Immunotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology position paper

Optimization of treatment strategies for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer stands as a malignant neoplasm bearing the highest burden of morbidity and mortality within the elderly population on a global scale. Among the lung cancer subtypes, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prevails as the most prevalent. As age advances, elderly patients often present with an increased prevalence of comorbidities, diminished organ reserve function, and alterations in drug pharmacokinetics, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and clearance. These factors collectively contribute to a reduction in their capacity to tolerate therapeutic interventions. Regrettably, there exists a paucity of research data and evidence regarding the management of elderly patients afflicted by advanced lung cancer. This article endeavors to compile and elucidate strategies for the enhancement of treatment approaches, with the aim of aiding clinical decision-making. Prior to the selection of clinical treatment modalities for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, a comprehensive assessment should be conducted, taking into account various facets, including tumor characteristics, patient age, physiological status, and the presence of comorbidities. The treatment strategy should be implemented in a tiered fashion, thereby affording the opportunity for the tailoring of individualized therapeutic approaches for elderly patients afflicted by advanced NSCLC. The demographic of elderly patients confronting advanced NSCLC presents a complex landscape marked by intricate underlying conditions, necessitating the imperative optimization of treatment strategies.

Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly population: a generic protocol

OBJECTIVES

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as monotherapy or in combination compared to standard of care for elderly people (≥ 65 years) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Precision Immuno-Oncology in NSCLC through Gender Equity Lenses

Precision immuno-oncology involves the development of personalized cancer treatments that are influenced by the unique nature of an individual's DNA, immune cells, and their tumor's molecular characterization. Biological sex influences immunity; females typically mount stronger innate and adaptive immune responses than males. Though more research is warranted, we continue to observe an enhanced benefit for females with lung cancer when treated with combination chemoimmunotherapy in contrast to the preferred approach of utilizing immunotherapy alone in men. Despite the observed sex differences in response to treatments, women remain underrepresented in oncology clinical trials, largely as a result of gender-biased misconceptions. Such exclusion has resulted in the development of less efficacious treatment guidelines and clinical recommendations and has created a knowledge gap in regard to immunotherapy-related survivorship issues such as fertility. To develop a more precise approach to care and overcome the exclusion of women from clinical trials, flexible trial schedules, multilingual communication strategies, financial, and transportation assistance for participants should be adopted. The impact of intersectionality and other determinants of health that affect the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in women must also be considered in order to develop a comprehensive understanding of the unique impact of immunotherapy in all women with lung cancer.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited in elderly NSCLC: a retrospective efficacy study and meta-analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the long-term survival of NSCLC patients. However, the efficacy of ICIs in elderly NSCLC patients remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy of ICIs in those patients using public databases and RCTs. NSCLC patients were identified into elderly and non-elderly groups by age 75 years. The retrospective study showed significant differences in OS and PFS between non-elderly and elderly patients treated with ICIs (P= 0.029 and 0.027), with reduced efficacy in elderly NSCLC patients. ECOG PS also negatively affected OS in elderly NSCLC patients (P= 0.007). In meta-analysis, the HR for OS in the non-elderly and elderly groups were 0.74 and 0.90, respectively, and the difference between the two age groups was statistically significant (P= 0.025). ICIs resulted in a lower incidence of all-grade (OR= 0.47) and high-grade TRAEs (OR= 0.38) than chemotherapy. Our findings revealed that the survival benefit of ICIs in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) may be lower than in non-elderly patients. In addition, the incidence of TRAEs induced by ICIs was lower than chemotherapy.

The impact of concurrent bacterial lung infection on immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Objective

To find out how bacterial lung infections (BLI) affect the effectiveness of therapy and the rate of pneumonia caused by pneumonia related to checkpoint inhibitors (CIP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are getting immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Patients and methods

507 NSCLC patients who received at least two ICI treatments between June 2020 and December 2022 at the Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology(AHKUST) were included in a retrospective cohort study. Based on whether there was a concurrent BLI diagnosis from high-resolution CT scans of the chest, the patients were divided into two groups: 238 in the NSCLC with BLI group (NSCLC-BLI group), and 269 in the NSCLC alone group. The collected therapeutic outcome measures included the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence rate of CIP. We analyzed the effect of BLI on the therapeutic efficacy of ICI treatment and the incidence rate of CIP in NSCLC patients.Inclusion criteria based on NSCLC patients staged I to IV according to the 8th edition of the International Association for Lung Cancer Research (IASLC).

