Fluctuations in macular thickness in patients with diabetic macular oedema treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents

Dexamethasone Implant under a Proactive Treatment Regimen in Clinical Setting: The ProDEX Study

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of switching intravitreal dexamethasone implants (DEX-implant) from pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen to a proactive regimen in patients with macular edema of diverse etiologies.

DESIGN

An observational, retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, national case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-one eyes from 68 patients treated between October 2015 and June 2023 were included.

METHODS

This study included consecutive eyes treated with DEX-implant who were switched from a PRN regimen to a proactive regimen for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), noninfectious uveitis macular edema (UME; including postsurgical macular edema), and radiation maculopathy (RM).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at each visit.

RESULTS

According to the etiology, DME represented 49.4% of eyes, UME 24.3%, RVO 21.0%, and RM 6.2%. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up under the PRN and proactive regimens was 20.6 (13.3) and 14.2 (10.3) months, respectively. Switching from a PRN to a proactive regimen significantly improved mean (SD) BCVA by 3.7 (12.9) ETDRS letters (P = 0.01) with a mean (SD) decrease in CMT of 108.0 (151.4) μm (P < 0.001). The proportion of visits with significant anatomic recurrence (> 50 μm) also decreased from 40.1% to 6.0% after switching to a proactive regimen (P < 0.001). The number of DEX-implant injections significantly increased during the proactive treatment period (P < 0.001), but the change in the number of visits was not significantly different (P = 0.2). The proactive treatment period was not associated with a significant increase in IOP (P = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to a proactive regimen in patients already treated with DEX-implant seems to significantly improve BCVA and CMT while maintaining stable IOP.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. It is defined as the diabetes-related accumulation of fluid, proteins, and lipids, with retinal thickening, within the macular area. DME affects a significant proportion of individuals with diabetes, with the prevalence increasing with disease duration and severity. It is estimated that approximately 25-30% of diabetic patients will develop DME during their lifetime. Poor glycemic control, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes duration, and genetic predisposition are recognized as risk factors for the development and progression of DME. Although the exact pathophysiology is still not completely understood, it has been demonstrated that chronic hyperglycemia triggers a cascade of biochemical processes, including increased oxidative stress, inflammation, activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cellular dysfunction, and apoptosis, with breakdown of the blood-retinal barriers and fluid accumulation within the macular area. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of DME are crucial for improving visual outcomes. Although the control of systemic risk factors still remains the most important strategy in DME treatment, intravitreal pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF molecules or steroids is currently considered the first-line approach in DME patients, whereas macular laser photocoagulation and pars plana vitrectomy may be useful in selected cases. Available intravitreal steroids, including triamcinolone acetonide injections and dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants, exert their therapeutic effect by reducing inflammation, inhibiting VEGF expression, stabilizing the blood-retinal barrier and thus reducing vascular permeability. They have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing macular edema and improving visual outcomes in DME patients but are associated with a high risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract development, so their use requires an accurate patient selection. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathology, epidemiology, risk factors, physiopathology, clinical features, treatment mechanisms of actions, treatment options, prognosis, and ongoing clinical studies related to the treatment of DME, with particular consideration of intravitreal steroids therapy.

Exploring the role of retinal fluid as a biomarker for the management of diabetic macular oedema

Anti-VEGF therapies are associated with significant gains in visual acuity and fluid resolution in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and have become the standard of care. However, despite their efficacy, outcomes can be unpredictable, vary widely between individual eyes, and a large proportion of patients have persistent fluid following initial treatment, with a negative impact on visual outcomes. Anatomical parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), in addition to visual acuity, are key to monitoring treatment effectiveness and guiding retreatment decisions; however, existing guidelines on the management of DMO lack clear recommendations for interpretation of OCT parameters, or proposed thresholds of various markers to guide retreatment decisions. Although central subfield thickness (CSFT) has been widely used as a marker for retreatment decisions in clinical trials in DMO, and a reduction in CSFT has generally been shown to accompany improvements in best-corrected visual acuity with treatment, analyses of the relationship between these parameters show that the correlation is small to moderate. A more direct relationship can be seen between an increased magnitude of CSFT fluctuations over time and poorer visual acuity, suggesting that control of CSFT could be important in maximising visual outcomes. The relationship between visual outcomes and qualitatively assessed intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid is also unclear, although quantitative assessments of fluid parameters suggest that untreated intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid negatively impact visual outcomes. These findings highlight a need for clearer guidelines on the management of retinal fluid to improve visual outcomes for patients with DMO.

