Long-term treatment with the PARP inhibitor niraparib does not increase the mutation load in cell line models and tumour xenografts

The mutagenic consequences of defective DNA repair

Multiple separate repair mechanisms safeguard the genome against various types of DNA damage, and their failure can increase the rate of spontaneous mutagenesis. The malfunction of distinct repair mechanisms leads to genomic instability through different mutagenic processes. For example, defective mismatch repair causes high base substitution rates and microsatellite instability, whereas homologous recombination deficiency is characteristically associated with deletions and chromosome instability. This review presents a comprehensive collection of all mutagenic phenotypes associated with the loss of each DNA repair mechanism, drawing on data from a variety of model organisms and mutagenesis assays, and placing greatest emphasis on systematic analyses of human cancer datasets. We describe the latest theories on the mechanism of each mutagenic process, often explained by reliance on an alternative repair pathway or the error-prone replication of unrepaired, damaged DNA. Aided by the concept of mutational signatures, the genomic phenotypes can be used in cancer diagnosis to identify defective DNA repair pathways.

DNA mismatch repair protects the genome from oxygen-induced replicative mutagenesis

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) corrects mismatched DNA bases arising from multiple sources including polymerase errors and base damage. By detecting spontaneous mutagenesis using whole genome sequencing of cultured MMR deficient human cell lines, we show that a primary role of MMR is the repair of oxygen-induced mismatches. We found an approximately twofold higher mutation rate in MSH6 deficient DLD-1 cells or MHL1 deficient HCT116 cells exposed to atmospheric conditions as opposed to mild hypoxia, which correlated with oxidant levels measured using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. The oxygen-induced mutations were dominated by T to C base substitutions and single T deletions found primarily on the lagging strand. A broad sequence context preference, dependence on replication timing and a lack of transcriptional strand bias further suggested that oxygen-induced mutations arise from polymerase errors rather than oxidative base damage. We defined separate low and high oxygen-specific MMR deficiency mutation signatures common to the two cell lines and showed that the effect of oxygen is observable in MMR deficient cancer genomes, where it best correlates with the contribution of mutation signature SBS21. Our results imply that MMR corrects oxygen-induced genomic mismatches introduced by a replicative process in proliferating cells.

Error-corrected next generation sequencing - Promises and challenges for genotoxicity and cancer risk assessment

Error-corrected Next Generation Sequencing (ecNGS) is rapidly emerging as a valuable, highly sensitive and accurate method for detecting and characterizing mutations in any cell type, tissue or organism from which DNA can be isolated. Recent mutagenicity and carcinogenicity studies have used ecNGS to quantify drug-/chemical-induced mutations and mutational spectra associated with cancer risk. ecNGS has potential applications in genotoxicity assessment as a new readout for traditional models, for mutagenesis studies in 3D organotypic cultures, and for detecting off-target effects of gene editing tools. Additionally, early data suggest that ecNGS can measure clonal expansion of mutations as a mechanism-agnostic early marker of carcinogenic potential and can evaluate mutational load directly in human biomonitoring studies. In this review, we discuss promising applications, challenges, limitations, and key data initiatives needed to enable regulatory testing and adoption of ecNGS - including for advancing safety assessment, augmenting weight-of-evidence for mutagenicity and carcinogenicity mechanisms, identifying early biomarkers of cancer risk, and managing human health risk from chemical exposures.

Combining PARP Inhibition and Immunotherapy in BRCA-Associated Cancers

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have significantly improved treatment outcomes of homologous recombination (HR) repair-deficient cancers. While the activity of these agents is largely linked to multiple mechanisms underlying the synthetic lethality of PARP inhibition and HR deficiency, emerging data suggest that their efficacy is also tied to their effects on the immune microenvironment and dependent upon cytotoxic T-cell activation. Effects observed in preclinical models are currently being validated in on-treatment biopsy samples procured from patients enrolled in clinical trials. Although this work has stimulated the development of combinations of PARP inhibitors with immunomodulatory agents, results to date have not demonstrated the superiority of combined PARP inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade compared with PARP inhibition alone. These results have stimulated a more comprehensive assessment of the immunosuppressive components of the tumor microenvironment that must be addressed so that the efficacy of PARP inhibitor agents can be maximized.

