1
|
Tan R, Liu J, Tang Q, Chen H, Zhang Z. Clinical Diagnostic Value of Shear-Wave Elastography in Detecting Malignant Nipple Retraction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024:00004728-990000000-00345. [PMID: 39143669 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In recent years, the use of shear-wave elastography (SWE) as a diagnostic tool for detecting malignant breast lesions has shown promising results. This study aims to determine the clinical diagnostic value of SWE in detecting malignant nipple retraction. METHODS Both US and SWE (Philips EPIQ7 system) were performed for 41 consecutive patients with nipple retraction (56 nipples). The mean, median, and maximum tissue elasticity values (in kilopascals) were determined for each nipple by using SWE. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of each measurement was determined by using the surgical pathology results or clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. RESULTS Of the 56 retracted nipples, 32 were due to benign lesions, and 24 were due to malignant lesions. No significant differences in dimensions or echo features were found between the benign and malignant groups. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) pattern were 63.89% (23/36), 95% (19/20), 95.83 (23/24), 59.38 (19/32), and 75% (42/56), respectively; the corresponding values for median elasticity on SWE were 88.46% (23/26), 96.67% (29/30), 95.83 (23/24), 90.63 (29/32), and 92.85 (52/56), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The addition of SWE to conventional US could help differentiate benign from malignant lesions associated with nipple retraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Tan
- From the Department of Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First Hospital of Changsha)
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Medical Record and Statistical Analysis, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
| | - Qi Tang
- From the Department of Ultrasonography, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First Hospital of Changsha)
| | | | - Zhenhui Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics, The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University (The First Hospital of Changsha), Changsha, Hunan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nyante SJ, Abraham L, Bowles EJA, Lee CI, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, Henderson LM. Racial and Ethnic Variation in Diagnostic Mammography Performance among Women Reporting a Breast Lump. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1542-1551. [PMID: 37440458 PMCID: PMC10790330 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated diagnostic mammography among women with a breast lump to determine whether performance varied across racial and ethnic groups. METHODS This study included 51,014 diagnostic mammograms performed between 2005 and 2018 in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium among Asian/Pacific Islander (12%), Black (7%), Hispanic/Latina (6%), and White (75%) women reporting a lump. Breast cancers occurring within 1 year were ascertained from cancer registry linkages. Multivariable regression was used to adjust performance statistic comparisons for breast cancer risk factors, mammogram modality, demographics, additional imaging, and imaging facility. RESULTS Cancer detection rates were highest among Asian/Pacific Islander [per 1,000 exams, 84.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 72.0-98.2)] and Black women [81.4 (95% CI: 69.4-95.2)] and lowest among Hispanic/Latina women [42.9 (95% CI: 34.2-53.6)]. Positive predictive values (PPV) were higher among Black [37.0% (95% CI: 31.2-43.3)] and White [37.0% (95% CI: 30.0-44.6)] women and lowest among Hispanic/Latina women [22.0% (95% CI: 17.2-27.7)]. False-positive results were most common among Asian/Pacific Islander women [per 1,000 exams, 183.9 (95% CI: 126.7-259.2)] and lowest among White women [112.4 (95% CI: 86.1-145.5)]. After adjustment, false-positive and cancer detection rates remained higher for Asian/Pacific Islander and Black women (vs. Hispanic/Latina and White). Adjusted PPV was highest among Asian/Pacific Islander women. CONCLUSIONS Among women with a lump, Asian/Pacific Islander and Black women were more likely to have cancer detected and more likely to receive a false-positive result compared with White and Hispanic/Latina women. IMPACT Strategies for optimizing diagnostic mammography among women with a lump may vary by racial/ethnic group, but additional factors that influence performance differences need to be identified. See related In the Spotlight, p. 1479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J. Nyante
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Linn Abraham
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Erin J. Aiello Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Christoph I. Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine; Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Karla Kerlikowske
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Diana L. Miglioretti
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Brian L. Sprague
- Department of Surgery and University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Louise M. Henderson
