SP1-mediated up-regulation of lncRNA TUG1 underlines an oncogenic property in colorectal cancer

Wnt/β-catenin-driven EMT regulation in human cancers

Metastasis accounts for 90% of cancer-related deaths among the patients. The transformation of epithelial cells into mesenchymal cells with molecular alterations can occur during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The EMT mechanism accelerates the cancer metastasis and drug resistance ability in human cancers. Among the different regulators of EMT, Wnt/β-catenin axis has been emerged as a versatile modulator. Wnt is in active form in physiological condition due to the function of GSK-3β that destructs β-catenin, while ligand-receptor interaction impairs GSK-3β function to increase β-catenin stability and promote its nuclear transfer. Regarding the oncogenic function of Wnt/β-catenin, its upregulation occurs in human cancers and it can accelerate EMT-mediated metastasis and drug resistance. The stimulation of Wnt by binding Wnt ligands into Frizzled receptors can enhance β-catenin accumulation in cytoplasm that stimulates EMT and related genes upon nuclear translocation. Wnt/β-catenin/EMT axis has been implicated in augmenting metastasis of both solid and hematological tumors. The Wnt/EMT-mediated cancer metastasis promotes the malignant behavior of tumor cells, causing therapy resistance. The Wnt/β-catenin/EMT axis can be modulated by upstream mediators in which non-coding RNAs are main regulators. Moreover, pharmacological intervention, mainly using phytochemicals, suppresses Wnt/EMT axis in metastasis suppression.

SIX1 induced HULC modulates neuropathic pain and Schwann cell oxidative stress after sciatic nerve injury

Neuropathic pain is a severe and debilitating condition caused by damage to the peripheral nerve or central nervous system. Although several mechanisms have been identified, the underlying pathophysiology of neuropathic pain is still not fully understood. Unfortunately, few effective therapies are available for this condition. Therefore, there is an urgent need to investigate the underlying mechanisms of neuropathic pain to develop more effective treatments. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have recently gained attention due to their potential to modulate protein expression through various mechanisms. LncRNAs have been implicated in many diseases, including neuropathic pain. This study aimed to identify a novel lncRNA involved in neuropathic pain progression. The lncRNA microarray analysis showed that lncRNA Upregulated in Liver Cancer (HULC) was significantly upregulated in spinal cord tissue of sciatic nerve injury (SNI) rats. Further experiments confirmed that HULC promoted neuropathic pain progression and aggravated H2O2-induced Schwann cell injury. Mechanistically, Sine Oculis Homeobox 1 (SIX1) regulated the transcriptional expression of HULC, and both SIX1 and HULC were involved in neuropathic pain and Schwann cell injury. The results of our research indicate the existence of a previously unknown SIX1/HULC axis that plays a significant role in the development and progression of neuropathic pain, shedding light on the complex mechanisms that underlie this debilitating condition. These findings offer novel insights into the molecular pathways involved in neuropathic pain. This study underscores the potential of targeting lncRNAs as a viable approach to alleviate the suffering of patients with neuropathic pain.

SP1-Induced Upregulation of LncRNA AFAP1-AS1 Promotes Tumor Progression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Regulating mTOR Pathway

The long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) actin fiber-associated protein-1 antisense RNA 1 (AFAP1-AS1) exerted oncogenic activity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We designed this study and conducted it to investigate the upstream regulation mechanism of AFAP1-AS1 in TNBC tumorigenesis. In this work, we proved the localization of AFAP1-AS1 in the cytoplasm. We elucidated the mechanism by which the transcription factor specificity protein 1 (SP1) modulated AFAP1-AS1 in TNBC progression, which has yet to be thoroughly studied. Dual luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay revealed a strong affinity of SP1 toward the promoter regions P3 of AFAP1-AS1, proving the gene expression regulation of AFAP1-AS1 via SP1 in TNBC. Additionally, SP1 could facilitate the tumorigenesis of TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo by regulating the AFAP1-AS1 expression. Furthermore, silenced AFAP1-AS1 suppressed the expression of genes in the mTOR pathway, such as eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B (EIF4B), mitogen-activated protein kinase-associated protein 1 (MAPKAP1), SEH1-like nucleoporin (SEH1L), serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 (SGK1), and its target NEDD4-like E3 ubiquitin protein ligase (NEDD4L), and promoted the gene expression of s-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (SKP2). Overall, this study emphasized the oncogenic role of SP1 and AFAP1-AS1 in TNBC and illustrated the AFAP1-AS1 upstream interaction with SP1 and the downstream modulatory of mTOR signaling, thus offering insights into the tumorigenesis mechanism in TNBC.

