Evaluating the temperature effects of ice and heat tests on ptosis due to Myasthenia Gravis

The Icepack Test in the Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis with Ocular Features: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy, Technique, and Economic Utility

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG) may be challenging and require multiple specialised testing modalities. Accessing these investigations can involve significant waiting time and costs. The bedside icepack test (IPT) has been proposed to assist with the diagnosis of MG with ocular features, and may prove an economically viable; however, there have been there is heterogeneity in the literature evaluating the IPT.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review was performed examining the accuracy, described techniques, and economic implications of the IPT for the diagnosis of MG with ocular features.

METHOD

The databases EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 2022. The systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility determination was undertaken with a standardised form using appropriate inclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for diagnostic test accuracy was employed to evaluate studies that presented the diagnostic performance of the IPT. The Johanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Economic Evaluations was used for the assessment of studies presenting economic evaluations of the IPT.

RESULTS

20 articles met the specified criteria and included a total of 1264 participants. The IPT had a sensitivity ranging from 38.5% to 100%. Specificity was found to be > 95% in six studies. Excluding two outlier results of 25% and 31.3%, the lowest specificity recorded was 62.5%. The most commonly described method of evaluating the IPT involved applying ice to both eyelids and using a >2 mm change as a threshold for a positive test (evaluated with a ruler). There were no adverse effects described with the IPT. There were no studies that formally examined the economic implications of the IPT.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPT is a well-tolerated and readily available diagnostic tool that has an important role in the evaluation of possible MG with ocular features in specific contexts. Despite limited economic evaluation of this test, it is likely the use of the IPT may result in significant financial and time savings.

Bedside and laboratory diagnostic testing in myasthenia

Myasthenia gravis (MG) and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are a group of disorders with a well characterised autoimmune or genetic and neurophysiological basis. We reviewed the literature from the last 20 years assessing the utility of various neurophysiological, immunological, provocative and genetic tests in MG and CMS. Diagnostic sensitivity of repetitive nerve stimulation test ranges between 14 and 94% and specificity between 73 and 100%; sensitivity of single-fibre EMG (SFEMG) test ranges between 64 and 100% and specificity between 22 and 100%; anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody sensitivity ranges from 13 to 97% and specificity ranges from 95 to 100%. Overall, SFEMG has the highest sensitivity while positive anti-AChR antibodies have the highest specificity. Newer testing strategies that have been investigated over the last couple of decades include ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, otoacoustic emissions and disease-specific circulating miRNAs in serum for autoimmune myasthenia, as well as next-generation sequencing for genetic testing of CMS. While there has been significant progress in developing newer testing strategies for diagnosing MG and CMS over the last couple of decades, more research is needed to assess the utility of these newer tools regarding their sensitivity and specificity.

Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis

The diagnosis of autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis (MG) remains clinical and rests on the history and physical findings of fatigable, fluctuating muscle weakness in a specific distribution. Ancillary bedside tests and laboratory methods help confirm the synaptic disorder, define its type and severity, classify MG according to the causative antibodies, and assess the effect of treatment objectively. We present an update on the tests used in the diagnosis and follow-up of MG and the suggested approach for their application.

Ocular myasthenia gravis: an update on diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease that commonly affects the palpebral and extraocular muscles. Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is a variant of the disease that is confined to the ocular muscles but frequently becomes generalized over time. The diagnosis of OMG is often challenging but both clinical and laboratory findings are helpful in confirming the clinical suspicion. This review provides an update on the diagnostic approach and therapeutic options for OMG.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antimuscle-specific tyrosine kinase and LDL-related receptor-related protein 4 are newly available serologic testing for myasthenia gravis that can help in increasing the diagnostic sensitivity of OMG. They should be included to the diagnostic algorithm of OMG in appropriate clinical situations.

SUMMARY

OMG remains a primarily clinical diagnosis, but recent advances in laboratory testing can improve the diagnostic accuracy and should be used in appropriate clinical settings. The mainstay of treatment for OMG has not significantly changed over the past years, but the increasing availability of steroid-sparing agents improved the disease control while minimizing steroid-induced complications.