Long-Term Control of Retinal Thickness Variability and Vision Following the 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant

Purpose: To assess the impact of retinal thickness variability (RTV) control on visual and treatment burden outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who received the 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien, Alimera Sciences). Methods: This post hoc analysis examined the outcomes of a 3-year, phase 4, nonrandomized, open-label observational study. Retinal thickness was measured as central subfield thickness (CST). RTV was quantified by CST area under the curve (CST-AUC), retinal thickness amplitude (RTA), and retinal thickness standard deviation (RTSD). Visual outcomes were measured as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and treatment burden was measured as the number of yearly supplemental DME treatments. Results: The percentage of eyes with a CST ≤300 µm fluctuated throughout the study but was significantly increased relative to baseline at 36 months (baseline: 32.9% vs 36 months: 46.8%; P < .05). FAc significantly reduced RTV in all measures more than 36 months (P < .0001). When divided into quartiles, eyes with the best RTV control post FAc had the greatest BCVA gains and improved disease control (ie, reduced need for supplemental therapy). The last-observed BCVA letter score exhibited linear correlations with CST-AUC (R2 = -0.100), RTA (R2 = -0.125), and RTSD (R2 = -0.162). A multivariate linear regression with baseline BCVA as a covariate displayed improved correlations with the last-observed BCVA, CST-AUC (R2 = -0.448), RTA (R2 = -0.432), and RTSD (R2 = -0.436). Conclusions: The sustained corticosteroid release of the 0.19 mg FAc implant reduced RTV in patients with DME, which directly correlated with significantly improved vision and a reduced supplemental treatment burden.

BETTER BASELINE VISION LEADS TO BETTER OUTCOMES AFTER THE 0.19-mg FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

PURPOSE

Analysis of a 3-year, Phase 4, open-label, observational study evaluating the association of baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with visual, treatment burden, and retinal thickness variability (RTV) outcomes and intraocular pressure (IOP)-related events after the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant.

METHODS

Data from patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who did not have a clinically significant rise in IOP after previous corticosteroid treatment (N = 202 eyes from 159 patients) were segregated by baseline BCVA of ≥20/40 or <20/40 and analyzed for BCVA, number of yearly supplemental DME treatments, RTV, and incidence of IOP-related events.

RESULTS

At 36 months post-FAc, eyes with better baseline BCVA (≥20/40) maintained baseline BCVA, whereas vision in eyes with worse baseline BCVA (<20/40) increased by approximately 7 letters to 61.34 letters (Snellen equivalent approximately 20/60; P < 0.05). Treatment burden and RTV decreased post-FAc regardless of baseline BCVA. Eyes with better baseline BCVA (≥20/40) had numerically fewer IOP-related events post-FAc versus eyes with worse baseline BCVA (<20/40), including a lower incidence of incisional IOP-lowering surgery.

CONCLUSION

The 0.19-mg FAc implant improved RTV and treatment burden regardless of baseline BCVA. Better baseline BCVA (≥20/40) was associated with long-term BCVA maintenance. Although eyes with worse baseline BCVA (<20/40) experienced significantly improved BCVA, it never rose to the level of those with better baseline BCVA. These data indicate that early, effective intervention in DME, before significant vision loss occurs, is key to maintaining visual outcomes.

Macular Thickness Fluctuations in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Intravitreal Steroid

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Macular thickness fluctuations (MTF) over time may be more predictive of visual outcomes than absolute macular thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). It is unclear whether this association exists in DME patients treated with intravitreal steroids or whether steroids confer reduced MTF versus anti-VEGF treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MTF was compared before and after initiation of steroids in DME patients treated with intravitreal steroids. A mixed-effects linear regression model was used to determine the association between MTF and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

Mean 12-month MTF significantly decreased after steroid initiation (61.1 μm versus 53.5 μm, P = 0.04, n = 105 eyes). Mean BCVA after 12 months was not significantly different from baseline. No significant association between post-steroid MTF and 12-month BCVA was found.

CONCLUSION

Steroid treatment decreases MTF while BCVA remains stable in DME patients previously treated with anti-VEGF. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:454-460.].

Predictive Factors of Visual Outcome in Treatment-Naïve Diabetic Macular Edema: Preliminary Results from the Clinical Study "FOVEA"

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of vision impairment in diabetic retinopathy. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between visual outcome and anatomic changes detected by traditional multimodal retinal imaging and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in DME eyes under treatment with Aflibercept.

METHODS

Sixty-six DME eyes of 62 patients under treatment with intravitreal Aflibercept and with one-year follow-up were enrolled. All participants underwent a full ophthalmic evaluation, including best correct visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography and OCTA, both at baseline and final examination. Fractal OCTA analysis of the superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP and DCP) was performed to estimate vascular perfusion density and lacunarity (LAC).