Genomic and expressional dynamics of ovarian cancer cell lines in PARPi treatment revealed mechanisms of acquired resistance

BACKGROUND

Patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) can benefit from poly- (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) therapy. However, PARPi resistance has become a challenge in clinical practice, and its mechanism requires further exploration.

METHODS

We established three PARPi-resistant cell strains following olaparib exposure. CCK-8, clonogenic survival, transwell, wound healing, cell cycle, RT-qPCR and western blot assays were performed to explore the functional phenotype of the resistant cells. Whole-exome sequencing and RNA-sequencing were performed to identify the altered genes. Stable knockdown and overexpression were used to investigate the role of EP300, an upstream regulator of E-cadherin and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), in cell lines. We further validated the finding in clinical ovarian cancer samples by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We combined public datasets to obtain an integrated PARPi sensitivity profile in EOC cells, which indicated that primary PARPi resistance could not be fully explained by mutations in BRCA1/2 or homologous recombination deficiency related genes. Genomic and transcriptome analyses revealed distinct mechanisms between primary and acquired resistance. Long-term PARPi treatment induced accumulation of de novo single nucleotide variants (SNV), and the complete frame-shift deletion of PARP1 was detected in the A2780 resistant strain. Additionally, the depressed histone acetyltransferase of EP300 could cause resistant phenotype through activated EMT process in vitro, and associated with PARPi-resistance in EOC patients.

CONCLUSION

Long-term PARPi treatment led to evolutionary genomic and transcriptional alterations that were associated with acquired resistance, among which depressed EP300 partly contributed to the resistant phenotype.

Exploring Dynamic Metabolome of the HepG2 Cell Line: Rise and Fall

Both biological and technical variations can discredit the reliability of obtained data in omics studies. In this technical note, we investigated the effect of prolonged cultivation of the HepG2 hepatoma cell line on its metabolomic profile. Using the GC × GC-MS approach, we determined the degree of metabolic variability across HepG2 cells cultured in uniform conditions for 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 days. Post-processing of obtained data revealed substantial changes in relative abundances of 110 metabolites among HepG2 samples under investigation. Our findings have implications for interpreting metabolomic results obtained from immortal cells, especially in longitudinal studies. There are still plenty of unanswered questions regarding metabolomics variability and many potential areas for future targeted and panoramic research. However, we suggest that the metabolome of cell lines is unstable and may undergo significant transformation over time, even if the culture conditions remain the same. Considering metabolomics variability on a relatively long-term basis, careful experimentation with particular attention to control samples is required to ensure reproducibility and relevance of the research results when testing both fundamentally and practically significant hypotheses.

Exposure to escalating olaparib does not induce acquired resistance to PARPi and to other chemotherapeutic compounds in ovarian cancer cell lines

