Outcomes of phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation performed with dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy or trabecular micro-bypass stent insertion

Combined Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation and Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification Alone in the Glaucoma Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The complete safety and efficacy of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) remain unclear in the literature and, to our knowledge, there are no current meta-analyses on phaco-ECP versus phacoemulsification alone to date. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing these two strategies through studies, assessing the effectiveness and safety of outcomes in a population with glaucoma. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023482376). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to December 2023. A random-effects model was used for all analyses due to heterogeneity. Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Denmark) was used for statistical analysis. Finally, nine studies were included in this comprehensive review and a total of 5389 eyes were analyzed in our study. In comparison to the ECP and phacoemulsification group, those receiving phacoemulsification alone showed better results in best-corrected visual acuity (MD 0.09; CI 95% 0.03 to 0.16; I²=0%), but worse outcomes in intraocular pressure (IOP) (MD -1.49; 95% CI -2.29 to -0.68; I²=29%) and use medications (MD -0.75; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.56; I²=0%) in the last visit. Complication rates, both general and serious, were significantly different between the groups, indicating the potential impact of combined procedures on patient outcomes. Thus, combining ECP with phacoemulsification for glaucoma treatment showed sustained IOP reduction and decreased medication dependence. However, higher complication rates suggest careful consideration of risks. More extensive research with larger trials and longer follow-ups is needed to validate findings and address limitations, providing valuable insights into this treatment approach.

Comparing Outcomes of 45 Xen Implantation Ab Interno With Closed Conjunctiva to Ab Externo With Open Conjunctiva Approaches

PRCIS

Ab externo with open conjunctiva placement may lead to improved gelatin stent (XEN Gel Stent; Allergan) success rate compared with ab interno with closed conjunctiva because it conferred more favorable intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication burden reduction based on our complete and qualified success criteria.

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of a gelatin stent (XEN 45 Gel Stent; Allergan) placed either ab interno with closed conjunctiva (AIC) or ab externo with open conjunctiva (AEO) with or without cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study of 85 eyes from 85 glaucoma patients who received XEN 45 Gel Stent placed either AIC (N=32) or AEO (N=53) with or without cataract surgery between July 2018 and January 2022 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Patients were included if they were 18 years of age or above and had at least 30 days of follow-up without any disqualifying event.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were similar between both groups, except for the glaucoma type. Both AIC and AEO procedures resulted in significant patterns of IOP and medication reduction from baseline up to 1 year. At postoperative year (POY)1, mean IOP was reduced to 11.34±4 mmHg on 1.29±1.34 medications after AEO and 13.70±3.32 mmHg on 2±1.81 medications after AIC. The average IOP reduction was significantly greater in the AEO group at all postoperative time points beyond postoperative week 2. There were significant differences in the survival curves of AEO and AIC groups under both the complete success criteria and the qualified success criteria. Under the complete success criteria, the cumulative probability of survival at POY1 was 28.5% in the AEO group and 3.8% in the AIC group. Under the qualified success criteria, the cumulative probability of survival at POY1 was 60.3% in the AEO group and 21.9% in the AIC group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we demonstrate that both placements reduce IOP and medication from baseline, with AEO placement having more favorable success rates compared with AIC placement.

A comparative study of ultrasound cycloplasty and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of secondary glaucoma

To compare the clinical efficacy of ultrasound cycloplasty (UCP) and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) in the treatment of secondary glaucoma. In a 12-month prospective single-center study, 22 patients with secondary glaucoma were treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and 23 patients with secondary glaucoma were treated by a semiconductor laser. At the final follow-up, the two groups' surgical outcomes were compared. A complete success was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction of at least 20% from baseline and an IOP of > 5 mmHg and ≦ 21 mmHg, while a qualified success was defined as an IOP reduction of at least 20% from baseline and an IOP of > 5 mmHg. The secondary outcome was the average IOP, number of drugs, and complications at each follow-up compared with the baseline. The average preoperative IOPs in the UCP and ECP groups were 36.4 ± 9.5 mmHg (n = 2.3 drops, n = 0.2 tablets) and 34.5 ± 11.7 mmHg (n = 2.0 drops, n = 0.3 tablets), respectively. In the last follow-up, the success rate of UCP was 54% (with a decrease of 32%) and that of ECP was 65% (with a decrease of 35%), and the P-value between the two groups was > 0.05. However, there was a difference in the average IOP between these two groups 1 day and 1 week after the operation, and the IOP reduction efficiency in the ECP group was better. However, the amount of drug used after these two surgeries was significantly reduced. There were fewer postoperative complications in the UCP group (18 cases) than in the ECP group (35 cases). Both UCP and ECP can effectively reduce IOP in secondary glaucoma, and ECP has a better effect at the early stages. However, UCP has higher safety and tolerance for patients.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges

The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.

