Rate of change of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D following sublingual and capsular vitamin D preparations

Variability in response to vitamin D supplementation according to vitamin D metabolism related gene polymorphisms in healthy adults

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of polymorphisms in some key gene actors of the vitamin D (vitD) metabolic pathway on supplementation efficacy.

METHODS

In total, 245 healthy participants were recruited from occupational medicine service in Sahloul University Hospital with vitD deficiency [25(OH)D ≤ 30 ng/ml]. After giving an informed consent, all participants were asked to complete a generalized questionnaire and to follow a detailed personalized supplementation protocol. Genetic study was performed by PCR-RFLP for 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) belonging to DBP, CYP2R1, CYP27B14, CYP24A1 and VDR genes. Statistical study was carried out with SPSS23.0.

RESULTS

Among the studied SNPs, non-response was significantly associated with variant alleles of rs4588 (OR* = 11.51; p < 0.001), rs10766197 (OR* = 6.92; p = 0.008) and rs12794714 (OR* = 5.09; p = 0.004). These three SNPs contributed in 18.8% in response variability with rs4588 being the most influential (10.3%). There was a significant linear negative correlation between baseline 25(OH)D and post supplementation 25(OH)D concentration (r = -0.437; p < 0.001) as well as a linear negative association between the increase in 25(OH)D concentration and GRS (GRS: genetic risk score = the sum of risk alleles) (r = -0.149; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

DBP-rs4588, CYP2R1-rs10766197 and rs12794714 variants are associated with variations in serum 25(OH)D concentrations and efficacy of response to vitD supplementation in Tunisian adults. Taking into account these variations can help to better adapt vitD intake to ensure a higher response to supplementation.

Vitamin D supplementation in people with IBS has no effect on symptom severity and quality of life: results of a randomised controlled trial

Purpose

Several small trials suggest a benefit of vitamin D supplementation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The generalisability of these reports is limited by their design and scale. This study aimed to assess whether vitamin D supplementation improved IBS symptoms in a UK community setting.

Methods

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants were recruited from the community in winter months between December 2017 and March 2019. 135 participants received either vitamin D (3,000 IU p.d.) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in IBS symptom severity; secondary outcomes included change in IBS-related quality of life.

Results

The participants were analysed on an intent-to-treat basis. 60% of participants were vitamin D deficient or insufficient at baseline. Although vitamin D levels increased in the intervention arm relative to placebo (45.1 ± 32.88 nmol/L vs 3.1 ± 26.15 nmol/L; p < 0.001). There was no difference in the change of IBS symptom severity between the active and placebo trial arms (− 62.5 ± 91.57 vs – 75.2 ± 84.35, p = 0.426) over time. Similarly there was no difference between trial arms in τhe change in quality of life (− 7.7 ± 25.36 vs – 11.31 ± 25.02, p = 0.427).

Conclusions

There is no case for advocating use of vitamin D in the management of IBS symptoms. The prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency suggests routine screening and supplementation should be implemented in this population for general health reasons.

This trial was retrospectively registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN13277340) on 24th April 2018 after recruiting had been initiated.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00394-021-02633-w.

Vitamin D levels of the healthy infants using oral spray or drop form of vitamin D supplement in the first year of life

OBJECTIVE:

Vitamin D (VD) deficiency is a common problem worldwide, especially in pregnant women and newborns. Regular administration of VD supplements has been recommended worldwide since 2010. Recently, a new formulation providing VD supplementation in the form of a spray which is absorbed through the buccal mucosa has been introduced, but there is very little information in the literature about the effectiveness of it, especially in children. Therefore, in our study, we aim to investigate whether there was a difference in VD levels at one year of age infants who have started oral vitamin D supplements (400 IU/day) as spray or drop form in the neonatal period and have used it regularly during the first year of life.

METHODS:

In our retrospective study, the medical records of 243 healthy infants at one year of age who were followed up regularly in the first year of life in our well-child follow-up clinic were evaluated. The infants who had congenital anomalies, chronic diseases, and those using irregular vitamin D supplements were excluded from this study.

