Coordinated targeting of CK2 and KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Co-targeting of ACK1 and KIT triggers additive anti-proliferative and -migration effects in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) harbor mutated receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) KIT/PDGFRA, which provides an attractive therapeutic target. However, a majority of GISTs ultimately develop resistance to KIT/PDGFRA inhibitor imatinib, multiple therapeutic targets will be identified as a reasonable strategy in imatinib-resistant GISTs. Biological mechanisms of non-RTK activated CDC42 associated kinase 1 (ACK1) are still unclear, which has been found to be activated in GISTs. In the current report, ACK1 overexpression is demonstrated in GIST cell lines and biopsies. RNA-seq analysis and immunoblotting show that ACK1 expression is dependent on imatinib treatment time in GIST-T1 cell line. The colocalization/complex of KIT and ACK1 in GIST cells are observed, and ACK1 activation is in a partially KIT and CDC42 dependent manner. Treatment with a specific ACK1 inhibitor AIM-100 or ACK1 siRNA, mildly suppresses cell viability, but markedly inhibits cell migration in imatinib sensitive and in imatinib resistant GIST cell lines, which is associated with inactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MAPK signaling pathways, and inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, evidencing upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of ZEB1, N-cadherin, vimentin, snail, and/or β-catenin after treatment with AIM-100 or ACK1/CDC42 shRNAs. Combination inhibition of ACK1 and KIT results in additive effects of anti-proliferation and pro-apoptosis as well as cell cycle arrest, and inhibition of invasiveness and migration in vitro and in vivo, compared to either intervention alone through dephosphorylation of KIT downstream intermediates (AKT, S6, and MAPK). Our data suggest that co-targeting of ACK1 and KIT might be a novel therapeutic strategy in imatinib-resistant GIST.

SPK1/S1P axis confers gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) resistance of imatinib

BACKGROUND

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is highly effective in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the most of GISTs patients develop secondary drug resistance after 1-3 years of IM treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the IM-resistance mechanism via the multi-scope combined with plasma concentration of IM, genetic polymorphisms and plasma sensitive metabolites.

METHODS

This study included a total of 40 GISTs patients who had been regularly treated and not treated with IM. The plasma samples were divided into three experiments, containing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), OCT1 genetic polymorphisms and non-targeted metabolomics. According to the data of above three experiments, the IM-resistant cell line, GIST-T1/IMR cells, was constructed for verification the IM-resistance mechanism.

RESULTS

The results of non-targeted metabolomics analysis suggested that the sphingophospholipid metabolic pathway including the SPK1/S1P axis was inferred in IM-insensitive patients with GISTs. A GIST cell line (GIST-T1) was immediately induced as an IM resistance cell model (GIST-T1/IMR) and we found that blocking the signal pathway of SPK1/S1P in the GIST-T1/IMR could sensitize treatment of IM and reverse the IM-resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that IM secondary resistance is associated with the elevation of S1P, and blockage the signaling pathway of SPK1/S1P warrants evaluation as a potential therapeutic strategy in IM-resistant GISTs. The design of this study from blood management, group information collection, IM plasma concentration with different elements, identification of sphingolipid metabolism and lastly verification the function of SPK1/S1P in the IM-resistance GISTs cells.

The synergistic therapeutic effect of imatinib and protein kinase CK2 Inhibition correlates with PI3K-AKT activation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Casein kinase 2 (CK2) has been reported to be involved in several cellular processes in multiple cancers. However, the role of CK2 in GIST remains unclear.

AIM

We aimed to investigate the combinatorial treatment of imatinib (IM) and CK2 inhibition on the progression of GISTs.

METHODS

GIST biopsies and adjacent normal tissues were collected from patients. GIST882 and GIST48 cell lines were subjected to investigate the effect of IM and CK2 inhibition in GIST cells. CCK-8 assay, Caspase-3 activity assay, western blotting, and flow cytometry analysis were employed in the present investigation.