RESULTS

At the final examination, there was a significant improvement in terms of BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT). Furthermore, eyes with CMT <373 µm at baseline reached the higher BCVA at the last follow-up. Eyes with CMT ≥373 µm and DCP LAC <0.41 reached a higher final BCVA, if compared with eyes showing the same CMT but higher initial LAC.

CONCLUSION

A 12-month treatment with intravitreal Aflibercept for DME resulted in significant visual and anatomic improvement. Multimodal retinal imaging, together with fractal OCTA analysis, may provide useful biomarkers, predictive of visual outcome in DME.

The 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant Reduces Treatment Burden in Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To assess treatment burden in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN).

DESIGN

Prospective and retrospective analyses of a 36-month, phase 4, open-label, observational study.

METHODS

Setting: Multicenter.

PATIENT POPULATION

Included patients had DME and previously received corticosteroid treatment without a clinically significant rise in intraocular pressure (IOP) (N = 202 eyes in 159 patients). Patients were not randomized.

OBSERVATION PROCEDURES

Prospective, observational treatment burden data were analyzed for their relationship to safety and functional efficacy outcomes across 36 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes included the mean number of yearly treatments, supplemental-free probability over time, best-corrected visual acuity, and monitoring of IOP-related events.

RESULTS

Over 36 months, the mean number of yearly treatments decreased from 3.5 before FAc to 1.7 after FAc; at 36 months, 68.3% of patients required 0 to 2 treatments per year. After FAc, the percentage of eyes requiring supplemental therapy decreased vs before FAc (P < .0001 for each). Through 36 months, 25% of FAc-treated eyes did not require supplemental treatment. At 36 months, mean best-corrected visual acuity increased by 4.5 letters vs a decline of 6.4 letters in the 36 months before FAc. IOP elevations >25 mm Hg occurred in 18.2% of eyes that did not receive supplemental treatment after FAc vs 27.2% of eyes that received supplemental treatments, which included additional intraocular steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 36 months, the FAc implant is associated with improved visual outcomes and better disease control as measured by a significant reduction in yearly treatment burden in patients with DME.

Clinical Application of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Diabetic Macular Edema Comparing Two Loading Regimens

Background and Objectives: We investigated and compared the efficacy of three and five monthly loading regimens of an intravitreal aflibercept injection (IVA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study that included patients diagnosed with DME and treated with an either three or five monthly aflibercept loading regimen from July 2018 to March 2022. Information on clinical characteristics and changes in the central retinal thickness (CRT) were obtained from medical records. Results: In total, 44 eyes of 44 patients with DME treated with IVA were included in this study, with 30 eyes treated with 3-monthly loadings (three-loading group) and 14 eyes with 5-monthly loadings (five-loading group). The mean CRT significantly decreased from the baseline one month after loading in both the three-loading and five-loading groups (p < 0.001). Four cases were refractory to treatment in the three-loading group, while there were no cases of refractory DME in the five-loading group. The stability rate was significantly higher in the five-loading group at three months after loading (p = 0.033). Conclusions: Five-monthly loading regimens of IVA might be favorable for DME considering the rate of refractory cases, stable duration, and the importance of early responsiveness to IVA in DME.

Factors Associated with Fluctuations in Central Subfield Thickness in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Using Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Protocols T and V

PURPOSE

To identify baseline ocular and systemic factors associated with central subfield thickness (CST) fluctuations in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using data from Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Protocols T and V.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of clinical trial databases.

SUBJECTS

Patients in Protocols T and V.

METHODS

The standard deviation (SD) of all recorded CSTs for each patient during each Protocol's study period was calculated. The CST SD (corresponding to CST fluctuations) for each patient was analyzed against baseline ocular and systemic factors using linear regression analyses. Each Protocol was analyzed separately.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Factors associated with CST fluctuations.

RESULTS

A total of 1197 eyes of 1197 subjects were included. In Protocol T (559 eyes, mean CST SD was 56.4 ± 35.1 microns), using multivariate linear regression analysis, baseline urine albumin/creatine ratio (for every 1000 mg/g, CST point estimate 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58 to 6.43, P = 0.0190), and baseline CST (for every 10 microns, 0.87, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.16, P < 0.0001) were positively associated with CST fluctuations. Baseline visual acuity (for every 10 ETDRS letters, -9.52, 95% CI -11.89 to -7.15, P < 0.0001) was negatively associated with CST fluctuations. In Protocol V (638 eyes, mean CST SD 36.6 ± 28.4 microns), gender (female, 2.18, 95% CI 0.30 to 4.06, P = 0.0227), baseline CST (for every 10 microns, 2.51, 95% CI 2.21 to 2.82, P < 0.0001), systolic blood pressure (for every 1 mm of mercury, 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.21, P = 0.0261), and observation with deferred anti-VEGF injections (5.04, 95% CI 2.51 to 7.58, P < 0.0001) were positively associated with CST fluctuations. Type 2 diabetes (-7.37, 95% CI -13.64 to -1.11, P = 0.0209) and prompt anti-VEGF injections (-6.51, 95% CI -9.07 to -3.96, P < 0.0001) were negatively associated with CST fluctuations.