RESULTS:

The findings showed that the spray form of VD was used in 136 babies (56.0%) in the study group and the drop form was used in 107 (44.0%) of them. VD deficiency (defined as 25 [OH] D level <20 ng/ml) was 33.3% (n=81). VD levels were 24 ng/ml (8–109 ng/ml) and 21 ng/ml (7–65 ng/ml) in the infants using spray and drop form, respectively. The difference between the two forms of VD supplementation regarding 25 (OH) D levels was significant (p=0.010); VD levels were higher in the infants using the spray form.

CONCLUSION:

Our study findings suggest that the infants using oral spray form have higher VD levels compared to oral drop form. Concerning VD levels, the spray form may be preferred as a suitable alternative to the drop form, and the spray form may provide regular and easy use in children.

Efficiency of Vitamin D Supplementation in Healthy Adults is Associated with Body Mass Index and Baseline Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Level

Vitamin D (VitD) has a critical role in phosphorous-calcium metabolism as well as an important role in the immune system. In the human body, VitD is synthesized as cholecalciferol in the skin, but this process requires sunlight (UVB) radiation. Numerous reports showed high prevalence of VitD deficiency, particularly during the winter season, indicating the importance of VitD supplementation. Various factors can affect the absorption of VitD, including dosage and formulation. The primary study objective was to examine the efficiency of supplementation with three different formulations containing cholecalciferol in comparison with the control group. The secondary objective was to identify other factors affecting increase in serum 25-OH-VitD. A randomized controlled intervention study was conducted in Slovenia during wintertime (January- March) on 105 apparently healthy subjects (aged 18-65 years) with suboptimal VitD status (25-OH-VitD 30-50 nmol/L). Subjects were randomized into four groups: three treatment groups receiving (A) capsules with starch-adsorbed VitD, (B) oil-based Valens VitD oral spray, or (C) water-based Valens VitD oral spray and a control group (D) which did not receive supplemental VitD. Two months of supplementation with cholecalciferol (1000 IU; 25 µg daily) resulted in significant increase in serum 25-OH-VitD levels in comparison with control group (pooled Δc 32.8 nmol/L; 95% CI: 23.0, 42.5, p < 0.0001). While we did not observe any significant differences between the tested formulations, the efficiency of supplementation was associated with body mass index and baseline serum 25-OH-VitD level. Higher supplementation efficiency was observed in participants with normal body weight (BMI < 25) and in those with more pronounced VitD insufficiency. We also determined that tested dosage was not sufficient to achieve recommended 25-OH-VitD levels in all subjects.

Efficacy of Vitamin D3 Buccal Spray Supplementation Compared to Other Delivery Methods: A Systematic Review of Superiority Randomized Controlled Trials

(1) Background: Vitamin D deficiency is an important public health concern and supplementation is common for this deficiency. Many different modes of delivering supplementation have been proposed in order to enhance absorption and utilization. The present review compared the efficacy of vitamin D₃ buccal spray against other forms of supplementation delivery. (2) Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019136146). Medline/PubMed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov were searched from their inception until September 2019, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare vitamin D₃ delivery via sublingual spray against other delivery methods. Eligible RCTs involved humans, of any age and health status, published in any language that evaluated changes in plasma 25(OH)D concentrations. Three reviewers independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias (RoB) and the quality of the trials. (3) Results: Out of 9759 RCTs, four matched the predefined criteria. Intervention duration ranged from 30 days to 3 months whereas vitamin D₃ dosage ranged between 800 and 3000 IU/day. One RCT advocated for the superiority of buccal spray in increasing plasma 25(OH)D concentrations, although several limitations were recorded in that trial. The rest failed to report differences in post-intervention 25(OH)D concentrations between delivery methods. Considerable clinical heterogeneity was observed due to study design, intervention duration and dosage, assays and labs used to perform the assays, population age and health status, not allowing for synthesis of the results. (4) Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, delivery of vitamin D₃ via buccal spray does not appear superior to the other modes of delivery. Future RCTs avoiding the existing methodological shortcomings are warranted.