RESULTS

Our results showed that CK2 was highly expressed in GIST biopsies, and inhibition of CK2 resulted in decrease in cell viability and increase in apoptosis of GIST cells. Moreover, the combination treatment with CX-4945 (CX) and IM resulted in a more significant decrease in cell viability and increase in cell apoptosis compared with mono-treatment. Mechanistically, the combination treatment influenced the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. The activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway reversed the synergistic impacts of the combined treatment on cell viability and apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that inhibition of CK2 combined with IM exhibited a synergistic anti-cancer effect on GIST cells through inactivation of the PI3K/AKT pathway.

Risk-Related Genes and Associated Signaling Pathways of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Purpose

Knowledge on the potential association between differential gene expression and risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is currently limited. We used bioinformatics tools to identify differentially expressed genes in GIST samples and the related signaling pathways of these genes.

Patients and Methods

The GSE136755 dataset was obtained from the GEO database and differentially expressed genes (CENPA, CDK1, TPX2, CCNB1, CCNA2, BUB1, AURKA, KIF11, NDC80) were screened using String and Cytoscape bioinformatics tools. Then, three groups of eight patients at high, intermediate and low risk of GIST were selected from patients diagnosed with GIST by immunohistochemistry in our hospital from October 2020 to March 2021. Differential expression of CDK1 and BUB1 was verified by comparing the amount of expressed p21-Activated kinase 4 (PAK4) protein in pathological sections.

Results

SPSS26.0 analysis showed that the expression level of PAK4 in GISTs was significantly higher than in normal tissues and paratumoral tissues and there was significant difference among the three groups of patients (P < 0.01). PAK4 levels in paratumoral and normal tissues were negligible with no significant difference between the tissues.

Conclusion

CENPA, CDK1, TPX2, CCNB1, CCNA2, BUB1, AURKA, KIF11 and NDC80 gene expression can be used as biomarkers to assess the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors whereby expression increases gradually with the increased risk of GIST formation. The genes encode proteins that regulate the division, proliferation and apoptosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors mainly through PI3K/AKT, MARK, P53, WNT and other signaling pathways.

Proteasome Inhibition Suppresses KIT-Independent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Via Targeting Hippo/YAP/Cyclin D1 Signaling

Purpose: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin of the digestive tract. A yet more challenging resistance mechanism involves transition from oncogenic KIT to a new imatinib-insensitive oncogenic driver, heralded by loss of KIT expression. Our recent studies have shown that inhibition of cyclin D1 and Hippo signaling, which are overexpressed in KIT-independent GIST, is accompanied by anti-proliferative and apoptosis-promoting effects. PRKCQ, JUN, and the Hippo/YAP pathway coordinately regulate GIST cyclin D1 expression. Thus, targeting of these pathways could be effective therapeutically for these now untreatable tumors.

Methods: Targeting cyclin D1 expression of small molecular drugs was screened by a cell monolayer growth and western blotting. The biologic mechanisms of bortezomib to KIT-independent GISTs were assessed by immunoblotting, qRT-PCR, cell viability, colony growth, cell cycle analysis, apoptosis, migration and invasiveness.

Results: In the initial small molecular inhibitor screening in KIT-independent GIST62, we found that bortezomib-mediated inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome machinery showed anti-proliferative effects of KIT-independent GIST cells via downregulation of cyclin D1 and induction of p53 and p21. Treatment with proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, led to downregulation of cyclin D1 and YAP/TAZ and an increase in the cleaved PARP expression in three KIT-independent GIST cell lines (GIST48B, GIST54, and GIST226). Additionally, it induced p53 and p21 expression in GIST48B and GIST54, increased apoptosis, and led to cell cycle G1/G2-phase arrest, decreased cell viability, colony formation, as well as migration and invasiveness in all GIST cell lines.

Conclusion: Although our findings are early proof-of-principle, there are signs of a potential effective treatment for KIT-independent GISTs, the data highlight that targeting of cyclin D1 and Hippo/YAP by bortezomib warrants evaluation as a novel therapeutic strategy in KIT-independent GISTs.