CAP1 (cyclase-associated protein 1) mediates the cyclic AMP signals that activate Rap1 in stimulating matrix adhesion of colon cancer cells

We previously reported that CAP1 (Cyclase-Associated Protein 1) regulates matrix adhesion in mammalian cells through FAK (Focal Adhesion Kinase). More recently, we discovered a phosphor-regulation mechanism for CAP1 through the Ser307/Ser309 tandem site that is of critical importance for all CAP1 functions. However, molecular mechanisms underlying the CAP1 function in adhesion and its regulation remain largely unknown. Here we report that Rap1 also facilitates the CAP1 function in adhesion, and more importantly, we identify a novel signaling pathway where CAP1 mediates the cAMP signals, through the cAMP effectors Epac (Exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP) and PKA (Protein Kinase A), to activate Rap1 in stimulating matrix adhesion in colon cancer cells. Knockdown of CAP1 led to opposite adhesion phenotypes in SW480 and HCT116 colon cancer cells, with reduced matrix adhesion and reduced FAK and Rap1 activities in SW480 cells while it stimulated matrix adhesion as well as FAK and Rap1 activities in HCT116 cells. Importantly, depletion of CAP1 abolished the stimulatory effects of the cAMP activators forskolin and isoproterenol, as well as that of Epac and PKA, on matrix adhesion in both cell types. Our results consistently support a required role for CAP1 in the cAMP activation of Rap1. Identification of the key role for CAP1 in linking the major second messenger cAMP to activation of Rap1 in stimulating adhesion, which may potentially also regulate proliferation in other cell types, not only vertically extends our knowledge on CAP biology, but also carries important translational potential for targeting CAP1 in cancer therapeutics.

SP1 transcriptionally regulates UBE2N expression to promote lung adenocarcinoma progression

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the main cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Understanding the mechanisms of LUAD progression may provide insights into targeted therapy approaches for this malignancy. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2 N (UBE2N) has been demonstrated to play key roles in the progression of various cancers. However, the functions and mechanisms underlying UBE2N expression in LUAD are still unclear. In this study, we found that UBE2N is highly expressed in LUAD and patients with high UBE2N expression in their tumors have poor clinical outcomes. Moreover, we showed that UBE2N interference significantly inhibited LUAD progression in vitro and in vivo. At the molecular level, we demonstrated that the UBE2N is a bona fide target of transcription factor SP1. SP1 directly bound to the promoter of UBE2N and upregulated its expression in LUAD cells, which in turn contributed to the progression of LUAD. Furthermore, we found that there is a strong positive correlation between the expression of SP1 and UBE2N in LUAD samples. Importantly, LUAD patients with concomitantly high expression of SP1 and UBE2N were significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the SP1-UBE2N signaling axis might play a key role in the malignant progression of LUAD, which provides new targets and strategies for the treatment of LUAD.

Specificity Proteins (Sp) and Cancer

The specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors (TFs) Sp1, Sp2, Sp3 and Sp4 exhibit structural and functional similarities in cancer cells and extensive studies of Sp1 show that it is a negative prognostic factor for patients with multiple tumor types. In this review, the role of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 in the development of cancer and their regulation of pro-oncogenic factors and pathways is reviewed. In addition, interactions with non-coding RNAs and the development of agents that target Sp transcription factors are also discussed. Studies on normal cell transformation into cancer cell lines show that this transformation process is accompanied by increased levels of Sp1 in most cell models, and in the transformation of muscle cells into rhabdomyosarcoma, both Sp1 and Sp3, but not Sp4, are increased. The pro-oncogenic functions of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 in cancer cell lines were studied in knockdown studies where silencing of each individual Sp TF decreased cancer growth, invasion and induced apoptosis. Silencing of an individual Sp TF was not compensated for by the other two and it was concluded that Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4 are examples of non-oncogene addicted genes. This conclusion was strengthened by the results of Sp TF interactions with non-coding microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs where Sp1 contributed to pro-oncogenic functions of Sp/non-coding RNAs. There are now many examples of anticancer agents and pharmaceuticals that induce downregulation/degradation of Sp1, Sp3 and Sp4, yet clinical applications of drugs specifically targeting Sp TFs are not being used. The application of agents targeting Sp TFs in combination therapies should be considered for their potential to enhance treatment efficacy and decrease toxic side effects.