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors (PARPi) such as olaparib and niraparib are currently used as a treatment option for BRCA-deficient tumors and also show efficacy in platinum-sensitive tumors. However, resistance to PARPi occurs in numerous patients and in particular acquired PARPi resistance presents a major obstacle in the treatment of these tumors. In the present study, it was investigated whether stepwise exposure of ovarian cancer cells to escalating concentrations of olaparib produced subcells with acquired resistance to PARPi and/or acquired cross-resistance to platinum compounds, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin. To this aim, the sensitivity of fourteen ovarian cancer cell lines, including nine with TP53-mutations and five carrying BRCA-mutations, to olaparib and niraparib was determined and a subset of seven cell lines was selected to investigate the potential of olaparib to produce resistance. It was identified that escalating olaparib did neither produce subcells with acquired PARPi-resistance nor did it produce acquired cross-resistance to platinum compounds, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel. This finding was independent of the cells' TP53 and BRCA mutation status. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated deletion of PARP1 did not affect sensitivity to PARPi, platinum compounds, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel. In addition, olaparib sensitivity correlated with niraparib sensitivity, but BRCA-mutated cells were not more sensitive to PARPi. Moreover, PARPi sensitivity associated with cross-sensitivity not only to platinum compounds but also to anthracylines, paclitaxel, and inhibitors of histone deacetylases. These in vitro data indicated that olaparib exposure is unlikely to produce an acquired resistance phenotype and that PARPi-sensitive ovarian cancer cells are also cross-sensitive to non-platinum and even to compounds not directly interacting with the DNA.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer in women world-wide. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most common; three-quarters of women present when disease has spread outside the pelvis (stage III or IV). Treatment consists of a combination of  surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Although initial responses to chemotherapy are good, most women with advanced disease will relapse. PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitors (PARPi), are a type of anticancer treatment that works by preventing cancer cells from repairing DNA damage, especially in those with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) variants. PARPi offer a different mechanism of anticancer treatment from conventional chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and risks of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) inhibitors (PARPi) for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

SEARCH METHODS

We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central 2020, Issue 10), Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trial Register, MEDLINE (1990 to October 2020), Embase (1990 to October 2020), ongoing trials on www.controlled-trials.com/rct, www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials, the National Research Register (NRR), FDA database and pharmaceutical industry biomedical literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included trials that randomised women with EOC to PARPi with no treatment, or PARPi versus conventional chemotherapy, or PARPi together with conventional chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology. Two review authors independently assessed whether studies met the inclusion criteria. We contacted investigators for additional data. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL) and rate of adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 studies (6109 participants); four (3070 participants) with newly-diagnosed, advanced EOC and 11 (3039 participants) with recurrent EOC. The studies varied in types of comparisons and evaluated PARPi. Eight studies were judged as at low risk of bias in most of the domains. Quality of life data were generally poorly reported. Below we present six key comparisons.  The majority of participants had BRCA mutations, either in their tumour (sBRCAmut) and/or germline (gBRCAmut), or homologous recombination deficiencies (HRD) in their tumours. Newly diagnosed EOC Overall, four studies evaluated the effect of PARPi in newly-diagnosed, advanced EOC. Two compared PARPi with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone. OS data were not reported. The combination of PARPi with chemotherapy may have little to no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (two studies, 1564 participants; hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI 0).49 to 1.38; very low-certainty evidence)(no evidence of disease progression at 12 months' 63% with PARPi versus 69% for placebo).  PARPi with chemotherapy likely increases any severe adverse event (SevAE) (grade 3 or higher) slightly (45%) compared with chemotherapy alone (51%) (two studies, 1549 participants, risk ratio (RR) 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.20; high-certainty evidence). PARPi combined with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone likely results in little to no difference in the QoL (one study; 744 participants, MD 1.56 95% CI -0.42 to 3.54; moderate-certainty evidence).  Two studies compared PARPi monotherapy with placebo as maintenance after first-line chemotherapy in newly diagnosed EOC. PARPi probably results in little to no difference in OS (two studies, 1124 participants; HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.59 to 1.13; moderate-certainty evidence) (alive at 12 months 68% with PARPi versus 62% for placebo). However, PARPi may increase PFS (two studies, 1124 participants; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.92; low-certainty evidence) (no evidence of disease progression at 12 months' 55% with PARPi versus 24% for placebo). There may be an increase in the risk of experiencing any SevAE (grade 3 or higher) with PARPi (54%) compared with placebo (19%)(two studies, 1118 participants, RR 2.87, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.99; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. There is probably a slight reduction in QoL with PARPi, although this may not be clinically significant (one study, 362 participants; MD -3.00, 95%CI -4.48 to -1.52; moderate-certainty evidence).  Recurrent, platinum-sensitive EOC Overall, 10 studies evaluated the effect of PARPi in recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC. Three studies compared PARPi monotherapy with chemotherapy alone. PARPi may result in little to no difference in OS (two studies, 331 participants; HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.47; low-certainty evidence) (percentage alive at 36 months 18% with PARPi versus 17% for placebo). Evidence is very uncertain about the effect of PARPi on PFS (three studies, 739 participants; HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.56 to 1.38; very low-certainty evidence)(no evidence of disease progression at 12 months 26% with PARPi versus 22% for placebo). There may be little to no difference in rates of any SevAE (grade 3 or higher) with PARPi (50%) than chemotherapy alone (47%) (one study, 254 participants; RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.80 to 1.39; low-certainty evidence). Four studies compared PARPi monotherapy as maintenance with placebo. PARPi may result in little to no difference in OS (two studies, 560 participants; HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.20; moderate-certainty evidence)(percentage alive at 36 months 21% with PARPi versus 17% for placebo). However, evidence suggests that PARPi as maintenance therapy results in a large PFS (four studies, 1677 participants; HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.42; high-certainty evidence)(no evidence of disease progression at 12 months 37% with PARPi versus 5.5% for placebo). PARPi maintenance therapy may result in a large increase in any SevAE (51%) (grade 3 or higher) than placebo (19%)(four studies, 1665 participants, RR 2.62, 95%CI 1.85 to 3.72; low-certainty evidence). PARPi compared with chemotherapy may result in little or no change in QoL (one study, 229 participants, MD 1.20, 95%CI -1.75 to 4.16; low-certainty evidence). Recurrent, platinum-resistant EOC Two studies compared PARPi with chemotherapy. The certainty of evidence in both studies was graded as very low. Overall, there was minimal information on the QoL and adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PARPi maintenance treatment after chemotherapy may improve PFS in women with newly-diagnosed and recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC; there may be little to no effect on OS, although OS data are immature. Overall, this is likely at the expense of an increase in SevAE. It is  disappointing that data on quality of life outcomes  are relatively sparse. More research is needed to determine whether PARPi have a role to play in platinum-resistant disease.

