1
|
Gurnari C, Robin M, Godley LA, Drozd-Sokołowska J, Włodarski MW, Raj K, Onida F, Worel N, Ciceri F, Carbacioglu S, Kenyon M, Aljurf M, Bonfim C, Makishima H, Niemeyer C, Fenaux P, Zebisch A, Hamad N, Chalandon Y, Hellström-Lindberg E, Voso MT, Mecucci C, Duarte FB, Sebert M, Sicre de Fontbrune F, Soulier J, Shimamura A, Lindsley RC, Maciejewski JP, Calado RT, Yakoub-Agha I, McLornan DP. Germline predisposition traits in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: a survey-based study and position paper on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10:e994-e1005. [PMID: 37898151 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00265-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
The recent application of whole exome or whole genome sequencing unveiled a plethora of germline variants predisposing to myeloid disorders, particularly myelodysplastic neoplasms. The presence of such variants in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes has important clinical repercussions for haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, from donor selection and conditioning regimen to graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and genetic counselling for relatives. No international guidelines exist to harmonise management approaches to this particular clinical scenario. Moreover, the application of germline testing, and how this informs clinical decisions, differs according to the expertise of individual clinical practices and according to different countries, health-care systems, and legislations. Leveraging the global span of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) network, we took a snapshot of the current European situation on these matters by disseminating an electronic survey to EBMT centres experienced in myelodysplastic syndromes transplantation. An international group of haematologists, transplantation physicians, paediatricians, nurses, and experts in molecular biology and constitutional genetics with experience in myelodysplastic syndromes contributed to this Position Paper. The panel met during multiple online meetings to discuss the results of the EBMT survey and to establish suggested harmonised guidelines for such clinical situations, which are presented here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Gurnari
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marie Robin
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Lucy A Godley
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joanna Drozd-Sokołowska
- Department of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marcin W Włodarski
- Department of Hematology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Kavita Raj
- University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Francesco Onida
- Hematology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Nina Worel
- Department of Transfusion Medicine and Cell Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Selim Carbacioglu
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Children's Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michelle Kenyon
- Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mahmoud Aljurf
- Division of Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Oncology Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Carmem Bonfim
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Division and Pele Pequeno Principe Research Institute, Hospital Pequeno Principe, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Hideki Makishima
- Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Charlotte Niemeyer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Pierre Fenaux
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, University Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U944, CNRS UMR7212, Paris, France; Saint-Louis Hospital, Hematology Laboratory, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Armin Zebisch
- Division of Hematology and Otto Loewi Research Center for Vascular Biology, Immunology and Inflammation, Division of Pharmacology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nada Hamad
- Department of Hematology, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yves Chalandon
- Division of Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eva Hellström-Lindberg
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Teresa Voso
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Mecucci
- Institute of Hematology and Center for Hemato-Oncology Research, University and Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Marie Sebert
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, University Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U944, CNRS UMR7212, Paris, France; Saint-Louis Hospital, Hematology Laboratory, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Flore Sicre de Fontbrune
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Centre National de Reference des Aplasies Médullaires Acquises et Constitutionnelles, Paris, France
| | - Jean Soulier
- INSERM U944, CNRS UMR7212, Paris, France; Saint-Louis Hospital, Hematology Laboratory, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Akiko Shimamura
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jarosław P Maciejewski
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rodrigo T Calado
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology, and Oncology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrison C, Bartley N, Jacobs C, Best M, Vatter S, Meiser B, Ballinger ML, Thomas DM, Butow P. Family communication and results disclosure after germline sequencing: A mixed methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 114:107800. [PMID: 37210765 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Research on family communication of germline genome sequencing (GS) results (versus of genetic results after targeted genetic testing) is still emerging, yet potentially complex results increase the importance of communicating risk to relatives. Promoting equity by ensuring patients have sufficient health literacy to interpret results is important in this context. This study aimed to identify cancer patients' perceived importance of result disclosure, predictors of perceptions, and perspectives on family communication. METHODS This explanatory-sequential, cross-sectional mixed-methods study involved participants (n = 246) completing a questionnaire and (n = 20) a semi-structured interview. Ordinal logistic regressions determined associations between potential predictors and perceived importance of result disclosure. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically using a constant-comparative approach. RESULTS More participants intended disclosing to nuclear (77.4%) than to extended family (42.7%). More than half (59.3%) felt results were family information; 62.7% believed it was important to disclose results to family members. Nuclear and extended family communication scores and education level were significantly positively associated with perceived importance of disclosure (p < 0.05). Six qualitative themes were identified: i) Responsibility to inform, ii) Choice, iii) Autonomy, iv) Family Communication, v) Significance of results, and vi) Health professional role. CONCLUSION Low health literacy and family conflict can complicate communication of GS results. Patients seek clear, interpretable information in a format they can easily communicate. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Healthcare professionals can facilitate discussion of GS results by offering written information, encouraging disclosure, exploring existing family dynamics and communication patterns, and offering strategies to improve family communication. Centralised genetic communication offices and chatbots can also be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camelia Harrison
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicci Bartley
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan Best
- Institute for Ethics and Society, The University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sabina Vatter
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mandy L Ballinger
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - David M Thomas
- Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; School of Psychology, Centre of Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patient perspectives on testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Blood Adv 2022; 6:6151-6161. [PMID: 36129839 PMCID: PMC9791300 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), an emerging biomarker for personalized risk-directed interventions, is increased in cancer survivors. However, little is known about patient preferences for CHIP testing. We surveyed participants in a prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The emailed survey included an introduction to CHIP and a vignette eliciting participants' preferences for CHIP testing, considering sequentially: population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematologic malignancy, and heart disease; increased CHIP-associated risks; current CHIP management; dedicated CHIP clinic; and hypothetical CHIP treatment. Preference changes were evaluated using the McNemar test. The survey response rate was 82.2% (528/642). Median age at time of survey was 46 years and median time from diagnosis was 108 months. Only 5.9% had prior knowledge of CHIP. After vignette presentation, most survivors (87.1%) recommended CHIP testing for the vignette patient. Presented next with CHIP-independent, population-based risks, 11.1% shifted their preference from testing to not testing. After receiving information about CHIP-associated risks, an additional 10.1% shifted their preference to testing. Preference for testing increased if vignette patient was offered a CHIP clinic or hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching preferences toward testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% of participants desired CHIP testing for themselves. Among participants, 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP caused at least moderate anxiety. Most young survivors favored CHIP testing, with preferences influenced by risk presentation and potential management strategies. Our findings highlight the importance of risk communication and psychosocial support when considering biomarkers for future risk in cancer survivors. This trial has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01468246.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shahani SA, Marcotte EL. Landscape of germline cancer predisposition mutations testing and management in pediatrics: Implications for research and clinical care. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:1011873. [PMID: 36225340 PMCID: PMC9548803 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.1011873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As germline genetic testing capacities have improved over the last two decades, increasingly more people are newly diagnosed with germline cancer susceptibility mutations. In the wake of this growth, there remain limitations in both testing strategies and translation of these results into morbidity- and mortality-reducing practices, with pediatric populations remaining especially vulnerable. To face the challenges evoked by an expanding diversity of germline cancer mutations, we can draw upon a model cancer-associated genetic condition for which we have developed a breadth of expertise in managing, Trisomy 21. We can additionally apply advances in other disciplines, such as oncofertility and pharmacogenomics, to enhance care delivery. Herein, we describe the history of germline mutation testing, epidemiology of known germline cancer mutations and their associations with childhood cancer, testing limitations, and future directions for research and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa A Shahani
- Department of Pediatrics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Erin L Marcotte
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.,Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|