CONCLUSIONS

Worse visual acuity at baseline, baseline renal disease, hypertension, female gender, type 1 diabetes, and delayed anti-VEGF treatment may be associated with increased CST fluctuations in patients with DME. Addressing these parameters may limit CST fluctuations and help identify patients requiring more frequent monitoring or treatment.

Real-Life Value of the Odysight® Application in At-Home Screening for Exudative Recurrence of Macular Edema

Background: The aim of this study was to describe the value of the Odysight® application in addition to a classical follow-up regimen in the detection of exudative recurrences in patients with macular edema. Methods: We conducted an observational, multicenter, retrospective study. The Odysight® application includes a visual acuity (VA) test that can lead to alerts in case of a drop of >5 VA letters on two successive tests. The efficacy of the alerts in detecting exudative recurrence was studied. Results: A total of 149 eyes of 123 patients were included. The sensitivity of alerts for the detection of recurrence was 30.8% (95% CI [17.6; 44.0]) and its specificity was 83.7% (95% CI [73.2; 94.3]. A better baseline VA was found to be significantly associated with a better retention of the application (OR = 0.05, 95% CI [0.002; 0.62]; p = 0.045). Of the 12/39 alerts that detected a recurrence, eight (20.5% of all alerts) resulted in the scheduling or advancement of an intravitreal injection. Conclusions: In the present study, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the Odysight® application seems low but its use in addition to the usual follow-up of the patient can detect, in certain cases, an early recurrence and thus allow an anticipated readjustment of the treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant for Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Previously Treated in Real-Life Practice: The REALFAc Study

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients and a chronic disease requiring long-term treatments. The fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant has recently been approved to treat DME in patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. This study evaluates the functional and anatomical efficacy of the FAc implant in real-life practice. A total of 62 eyes with chronic DME were included and followed for a mean of 13.9 (+7.5) months. Previous treatment included at least anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in 83.9% of eyes, dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) in 100% of eyes, vitrectomy in 29.0% of eyes, and laser photocoagulation (either panretinal or focal photocoagulation) in 75.8% of eyes. The mean baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 64.0 (+/−17.2) letters (median: 67.5 letters) with a mean DME duration of 60.3 (+/−30.6) months. The maximum BCVA gain occurred at 21 months with a mean gain of 5.0 (+/−12.7) letters. A total of 50.0% of eyes gained ≥5 letters during follow-up. Patients with lower BCVA at baseline had the lowest final BCVA (p < 0.001) but the highest BCVA gain (p = 0.02). The best overall improvement in mean central macular thickness (CMT) occurred at 18 months (p < 0.0001). The improvement in BCVA was inversely associated with the decrease in CMT and showed a decrease when CMT increased (DME recurrence). According to the history of vitrectomy, we did not find any significant difference in mean final BCVA (p = 0.1) and mean BCVA gain (p = 0.2) between eyes previously vitrectomized or not. A total of 23 eyes (37.1%) required additional treatment for DME, and 17.7% required an IOP-lowering procedure during follow-up. In conclusion, this real-life observational study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the FAc implant in patients with chronic DME already treated with other available therapies.

Fluocinolone acetonide implant in diabetic macular edema: International experts' panel consensus guidelines and treatment algorithm

Center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision impairment in working-age adults. While its management is particularly challenging in a poorly compliant population, continuous innovation and the advent of new molecules have improved its outcome. The control of glycemia and of systemic aggravating factors remain essential to slow down progression of disease complications including DME. The indications for macular laser photocoagulation has progressively been phased out as a standard of care and replaced by local intraocular anti-VEGFs biologics and glucocorticoids (GCs). Intravitreal GCs in controlled-release drug delivery systems have allowed to reduce injection frequency and treatment burden. The non biodegradable Fluocinolone Acetonide (FAc) implant allows a long-lasting stabilization of both functional and anatomic improvements. However, adequate patient selection and monitoring through regular follow-up are essential for optimal results. Based on their experience and the latest literature, the aim of the present review is to provide international expert panel consensus on the place of the FAc implant in the treatment algorithm of DME, as well as its safety profile and how to manage it.