Characterisation of the spectrum and genetic dependence of collateral mutations induced by translesion DNA synthesis

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a fundamental damage bypass pathway that utilises specialised polymerases with relaxed template specificity to achieve replication through damaged DNA. Misinsertions by low fidelity TLS polymerases may introduce additional mutations on undamaged DNA near the original lesion site, which we termed collateral mutations. In this study, we used whole genome sequencing datasets of chicken DT40 and several human cell lines to obtain evidence for collateral mutagenesis in higher eukaryotes. We found that cisplatin and UVC radiation frequently induce close mutation pairs within 25 base pairs that consist of an adduct-associated primary and a downstream collateral mutation, and genetically linked their formation to TLS activity involving PCNA ubiquitylation and polymerase κ. PCNA ubiquitylation was also indispensable for close mutation pairs observed amongst spontaneously arising base substitutions in cell lines with disrupted homologous recombination. Collateral mutation pairs were also found in melanoma genomes with evidence of UV exposure. We showed that collateral mutations frequently copy the upstream base, and extracted a base substitution signature that describes collateral mutagenesis in the presented dataset regardless of the primary mutagenic process. Using this mutation signature, we showed that collateral mutagenesis creates approximately 10–20% of non-paired substitutions as well, underscoring the importance of the process.

DNA base substitutions are the most common form of genomic mutations, formed both spontaneously and in response to environmental mutagens. One of the main mechanisms of base substitution mutagenesis is translesion synthesis, a process that relies on specialised DNA polymerases to replicate damaged DNA templates. In addition to incorrect base insertions at the site of lesions in the template, translesion polymerases may also generate ‘collateral’ mutations away from the lesion due to their lower accuracy in selecting the correct incoming nucleotide. In this study, we surveyed the whole genome sequence of experimental cell clones to examine the extent and genetic dependence of collateral mutagenesis in higher eukaryotes. Looking for close mutation pairs, we found that collateral mutations frequently occur near primary lesions generated by cisplatin or ultraviolet radiation in chicken and human cells, but are restricted to a short distance of approximately 25 base pairs. By analysing their sequence context, we showed that collateral mutations can also occur near correctly bypassed primary lesions and may be responsible for a considerable proportion of all base substitution mutations.

