circ_001504 promotes the development of renal cell carcinoma by sponging microRNA-149 to increase NUCB2

Use of Circular RNAs in Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutics of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer, representing 90% of kidney cancer diagnoses, and the deadliest urological cancer. While the incidence and mortality rates by renal cell carcinoma are higher in men compared to women, in both sexes the clinical characteristics are the same, and usually unspecific, thereby hindering and delaying the diagnostic process and increasing the metastatic potential. Regarding treatment, surgical resection remains the main therapeutic strategy. However, even after radical nephrectomy, metastasis may still occur in some patients, with most metastatic renal cell carcinomas being resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Therefore, the identification of new biomarkers to help clinicians in the early detection, and treatment of renal cell carcinoma is essential. In this review, we describe circRNAs related to renal cell carcinoma processes reported to date and propose the use of some in therapeutic strategies for renal cell carcinoma treatment.

NUCB2: roles in physiology and pathology

Nucleobindin2 (NUCB2) is a member of nucleobindin family which was first found in the nucleus of the hypothalamus, and had a relationship in diet and energy homeostasis. Its location in normal tissues such as stomach and islet further confirms that it plays a vital role in the regulation of physiological functions of the body. Besides, NUCB2 participates in tumorigenesis through activating various signal-pathways, more and more studies indicate that NUCB2 might impact tumor progression by promoting or inhibiting proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, metastasis, and invasion of tumor cells. In this review, we comprehensively stated NUCB2's expression and functions, and introduced the role of NUCB2 in physiology and pathology and its mechanism. What is more, pointed out the potential direction of future research.

The functions, oncogenic roles, and clinical significance of circular RNAs in renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common form of malignancy affecting the kidneys. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are non-coding RNAs that are derived from exonic or intronic sequences through a selective shearing process. There is growing evidence that these circRNAs can influence a range of biological pathways by serving as protein decoys, microRNA sponges, regulators of transcriptional activity, or templates for protein translation. The dysregulation of circRNA expression patterns is a hallmark of RCC and other cancer types, and there is strong evidence that these RNA species can play central roles in the onset and progression of RCC tumors. In the present review, we summarized recent findings on the functional roles and clinical impacts of circRNAs in RCC. Further, we discussed their potential utility as diagnostic biomarkers or targets for therapeutic intervention.

CircRNAs as Novel Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a type of long non-coding RNA with covalently closed loops that are naturally resistant to exoribonuclease. With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and bioinformatics, increasing data suggest that circRNAs are abnormally expressed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and act as important regulators of RCC carcinogenesis and progression. CircRNAs play important biological roles in modulating cell proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis, and gemcitabine chemoresistance in RCC. Most of the circRNAs studied in RCC have been reported to be significantly associated with many clinicopathologic characteristics and survival parameters of RCC. The stability and specificity of circRNAs enable them potential molecular markers for RCC diagnosis and prognosis. Moreover, circRNAs have emerged as targets for developing new therapies, because they can regulate various signaling pathways associated with RCC initiation and progression. In this review, we briefly summarize the biogenesis, degradation, and biological functions of circRNAs as well as the potential clinical applications of these molecules for RCC diagnosis, prognosis, and targeted therapy.

Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of CircRNA Expression in Renal Cancer

Background

Renal cancer (RC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the urinary system, and molecular targets for the specific diagnosis and treatment of RC have been widely explored. The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze circular RNAs (circRNAs), which may serve as novel tumor markers in terms of the diagnosis, prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of RC.

Methods

PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched for literature as up to July 30, 2021. All included studies were evaluated by the evaluation system, and the results were satisfactory. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were used to assess the association of circRNAs with diagnostic and clinicopathological indicators. The sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were combined to evaluate the diagnostic performance of circRNAs in RC.

