Outcomes of allogeneic transplant in patients with DDX41 mutated myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia

Unraveling germline predisposition in hematological neoplasms: Navigating complexity in the genomic era

Genomic advancements have yielded pivotal insights into hematological neoplasms, particularly concerning germline predisposition mutations. Following the WHO 2016 revisions, dedicated segments were proposed to address these aspects. Current WHO 2022, ICC 2022, and ELN 2022 classifications recognize their significance, introducing more mutations and prompting integration into clinical practice. Approximately 5-10% of hematological neoplasm patients show germline predisposition gene mutations, rising with risk factors such as personal cancer history and familial antecedents, even in older adults. Nevertheless, technical challenges persist. Optimal DNA samples are skin fibroblast-extracted, although not universally applicable. Alternatives such as hair follicle use are explored. Moreover, the scrutiny of germline genomics mandates judicious test selection to ensure precise and accurate interpretation. Given the significant influence of genetic counseling on patient care and post-assessment procedures, there arises a demand for dedicated centers offering specialized services.

Successful management of acute graft-versus-host disease with ibrutinib during cord blood transplantation for germline DDX41-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

Background

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with significant morbidity and mortality, and efficacy of currently available therapeutics are limited. Acute and chronic GVHD are similar in that both are initiated by antigen presenting cells and activation of alloreactive B-cells and T-cells, subsequently leading to inflammation, tissue damage, and organ failure. One difference is that acute GVHD is mostly attributed to T-cell activation and cytokine release, whereas B-cells are the key players in chronic GVHD. Ibrutinib is an irreversible inhibitor of the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), which is part of B-cell receptor signaling. Ibrutinib is currently used for treating chronic GVHD, but its efficacy towards acute GVHD is unknown. Besides BTK, ibrutinib also inhibits interleukin-2 inducible T-cell kinase (ITK), which is predominantly expressed in T-cells and a crucial enzyme for activating the downstream pathway of TCR signaling. ITK activates PLCγ2 and facilitates signaling through NF-κB, NFAT, and MAPK, leading to activation and proliferation of T-cells and enhanced cytokine production. Therefore, the TCR signaling pathway is indispensable for development of acute GVHD, and ITK inhibition by ibrutinib would be a rational therapeutic approach.

Case presentation

A 56-year-old male acute myeloid leukemia patient with Myeloid neoplasms with germline DEAD-box RNA helicase 41 (DDX41) mutation underwent cord blood transplantation and developed severe gastrointestinal (GI) acute GVHD which was refractory to steroids and mesenchymal stem cell therapy. While acute GVHD accommodated by multiple life-threatening GI bleeding events persisted, chronic cutaneous GVHD developed, and ibrutinib 420 mg/day was initiated from day 147 of transplant. Although ibrutinib was commenced targeting the chronic GVHD, unexpected and abrupt remission of acute GVHD along with remission of chronic GVHD was observed.

Conclusion

Ibrutinib is a promising therapeutic for treating acute GVHD, and further studies are warranted.

Venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents in DDX41-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: Mayo Clinic series on 12 patients

Venetoclax (VEN) is an FDA-approved selective inhibitor of B-cell leukaemia/lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), used for treating elderly or unfit acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients unable to undergo intensive chemotherapy. Combining VEN with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has shown impressive response rates in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and relapsed/refractory AML. However, the efficacy of VEN and HMAs in treating DDX41-mutated (mDDX41) MDS/AML patients remains uncertain. Despite the favourable prognostic nature of mDDX41 MDS/AML patients, there is a lack of clinical experience regarding their response to different treatment regimens, leading to an unknown optimal therapeutic approach.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with myeloid malignancies and DDX41 variants

DDX41 is the most frequently mutated gene in myeloid neoplasms associated with germline predisposition including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We analyzed 3795 patients with myeloid neoplasms and identified 151 (4%) with DDX41 variants and a diagnosis of AML (n = 96), MDS (n = 52), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 3). The most frequent DDX41 variants were the somatic variant p.R525H, followed by the germline variants p.M1I and p.D140fs. Most neoplasms had a normal karyotype (59%) and the most frequent co-mutations were TP53 (16%) and ASXL1 (15%). 30% of patients had no concomitant mutations besides DDX41 mutation. Patients with myeloid malignancies and DDX41 variants responded well to therapy, with an overall response rate for patients with treatment naïve AML and MDS of 87% and 84%, respectively. The median overall survival (mOS) of patients with treatment-naïve AML or MDS was 49 and 71 months, respectively. Patients with AML treated with low-intensity regimens including venetoclax had an improved survival (2-year OS 91% vs. 60%, p = .02) and lower cumulative incidence of relapse compared to those treated without venetoclax (10% vs. 56%, p = .03). In the 33% of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the 2-year OS was 80% and 85% for AML and MDS, respectively.