1
|
Zheng B, Qian F, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhou B, Fang L. Neddylation activated TRIM25 desensitizes triple-negative breast cancer to paclitaxel via TFEB-mediated autophagy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2024; 43:177. [PMID: 38926803 PMCID: PMC11201311 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03085-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paclitaxel (PTX) treatment resistance is an important factor leading to poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), therefore there is an urgent need to identify new target for combination therapy. Neddylation is a post-translational process that introduces a ubiquitin-like protein called neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated protein 8 (NEDD8). Previous studies have found that neddylation is activated in multiple tumors, but its relationship with PTX chemotherapy sensitivity has not been reported. METHODS Differences in UBC12 and NEDD8 expression levels between PTX-sensitive and PTX-insensitive TNBC tissues were validated using public databases and immunohistochemistry. The in vitro and in vivo functional experiments were used to observe the effect of neddylation inhibition combined with PTX therapy on tumor progression. Co-IP, western blot and PCR assays were used to investigate the molecular mechanisms. Molecular docking was used to simulate the protein binding of UBC12 and TRIM25. Molecular dynamics simulation was used to observe the changes in TRIM25 protein conformation. RESULTS We found that in TNBC that is insensitive to PTX, NEDD8 and NEDD8 conjugating enzyme UBC12 are highly expressed. Treatment with the NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) inhibitor mln4924 or knockdown of UBC12 significantly increased the sensitivity of the tumor to PTX, and this increase in sensitivity is related to UBC12-mediated autophagy activation. Mechanistically, UBC12 can transfer NEDD8 to E3 ubiquitin ligase tripartite motif containing 25 (TRIM25) at K117. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that the neddylation modification of TRIM25 reduces steric hindrance in its RING domain, facilitating the binding of TRIM25 and ubiquitylated substrates. Subsequently, TRIM25 promotes the nuclear translocation of transcription factor EB (TFEB) and transcription of autophagy related genes by increasing K63-polyubiquitination of TFEB, thereby reducing tumor sensitivity to PTX. CONCLUSIONS Neddylation is activated in PTX-insensitive TNBC. Specifically, autophagy gene transcriptional activation mediated by the UBC12/TRIM25/TFEB axis reduces TNBC sensitivity to PTX. Neddylation suppression combination with PTX treatment shows a synergistic anti-tumor effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bowen Zheng
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Fengyuan Qian
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Xuehui Wang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Yuying Wang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Baian Zhou
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Lin Fang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 301 Yanchang Middle Road, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lapehn S, Nair S, Firsick EJ, MacDonald J, Thoreson C, Litch JA, Bush NR, Kadam L, Girard S, Myatt L, Prasad B, Sathyanarayana S, Paquette AG. Transcriptomic comparison of in vitro models of the human placenta. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.14.598695. [PMID: 38915703 PMCID: PMC11195179 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.14.598695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Studying the human placenta through in vitro cell culture methods is necessary due to limited access and amenability of human placental tissue to certain experimental methods as well as distinct anatomical and physiological differences between animal and human placentas. Selecting an in vitro culture model of the human placenta is challenging due to representation of different trophoblast cell types with distinct biological roles and limited comparative studies that define key characteristics of these models. Therefore, the aim of this research was to create a comprehensive transcriptomic comparison of common in vitro models of the human placenta compared to bulk placental tissue from the CANDLE and GAPPS cohorts (N=1083). We performed differential gene expression analysis on publicly available RNA sequencing data from 6 common in vitro models of the human placenta (HTR-8/SVneo, BeWo, JEG-3, JAR, Primary Trophoblasts, and Villous Explants) and compared to CANDLE and GAPPS bulk placental tissue or cytotrophoblast, syncytiotrophoblast, and extravillous trophoblast cell types derived from bulk placental tissue. All in vitro placental models had a substantial number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, FDR<0.01) compared to the CANDLE and GAPPS placentas (Average DEGs=10,873), and the individual trophoblast cell types (Average DEGs=5,346), indicating that there are vast differences in gene expression compared to bulk and cell-type specific human placental tissue. Hierarchical clustering identified 53 gene clusters with distinct expression profiles across placental models, with 22 clusters enriched for specific KEGG pathways, 7 clusters enriched for high-expression placental genes, and 7 clusters enriched for absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion genes. In vitro placental models were classified by fetal sex based on expression of Y-chromosome genes that identified HTR-8/SVneo cells as being of female origin, while JEG-3, JAR, and BeWo cells are of male origin. Overall, none of the models were a close approximation of the transcriptome of bulk human placental tissue, highlighting the challenges with model selection. To enable researchers to select appropriate models, we have compiled data on differential gene expression, clustering, and fetal sex into an accessible web application: "Comparative Transcriptomic Placental Model Atlas (CTPMA)" which can be utilized by researchers to make informed decisions about their selection of in vitro placental models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Lapehn
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children!s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101 United States
| | - Sidharth Nair
