EXploring practice gaps to improve PERIoperativE Nutrition CarE (EXPERIENCE Study): a qualitative analysis of barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice guidelines

Implementation of nutritional care in hospitals: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators using implementation theory

BACKGROUND

Disease-related malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalised patients, but not all patients achieve the needed nutritional care. At a Danish University Hospital, focus has been on implementing nutritional practices based on clinical guidelines, but there is continuously variation between the wards regarding the quality of nutritional care.

AIM

The aim of this study was to identify the potential barriers and facilitators for implementation of the clinical guidelines for nutritional practices and to recommend suggestions for development of nutritional practices, using a theoretical implementation strategy.

METHOD

The design was a qualitative interview study of employees at a Danish University Hospital, using a semi-structured interview guide. The participants were nurses, nurse's assistant, nurse nutrition expert, head nurse and dieticians. We recruited 11 employees, representing eight different wards.

FINDINGS

The analysis identified six themes: (1) clear allocation of responsibilities and committed management enhances nutrition practices, (2) leadership support is essential, (3) physical settings and tools affect possibilities for action, (4) selection of equivalent staff is core, (5) teaching promotes the knowledge and skills and (6) a dietitian in the ward facilitates implementation of nutritional care. Barriers and facilitators among the themes were identified and has led to suggestions to strengthen nutritional care, based on implementation theory.

CONCLUSION

Various factors were identified as having impact on the implementation of nutrition practices and different suggestions have emerged to accommodate those factors, as well as to apply an implementation strategy to facilitate change in practice.

Implementing early feeding after liver transplant using implementation frameworks: A multimethod study

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) in the nutrition management of advanced liver disease and enhanced recovery after surgery recommendations state that normal diet should recommence 12-24 h following liver transplantation. This study aimed to compare postoperative nutrition practices to guideline recommendations, explore clinician perceptions regarding feeding after transplant surgery, and implement and evaluate strategies to improve postoperative nutrition practices.

METHODS

A pre-post multimethod implementation study was undertaken, guided by the knowledge-to-action framework. A retrospective chart audit of postoperative dietary practice and semistructured interviews with clinicians were undertaken. Implementation strategies were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change matching tool and then evaluated.

RESULTS

An evidence-practice gap was identified, with the median day to initiation of nutrition (free-fluid or full diet) on postoperative day (POD) 2 and only 25% of patients aligning with the EBGs. Clinician interviews identified belief in the importance of nutrition, with variation in surgical practice in relation to early nutrition, competing clinical priorities, and vulnerabilities in communication contributing to delays in returning to feeding. An endorsed postoperative nutrition protocol was implemented along with a suite of theory- and stakeholder-informed intervention strategies. Following implementation, the median time to initiate nutrition reduced to POD1 and alignment with EBGs improved to 60%.

CONCLUSION

This study used implementation frameworks and strategies to understand, implement, and improve early feeding practices in line with EBGs after liver transplant. Ongoing sustainability of practice change as well as the impact on clinical outcomes have yet to be determined.

Implementing Change: Sustaining Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Pediatric Surgery Using Iterative Assessments

INTRODUCTION

While Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are becoming more common in pediatric surgery, there is still little published about protocol compliance and sustainability.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study to evaluate the compliance of an ERAS protocol for pectus repair at a large academic children's hospital. Our primary outcome was overall protocol compliance at 1-y postimplementation of the ERAS protocol. Our comparison group included all pectus repairs for 2 y before protocol implementation.