Mapping molecular subtype specific alterations in breast cancer brain metastases identifies clinically relevant vulnerabilities

The molecular events and transcriptional plasticity driving brain metastasis in clinically relevant breast tumor subtypes has not been determined. Here we comprehensively dissect genomic, transcriptomic and clinical data in patient-matched longitudinal tumor samples, and unravel distinct transcriptional programs enriched in brain metastasis. We report on subtype specific hub genes and functional processes, central to disease-affected networks in brain metastasis. Importantly, in luminal brain metastases we identify homologous recombination deficiency operative in transcriptomic and genomic data with recurrent breast mutational signatures A, F and K, associated with mismatch repair defects, TP53 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) respectively. Utilizing PARP inhibition in patient-derived brain metastatic tumor explants we functionally validate HRD as a key vulnerability. Here, we demonstrate a functionally relevant HRD evident at genomic and transcriptomic levels pointing to genomic instability in breast cancer brain metastasis which is of potential translational significance.

Deficiency of replication-independent DNA mismatch repair drives a 5-methylcytosine deamination mutational signature in cancer

Multiple mutational signatures have been associated with DNA mismatch repair (MMR)–deficient cancers, but the mechanisms underlying their origin remain unclear. Here, using mutation data from cancer genomes, we identify a previously unknown function of MMR that is able to protect genomes from 5-methylcytosine (5mC) deamination–induced somatic mutations in a replication-independent manner. Cancers with deficiency of MMR proteins MSH2/MSH6 (MutSα) exhibit mutational signature contributions distinct from those that are deficient in MLH1/PMS2 (MutLα). This disparity arises from unrepaired 5mC deamination–induced mismatches rather than replicative DNA polymerase errors. In cancers with biallelic loss of MBD4 DNA glycosylase, repair of 5mC deamination damage is strongly associated with H3K36me3 chromatin, implicating MutSα as the essential factor in its repair. We thus uncover a noncanonical role of MMR in the protection against 5mC deamination–induced mutation in human cancers.

Targeting the DNA damage response in immuno-oncology: developments and opportunities

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment and substantially improved patient outcome with regard to multiple tumour types. However, most patients still do not benefit from such therapies, notably because of the absence of pre-existing T cell infiltration. DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency has recently emerged as an important determinant of tumour immunogenicity. A growing body of evidence now supports the concept that DDR-targeted therapies can increase the antitumour immune response by (1) promoting antigenicity through increased mutability and genomic instability, (2) enhancing adjuvanticity through the activation of cytosolic immunity and immunogenic cell death and (3) favouring reactogenicity through the modulation of factors that control the tumour-immune cell synapse. In this Review, we discuss the interplay between the DDR and anticancer immunity and highlight how this dynamic interaction contributes to shaping tumour immunogenicity. We also review the most innovative preclinical approaches that could be used to investigate such effects, including recently developed ex vivo systems. Finally, we highlight the therapeutic opportunities presented by the exploitation of the DDR-anticancer immunity interplay, with a focus on those in early-phase clinical development.

Combining poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in breast cancer: rationale and preliminary clinical results

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, both immune checkpoint inhibitors and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefit in some subsets of HER2-negative breast cancer patients. A biological rationale exists supporting a potential synergism between these compounds, which may further increase their antitumor activity in the clinic.

RECENT FINDINGS

PARP inhibitors were shown to activate type I interferon pathway, thus eliciting local and general immune response, while inducing programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) up-regulation. In addition, the DNA damages created by PARP inhibition may increase tumor mutational burden and neo-antigens, thereby favoring efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Accordingly, clinical trials combining PARP inhibitors and agents targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have been initiated in breast cancer in both advanced and early stages, enrolling patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation, homologous recombination deficiency and/or with triple negative phenotype. Preliminary safety and efficacy results are encouraging, but it is still unclear whether the combination adds benefit compared with each therapeutic administered as single agent.