Results

We included 22 studies that met the criteria, including 18 that were prognostic, 4 that were diagnostic, and 12 that were clinicopathologically relevant. In terms of prognosis, we found that upregulated circRNAs were positively associated with poor overall survival in patients with RC (HR=1.63, 95% CI=1.43–1.85). In terms of diagnosis, the combined SEN, SPE and AUC of circRNAs in the diagnosis of RC were 0.82, 0.84 and 0.89 (0.86–0.91), respectively. In terms of clinicopathological features, upregulated circRNAs were associated with the Fuhrman grade (OR=0.641, 95% CI=0.471–0.873), T stage (OR=0.236, 95% CI=0.141–0.396), TNM stage (OR=0.225, 95% CI=0.158–0.321) and lymphatic metastasis (OR=0.329, 95% CI=0.193–0.560).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis confirms that circRNAs may be candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and clinicopathological indicators of RC.

Genome-Wide Identification of CircRNAs of Infective Larvae and Adult Worms of Parasitic Nematode, Haemonchus contortus

CircRNAs, a novel class of ncRNA family, are endogenous transcriptional products involved in various biological and physiological processes in plants and animals. However, almost no information is available for circRNAs of parasitic helminths. In the present study, the circRNAs repertoire was comprehensively explored in Haemonchus contortus, a blood-sucking parasitic nematode of ruminants. In total, 20073 circRNAs were identified and annotated from three key developmental stages/genders of H. contortus including the free-living infective third-stage larvae (L3, 18883), parasitic adult female (Af, 3491), and male worms (Am, 2550) via deep-sequencing technology and bioinformatic analysis. Among these identified circRNAs, 71% were derived from exonic regions of protein-coding genes. The number of circRNAs transcribed from the X chromosome (4704) was higher than that from Chromosome I-V (3143, 3273, 3041, 3030, 2882). The amount of highly expressed circRNAs in third-stage larvae was significantly more abundant than that in adult stage. 15948 and 16847 circRNAs were differentially expressed between Af and L3s and between Am and L3, respectively. Among them, 13409 circRNAs existed in both comparisons. Furthermore, 1119 circRNAs were differentially expressed between Af_and_Am. GO enrichment analysis indicated that source genes of circRNAs differentially expressed between Am and L3 as well as between Af and L3 were significantly enriched in many biological processes, primarily including signaling, signal transduction and cell communication terms. KEGG analysis revealed that parental genes of differentially expressed circRNAs were mainly related to metabolism (pyruvate metabolism, glycerophospholipid metabolism, and carbon metabolism), MAPK signaling pathway, and phosphatidylinositol signaling system. Moreover, many circRNAs contained one or more miRNA potential binding sites, suggesting that they could regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Furthermore, the correctness of head-to-tail back splicing site and alternative circularization events were verified by Sanger sequencing using both divergent and convergent primers. Finally, the reliability of RNA-Seq data and the resistance of circRNAs to RNase R digestion were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. Taken together, our findings provide a foundation for elucidating the regulatory mechanisms of circRNAs in H. contortus, which will advance the understanding of circRNAs in parasitic nematodes.

Circular RNAs in renal cell carcinoma: Functions in tumorigenesis and diagnostic and prognostic potentials

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are non-coding RNAs with closed ends which makes them resistant to degrading enzyme RNAse R. These RNA molecules show cell, tissue or organ specific expression. Regulatory functions have been reported for a number of circRNAs. Particularly, they have been found to affect cell cycle and control cell proliferation. CircRNAs are involved in physiological processes like natural organ development. Their dysregulation in high-throughput technologies have been shown in a growing number of diseases especially many types of cancers such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Differentially expressed circRNAs in RCC tissues compared to normal tissues may affect carcinogenesis process. Overexpressed circRNAs promote tumorigenic functions of RCC cell lines while down-regulated transcripts repress them. Both dysregulated circRNAs are correlated with clinicopathological features, prognosis and survival in RCC patients which along with their acceptable diagnostic values suggest them as potential biomarkers in diagnosis or prediction of prognosis of RCC patients. In this review, we have assessed tumorigenic or tumor-suppressing effects of circRNAs and also their diagnostic and prognostic potentials in RCC.

Nucleobindin-2/Nesfatin-1-A New Cancer Related Molecule?

Cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and even tumors with similar clinicopathological characteristics show different biology, behavior, and treatment responses. As a result, there is an urgent need to define new prognostic and predictive markers to make treatment options more personalized. According to the latest findings, nucleobindin-2/nesfatin-1 (NUCB2/NESF-1) is an important factor in cancer development and progression. Nucleobindin-2 is a precursor protein of nesfatin-1. As NUCB2 and nesfatin-1 are colocalized in each tissue, their expression is often analyzed together as NUCB2. The metabolic function of NUCB2/NESF-1 is related to food intake, glucose metabolism, and the regulation of immune, cardiovascular and endocrine systems. Recently, it has been demonstrated that high expression of NUCB2/NESF-1 is associated with poor outcomes and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in, e.g., breast, colon, prostate, endometrial, thyroid, bladder cancers, or glioblastoma. Interestingly, nesfatin-1 is also considered an inhibitor of the proliferation of human adrenocortical carcinoma and ovarian epithelial carcinoma cells. These conflicting results make NUCB2/NESF-1 an interesting target of study in the context of cancer progression. The present review is the first to describe NUCB2/NESF-1 as a new prognostic and predictive marker in cancers.

MiR-30a-5p inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by targeting NUCB2

BACKGROUND

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant head and neck tumor arising in the nasopharynx. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are elucidated to exert tumor-suppressing function in human cancers. Numerous studies have manifested that miR-30a-5p serves as an anti-oncogene in various cancers.

OBJECTIVE

To research the biological function and molecular mechanism of miR-30a-5p in NPC.

METHODS

The morphology of NPC tissues was revealed by H&E staining. Transwell and wound healing assays were applied to investigate the effects of miR-30a-5p on NPC cell migration. The binding interaction between miR-30a-5p and nucleobindin 2 (NUCB2) was identified by luciferase reporter assay. Xenograft nude mice were used to detect the influence of miR-30a-5p on NPC tumor growth.

RESULTS

MiR-30a-5p was downregulated in NPC tissues and cells. The overexpression ofmiR-30a-5p inhibited proliferation, migration and invasion abilities of NPC cells. Moreover, NUCB2 was revealed to be a downstream target gene of miR-30a-5p, and knockdown of NUCB2 repressed the malignant behaviors of NPC cells and tumor growth. Additionally, rescue experiments revealed that miR-30a-5p suppressed the proliferation, migration and invasion of NPC cells via targeting NUCB2 in vitro. Meanwhile, in vivo assays depicted that NUCB2 overexpression rescued the effects induced by miR-30a-5p upregulation on tumor growth.

CONCLUSION

MiR-30a-5p modulates NPC progression by targeting NUCB2. These findings lay a foundation for exploring the clinical treatment of NPC.

LncRNA SNHG1 regulates immune escape of renal cell carcinoma by targeting miR-129-3p to activate STAT3 and PD-L1

Immune escape of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) impacts patient survival. However, the molecular mechanism of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) small nucleolar RNA host gene 1 (SNHG1) in RCC immune escape remains unclear. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting results revealed that the expression of lncRNA SNHG1 and STAT3 were upregulated in RCC tissues and cells and that the expression of miR-129-3p was downregulated. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results revealed the increased levels of immune-related factors (interferon-γ, tumour necrosis factor α, and interleukin-2) in RCC tissues. SNHG1 knockdown or miR-129-3p overexpression inhibited the proliferation and invasion of A498 and 786-O cells, while the proliferation and cytotoxicity of CD8⁺ T cells increased, which promoted the secretion of immune-related factors. STAT3 overexpression decreased the protective effect of miR-129-3p overexpression on RCC cell immune escape. In addition, miR-129-3p knockdown and STAT3 overexpression decreased the protective effect of lncRNA SNHG1 knockdown on RCC cell immune escape. In addition, PD-L1 expression was downregulated after lncRNA SNHG1 knockdown but upregulated after miR-129-3p knockdown and STAT3 overexpression. Dual-luciferase assays showed that lncRNA SNHG1 targets miR-129-3p, and miR-129-3p targets STAT3. RNA pull-down and RNA immunoprecipitation assays verified the regulatory relationship between SNHG1 and STAT3. In vivo, shSNHG1 prolonged the overall survival of RCC tumour model mice and inhibited RCC tumour growth and immune escape but increased CD8⁺ T cell infiltration in mice. Our findings provide an experimental basis for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of immune escape by RCC and reveal a novel target to treat this disease.