RESULTS

Overall protocol compliance at 12 mo was 89%. Of the 16 pectus repairs included in the ERAS protocol group, 94% (n = 15) and 94% (n = 15) received preoperative acetaminophen and gabapentin, respectively, which was significantly greater than the historical control group (P < 0.001). For the intraoperative components analyzed, only the intrathecal morphine was significantly different than historical controls (100% versus 49%, P < 0.001). Postoperatively, the time from operating room to return to normal diet was shorter for the ERAS group (0.53 d versus 1.16 d, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in readmission rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS protocol compliance varies based on phase of care. Solutions to sustain protocols depend on the institution and the patient population. However, the utilization of implementation science fundamentals was invaluable in this study to identify and address areas for improvement in protocol compliance. Other institutions may adapt these strategies to improve protocol compliance at their centers.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion within Pediatric Adherence Science

Given the long-standing history of systemic racism in psychological science, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts are increasingly vital to the advancement and improvement of the field. This commentary extends the seminal work of the article Upending Racism in Psychological Science: Strategies to Change How Our Science is Conducted, Reported, Reviewed, and Disseminated (Buchanan et al., Am Psychol, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6nk4x , 2020) by providing tangible applications and recommendations to improve DEI integration into pediatric adherence science. Real-world adherence examples are discussed regarding the challenges faced in systematically integrating DEI principles, potential solutions to overcoming barriers, and the implications of these efforts on scientific advancement in an effort to address and dismantle research practices that perpetuate inequity and White supremacy. Specifically, we provide discourse and practical guidance related to the conduct, reporting, reviewing, and dissemination of pediatric adherence science to promote dialog and produce actionable change toward the promotion of health equity and social justice.

Barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) by a multidisciplinary team in China: a multicentre qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the attitudes and barriers encountered in the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in China from the perspective of multidisciplinary team members.

DESIGN

Based on Donabedian's structure-process-outcome (SPO) model, a multicentre qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted.

SETTING

From September 2020 to December 2020, the participants of this study were interviewed from six tertiary hospitals in Sichuan province (n=3), Jiangsu province (n=2) and Guangxi province (n=1) in China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 42 members, including surgeons (n=11), anaesthesiologists (n=10), surgical nurses (n=14) and dietitians(n=7) were interviewed.

RESULTS

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) members still face many barriers during the process of implementing ERAS. Eight main themes are described around the barriers in the implementation of ERAS. Themes in the structure dimension are: (1) shortage of medical resources, (2) lack of policy support and (3) outdated concepts. Themes in the process dimension are: (1) poor doctor-patient collaboration, (2) poor communication and collaboration among MDT members and (3) lack of individualised management. Themes in the outcome dimension are: (1) low compliance and (2) high medical costs. The current implementation of ERAS is still based on ideas more than reality.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, barriers to ERAS implementation are broad. Identifying key elements of problems in the application and promotion of ERAS from the perspective of the MDT would provide a starting point for future quality improvement of ERAS, enhance the clinical effect of ERAS and increase formalised ERAS utilisation in China.

Evaluation of the agreement, adoption, and adherence to the evidence-based guidelines for the nutritional management of adult patients with head and neck cancer among Australian dietitians

AIM

Evidence-based guideline translation to practice can improve outcomes but is often impaired by poor implementation. This project aimed to evaluate the implementation of the Evidence-based guidelines for the nutritional management of adult patients with head and neck cancer among Australian dietitians providing clinical care to this population.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed, with face and content validity confirmed by an expert panel (n = 13), to gauge participant perceptions of the guidelines against an implementation evaluation framework. Dietitians were identified through Dietitians Australia and by contacting experts in the field. Eligibility was determined by questionnaire completion and prior guideline awareness. Responses were provided using a 5-point Likert scale. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics; with inferential analysis to determine if demographic information could reveal trends in guideline use and perception.

RESULTS

Of the 43 initial respondents, n = 28 completed the questionnaire, with n = 24/28 (86%) meeting full eligibility criteria for analysis. Median (range) scores for all four domains were high: awareness (4.0 [3.2-4.8]), agreement (4.4 [4.1-4.7]), adoption (3.5 [3.1-3.9]), and adherence (4.3 [4.1-4.9]). However, perception of guideline awareness and use among multidisciplinary team colleagues was low (mean 3.2/5.0 and 3.1/5.0, respectively). Dietitians with <10 years' experience had significantly higher perceptions of the guidelines' ability to positively influence practice; support evidence-based practice; and enhance dietitian credibility (P = 0.04) vs dietitians with ≥10 years' experience.

