Gene therapy: perspectives from young adults with Leber's congenital amaurosis

Infrastructuring precision medicine: Making gene therapies for rare diseases workable in practice

Long viewed by social scientists as a future imaginary, precision medicine is now materializing in many healthcare systems in the form of new diagnostic practices and novel treatment modalities, such as gene therapies. Based on an ethnographic study of the introduction of the first two clinically available in-vivo gene therapies in the Danish healthcare system, we investigate what it takes to make these therapies workable in practice. Drawing on social science literature on infrastructuring, we describe the many forms of mundane work required to fit these therapies into regulatory frameworks, political processes and daily work practices in the healthcare system. Further, we observe how the processes of infrastructuring required to introduce the gene therapies into clinical practice had transformative implications as they redistributed roles and responsibilities among clinicians, pharmacists, procurement agencies and pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Unlocking therapeutic potential: dual gene therapy for ameliorating the disease phenotypes in a mouse model of RPE65 Leber congenital amaurosis

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is the most common genetic cause of congenital visual impairment in infants and children. Patients with LCA who harbor RPE65 mutations exhibit a deficiency in photoreceptor rhodopsin, leading to severe night blindness and visual impairment following birth. Since either gene replacement therapy or anti-apoptosis therapy alone cannot maintain both functional and morphological normality for a long time in the animal model, we propose a robust treatment strategy, that is, gene replacement therapy combined with anti-apoptotic therapy to protect photoreceptors from further degeneration while compensating for lost RPE65 function. Here, rd12 mice were injected subretinally at postnatal day 14 with four vector administrations, respectively. At 6 months after treatment, it was discovered that injection of three vectors, AAV8 (Y733F)-CBA-hRPE65, AAV8(Y733F)-CBA-hRPE65-BCL-2-L10 and mixture of half-dose AAV8(Y733F)-CBA-hRPE65 and half-dose AAV8 (Y733F)-CBA-BCL-2-L10, could partially restore the visual function of rd12 mice. Meanwhile, these treated eyes also exhibited a thicker outer nuclear layer (ONL) structure. However, despite the fact that the eyes of rd12 mice injected with the AAV8 (Y733F)-CBA-BCL-2-L10 vector displayed a slightly thicker ONL structure compared to untreated eyes, the visual function of the treated eyes did not recover. Continuing the observation period to 12 months after treatment, we found that compared to rd12 mice at 6-month post-treatment, rd12 mice injected with AAV8 (Y733F)-CBA-hRPE65 or mixture of half-dose AAV8(Y733F)-CBA-hRPE65 and half-dose AAV8 (Y733F)-CBA-BCL-2-L10 exhibited varying degrees of decline in both visual function and ONL thickness. However, in the case of rd12 mice injected with the AAV8(Y733F)-CBA-hRPE65-BCL-2-L10 vector, the ONL thickness remains consistent at both 6 and 12 months after treatment. These mice continued to maintain a relatively strong visual function and showed restoration in the levels of RPE65 and Rhodopsin protein expression. Our findings illustrate that early postnatal treatment with AAV vectors containing both the hRPE65 gene and the Bcl-2L10 anti-apoptotic gene provide enhanced and sustained retinal protection.

The validation of inherited retinal disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures in adolescent patients

PURPOSE

To determine the validity of the validate the adult patient-reported outcome measure tools, the Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire (MRDQ) and Michigan Vision-Related Anxiety Questionnaire (MVAQ), in adolescent patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs).

METHODS

Ninety-one adolescent patients diagnosed with IRDs were recruited at the Hospital for Sick Children (University of Toronto) and the Kellogg Eye Center (University of Michigan). The patients were administered the MRDQ, MVAQ, and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Test-retest variability was assessed in eighteen patients within 14 days of the initial administration. Adolescent responses were analyzed for validity and reliability. As a further validation step, comparisons were made to adult data from the original MRDQ and MVAQ studies to ensure consistency in response ranges.

RESULTS

The existing MRDQ and MVAQ content and format could accurately detect the impact of IRD on activities of daily living in adolescents with IRDs. No floor/ceiling effects were identified, test-retest reliability was established (r = 0.73-0.86), and no items were excluded after differential item functioning analysis. Domain and trait associations with visual acuity and IRD phenotypes were similar between adolescents and adults.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRDQ and MVAQ are psychometrically validated questionnaires for which we have shown validity for use in adolescent patients with IRDs.