Advancing metabolic networks and mapping updated urinary metabolic fingerprints after exposure to typical carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines

Heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) were not only present in cooked foods and cigarette smoke, but also measured in airborne particles and diesel-exhaust particles. Typical HAAs have been reported to induce carcinogenicity and metabolic disturbances, but how these hazardous compounds interfere with metabolic networks by regulating metabolic pathways and fingerprinting signature metabolites as biomarkers remains ambiguous. We developed an advanced strategy that adopted chemical isotope labeling ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry for urinary nontargeted metabolomics analysis to gain new insight into in vivo physiological responses stimulated by exposure to typical HAAs. Rats were orally administered with a single dose of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) or 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx) (1 and 10 mg/kg bw) and their D₃-isotopic compounds, respectively, and urine samples were then continuously collected within 36 h. Metabolomics data were acquired and processed by classical multivariate statistical analysis, while urinary metabolites were further identified and characterized according to mass spectrometric fragmentation rules, time- and dose-dependent profiles, and calibration of synthesized standards. We monitored 23 and 37 urinary metabolites as the biotransformation products of PhIP and MeIQx, respectively, and first identified demethylated metabolites of PhIP, tentatively named 2-amino-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, and dihydroxylation products of classical HAAs as short-term biomarkers of exposure to further unravel the metabolic networks. In addition, our findings revealed that both HAAs significantly disturb histidine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, tricarboxylic acid cycle, etc. Furthermore, we found that histamine, methionine, alanine, and 4-guanidinobutanoic acid could be considered potential characteristic biomarkers for the oncogenicity or carcinogenicity of both PhIP and MeIQx and screened their specific key pivotal metabolites. The current metabolomics approach is applicable in mapping updated urinary metabolic fingerprints and identifying potential specific biomarkers for HAAs-induced early tumorigenesis.

Comprehensive analysis of immune ferroptosis gene in renal clear cell carcinoma: prognosis and influence of tumor microenvironment

OBJECTIVE

We conducted an in-depth study of the immune system and ferroptosis to identify prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for renal clear cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Immune ferroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (IFR-DEGs) were selected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A lasso-Cox risk scoring model was established; its prognostic value was determined using prognostic analysis and single multivariate Cox analysis. Model genes were subjected to subcellular fluorescence localization, mRNA and protein expression analyses, and single-cell RNA sequencing localization analysis. Risk score was analyzed using the immune score, immune infiltrating cell correlation, immune checkpoint, TIDE, and drug sensitivity.

RESULTS

A total of 103 IFR-DEGs were identified; a risk model comprising ACADSB, CHAC1, LURAP1L, and PLA2G6 was established. The survival curve, single multivariate Cox regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the model had good predictive ability (p < 0.05). It was also validated using the validation set and total cohort. Subcellular fluorescence localization revealed that ACADSB, CHAC1, and PLA2G6 were distributed in the cytoplasm and LURAP1L in the nucleus. The mRNA and protein expression trends were consistent. Single-cell RNA sequencing mapping revealed that ACADSB was enriched in distal tubule cell clusters. In the Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) mutation correlation analysis, 1.56% of the patients were found to have genetic alterations; The Spearman correlation analysis of model gene mutations showed that ACADSB was positively correlated with LURAP1L, which may have a synergistic effect; it was negatively correlated with CHAC1 and PLA2G6, and CHAC1 was negatively correlated with LURAP1L, which may have an antagonistic effect. Model and immune correlation analyses found that high-risk patients had significantly higher levels of CD8+ T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), immune checkpoints, immune scores, and immune escape than those in low-risk patients. High-risk patients had a higher susceptibility to small-molecule drugs.

CONCLUSION

A novel prognostic model of immune ferroptosis-related genes (ACADSB, CHAC1, LURAP1L, and PLA2G6), which plays an important role in immune infiltration, microenvironment, and immune escape, was constructed. It effectively predicts the survival of patients with KIRC.

The functions of long noncoding RNAs on regulation of F-box proteins in tumorigenesis and progression

Accumulated evidence has revealed that F-box protein, a subunit of SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, participates in carcinogenesis and tumor progression via targeting its substrates for ubiquitination and degradation. F-box proteins could be regulated by cellular signaling pathways and noncoding RNAs in tumorigenesis. Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), one type of noncoding RNAs, has been identified to modulate the expression of F-box proteins and contribute to oncogenesis. In this review, we summarize the role and mechanisms of multiple lncRNAs in regulating F-box proteins in tumorigenesis, including lncRNAs SLC7A11-AS1, MT1JP, TUG1, FER1L4, TTN-AS1, CASC2, MALAT1, TINCR, PCGEM1, linc01436, linc00494, GATA6-AS1, and ODIR1. Moreover, we discuss that targeting these lncRNAs could be helpful for treating cancer via modulating F-box protein expression. We hope our review can stimulate the research on exploration of molecular insight into how F-box proteins are governed in carcinogenesis. Therefore, modulation of lncRNAs is a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer therapy via regulation of F-box proteins.