CONCLUSION

Dietitians demonstrated high rates of guideline implementation and positive perceptions for its use in clinical practice. Future implementation strategies and evaluation should expand to engage the wider multidisciplinary team and more experienced clinicians.

Implementation science for dietitians: The 'what, why and how' using multiple case studies

AIM

Implementation science theories, models and frameworks help to address evidence-practice gaps, which have increasing importance for dietetic practice. This paper aims to provide dietitians with insight into how implementation science can be applied to practice, using multiple 'real-life' case studies.

METHODS

Three case studies were purposively selected across areas of dietetics practice to demonstrate application of commonly-used implementation theories, models and frameworks. Reflections from the authors were provided in response to a structured set of questions outlining how the theoretical approach was selected and used, and considerations for future application. Within and cross-case analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Dietitians used diverse implementation theories, models and frameworks to identify barriers and enablers, to plan for implementation, and to guide the selection of implementation strategies. Implementation theory was used to evaluate the implementation process in one case study. Cross-case analysis identified that mentoring by those with implementation expertise, multidisciplinary implementation teams, and leadership and investment in research and translation at an organisational and departmental level as key enablers.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper offers dietitians insight into how implementation science can be applied to improve the uptake of evidence-based practices within nutrition and dietetics, and suggests that there needs to be investment in implementation science as a foundation science within nutrition and dietetics, including education, training and mentoring for dietitians.

Power, autonomy and interprofessional practice in dietitian clinical decision making: An interpretive study in acute hospitals

Dietitians learn clinical decision making (CDM) predominantly as an autonomous cognitive process that considers the needs and preferences of the patient. Although interprofessional education is increasing in tertiary dietetic programmes, a paucity of research exists that explores the nature of how practising dietitians make decisions, independent or otherwise. This qualitative interpretative study explored the nature of experienced dietitian CDM in the acute care setting. Philosophical hermeneutic principles guided text construction and interpretation via in-depth, semi-structured interviews with practising dietitians with at least 3 years of experience. A reference focus group commented on the emerging findings, increasing the rigour of the research. Ten dietitians participated in the interviews and there were five dietitians in the reference focus group. CDM was found to be a highly social phenomenon with varying degrees of autonomy involving complex power relations with various other health professionals, in particular, medical practitioners. Dietitians respond to existing power relations in key ways, including building and maintaining relationships, advocating on behalf of the patient and negotiating decisions with other healthcare staff when in pursuit of improved health and nutrition related outcomes for patients. Strategic interprofessional communication skills are foundational to effective patient care and advancing the role of the dietitian. Power and autonomy in dietitian CDM are important concepts that could inform interprofessional education when seeking to promote both effective dietetic and interprofessional practice.

Fasting and surgery timing (FaST) audit

BACKGROUND & AIMS

International guidance advocates the avoidance of prolonged preoperative fasting due to its negative impact on perioperative hydration. This study aimed to assess the adherence to these guidelines for fasting in patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery in the East Midlands region of the UK.

METHODS

This prospective audit was performed over a two-month period at five National Health Service (NHS) Trusts across the East Midlands region of the UK. Demographic data, admission and operative details, and length of preoperative fasting were collected on adult patients listed for emergency and elective surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 343 surgical patients included within the study, 50% (n = 172) were male, 78% (n = 266) had elective surgery and 22% (n = 77) underwent emergency surgery. Overall median fasting times (Q1, Q3) were 16.1 (13.0, 19.4) hours for food and 5.8 (3.5, 10.7) hours for clear fluids. Prolonged fasting >12 h was documented in 73% (n = 250) for food, and 21% (n = 71) for clear fluids. Median fasting times from clear fluids and food were longer in the those undergoing emergency surgery when compared with those undergoing elective surgery: 13.0 (6.4, 22.6) vs. 4.9 (3.3, 7.8) hours, and 22.0 (14.0, 37.4) vs. 15.6 (12.9, 17.8) hours respectively, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite international consensus on the duration of preoperative fasting, patients continue to fast from clear fluids and food for prolonged lengths of time. Patients admitted for emergency surgery were more likely to fast for longer than those having elective surgery.