SUMMARY

Although a strong rationale exists to support the combination of PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors, future clinical trials will have to demonstrate whether it improves outcome and to identify which patients are the most likely to benefit from.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated breast cancer and the roles of current modelling systems in drug discovery

For a drug candidate to be fully developed takes years and investment of hundreds of millions of dollars. There is no doubt that drug development is difficult and risky, but vital to protecting against devastating disease. This difficulty is clearly evident in BRCA1 and BRCA2 related breast cancer, with current treatment options largely confined to invasive surgical procedures, as well as chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimes which damage healthy tissue and can leave remnant disease. Consequently, patient survival and relapse rates are far from ideal, and new candidate treatments are needed. The preclinical stages of drug discovery are crucial to get right for translation to hospital beds. Disease models must take advantage of current technologies and be accurate for rapid and translatable treatments. Careful selection of cell lines must be coupled with high throughput techniques, with promising results trialled further in highly accurate humanised patient derived xenograft models. Traditional adherent drug screening should transition to 3D culture systems amenable to high throughput techniques if the gap between in vitro and in vivo studies is to be partially bridged. The possibility of organoid, induced pluripotent stem cell, and conditionally reprogrammed in vitro models is tantalising, however protocols are yet to be fully established. This review of BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer biology and current modelling systems will hopefully guide the design of future drug discovery endeavours and highlight areas requiring improvement.

Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibition in Patients with Breast Cancer and BRCA 1 and 2 Mutations

The poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors olaparib and talazoparib, have recently been approved for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) and germline BRCA 1 or 2 mutations due to improved progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy. An increasing number of clinical trials are evaluating the role of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in BC, alone and in combination with other therapies (including immunotherapy), as well as in earlier stages of the disease. This review describes the unique mechanism of action of these drugs and puts into clinical context the results of pivotal clinical trials. We also discuss the future development of PARPi in BC, their potential combination with other strategies, including chemotherapy and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and the impact of these treatments in current genetic counselling.

Combination of PARP Inhibitor Olaparib, and PD-L1 Inhibitor Durvalumab, in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: a Proof-of-Concept Phase II Study

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies suggest PARP inhibition (PARPi) induces immunostimulatory micromilieu in ovarian cancer thus complementing activity of immune checkpoint blockade. We conducted a phase II trial of PARPi olaparib and anti-PD-L1 durvalumab and collected paired fresh core biopsies and blood samples to test this hypothesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a single-center, proof-of-concept phase II study, we enrolled women aged ≥18 with recurrent ovarian cancer. All patients were immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve and had measurable disease per RECISTv1.1, ECOG performance status 0-2, and adequate organ and marrow function. Patients received olaparib 300 mg twice daily and durvalumab 1,500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were safety and progression-free survival (PFS). Translational objectives included biomarker evaluation for relationships with clinical response and immunomodulatory effects by treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with ovarian cancer [median, four prior therapies (IQR, 2-5.5), predominantly platinum-resistant (86%), BRCA wild-type (77%)] received at least one full cycle of treatment. ORR was 14% [5/35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8%-30.3%]. Disease control rate (PR+SD) was 71% (25/35; 95% CI, 53.7%-85.4%). Treatment enhanced IFNγ and CXCL9/CXCL10 expression, systemic IFNγ/TNFα production, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, indicating an immunostimulatory environment. Increased IFNγ production was associated with improved PFS [HR, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.16-0.87), P = 0.023], while elevated VEGFR3 levels were associated with worse PFS (HR, 3.22 (95% CI, 1.23-8.40), P = 0.017].

CONCLUSIONS

The PARPi and anti-PD-L1 combination showed modest clinical activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. Our correlative study results suggest immunomodulatory effects by olaparib/durvalumab in patients and indicate that VEGF/VEGFR pathway blockade would be necessary for improved efficacy of the combination.

