Adolescent and young adult (AYA) versus pediatric patients with acute leukemia have a significantly increased risk of acute GVHD following unrelated donor (URD) stem cell transplantation (SCT): the Children's Oncology Group experience

A Validated Risk Stratification That Incorporates MAGIC Biomarkers Predicts Long-Term Outcomes in Pediatric Patients with Acute GVHD

Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in children but overall clinical grade at onset only modestly predicts response to treatment and survival outcomes. Two tools to assess risk at initiation of treatment were recently developed. The Minnesota risk system stratifies children for risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) according to the pattern of GVHD target organ severity. The Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) algorithm of 2 serum biomarkers (ST2 and REG3α) predicts NRM in adult patients but has not been validated in a pediatric population. We aimed to develop and validate a system that stratifies children at the onset of GVHD for risk of 6-month NRM. We determined the MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs) and Minnesota risk for a multicenter cohort of 315 pediatric patients who developed GVHD requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids. MAPs created 3 risk groups with distinct outcomes at the start of treatment and were more accurate than Minnesota risk stratification for prediction of NRM (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), .79 versus .62, P = .001). A novel model that combined Minnesota risk and biomarker scores created from a training cohort was more accurate than either biomarkers or clinical systems in a validation cohort (AUC .87) and stratified patients into 2 groups with highly different 6-month NRM (5% versus 38%, P < .001). In summary, we validated the MAP as a prognostic biomarker in pediatric patients with GVHD, and a novel risk stratification that combines Minnesota risk and biomarker risk performed best. Biomarker-based risk stratification can be used in clinical trials to develop more tailored approaches for children who require treatment for GVHD.

Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes of patients aged ≥ 55 years with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes in China: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes (AML/MDS) have historically had poor prognoses. However, there has been a recent increase in the use of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are in this patient population. Nevertheless, the optimal choice of donor type for the patients remains an unmet need. Limited data exist on the use of allo-HSCT in elderly patients with AML/MDS from China. To better understand and optimize the selection of donor type for the elderly patients, particularly for those with refractory or relapsed disease, in comparison with the previous studies in the US and Europe.

METHODS

Our retrospective study enrolled 259 patients aged over 55 years who underwent their first allo-HSCT between April 2015 and August 2022. These patients were divided into three groups based on donor type: haploidentical related donor group (haploidentical related donor transplantation [HID], n = 184), matched sibling donor group (matched sibling donor transplantation [MSD], n = 39), and matched unrelated donor group (matched unrelated donor transplantation [MUD], n = 36). Statistics were performed with the chi-square test, the log-rank and Fine-Gray tests.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 57 years (range: 55-75) and 26.25% of patients were over 60 years old. Younger patients had a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (HR = 1.942, P = 0.035), faster neutrophil recovery (HR = 1.387, P = 0.012), and better overall survival (HR = 0.567, P = 0.043) than patients aged ≥ 60 years across the entire cohort. Patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) diseases had delayed neutrophil engraftment (P = 0.010, HR = 0.752) and platelet engraftment (P < 0.001, HR = 0.596), higher incidence of relapses (HR = 2.300, P = 0.013), and inferior relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.740, HR = 0.016) regardless of donor type. When it came to graft-versus-host-disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), MUDs turned out to be superior to HIDs (HR = 0.472, P = 0.026) according to the multivariable analysis. In contrast, we found MSDs had an inferior GRFS to HIDs in parallel (HR = 1.621, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The choice of donor type did not significantly affect the outcomes of allo-HSCT. However, when considering the quality of post-transplant life, MUDs or HIDs from younger donors may be the optimal choice for elderly patients.

Outcomes of haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adolescent and young adults with acute myeloid leukaemia

We aimed to identify the efficacy of haploidentical related donor (HID) haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adolescent and young adults (AYAs) with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in a large cohort. Consecutive AML AYAs (15-39 years old, n = 599) receiving HID HSCT in complete remission (CR) were included. The 3-year cumulative incidence of measurable residual disease occurrence, relapse and non-relapse mortality after HID HSCT was 28.6% (95% CI: 25.0-32.2), 11.6% (95% CI: 9.0-14.2) and 6.7% (95% CI: 4.7-8.7) respectively. The 3-year probability of event-free survival, leukaemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) after HID HSCT was 60.7% (95% CI: 56.9-64.8), 81.7% (95% CI: 78.7-84.9) and 85.6% (95% CI: 82.8-88.4) respectively. In multivariable analysis, AML risk category at diagnosis and comorbidity burdens before HID HSCT were independently associated with LFS and OS. Compared to the older adults (≥ 40 years, n = 355) with AML receiving HID HSCT in CR during the same time period, AYAs have a lower incidence of non-relapse mortality and higher probabilities of LFS and OS. Thus, we firstly confirmed the safety and efficacy of HID HSCT in AYAs with AML-CR.

Precision Delivery of Steroids as a Rescue Therapy for Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is one of the most serious complications following stem cell transplant in children and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment, and although a majority of children respond to systemic steroids, those refractory to or dependent upon corticosteroids suffer from complications secondary to long-term steroid administration. This problem has prompted consideration of steroid-sparing treatment strategies, although the time to clinical remission can be variable. Intraarterial corticosteroid delivery has been used in adults as a rescue therapy in steroid-resistant patients, but its use in children has been limited. We investigated the feasibility of intraarterial steroid administration into the bowel and/or liver in a cohort of six pediatric patients with acute GVHD. All patients successfully underwent treatment with no serious adverse effects. Five of five (100%) patients with gastrointestinal bleeding due to GVHD had rapid symptom improvement by 48 h, which was durable up to three weeks. Three of four (75%) patients with hepatic GVHD had improved cholestasis following intraarterial steroid administration. Our experience with this small cohort preliminarily demonstrated the feasibility and safety of intraarterial steroid administration in children with acute GVHD. This approach warrants consideration as a rescue therapy in steroid-refractory cases and as a "bridge" therapy for children with severe acute GVHD who are transitioning to steroid-sparing regimens.