Multidisciplinary Provision of Food and Nutritional Care to Hospitalized Adult In-Patients: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Multidisciplinary approaches to nutritional care are increasingly emphasized and recommended. However, there is little evidence of how different disciplines work together collaboratively to deliver optimum quality care to adult in-patients. This scoping review aimed to describe the existing literature on multidisciplinary collaboration to identify the various disciplines involved and the features that influence collaborative working in implementing multidisciplinary food and nutritional care with adult in-patients.

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched, including MEDLINE Complete, Embase, CINAHL Complete, HMIC, and Scopus, from their inception to December 2019. Data were retrieved from eligible studies. A narrative description of findings is reported with respect to the disciplines involved, the aspects of nutritional care explored, and the collaborative processes categorized using the input, process, and outcome framework.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies with heterogeneous study designs met the eligibility criteria. Studies were undertaken in six countries. Findings show a wide diversity of multidisciplinary collaborations in various aspects of nutritional care in all studies. Multidisciplinary nutritional care provision was facilitated by several processes, including training and development, communication and information sharing, and clinical leadership and management support. Outcomes were reported at the patient, team, and organizational levels.

CONCLUSION

This review reveals the significance of the interrelationship between different disciplines and their complementary contributions towards the delivery of optimal food and nutritional care. Key aspects include the involvement of different disciplines, the clarification of roles and multidisciplinary interrelationships, communication, information sharing, clinical leadership, and management support, all of which facilitated collaborative working. Our review uncovered that these features can significantly influence multidisciplinary working. This review is the first to present literature concerning the attributes that affect collaborative working. Further research is recommended specifically around multidisciplinary nutritional care processes and conditions that allow for better collaborative working.

Evaluation of an intervention to improve nutrition intake in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: A mixed-methods pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Timely and adequate nutrition after surgery is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an intervention, developed using an integrated knowledge translation approach, designed to improve oral intake among postoperative colorectal patients.

METHODS

A pre/post, mixed-methods pilot study was undertaken at a tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. Patients who had undergone elective colorectal surgery and were admitted to the ward where 10 nutrition-related strategies had been implemented were included. Quantitative data, including patient demographics, timing and type of nutrition consumed, and protein and energy intake were collected pre- and post-intervention via chart audits, direct observations, and verbal clarification. Qualitative data on patient (n = 18) responses to the intervention were collected through one-on-one, semistructured interviews and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were observed (30 pre- and 34 post-intervention). Significant improvements were seen for the following outcomes (presented as median [interquartile range], pre- versus post-intervention): time (h) to first dietary intake (15.7 [7.4-22.5] versus 4.9 [3.7-14.2]); patient energy intakes (kJ) on day 1 (1719 [947-2200] versus 3530 [2192-5169]) and day 2 (2506 [1071-3749] versus 4144 [2987-5889]); and patient protein intake (g) on day 1 (3.3 [1.8-11.2] versus 30.3 [20-45]) and day 2 (10.8 [3.5-29.9] versus 39.6 [30.7-59]). Prescription of free fluids as first diet type increased from 13% to 79% pre- and post-intervention, respectively. There were no significant differences in time (h) to first solid dietary intake (86.1 [60.1-104] versus 69.2 [46.1-115.5]) and overall proportion of patients who met both their estimated energy and protein requirements while in hospital pre- and post-intervention (22 versus 37%). Patients reported positive experiences with the intervention.

CONCLUSION

A multifaceted intervention developed using an integrated knowledge translation approach has the potential to improve oral intake in patients who undergo colorectal surgery. A larger-scale trial is required to confirm these findings and assess the effects of the intervention on clinical outcomes and costs.