Comparing Outcomes of Phacoemulsification and Endocyclophotocoagulation with Either Dual Blade Goniotomy (PEcK) or Two Trabecular Stents (ICE2)

Purpose

To compare outcomes of phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation with either dual blade goniotomy (PEcK) or two trabecular stents (ICE2).

Setting

Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study from a level 3 triage center.

Methods

One hundred and seventy charts and a total of 1294 visits were reviewed following either PEcK or ICE2 from 2018 to 2022. One hundred and twenty-eight patients had PEcK and 42 underwent ICE2. Patients with less than 30 days of follow-up were excluded. The mean follow-up time was 505 ± 308 days. Two Kaplan-Meier curves (KM) assessed survival with ≤ baseline medications while maintaining (1) [GIC - Goal IOP Criteria] IOP ≤ goal IOP or (2) [PRC - Percent Reduction Criteria] IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 mmHg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg for at least two consecutive visits. IOP and medication burden reduction were compared using a paired t-test.

Results

Most patients were Caucasian (65%) and had mild-stage glaucoma (43%). The most common glaucoma type was primary open-angle glaucoma (58%). Average age was 72.2 years at the time of surgery. Mean preoperative IOP was 17.58 ± 4.98 mmHg on 3.00 ± 1.41 medications in PEcK and 15.36 ± 3.58 mmHg on 1.81 ± 1.11 medications in ICE2 (p = 0.015 for IOP; p < 0.001 for medications). Under GIC, the success rate was significantly higher in PEcK at POM6 (69% vs 46%, p < 0.001) and POY1 (63% vs 36%, p < 0.001). Under PRC, the success rate was significantly higher in PEcK at POM6 (73% vs 61%, p = 0.031) and POY1 (67% vs 50%, p = 0.028). Mean reductions at POY1 were 5.00 ± 4.31 mmHg on 1.35 ± 1.08 less medications after PEcK and 3.14 ± 2.83 mmHg on 1.01 ± 0.94 less medications after ICE2 (p < 0.001 at POY1 for IOP; p < 0.05 after POW6 for medications).

Conclusion

Both PEcK and ICE2 reduce medication and IOP from baseline, with PEcK having more favorable GIC and PRC success rates and greater IOP and medication reduction at 1 year.

Combined MIGS: Comparing Additive Effects of Phacoemulsification, Endocyclophotocoagulation, and Kahook Dual Blade

Purpose

Combining two or more MIGS (cMIGS) promises to be more efficacious than single MIGS (sMIGS). This study compared the efficacy of PEcK, which combines Phacoemulsification (Phaco), Endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP), and Kahook dual blade (KDB), relative to both of its constituent sMIGS, Phaco/ECP (Endo Optiks, NJ) and Phaco/KDB (New World Medical, CA) for the first time.

Patients and methods

Data was collected retrospectively from 1833 visits of 271 patients who underwent PEcK, Phaco/ECP, or Phaco/KDB from 2016-2021 at Massachusetts Eye and Ear. Primary outcomes included Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) of intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication burden, as well as survival models.

Results

Mean preoperative IOP was 17.6 ± 5.0 (SD) mmHg on 3.0 ± 1.4 medications in the PEcK group (n = 128), 17.9 ± 5.1 mmHg on 2.2 ± 1.5 medications in the Phaco/ECP group (n = 78), and 16.1 ± 4.3 mmHg on 0.4 ± 1.0 medications in the Phaco/KDB group (n = 65). For more than 36 months, all procedures resulted in significant patterns of IOP and medication reduction (all p < 0.001), before and after statistical adjustment. The reduction pattern in IOP was significantly different when comparing all groups over time and favored PEcK (p = 0.04), but the reduction pattern in medications was not significantly different (p = 0.11). Procedures did not differ in procedural time (p = 0.18) or in survival to maintain ≥20% IOP reduction (p = 0.43) without additional medication or procedure. There was a trend toward significant difference in maintaining IOP ≤ goal IOP that favored PEcK over Phaco/ECP after adjustment (p = 0.09).

Conclusion

PEcK may confer greater IOP reduction without added procedural time compared to Phaco/ECP and Phaco/KDB in predominantly mild or moderate glaucoma. Further research on cMIGS may benefit from adopting this comparative analysis to constituent MIGS.

Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma compared to alternative procedures -A Systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Despite many recent developments, preference in the choice of surgical treatment of uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) remains a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study compares the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) to alternative surgical procedures, for all types of glaucoma.

METHODOLOGY

The methodology adheres to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines for systematic review reporting. Studies reporting ECP and alternative surgeries in treating refractory glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma, aphakic glaucoma, filtering surgical failure-induced glaucoma, congenital or juvenile glaucoma, and secondary glaucoma such as uveitis glaucoma, traumatic glaucoma, secondary glaucoma postcorneal transplantation, etc. were included. The efficacy was evaluated from the number of IOP-lowering drugs, and mean change in pre- and post-IOP were the outcomes assessed in ECP and non-ECP groups in this review. Evaluations of the postoperative complications revealed the safety assessment of the procedure.

RESULTS

In total, 11 relevant studies were selected in this study with a total of 5418 eyes, including 763 eyes in the ECP group and 4655 in the non-ECP group. This review observed that both ECP and non-ECP procedures had been successful in reducing postoperative IOP.

CONCLUSION

It can be deduced from this review, that all types of glaucoma can be treated efficiently with significantly higher success rates with ECP and ECP demonstrates lowest postoperative complications when compared to non ECP procedures. This review provides updated scientific evidence which caters to support clinical decisions for surgical treatment of glaucoma.

Comparison of Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Combined with Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation, iStent, or Both in the Management of Open-Angle Glaucoma

INTRODUCTION

To compare outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (phaco/ECP), first generation iStent implantation (phaco/iStent), or both (phaco/iStent/ECP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients at the University of Colorado Department of Ophthalmology. Outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), medication use, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and surgical complications were analyzed. Success was defined as IOP reduction of ≥ 20% and/or reduction by at least one glaucoma medication.

RESULTS

A total of 394 eyes were included in the study. There were 170 eyes (43.1%) in the phaco/ECP group, 175 eyes (44.4%) in the phaco/iStent group, and 49 eyes (12.4%) in the phaco/iStent/ECP group. The mean pre-operative IOP was 15.9 mmHg for phaco/ECP, 15.8 mmHg for phaco/iStent, and 15.2 mmHg for phaco/iStent/ECP. At 24 months, the mean IOP was 13.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001), 14.2 mmHg (p = 0.0001), and 13.0 mmHg (p = 0.0007), respectively. The mean pre-operative number of glaucoma medications was 2.0 for phaco/ECP, 1.4 for phaco/iStent, and 2.2 for phaco/iStent/ECP and at 24 months post-surgery decreased to, 1.8 (p = 0.011), 0.9 (p < 0.0001), and 1.7 (p = 0.01), respectively. The success rate at 24 months was 54.4% for phaco/ECP, 75.3% for phaco/iStent, and 55.6% for phaco/iStent/ECP.

CONCLUSION

Phacoemulsification when combined with ECP, iStent, or both, lowered IOP and glaucoma medication reliance at 24 months. The success rate for phaco/iStent was significantly higher than phaco/ECP. When iStent was added to phaco/ECP, the success rate was higher at earlier postoperative visits compared to the phaco/ECP alone.

Comparative outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with micro-invasive glaucoma surgery plus: Schlemm canal microstent versus Ab interno trabecular excision

PURPOSE

To report the relative efficacy of combining phacoemulsification with a Schlemm's canal microstent (Phaco/Hydrus) or dual blade trabecular excision (Phaco/KDB).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-one eyes of 131 patients who underwent Phaco/Hydrus or Phaco/KDB procedures from January 2016 to July 2021 at a tertiary care center were included and assessed for up to 36months postoperatively. Primary outcomes were intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of glaucoma medications, evaluated by generalized estimating equations (GEE). Two Kaplan-Meier estimates (KM) assessed survival without additional intervention or pressure lowering medication while maintaining: (1) IOP≤21mmHg and≥20% IOP reduction or (2) IOP≤preoperatively designated goal.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative IOP was 17.70±4.91 (SD) mmHg on 0.28±0.86 medications in the Phaco/Hydrus cohort (n=69) and 15.92±4.34mmHg on 0.19±0.70 medications in the Phaco/KDB cohort (n=62). At 12months, mean IOP was reduced to 14.98±2.77mmHg on 0.12±0.60 medications after Phaco/Hydrus and 13.52±4.13mmHg on 0.04±0.19 medications after Phaco/KDB. GEE models of IOP (P<0.001) and medication burden (P<0.05) showed significant patterns of reduction across all timepoints in both cohorts. There were no differences in IOP reduction (P=0.94), number of medications (P=0.95) or survival (P=0.72 by KM1, P=0.11 by KM2) between procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Phaco/Hydrus and Phaco/KDB resulted in significantly reduced IOP and medication burden for over 12months. Phaco/Hydrus and Phaco/KDB confer similar outcomes in terms of IOP, medication burden, survival, and procedural time in a population with predominantly mild and moderate open-angle glaucoma.

