Association of post-diagnostic use of cholera vaccine with survival outcome in breast cancer patients

Peri-weaning cholera toxin consumption suppresses chemically-induced carcinogenesis in mice

Gastrointestinal bacteria are known to have an impact on local and systemic immunity, and consequently either promote or suppress cancer development. Following the notion that perinatal bacterial exposure might confer immune system competency for life, we investigated whether early-life administration of cholera-toxin (CT), a protein exotoxin of the small intestine pathogenic bacterium Vibrio cholerae, may shape local and systemic immunity to impart a protective effect against tumor development in epithelia distantly located from the gut. For that, newborn mice were orally treated with low non-pathogenic doses of CT and later challenged with the carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA), known to cause mainly mammary, but also skin, lung and stomach cancer. Our results revealed that CT suppressed the overall incidence and multiplicity of tumors, with varying efficiencies among cancer types, and promoted survival. Harvesting mouse tissues at an earlier time-point (105 instead of 294 days), showed that CT does not prevent preneoplastic lesions per se but it rather hinders their evolution into tumors. CT pretreatment universally increased apoptosis in the cancer-prone mammary, lung and nonglandular stomach, and altered the expression of several cancer-related molecules. Moreover, CT had a long-term effect on immune system cells and factors, the most prominent being the systemic neutrophil decrease. Finally, CT treatment significantly affected gut bacterial flora composition, leading among others to a major shift from Clostridia to Bacilli class abundance. Overall, these results support the notion that early-life CT consumption is able to affect host's immune, microbiome and gene expression profiles toward the prevention of cancer.

Drug repurposing using real-world data

The use of real-world data in drug repurposing has emerged due to well-established advantages of drug repurposing in supplementing de novo drug discovery and incentives in incorporating real-world evidence in regulatory approvals. We conducted a scoping review to characterize repurposing studies using real-world data and discuss their potential challenges and solutions. A total of 250 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 36 were original studies on hypothesis generation, 101 on hypothesis validation, and seven on safety assessment. Key challenges that should be addressed for future progress in using real-world data for repurposing include isolated data sources with poor clinical granularity, false-positive signals from data mining, the sensitivity of hypothesis validation to bias and confounding, and the lack of clear regulatory guidance.

Nanoparticulate drugs and vaccines: Breakthroughs and bottlenecks of repurposing in breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly diagnosed and topmost cause of death in females worldwide. Drug repurposing (DR) has shown great potential against BC by overcoming major shortcomings of approved anticancer therapeutics. However, poor physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic performance, stability, non-selectivity to tumors, and side effects are severe hurdles in repurposed drug delivery against BC. The variety of nanocarriers (NCs) has shown great promise in delivering repurposed therapeutics for effective treatment of BC via improving solubility, stability, tumor selectivity and reducing toxicity. Besides, delivering repurposed cargos via theranostic NCs can be helpful in the quick diagnosis and treatment of BC. Localized delivery of repurposed candidates through apt NCs can diminish the systemic side effects and improve anti-tumor effectiveness. However, breast tumor variability and tumor microenvironment have created several challenges to nanoparticulate delivery of repurposed cargos. This review focuses on DR as an ingenious strategy to treat BC and circumvent the drawbacks of approved anticancer therapeutics. Various nanoparticulate avenues delivering repurposed therapeutics, including non-oncology cargos and vaccines to target BC effectively, are discussed along with case studies. Moreover, clinical trial information on repurposed medications and vaccines for the treatment of BC is covered along with various obstacles in nanoparticulate drug delivery against cancer that have been so far identified. In a nutshell, DR and drug delivery of repurposed drugs via NCs appears to be a propitious approach in devastating BC.

Travel vaccines are strongly associated to reduced mortality in prostate cancer patients - a real effect or residual confounding?

Repurposing of existing drugs and vaccines for diseases that they were not originally intended for is a promising research field. Recently there has been evidence that oral cholera vaccine might be used in the treatment of inflammatory disease and some common cancers. Specifically, Ji et al showed that the administration of cholera vaccine after a prostate cancer diagnosis reduced prostate cancer specific mortality rates by almost 50%. In a cohort of men from Stockholm, Sweden, with more detailed cancer data and a higher coverage of exposure to vaccine, we replicated these findings using a marginal structural Cox model. We showed that administration of cholera vaccine after prostate cancer diagnosis is associated with a significant reduction in mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.69, p-value 0.0001) even after adjusting for all known confounders. However, the same effect (or even stronger) could be seen for several other traveling vaccines and malaria prophylaxis. Therefore, we conclude that this effect is most likely due to a healthy traveler bias and is an example of residual confounding.

Evaluation of Heterologous Effects of Travel Vaccines in Colorectal Cancer: A Database Study and a Cautionary Tale

Background and Aims

Recently, cholera vaccine use was shown to be associated with a reduced risk of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). However, evidence on heterologous effects of travel vaccines is limited. The aim of this study was to study heterologous effects of travel vaccines in patients with CRC.

Methods

We performed a retrospective database study on a cohort of CRC patients in Sweden and their postdiagnostic use of travel medications between July 2005 and December 2017. We obtained data from national registries on number of CRC diagnosis, death from CRC or other causes, age at diagnosis, and postdiagnostic use of travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis. The Cox regression model was used to calculate incidence rate and incidence rate ratios of CRC-related and all-cause mortality by postdiagnostic travel medication status.

Results

Two hundred ninety-five patients exposed to travel vaccines and malaria prophylaxis and 73,466 patients not exposed to travel medications were identified. CRC-related mortality was lowered in the exposed patients compared to the unexposed patients, irrespective of the travel medications used. The incidence rate ratios for CRC-related mortality and overall mortality were comparable.

Conclusion

We postulated that patients in better health were likely to travel more frequently than patients with poor health, leading to a healthy user bias. The results suggested the same, as similar reduced mortality risks were found for all the investigated travel medications, lowering the biological plausibility of truly protective effect from post-therapeutic use of any of the travel medication studied. We advocate the use of multiple negative exposure controls and to exercise caution while drawing conclusions from travel vaccine research.

Repurposing Infectious Diseases Vaccines Against Cancer

Vaccines used to prevent infections have long been known to stimulate immune responses to cancer as illustrated by the approval of the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine to treat bladder cancer since the 1970s. The recent approval of immunotherapies has rejuvenated this research area with reports of anti-tumor responses with existing infectious diseases vaccines used as such, either alone or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we have reviewed and summarized research activities using approved vaccines to treat cancer. Data supporting a cancer therapeutic use was found for 16 vaccines. For 10 (BCG, diphtheria, tetanus, human papillomavirus, influenza, measles, pneumococcus, smallpox, typhoid and varicella-zoster), clinical trials have been conducted or are ongoing. Within the remaining 6, preclinical evidence supports further evaluation of the rotavirus, yellow fever and pertussis vaccine in carefully designed clinical trials. The mechanistic evidence for the cholera vaccine, combined with the observational data in colorectal cancer, is also supportive of clinical translation. There is limited data for the hepatitis B and mumps vaccine (without measles vaccine). Four findings are worth highlighting: the superiority of intravesical typhoid vaccine instillations over BCG in a preclinical bladder cancer model, which is now the subject of a phase I trial; the perioperative use of the influenza vaccine to limit and prevent the natural killer cell dysfunction induced by cancer surgery; objective responses following intratumoral injections of measles vaccine in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; objective responses induced by human papillomavirus vaccine in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. All vaccines are intended to induce or improve an anti-tumor (immune) response. In addition to the biological and immunological mechanisms that vary between vaccines, the mode of administration and sequence with other (immuno-)therapies warrant more attention in future research.