Results

The NSCLC-BLI group showed superior ORR to the NSCLC group when treated with ICIs. Multifactorial logistic regression and Cox analyses, adjusted for confounders, identified BLI as an independent positive prognostic factor for ORR (HR=0.482, 95%CI: 0.391-0.550; P<0.001) and PFS (HR=0.619; 95%CI: 0.551-0.771; P<0.001). No correlation between BLI and OS was found. Out of 26 cases of CIP, 12 were in the NSCLC-BLI group and 14 in the NSCLC group, with no significant difference in incidence (P=0.145).

Conclusion

NSCLC patients with BLI receiving ICI treatment show superior ORR and PFS compared to NSCLC alone without an increased CIP risk, positioning BLI as a predictive factor for improved outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs. However, the study has limitations including its retrospective nature and lacking data on BLI bacteria types and levels, which could influence therapy outcomes.

Early mortality in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in routine practice

BACKGROUND

We sought to estimate the proportion of patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) who die soon after starting ICI in the real world and examine factors associated with early mortality (EM).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked health administrative data from Ontario, Canada. EM was defined as death from any cause within 60 days of ICI initiation. Patients with melanoma, lung, bladder, head and neck, or kidney cancer treated with ICI between 2012 and 2020 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 7126 patients treated with ICI were evaluated. Fifteen percent (1075 of 7126) died within 60 days of initiating ICI. The highest mortality was observed in patients with bladder and head and neck tumors (approximately 21% each). In multivariable analysis, previous hospital admission or emergency department visit, prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy, stage 4 disease at diagnosis, lower hemoglobin, higher white blood cell count, and higher symptom burden were associated with higher risk of EM. Conversely, patients with lung and kidney cancer (compared with melanoma), lower neutrophil to lymphocytes ratio, and with higher body mass index were less likely to die within 60 days post ICI initiation. In a sensitivity analysis, 30-day and 90-day mortality were 7% (519 of 7126) and 22% (1582 of 7126), respectively, with comparable clinical factors associated with EM identified.

CONCLUSIONS

EM is common among patients treated with ICI in the real-world setting and is associated with several patient and tumor characteristics. Development of a validated tool to predict EM may facilitate better patient selection for treatment with ICI in routine practice.

Improved uptake and survival with systemic treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: younger versus older adults

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, there has been increasing availability of novel therapeutics with improved tolerability and efficacy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study goals were: to compare the uptake of systemic therapy (ST) before and after the availability of targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapy and to examine the changes in overall survival (OS) over time between younger and older adults with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

All patients with advanced NSCLC referred to British Columbia (BC) Cancer in 2009, 2011, 2015 and 2017 were included. One-year time points were based on molecular testing implementation and funded drug availability: baseline (2009), epidermal growth factor receptor TKI (2011), anaplastic lymphoma kinase TKI (2015) and Programed Death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (2017). Age groups were <70years and ≥70years. Baseline demographics, simplified comorbidity scores (SCS), disease characteristics, and ST details were collected retrospectively. Variables were compared using X2, Fisher's exact tests and logistic-regression analysis. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

3325 patients were identified. Baseline characteristics were compared between ages < 70 years and ≥ 70 years for each time cohort with significant differences noted in baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and SCS. The rate of ST delivery trended upwards over time with age <70 years: 2009 44%, 2011 53%, 2015 50% and 2017 52% and age ≥70 years: 22%, 25%, 28% and 29% respectively. Predictors for decreased use of ST for age <70 years: ECOG ≥2, SCS ≥9, year 2011, and smoking history; and age ≥70 years: ECOG ≥2, years 2011 and 2015, and smoking history. The median OS of patients who received ST improved from 2009 to 2017: age <70 years 9.1 m vs. 15.5 m and age ≥70 years 11.4 m vs. 15.0 m.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an increased uptake of ST for both age groups with the introduction of novel therapeutics. Although a smaller proportion of older adults received ST, those who received treatment had comparable OS to their young counterpart. The benefit of ST in both age groups was seen across the different types of treatments. With careful assessment and selection of appropriate candidates, older adults with advanced NSCLC appear to benefit from ST.

Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The need for evidence-based data in the rapidly growing group of older patients is vast and more elderly-specific studies are desperately needed, for which there is clear demand from both patients and providers. Notably, many of the studies discussed in this review included unplanned subset analyses based on age and/or were not originally stratified by age; therefore, these data, particularly overall survival data, need to be interpreted with some caution as they may not be statistically valid based on the initial trial design and statistical plan. As we await data from ongoing elderly-specific trials, our recommendation for managing older patients with CRC should include geriatric screening tools (e.g., CSGA, VES-13, G8, CARG, CRASH) to help guide treatment adjustments for improved tolerability without sacrificing efficacy. For patients with a positive screen for significant geriatric concerns, a full geriatric assessment is recommended to guide treatment approach and supportive care. Prior data support the use of all approved medications for CRC in older adults who are fit; however, treatment breaks and dose attenuation with potential escalation are reasonable options for these patients. Ultimately, management decisions in the care of older adults with mCRC must be made through shared decision-making with the patient with consideration for the patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, social support, as well as potential toxicities and possible effect on QoL.

Immunotherapy for older patients with cancer

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The aim of this review is to describe the clinical use and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with solid tumors, where there is an abundance of evidence with recent updates including subgroups of older patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies with updated analyses and subgroups of older patients show that in general older patients benefit as well as younger patients and tolerate immunotherapy very well. However, in some instances of combination therapies which may expose patients to more toxicity, the benefits are reduced, and careful selection of older patients, including adjunctive assessments such as geriatric assessment, can help to identify the appropriate treatment for an individual patient.

SUMMARY

Older adults remain underrepresented in clinical trials, including those involving immunotherapy. Therefore, efforts must be made to include more older patients in trials and to assess real-world evidence to inform decision-making.

Immunotherapy for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Therapeutic Advances and Biomarkers

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer and improved patients' prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have quickly become standard frontline treatment for metastatic non-oncogene addicted disease, either as a single agent or in combination strategies. However, only a few patients have long-term benefits, and most of them do not respond or develop progressive disease during treatment. Thus, the identification of reliable predictive and prognostic biomarkers remains crucial for patient selection and guiding therapeutic choices. In this review, we provide an overview of the current strategies, highlighting the main clinical challenges and novel potential biomarkers.

Improvements in survival for patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma in the lung, diagnosed between 2010 - 2020 - A population-based registry study from Norway

OBJECTIVES

We investigated how the prognosis for Norwegian patients with stage IV, adenocarcinoma (NSCLC) has developed during the last decade, to observe if increased survival coincides with the introduction of immunotherapy at a population level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incidence data from the Cancer Registry of Norway are virtually complete and includes information about histological subtypes and biomarkers. The data was used to analyze median and relative survival for females and males diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC, divided by histological subgroups and age-groups.

RESULTS

During 2010 - 2020, 14472 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer in stage IV, in Norway. Among them 6351 patients (43%) were classified with adenocarcinoma. The median survival has increased for both sexes, but the largest increase is seen in females. From 2010 to 2020, median survival for females in the 0-69 group increased from 6.7 months to 12 months and from 3.7 months to 10 months for the 70+ age group. For the equivalent male age groups, we see an increase from 6.1 months to 7.7 months for the 0-69 group, and an increase from 3.8 months to 4.5 months for the 70+ group. When excluding patients with EGFR/ALK mutations from the survival analysis, the groups continue to display an increased survival from 2010 to 2020, although modest in the male 70+ group. The 1-year relative survival (RS) has increased for both sexes, from 32.4% to 51.2 in females and 25.4% to 44.5% in males. When EGFR/ALK positive patients were excluded from the analysis 1-year RS in females rose from 32.4% to 47.4% and for males from 25.4% to 41.8%.

CONCLUSION

A real-world patient population of stage IV, NSCLC adenocarcinoma have had a clinically meaningful increase in both median and relative survival from 2010 - 2020. The steepest survival increase has taken place after 2016, the time point where immunotherapy was implemented as a treatment option for the stage IV, adenocarcinoma population not harboring targetable mutations (EGFR/ALK).