Acute onset binocular diplopia: a retrospective observational study of 100 consecutive cases managed at a tertiary eye centre in Saudi Arabia

Diplopia in the Younger Adult (≤65 Years Old) Compared With Older Adult (>65 Years Old) Population-Presentation, Progression, and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Despite the impact of new-onset diplopia on the quality of life, there are few studies concerning new-onset diplopia in seniors. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology, etiology, prognosis, and outcome of different treatments in the older adults compared with younger adult patients presenting with new-onset binocular diplopia.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 YO with new-onset binocular diplopia presenting between 2010 and 2021. Data collected included age at presentation, gender, duration of time since diplopia onset, imaging results, known trigger, etiology, treatment, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten patients were included. Of them, 75 patients were ≤65 YO (35.7%, the "younger adult group") and 135 > 65 YO (64.3%, the "older adults group"). The common etiology in both groups was neurogenic (54.7% ≤ 65 vs 62.2% >65, P = 0.29). Cranial nerve palsies were more commonly microvascular in the older adults (96.0% vs 74.1%, P = 0.005), whereas tumor-related cranial nerve palsies were more frequent in younger adults (14.81% vs 2.04%, P = 0.03). A restrictive etiology was observed in 20% of younger adult compared with 11.1% of older adults group ( P = 0.08). Sagging eye syndrome (SES) was the second most common etiology in the older adults group at 11.9%, compared with 1.3% in the younger adult group ( P = 0.01). Decompensated phoria/tropia appeared in 16% of younger adult group compared with 11.9% of older adults ( P = 0.4), with an obvious trigger (mostly cataract surgery) in the latter (80% older adults vs 20% younger adults, P = 0.019). Positive imaging findings were found in 46.7% of patients ≤65 compared with 25.3% of >65 ( P = 0.01) and complete spontaneous resolution of diplopia was noted in 32.1% of the older adults compared with 11.8% of younger adults ( P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurogenic diplopia was the most common etiology for both groups, but is more prominent in the older adults. Noticeable findings in the older adults were SES diagnosis, identification of triggers for impaired fusion/diplopia, and a paucity of positive findings in imaging results. It is important to know these differences not only for managing seniors better, but also to minimize symptoms of binocular diplopia after lens-related procedures.

[Management of binocular diplopia in the department of ophthalmic emergencies at the Regional University Hospital of Tours]

OBJECTIVES

To describe the etiologies of binocular diplopia for patients presenting to the ophthalmologic emergency department of the Regional University Center Hospital (CHRU) of Tours.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the medical records of patients who presented with binocular diplopia in the ophthalmic emergency department of the CHRU of Tours between January 1st and December 31st, 2019. Binocular diplopia was classified as paralytic or non-paralytic according to the ocular motility examination.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients were included. The median age was 61 years. Internal referral from other hospital services represented 44.6% of the patients. On ophthalmological examination, 73.2% had paralytic diplopia, 13.4% non-paralytic diplopia and 13.4% normal examination. Neuroimaging was performed in 88.3% of cases, with 75.7% of patients receiving it on the same day. Oculomotor nerve palsy was the most frequent cause of diplopia in 58.9%, the majority represented by abducens nerve palsy (60.6%). The most frequent etiology of binocular diplopia was ischemic, with microvascular damage in 26.8% of cases and stroke in 10.7% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Among patients assessed in an ophthalmological emergency department setting, one in ten patients had stroke. It is essential to inform patients of the urgent nature of ophthalmological evaluation in the case of acute binocular diplopia. Urgent neurovascular management is also mandatory and should be based on the clinical description provided by the ophthalmologist. Neuroimaging should be performed as soon as possible, based on the ophthalmologic and neurological findings.

Diplopia: characteristics and etiologic distribution in a referral-based university hospital

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The etiologic distribution and clinical features of diplopia may differ according to the specialties involved in the management. This study aimed to establish the clinical features and underlying etiologies of diplopia by recruiting patients from all departments.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 4127 patients with diplopia as the chief complaint, who had been recruited from all departments at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea, from 2003 to 2020.

RESULTS

Diplopia was binocular in 3557 (94.2%) and monocular in 219 (5.8%) patients. The common causes of binocular diplopia included microvascular (n = 516, 14.5%), strokes (n = 412, 11.6%), neoplastic (n = 304, 8.5%), myasthenia gravis (n = 253, 7.1%), traumatic (n = 240, 6.7%), and decompensated phoria (n = 232, 6.5%), and comprised more than a half of the causes. Patients with binocular diplopia were usually managed by neurologists (2549/3557, 71.7%), followed by ophthalmologists (2247/3557, 63.2%), emergency physicians (1528/3557, 43.0%), neurosurgeons (361/3557, 10.1%), and others (271/3557, 7.6%). The etiologies of binocular diplopia differed markedly according to the patients' age and the specialties involved in the management (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the differences in the etiologic distribution of diplopia according to the patients' age and the specialties involved in the management, the results of previous reports on the characteristics and etiology of diplopia, primarily performed in a single specialty department, should be interpreted with a possible selection bias.

Acute-onset binocular diplopia in neurological unit: Aetiological factors and diagnostic assessment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the aetiology of acute-onset binocular diplopia (AOBD) in neurological units and identify the key diagnostic procedures in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinico-demographic data from patients hospitalized for AOBD from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. AOBD due to an underlying neurological disorder known to cause diplopia was addressed as secondary diplopia. Ophthalmoparesis plus was defined when subtle neurological signs/symptoms other than ophthalmoparesis were detected during neurological examination.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients (mean age 57.6 years) were included in the study. A total of 89 subjects (52%) had an oculomotor disturbance consistent with sixth nerve palsy, and 42 (24.6%) showed multiple oculomotor nerve involvement. The most common cause of AOBD was presumed to be microvascular in 56 patients (32.7%), while a secondary aetiology was identified in 102 (59.6%). Ophthalmoparesis plus and multiple oculomotor nerve involvement significantly predicted a secondary aetiology in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Brain CT was never diagnostic in isolated ophthalmoparesis. A combination of neuroimaging examinations established AOBD diagnosis in 54.9% of subjects, whereas rachicentesis and neurophysiological examinations were found to be performant in the remaining cases.

CONCLUSIONS

AOBD may herald insidious neurological disease, and an extensive diagnostic workup is often needed to establish a diagnosis. Neurological examination was pivotal in identifying patients at higher risk of secondary aetiology. Even in cases of apparently benign presentation, a serious underlying disease cannot be excluded. Brain MRI was found to perform well in all clinical scenarios, and it should be always considered when managing AOBD.

Causes and Outcomes of Patients Presenting with Diplopia: A Hospital-based Study

Diplopia or double vision has various aetiologies and often presents to the ophthalmologist. The purpose of our study was to study in detail the aetiology, progression, and outcome in patients of diplopia presenting to the ophthalmology department of a tertiary care centre. In a prospective observational study, all patients presenting to the emergency services and the outpatient department of a tertiary care centre over a period of 1 year were recruited. One hundred and sixty patients who presented with diplopia with a mean age of 40 (range 7-76) years were included. There were 112 (70%) males and 48 (30%) females. The most common cause for binocular diplopia was vasculopathy in 43 (28.66%) followed by trauma in 37 (24.66%). In those less than 20 years decompensating heterophorias were most common and had the best prognosis. Traumatic causes were common in the age group 20-40 years and vascular in the >40 years age group. For all other aetiologies, elderly patients had more resolution than young patients (p = .04). Larger deviation at presentation, younger age group, and a history of trauma were associated with late recovery (p = .03. p = .04 and p = .04, respectively).