experience thus far has supported the feasibility, acceptability and reliability of the system as well as identifying its limitations. We provide a summary of experience and learning so far in this 'work in progress', as well as highlighting future challenges of delivering a modern, robust, data-complete, risk-adapted benchmarking program across new EBMT Registry systems.