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han HJ, Chu YC, Wang J, Lai YC, Tseng LM, Huang CC. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by screening mammography in Taiwan: a single institute's experience. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:330. [PMID: 37344800 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02445-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy in the world. Nearly ninety percent of screening-detected breast cancers were diagnosed with earlier stages of 0 to II in Taiwan. It's widely acknowledged that mammography screening of breast cancer can achieve the goal of early diagnosis and treatment in terms of preventive task while neglected interval cancers are associated with unfavorable tumor characteristics and worse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics of screening-detected breast cancers in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS Both screening and diagnostic mammography examinations with accompanied BI-RADS (breast imaging-reporting and data system) classification were extracted from the health information system and linked to cancer registry in Taiwan. Enrolled population included those attending their first mammography between 2012 and 2016, excluding subjects with previous breast cancer, or with missing or incomplete data. We compared treatment outcomes between breast cancers with either initial screening or diagnostic mammography (control group), and investigated the compositions of breast cancers detected by screening mammography through direct chart reviews. RESULTS A total of 84,246 screening and 61,230 diagnostic mammography sessions were performed from 2010 to 2020. More positive results (BI-RADS 0, 3, 4 and 5) were observed for those attending the first diagnostic than the first screening mammography (43.58% versus 16.12%, p < 0.001). Earlier stages (0 and I) distribution (92% versus 81%, p < 0.0001), better survivorship (overall survival: 96.91% versus 92.17%, p = 0.007) and a lower HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor II) positive status and lower tumor grade were noted in breast cancers with initial screening rather than diagnostic mammography. Among 26,103 mammography screening invitees between 2012 and 2016, 325 breast cancers were ascertained from cancer registry. Of these, 234 had one, 72 had two and 19 had three episodes of mammography before cancer diagnosis. Extensive chart reviews revealed that women with and without breast symptoms constituted 29.9 and 70.1% of the 325 screening-detected breast cancers, with the latter further divided into false negative results (interval cancer), diagnosed at the first mammography, diagnostic at the secondary or subsequent mammography and those with a delayed biopsy or confirmatory imaging constituted (5.2, 47, 10.5 and 7.4%). CONCLUSION Screening-detected breast cancers were a mixture of women with and without symptoms, those with a false negative result, true negative results with cancer detected at subsequent mammography and non-adherers. Despite this, efficacy of mammography screening was ascertained in Taiwan from this study. To further enhance earlier detection and decrease false negativity, the impact of repeated mammography, and additional sonography for symptomatic women, compliance following a positive screening mammography should not be overemphasized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Ju Han
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Chia Chu
- Information Management Office, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Big Data Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Information Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jane Wang
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Nurse-Midwifery and Women Health, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chen Lai
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Ming Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
| | - Chi-Cheng Huang
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Larsen M, Lilleborge M, Vigeland E, Hofvind S. Self-reported symptoms among participants in a population-based screening program. Breast 2020; 54:56-61. [PMID: 32927237 PMCID: PMC7495098 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A limited number of studies have explored the association between self-reported symptoms and the risk of breast cancer among participants of population based screening programs. METHODS We performed descriptive statistics on recall, screen-detected and interval cancer, positive predictive value and histopathological tumour characteristics by symptom group (asymptomatic, lump, and skin or nipple changes) as reported from 785,642 women aged 50-69 when they attended BreastScreen Norway 1996-2016. Uni- and multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models were used to analyze the association between symptom group and screen-detected or interval cancer. Results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS A lump or skin/nipple change was reported in 6.2% of the 3,307,697 examinations. The rate of screen-detected cancers per 1000 examinations was 45.2 among women with a self-reported lump and 5.1 among asymptomatic women. Adjusted odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was 10.1 (95% CI: 9.3-11.1) and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6-2.5) for interval cancer among women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. Tumour diameter, histologic grade and lymph node involvement of screen-detected and interval cancer were less prognostically favourable for women with a self-reported lump versus asymptomatic women. CONCLUSION Despite targeting asymptomatic women, 6.2% of the screening examinations in BreastScreen Norway was performed among women who reported a lump or skin/nipple change when they attended screening. The odds ratio of screen-detected cancer was higher for women with versus without symptoms. Standardized follow-up guidelines might be beneficial for screening programs in order to take care of women reporting signs or symptoms of breast cancer when they attend screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marthe Larsen
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marie Lilleborge
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Einar Vigeland
- Department of Radiology, Vestfold Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|