Two main mutational processes operate in the absence of DNA mismatch repair

The analysis of tumour genome sequences has demonstrated high rates of base substitution mutagenesis upon the inactivation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR), and the resulting somatic mutations in MMR deficient tumours appear to significantly enhance the response to immune therapy. A handful of different algorithmically derived base substitution mutation signatures have been attributed to MMR deficiency in tumour somatic mutation datasets. In contrast, mutation data obtained from whole genome sequences of isogenic wild type and MMR deficient cell lines in this study, as well as from published sources, show a more uniform experimental mutation spectrum of MMR deficiency. In order to resolve this discrepancy, we reanalysed mutation data from MMR deficient tumour whole exome and whole genome sequences. We derived two base substitution signatures using non-negative matrix factorisation, which together adequately describe mutagenesis in all tumour and cell line samples. The two new signatures broadly resemble COSMIC signatures 6 and 20, but perform better than existing COSMIC signatures at identifying MMR deficient tumours in mutation signature deconstruction. We show that the contribution of the two identified signatures, one of which is dominated by C to T mutations at CpG sites, is biased by the different sequence composition of the exome and the whole genome. We further show that the identity of the inactivated MMR gene, the tissue type, the mutational burden or the patient's age does not influence the mutation spectrum, but that a tendency for a greater contribution by the CpG mutational process is observed in tumours as compared to cultured cells. Our analysis suggest that two separable mutational processes operate in the genomes of MMR deficient cells.

Mechanism and current progress of Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the fifth most lethal cancer type overall in women. Ovarian cancer often presents genome instability, with almost half of the ovarian cancers harbor defects in one or more of the six DNA repair pathways, most of them in homologous recombination (HR). Targeting DNA repair genes has becoming a unique strategy to combat HR-deficient cancers in recent years. The multi-functional enzyme Poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) plays an impart role in DNA damage repair and genome stability. PARP inhibitors inhibit DNA repair pathways and cause apoptosis of cancer cells, especially in homologous recombination (HR)-deficient cells. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have drawn increasing amount of attention due to their remarkable efficacy and low toxicity in treating HR-deficient ovarian cancers (i.e. BRCA1/2 mutated). To date, three PARP inhibitor drugs have been approved for treating ovarian cancer by FDA in United States, namely Olaparib, Rucaparib, and Niraparib. In this review, we summarized the current research progress of PARPi from basic science to clinical studies. We discussed the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors and the exciting results from the clinical studies of the FDA-approved PARP inhibitors. We also highlighted the current research progress on PARP inhibitor resistance, which has become a challenge in clinics.

PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Depends on CD8+ T-cell Recruitment via Intratumoral STING Pathway Activation in BRCA-Deficient Models of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Combinatorial clinical trials of PARP inhibitors with immunotherapies are ongoing, yet the immunomodulatory effects of PARP inhibition have been incompletely studied. Here, we sought to dissect the mechanisms underlying PARP inhibitor-induced changes in the tumor microenvironment of BRCA1-deficient triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We demonstrate that the PARP inhibitor olaparib induces CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration and activation in vivo, and that CD8⁺ T-cell depletion severely compromises antitumor efficacy. Olaparib-induced T-cell recruitment is mediated through activation of the cGAS/STING pathway in tumor cells with paracrine activation of dendritic cells and is more pronounced in HR-deficient compared with HR-proficient TNBC cells and in vivo models. CRISPR-mediated knockout of STING in cancer cells prevents proinflammatory signaling and is sufficient to abolish olaparib-induced T-cell infiltration in vivo. These findings elucidate an additional mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors and provide a rationale for combining PARP inhibition with immunotherapies for the treatment of TNBC. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates cross-talk between PARP inhibition and the tumor microenvironment related to STING/TBK1/IRF3 pathway activation in cancer cells that governs CD8⁺ T-cell recruitment and antitumor efficacy. The data provide insight into the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors in BRCA-associated breast cancer.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 681.