Combined Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery - A Review of the Literature and Future Directions

The use of microinvasive invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in the treatment of glaucoma has increased exponentially over the last 10 years. However, practice patterns vary widely given the relative newness of these technologies. Some surgeons perform two or more MIGS simultaneously, such as those that target aqueous production and those that target aqueous outflow. These combined MIGS (cMIGS) may result in lower intraocular pressure (IOP) and reduced medication burden as compared to single MIGS (sMIGS). Current evidence suggests some cMIGS are more effective in reducing medication burden for at least 12 months versus sMIGS. This review focuses on the current evidence related to the efficacy of cMIGS as well as novel combinations of standalone MIGS, limitations of the current literature, and future directions for research.

Outcomes and risk factors for ab interno trabeculotomy with a Kahook Dual Blade

PURPOSE

To verify the surgical results and risk factors for ab interno trabeculotomy using a Kahook Dual Blade (KDB-LOT) in patients with various glaucoma types.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective case series of 205 eyes that underwent KDB-LOT. For Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, criterion A was defined as a ≤ 20% reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline. Criteria B, C, and D were IOPs of ≤ 21, 18, and 15 mmHg, respectively. The Cox proportional hazard (CPH) model investigated prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) IOP decreased from 24.7 (7.98) to 17.6 (4.80) mmHg in all cases, from 21.3 (6.88) to 17.8 (3.52) mmHg in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), from 25.4 (7.32) to 17.1 (4.65) mmHg in exfoliation glaucoma, from 30.6 (8.88) to 17.8 (8.29) mmHg in uveitic glaucoma, and from 30.8 (7.29) to 17.3 (0.83) mmHg in steroid-induced glaucoma at 1 year after KDB-LOT. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with POAG had the best prognosis under criteria B and C, and the 1-year survival rate in patients under criterion D was less than 35% for any disease type. CPH analysis revealed that age and KDB-LOT with phacoemulsification were good prognostic factors. Risk factors for surgical failure were previous cataract surgery, selective laser trabeculoplasty, and postoperative peripheral anterior synechiae.

CONCLUSION

KDB-LOT was effective in treating patients with several glaucoma types but showed difficulty in pushing IOP below 15 mmHg. Prognostic factors should be considered when making decisions regarding surgical indications.

Endocyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification in surgically naive primary open-angle glaucoma: three-year results

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of endocyclophotocoagulation with phacoemulsification (phaco-ECP) in surgically naive, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

A retrospective case series of patients undergoing phaco-ECP between 2007 and 2017 at a single centre in London, UK. The primary outcome was intraocular pressure (IOP). Secondary outcomes were visual acuity, visual field global indices, topical medications and surgical complications. Failure criteria were: (1) IOP > 21 mmHg or <20% reduction at two consecutive visits, (2) IOP <5 mmHg and (3) further IOP-lowering surgery.

RESULTS

Eighty-three eyes from 83 patients were eligible. Pre-operatively, mean IOP (±SD) was 18.4 ± 5.2 mmHg. The mean number of topical agents (±SD) was 2.7 ± 0.9. Mean IOP (±SD) significantly reduced to 14.3 ± 4.7 at 1 year, 14.1 ± 4.0 at 2 years and 13.6 ± 3.7 at 3 years (p < 0.0001). Topical medications were significantly reduced to 1.3 ± 1.2 at 1 year, 1.7 ± 1.2 at 2 years and 1.8 ± 1.3 at 3 years (p < 0.0001). Annual IOP 'survival' was 70%, 54% and 45% at year 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Complications included uveitis (6%), macular oedema (2%), IOP spikes (1%) and corneal decompensation (1%) with no episodes of hypotony or retinal detachment. One patient underwent filtration surgery within 3 years (1%).

CONCLUSION

Phaco-ECP facilitates significant IOP lowering and reduction of medication burden in surgically naive POAG requiring cataract extraction. The procedure is relatively safe and without the use of implants and their associated risks.