Dietary sodium restriction prevents vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor-induced hypertension

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition prevents renal toxicity but not hypertension during sunitinib treatment

BACKGROUND

Anticancer angiogenesis inhibitors cause hypertension and renal injury. Previously we observed in rats that high-dose aspirin (capable of blocking cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and-2) was superior to low-dose aspirin (blocking COX-1 only) to prevent these side-effects during treatment with the angiogenesis inhibitor sunitinib, suggesting a role for COX-2. High-dose aspirin additionally prevented the rise in COX-derived prostacyclin (PGI2). Therefore, we studied the preventive effects of selective COX-2 inhibition and the hypothesized contributing role of PGI2 during angiogenesis inhibition.

METHODS

Male WKY rats received vehicle, sunitinib ((SU), 14 mg/kg/day) alone or combined with COX-2 inhibition (celecoxib, 10 mg/kg/day) or a PGI2 analogue (iloprost, 100 μg/kg/day) for 8 days (n = 8-9 per group). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured via radiotelemetry, biochemical measurements were performed via ELISA and vascular function was assessed via wire myography.

RESULTS

SU increased MAP (17±1mmHg versus 3±1mmHg after vehicle on day 4, P < 0.002), which could not be significantly blunted by celecoxib (+12±3mmHg on day 4, P = 0.247), but was temporarily attenuated by iloprost (treatment days 1 + 2 only). Urinary PGI2 (996 ± 112 versus 51 ± 11ng/24h after vehicle, P < 0.001), but not circulating PGI2 increased during SU, which remained unaffected by celecoxib and iloprost. Celecoxib reduced sunitinib-induced albuminuria (0.36 ± 0.05 versus 0.58 ± 0.05mg/24h after SU, P = 0.005). Wire myography demonstrated increased vasoconstriction to endothelin-1 after SU (Emax P = 0.005 versus vehicle), which remained unaffected by celecoxib or iloprost.

CONCLUSION

Selective COX-2 inhibition ameliorates albuminuria during angiogenesis inhibition with sunitinib, which most likely acts independently of PGI2. To combat angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension, dual rather than selective COX-1/2 blockade seems preferential.

Management of hypertension in patients with cancer: challenges and considerations

The survival rates of many cancers have significantly improved due to recent advancements in cancer screening and therapeutics. Although better cancer outcomes are encouraging, additional health challenges have surfaced, the utmost of which is the burden imposed by various cardiovascular and renal toxicities of anticancer therapies. To improve the overall outcome of patients with cancer, it is essential to understand and manage these treatment-related adverse effects. The cardiovascular side effects of antineoplastic therapies are well-known and include left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, myocardial ischaemia, QT prolongation, arrhythmia and hypertension. Among these, hypertension is the most common complication, prevalent in about 40% of all cancer patients, yet frequently overlooked and undertreated. This review explores the intricate connection between cancer and hypertension and provides distinct approaches to diagnosing, monitoring and managing hypertension in patients with cancer. We also outline the challenges and considerations that are relevant to the care of patients receiving anticancer drugs with prohypertensive potential.

VEGFC ameliorates salt-sensitive hypertension and hypertensive nephropathy by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome via activating VEGFR3-AMPK dependent autophagy pathway

Salt-sensitivity hypertension (SSHTN) is an independent predictor for cardiovascular mortality. VEGFC has been reported to be a protective role in SSHTN and hypertensive kidney injury. However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear. The current study aimed to explore the protective effects and mechanisms of VEGFC against SSHTN and hypertensive nephropathy. Here, we reported that VEGFC attenuated high blood pressure as well as protected against renal inflammation and fibrosis in SSHTN mice. Moreover, VEGFC suppressed the activation of renal NLRP3 inflammasome in SSHTN mice. In vitro, we found VEGFC inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation, meanwhile, upregulated autophagy in high-salt-induced macrophages, while these effects were reversed by an autophagy inhibitor 3MA. Furthermore, in vivo, 3MA pretreatment weakened the protective effects of VEGFC on SSHTN and hypertensive nephropathy. Mechanistically, VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR3) kinase domain activated AMPK by promoting the phosphorylation at Thr183 via binding to AMPK, thus enhancing autophagy activity in the context of high-salt-induced macrophages. These findings indicated that VEGFC inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation by promoting VEGFR3-AMPK-dependent autophagy pathway in high-salt-induced macrophages, which provided a mechanistic basis for the therapeutic target in SSHTN and hypertensive kidney injury.