Comparisons of screening strategies for identifying Lynch syndrome among patients with MLH1-deficient colorectal cancer

Testing region selection and prognostic analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation in colorectal cancer in China

Background

MLH1 promoter methylation analysis is recommended in screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in patients with MLH1-deficient colorectal cancer (CRC). The study aims to identify specific methylation regions in the MLH1 promoter and to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of and prognosis for patients with MLH1 methylation.

Methods

A total of 580 CRC cases were included. The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression was assessed by using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The methylation status of the Regions A, B, C, D, and E in the MLH1 promoter was tested by using bisulfite sequencing PCR. The specificities of the five regions were calculated. Associations between MLH1 methylation and clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analyses for overall survival (OS) were carried out.

Results

In 580 CRC cases, the specificities of the methylation test in Regions D and E were both 97.8%. In the MLH1-deficient CRCs, the frequencies of MLH1 methylation and BRAFV600E mutation were 52.6% and 14.6%, respectively; BRAFV600E mutation occurred in 27.7% of patients with MLH1-methylated CRC. In the MMR-deficient patients, compared with MLH1 unmethylation, MLH1 methylation was more common in patients who were aged ≥50 years, female, had no family history of LS-related tumors, and had tumors located at the right colon. In the MMR-deficient patients, the MLH1-methylated cases had lower OS rates than the unmethylated cases with a family history of LS-related tumors (P = 0.047).

Conclusions

Regions D and E in the MLH1 promoter are recommended for determining the MLH1 methylation status in screening for LS in MLH1-deficient CRC. In MMR-deficient patients, the MLH1-methylated cases had a worse OS than the unmethylated cases with a family history of LS-related cancer.

MLH1 Promotor Hypermethylation in Colorectal and Endometrial Carcinomas from Patients with Lynch Syndrome

Screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer patients generally involves immunohistochemical staining of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. In case of MLH1 protein loss, MLH1 promotor hypermethylation (MLH1-PM) testing is performed to indirectly distinguish the constitutional MLH1 variants from somatic epimutations. Recently, multiple studies have reported that MLH1-PM and pathogenic constitutional MMR variants are not mutually exclusive. This study describes 6 new and 86 previously reported MLH1-PM CRCs or endometrial cancers in LS patients. Of these, methylation of the MLH1 gene promotor C region was reported in 30 MLH1, 6 MSH2, 6 MSH6, and 3 PMS2 variant carriers at a median age at diagnosis of 48.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 39-56.75 years], 39 years (IQR, 29-51 years), 58 years (IQR, 53.5-67 years), and 68 years (IQR, 65.6-68.5 years), respectively. For 31 MLH1-PM CRCs in LS patients from the literature, only the B region of the MLH1 gene promotor was tested, whereas for 13 cases in the literature the tested region was not specified. Collectively, these data indicate that a diagnosis of LS should not be excluded when MLH1-PM is detected. Clinicians should carefully consider whether follow-up genetic MMR gene testing should be offered, with age <60 to 70 years and/or a positive family history among other factors being suggestive for a potential constitutional MMR gene defect.

Screening and Management of Lynch Syndrome: The Chinese Experience

Lynch syndrome (LS), caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair genes, is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer. While LS is also associated with various cancers, early detection of the proband is meaningful for tumor prevention, treatment, and familial management. It has been a dramatic shift on the screening approaches for LS. As the rapid development of the molecular biological methods, a comprehensive understanding of the LS screening strategies will help to improve the clinical care for this systematic disease. The current screening strategies have been well validated but mainly by evidence derived from western population, lacking consideration of the ethnic heterogeneity, which hampers the universality and clinical application in China. Hence, this review will focus on the Chinese experience in LS screening, aiming to help better understand the ethnic diversity and further optimize the screening strategies.

