Oral surgery wait times in NHS secondary dental care in England: a five-year review

Adult intravenous sedation in general dental practice: indication, effectiveness and patient experiences

Background Conscious sedation is an option in primary dental care for anxious patients or those undergoing extensive procedures. The objective of this retrospective service evaluation was to study the range of treatments delivered during sedation with intravenous midazolam, together with patient-reported experience measures.Methods Data from 100 consecutive patients treated under sedation at a single private dental practice were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were asked questions about their experience of sedation during a post-operative follow-up phone call.Results Over half of patients were treated under sedation due to anxiety. The mean dose of midazolam was 7.8 mg and the average treatment time was 1 hour 25 minutes. Of note, the average dose for the most extensive procedure - implant immediate full arch loading - was 11.7 mg; however, this equated to an average dose of 4.5 mg per hour. One patient needed supplemental oxygen; flumazenil was never required. Additionally, 91% of patients felt they had enough sedation, and 50% could remember the events of treatment.Conclusion With the British National Formulary recommending a maximum dose of 7.5 mg midazolam, this study demonstrates that this dose can be safely exceeded in dental treatment; therefore, a dose that accounts for the length of the procedure is a more valid approach. Moreover, patients undergoing a variety of dental treatments were satisfied with the amount of intravenous sedation received and age is not an absolute limit for sedating older people.

Dental Surgical Activity in Hospitals during COVID-19: A Nationwide Observational Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

The number of surgical extractions performed in hospitals in England remains unclear. This study reports the volume of surgical extractions conducted in hospitals and change in activity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide observational cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England for patients undergoing surgical removal of a tooth (defined using OPSC-4 code F09) between April 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Procedures were stratified by age, gender, and urgency (elective or nonelective), reported using descriptive statistics, number, and percentage. We conducted post hoc modeling to predict surgical activity to December 2023. In addition, we contrasted this with aggregate national data on simple dental extraction procedures and drainage of dental abscesses in hospital as well as dental activity in general practice.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 569,938 episodes for the surgical removal of a tooth (females 57%). Of these, 493,056/569,938 (87%) were for adults and 76,882/569,938 (13%) children ≤18 years. Surgical extractions were most frequent in adult females. Elective cases accounted for 96% (n = 548,805/569,938) of procedures. The median number of procedures carried out per quarter was 27,256, dropping to 12,003 during the COVID-19 pandemic, representing a 56% reduction in activity. This amounted to around 61,058 cancelled procedures. Modeling predicts that this activity has not returned to prepandemic levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of surgical extractions taking place in hospitals during the pandemic fell by 56%. The true impact of this reduction is unknown, but delayed treatment increases the risk of complications, including life-threatening infections.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

The result of this study provides an evidence-based overview of the trends relating to surgical extractions of teeth in England taking place in hospitals. This information can be used to inform service and workforce planning to meet the needs of patients requiring surgical extractions. The data also provide an insight into the oral health needs of the population in England.