|
1
|
Taneri PE, Devane D, Kirkham J, Molloy E, Daly M, Branagan A, Suguitani D, Wynn JL, Kissoon N, Kawaza K, Simons SHP, Bonnard LN, Giannoni E, Strunk T, Ohaja M, Mugabe K, Quirke F, Bazilio K, Biesty L. Outcomes of interventions in neonatal sepsis: A systematic review of qualitative research. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024. [PMID: 38842248 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While a systematic review exists detailing neonatal sepsis outcomes from clinical trials, there remains an absence of a qualitative systematic review capturing the perspectives of key stakeholders. OBJECTIVES Our aim is to identify outcomes from qualitative research on any intervention to prevent or improve the outcomes of neonatal sepsis that are important to parents, other family members, healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers as a part of the development of a core outcome set (COS) for neonatal sepsis. SEARCH STRATEGY A literature search was carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo databases. SELECTION CRITERIA Publications describing qualitative data relating to neonatal sepsis outcomes were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Drawing on the concepts of thematic synthesis, texts related to outcomes were coded and grouped. These outcomes were then mapped to the domain headings of an existing model. MAIN RESULTS Out of 6777 records screened, six studies were included. Overall, 19 outcomes were extracted from the included studies. The most frequently reported outcomes were those in the domains related to parents, healthcare workers and individual organ systemas such as gastrointestinal system. The remaining outcomes were classified under the headings of general outcomes, miscellaneous outcomes, survival, and infection. CONCLUSIONS The outcomes identified in this review are different from those reported in neonatal sepsis clinical trials, thus highlighting the importance of incorporating qualitative studies into COS development to encapsulate all relevant stakeholders' perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petek Eylul Taneri
- HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Declan Devane
- HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland & Cochrane Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jamie Kirkham
- Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eleanor Molloy
- Department of Neonatology, Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health &Trinity Research in Childhood Centre (TRiCC), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Neonatology, Children's Health Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mandy Daly
- Advocacy and Policymaking, Irish Neonatal Health Alliance, Bray, Ireland
| | - Aoife Branagan
- Department of Neonatology, Coombe Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health &Trinity Research in Childhood Centre (TRiCC), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denise Suguitani
- Brazilian Parents of Preemies' Association, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - James L Wynn
- Department of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Niranjan Kissoon
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kondwani Kawaza
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Sinno H P Simons
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care, Erasmus UMC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eric Giannoni
- Clinic of Neonatology, Department Mother-Woman-Child, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Strunk
- Neonatal Directorate, Child and Adolescent Health Service; Wesfarmers' Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Magdalena Ohaja
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Kenneth Mugabe
- Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda
| | - Fiona Quirke
- HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Linda Biesty
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Evidence Synthesis Ireland & Cochrane Ireland, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Richardson E, McEwen A, Newton-John T, Crook A, Jacobs C. Outcomes of Importance to Patients in Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: A Qualitative Study to Inform a Core Outcome Set. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081310. [PMID: 36013258 PMCID: PMC9409855 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes assessed across studies of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). Only a small number of studies have measured patient-reported outcomes or included patients in the selection of outcomes that are meaningful to them. This study was a cross-sectional, qualitative study of 15 patient participants conducted to inform a core outcome set. A core outcome set is an approach to facilitate standardisation in outcome reporting, allowing direct comparison of outcomes across studies to enhance understanding of impacts and potential harms. The aim of this study was to incorporate the patient perspective in the development of a core outcome set by eliciting a detailed understanding of outcomes of importance to patients. Data were collected via online, semi-structured interviews using a novel method informed by co-design and the nominal group technique. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Outcomes elicited from patient stakeholder interviews highlighted several under-explored areas for future research. This includes the role of grief and loss in increased risk couples, the role of empowerment in conceptualising the utility of RGCS, the impact of societal context and barriers that contribute to negative experiences, and the role of genetic counselling in ensuring that information needs are met and informed choice facilitated as RGCS becomes increasingly routine. Future research should focus on incorporating outcomes that accurately reflect patient needs and experience.
Collapse
|