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children!s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101 United States
| | - Evan J. Firsick
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children!s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101 United States
| | - James MacDonald
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195 United States
| | - Ciara Thoreson
- Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, Lynwood, WA 98036 United States
| | - James A Litch
- Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, Lynwood, WA 98036 United States
| | - Nicole R. Bush
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences; Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 United States
| | - Leena Kadam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239 United States
| | - Sylvie Girard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 United States
| | - Leslie Myatt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239 United States
| | - Bhagwat Prasad
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202 United States
| | - Sheela Sathyanarayana
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195 United States
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children!s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101 United States
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98101 United States
| | - Alison G. Paquette
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children!s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101 United States
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195 United States
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195 United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qin M, Deng C, Wen L, Luo G, Meng Y. CRISPR-Cas and CRISPR-based screening system for precise gene editing and targeted cancer therapy. J Transl Med 2024; 22:516. [PMID: 38816739 PMCID: PMC11138051 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05235-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Target cancer therapy has been developed for clinical cancer treatment based on the discovery of CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat) -Cas system. This forefront and cutting-edge scientific technique improves the cancer research into molecular level and is currently widely utilized in genetic investigation and clinical precision cancer therapy. In this review, we summarized the genetic modification by CRISPR/Cas and CRISPR screening system, discussed key components for successful CRISPR screening, including Cas enzymes, guide RNA (gRNA) libraries, target cells or organs. Furthermore, we focused on the application for CAR-T cell therapy, drug target, drug screening, or drug selection in both ex vivo and in vivo with CRISPR screening system. In addition, we elucidated the advantages and potential obstacles of CRISPR system in precision clinical medicine and described the prospects for future genetic therapy.In summary, we provide a comprehensive and practical perspective on the development of CRISPR/Cas and CRISPR screening system for the treatment of cancer defects, aiming to further improve the precision and accuracy for clinical treatment and individualized gene therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingming Qin
- Reproductive Medical Center, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University (Foshan Women and Children Hospital), Foshan, Guangdong, 528000, China
- Department of Developmental Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China
| | - Chunhao Deng
- Chinese Medicine and Translational Medicine R&D center, Zhuhai UM Science & Technology Research Institute, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519031, China
| | - Liewei Wen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China
| | - Guoqun Luo
- Reproductive Medical Center, Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University (Foshan Women and Children Hospital), Foshan, Guangdong, 528000, China.
| | - Ya Meng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Urbini M, Bleve S, Schepisi G, Menna C, Gurioli G, Gianni C, De Giorgi U. Biomarkers for Salvage Therapy in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16872. [PMID: 38069192 PMCID: PMC10706346 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The outcome of metastatic testicular germ cell tumor patients has been dramatically improved by cisplatin-based chemotherapy combinations. However, up to 30% of patients with advanced disease relapse after first-line therapy and require salvage regimens, which include treatments with conventional-dose chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. For these patients, prognosis estimation represents an essential step in the choice of medical treatment but still remains a complex challenge. The available histological, clinical, and biochemical parameters attempt to define the prognosis, but they do not reflect the tumor's molecular and pathological features and do not predict who will exhibit resistance to the several treatments. Molecular selection of patients and validated biomarkers are highly needed in order to improve current risk stratification and identify novel therapeutic approaches for patients with recurrent disease. Biomolecular biomarkers, including microRNAs, gene expression profiles, and immune-related biomarkers are currently under investigation in testicular germ cell tumors and could potentially hold a prominent place in the future treatment selection and prognostication of these tumors. The aim of this review is to summarize current scientific data regarding prognostic and predictive biomarkers for salvage therapy in testicular germ cell tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Urbini
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Sara Bleve
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (S.B.); (G.S.); (C.M.); (C.G.); (U.D.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Schepisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (S.B.); (G.S.); (C.M.); (C.G.); (U.D.G.)
| | - Cecilia Menna
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (S.B.); (G.S.); (C.M.); (C.G.); (U.D.G.)
| | - Giorgia Gurioli
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Caterina Gianni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (S.B.); (G.S.); (C.M.); (C.G.); (U.D.G.)
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (S.B.); (G.S.); (C.M.); (C.G.); (U.D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|