Evaluating the quality of the economic evidence in colorectal cancer genomics studies

The increase in the use of genome-based screening and diagnostic tests adds to the overall costs of oncologic care for colorectal cancer. This, in turn, has resulted in an increase in published economic analyses. Aim: To perform a systematic literature review of the available economic evidence evaluating the value of genomic testing for colorectal cancer and appraise the quality of the economic studies conducted to date. Methods: A systematic review of the literature for economic studies of colorectal cancer genomics from January 2006 through October 2020, and evaluation of study quality using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument was conducted. The validated QHES was then applied to a final set of articles that met eligibility criteria. Results: Our search of the literature initially yielded 12,859 records. A final set of 49 articles met our inclusion criteria. The QHES score ranged from 24 to 100, with an average score of 82. Most of the studies (n = 40, 82%) scored above 75 and were considered of good quality. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed that most of the economic analyses of colorectal cancer genomic molecular diagnostics in the literature may be of good quality. There is, however, some variation in methodological rigor between the articles.

BRAF and MLH1 Analysis Algorithm for the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome Risk in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: Evidence-Based Data from the Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases

Several causes may lead to CRC, either extrinsic (sporadic forms) or genetic (hereditary forms), such as Lynch syndrome (LS). Most sporadic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) CRC cases are characterized by the methylation of the MLH1 promoter gene and/or BRAF gene mutations. Usually, the first test performed is the mismatch repair deficiency analysis. If a tumor shows a dMMR, BRAF mutations and then the MLH1 promoter methylation status have to be assessed, according to the ACG/ASCO screening algorithm. In this study, 100 consecutive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of dMMR CRC were analyzed for both BRAF mutations and MLH1 promoter methylation. A total of 47 (47%) samples were BRAF p.V600E mutated, while MLH1 promoter methylation was found in 77 cases (77.0%). The pipeline “BRAF-followed-by-MLH1-analysis” led to a total of 153 tests, while the sequence “MLH1-followed-by-BRAF-analysis” resulted in a total of 123 tests. This study highlights the importance of performing MLH1 analysis in LS screening of BRAF-WT specimens before addressing patients to genetic counseling. We show that MLH1 analysis performs better as a first-line test in the screening of patients with LS risk than first-line BRAF analysis. Our data indicate that analyzing MLH1 methylation as a first-line test is more cost-effective.

B2M and JAK1/2-mutated MSI-H Colorectal Carcinomas Can Benefit From Anti-PD-1 Therapy

β2-microglobulin (B2M) and Janus kinases 1 and 2 (JAK1/2) mutations have been suggested as genetic mechanisms of immune evasion for anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy. Whether B2M and JAK1/2 lose-of-function mutation can cause primary resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients remains controversial. Here, we sought to compare the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in DNA mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high CRC patients with or without B2M or JAK1/2 mutations. Thirty-Five CRC patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy were enrolled in this study. All tumor samples underwent next-generation sequencing. The clinical and molecular data from 110 CRC patients sequenced with the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) assay and accessed through cBioportal were also analyzed in this study. Of the 35 CRC patients from our center, 10 (28.6%) had a B2M loss-of-function mutation, and 8 (22.9%) had a JAK1/2 loss-of-function mutation. Compared with B2M wild-type CRCs, B2M-mutated CRCs did not show a higher frequency of resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy (P=0.71). There was even better response to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with JAK1/2 mutation than in those without (P=0.015). Of the 110 CRC patients in the MSK-IMPACT datasets, 13 (11.8%) had a B2M mutation, and 15 (13.6%) had a JAK1/2 mutation. After analyzing the response to anti-PD-1 therapy in these 110 patients, we found similar results (P=0.438 and 0.071, respectively). Moreover, patients with B2M or JAK1/2 mutation had a lower tumor mutational burden score compared with those without. B2M and JAK1/2 loss-of-function mutations occur frequently in microsatellite instability-high CRC. Our study demonstrated that patients with CRC harboring B2M or JAK1/2 mutations should not be excluded from anti-PD-1 therapy.