An exploration of how developers use qualitative evidence: content analysis and critical appraisal of guidelines

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines have become increasingly widely used to guide quality improvement of clinical practice. Qualitative research may be a useful way to improve the quality and implementation of guidelines. The methodology for qualitative evidence used in guidelines development is worthy of further research.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was made of WHO, NICE, SIGN, NGC, RNAO, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP from January 1, 2011 to February 25, 2020. Guidelines which met IOM criteria and were focused on clinical questions using qualitative research or qualitative evidence, were included. Four authors extracted significant information and entered this onto data extraction forms. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool was used to evaluate the guidelines' quality. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0 and R version 3.3.2.

RESULTS

Sixty four guidelines were identified. The overall quality of the guidelines was high (almost over 60%). Domain 1 (Scope and Purpose) was ranked the highest with a median score of 83% (IQ 78-83). Domain 2 (Stakeholder involvement) and Domain 5 (Applicability) were ranked the lowest with median scores of 67% (IQ 67-78) and 67% (IQ 63-73) respectively. 20% guidelines used qualitative research to identify clinical questions. 86% guidelines used qualitative evidence to support recommendations (mainly based on primary studies, a few on qualitative evidence synthesis). 19% guidelines applied qualitative evidence when considering facilitators and barriers to recommendations' implementation. 52% guideline developers evaluated the quality of the primary qualitative research study using the CASP tool or NICE checklist for qualitative studies. No guidelines evaluated the quality of qualitative evidence synthesis to formulate recommendations. 17% guidelines presented the level of qualitative research using the grade criteria of evidence and recommendation in different forms such as I, III, IV, very low. 28% guidelines described the grades of the recommendations supported by qualitative and quantitative evidence. No guidelines described the grade of recommendations only supported by qualitative evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the included guidelines were high-quality. Qualitative evidence was mainly used to identify clinical questions, support recommendations, and consider facilitators and barriers to implementation of recommendations'. However, more attention needs to be paid to the methodology. For example, no experts proficient in qualitative research were involved in guideline development groups, no assessment of the quality of qualitative evidence synthesis was included and there was lack of details reported on the level of qualitative evidence or grade of recommendations.

Physicians' perceptions about managing enteral nutrition and the implementation of tools to assist in nutritional decision-making in a paediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

For critically ill children hospitalised in paediatric intensive care units, adequate nutrition reduces their risk of morbidity and mortality. Barriers may impede optimal nutritional support in this population. Moreover, physicians are usually responsible for prescribing nutrition, although they are not experts. Therefore, tools may be used to assist in nutritional decision-making, such as nutrition protocols.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this two-stage qualitative study was to explore the perceptions of physicians about their management of enteral nutrition in a paediatric intensive care unit and the implementation of a nutrition protocol and computerised system.

METHODS

This study involved semistructured interviews with physicians at the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit of Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. Research dietitians conducted interviews before (stage one) and after (stage two) the implementation of a nutrition protocol and computerised system. During stage one, six junior physicians and five fellows were interviewed. At stage two, 12 junior physicians, 12 fellows, and five senior physicians were interviewed. Interviews were recorded, with data transcribed verbatim before a thematic analysis using a framework method.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged from thematic analysis: "nutritional knowledge", "nutritional practices", and "resources to manage nutrition". During stage one, physicians, especially junior physicians, reported a lack of nutritional knowledge for critically ill children and stated that nutritional issues primarily depended on senior physicians, who themselves had various practices. All physicians were in favour of a nutrition protocol and computerised system. At stage two, interviewees stated that they used both tools regularly. They reported improved nutritional knowledge, more systematic and consistent nutritional practices, and increased attention to nutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a nutrition protocol and computerised system by a multiprofessional team helped physicians in the paediatric intensive care unit to manage nutritional support and increase their attention to nutrition.