The cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship of diabetic retinopathy to cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Association Between Hormone Levels and Retinopathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

To explore the relationship between hormone levels and diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Methods

This cross-sectional study recruited 2432 patients with type 2 diabetes from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between 2016 and 2019. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between hormone levels and DR.

Results

DR was diagnosed in 953 patients (39.19%), with no significant gender difference in prevalence. Among men, DR prevalence increased with testosterone level increasing (Q4 vs. Q1: odds ratio [OR] = 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.41) but decreased with prolactin levels increasing (Q4 vs. Q1: OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.96). Among women, high follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (Q4 vs. Q1: OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.40-3.52) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels (Q4 vs. Q1: OR = 1.77; 95% CI, 1.20-2.63) were linked with increased DR prevalence. No associations were found in premenopausal women, but postmenopausal women with high prolactin level had increased DR prevalence (Q2 vs. Q1: OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.01-2.19). Dose-response relationships were suggested for FSH (P = 0.087) and testosterone (P = 0.088) with DR prevalence, though caution is advised due to the risk of type I error arising from multiple comparisons. Other risk factors included low body mass index (OR = 0.98), smoking (OR = 1.32), long diabetes duration (OR = 1.02), and high systolic blood pressure (OR = 1.01).

Conclusions

Prolactin (negatively) and testosterone (positively) were correlated with DR risk in men. FSH and testosterone showed suggestive dose-response relationship with DR prevalence in postmenopausal women. Further research is needed for type 1 diabetes.

Translational Relevance

Sex hormones play a crucial role in DR development, affecting men and women differently.

Associations between vision impairment and eye diseases with dementia, dementia subtypes and cognitive impairment: An umbrella review

Vision impairment (VI) and eye diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), glaucoma and cataract have been reported to be associated with cognitive impairment and dementia, however, to date, very little attempt has been made to collate and synthesizes such literature. Therefore, the aim of this umbrella review is to systematically assesses the credibility and certainty of evidence of associations between vision impairment (VI) and eye diseases with cognitive impairment, dementia and dementia subtypes. We conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses by screening articles in any language in PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and CDSR published from database inception up to May 30, 2024. Quality appraisal of each included original meta-analysis was assessed using A Measurement Tool for Assessing Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2). The certainty of the evidence was based on statistical significance, study size, heterogeneity, small study effects, prediction intervals (PI), and bias. We followed an a-priori protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024564249). We identified 13 meta-analyses (AMSTAR 2; high accuracy of the findings 1, moderate 10, and low 2) that included 232 original articles based on 99,337,354 participants. Overall, no evidence was highly suggestive or convincing. Suggestive evidence was found for associations between cataract and dementia (equivalent odds ratio [eOR] 1.20, 95 %CI, 1.16-1.25), cataract and Alzheimer's disease (eOR 1.21, 95 %CI, 1.15-1.28), and AMD and Alzheimer's disease (eOR 1.27, 95 %CI, 1.27-1.27). Weak evidence was found for associations between VI and dementia (eOR 1.50, 95 %CI, 1.23-1.84), DR and dementia (eOR 1.33, 95 %CI, 1.17-1.50), cataract and vascular dementia (eOR 1.26, 95 %CI, 1.09-1.45), VI identified by cross-sectional studies and cognitive impairment (eOR 2.37, 95 %CI, 2.31-2.44), and VI identified by objective measures and cognitive impairment (eOR 1.56, 95 %CI, 1.12-2.18). The observed suggestive level of evidence for the relationship between eye disease and dementia (as well as dementia subtypes) suggests that policy and interventions to aid in the prevention and management of eye disease may also aid in the prevention of dementia syndrome. Where the level of evidence is weak, further studies are needed with stronger methodological approaches.

Value proposition of retinal imaging in Alzheimer's disease screening: A review of eight evolving trends

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide. Current diagnostic modalities of AD generally focus on detecting the presence of amyloid β and tau protein in the brain (for example, positron emission tomography [PET] and cerebrospinal fluid testing), but these are limited by their high cost, invasiveness, and lack of expertise. Retinal imaging exhibits potential in AD screening and risk stratification, as the retina provides a platform for the optical visualization of the central nervous system in vivo, with vascular and neuronal changes that mirror brain pathology. Given the paradigm shift brought by advances in artificial intelligence and the emergence of disease-modifying therapies, this article aims to summarize and review the current literature to highlight 8 trends in an evolving landscape regarding the role and potential value of retinal imaging in AD screening.

Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes-related foot complications: A cohort study

Objective

Mild-moderate cognitive impairment has been identified in general diabetes, and early evidence indicates cognitive reductions may be more pronounced in those with diabetes-related foot complications (DRFC). Cognitive difficulties may impede treatment engagement and self-management. This requires further explication to optimise patient care and outcomes. The current study aimed to characterise cognitive function in people with DRFC using comprehensive cognitive measures.

Method

This cross-sectional cohort study recruited 80 adult participants (M age  = 63.38, SD = 11.40, range = 30 - 89) from the Royal Melbourne Hospital Diabetic Foot Unit in Victoria, Australia, all with DRFC. Each completed a comprehensive cognitive battery (memory, attention, executive functions) and scores were calculated using age-matched population norms, where available.

Results

On the majority of tasks, DRFC participants performed significantly worse than age-matched norms, with the largest decrements seen in inhibition control, verbal memory, verbal abstract reasoning and working memory. Small to moderate reductions were also seen in visual learning, verbal fluency, processing speed and premorbid functioning. Demographic (lower education, male gender) and clinical factors (higher HbA1c, macrovascular and microvascular disease, longer diabetes duration) were associated with poorer cognitive functioning.

Conclusions

Marked reductions in cognitive functioning were found in individuals with DRFC, predominantly in the domains of verbal memory and executive functioning. Lower education, male gender and indicators of diabetes severity, such as vascular disease, are associated with heightened risk for poorer cognitive functioning. As DRFCs are a serious complication with devastating outcomes if not successfully managed, cognitive barriers to self-management must be addressed to optimise treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01381-4.

The risk of dementia or cognitive impairment in patients with cataracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether cataract disease is associated with the risk of developing dementia or cognitive impairment.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature in PubMed, the Extracts Database (Embase), the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science databases was performed from the inception data of each database until 1 September 2022. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness and reliability of the overall findings. All extracted data were statistically analyzed using Stata software v.16.0. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and the Egger test.

RESULTS

There were 11 publications included in this study, which consisted of 489,211participants, spanning 10 countries from 2012 to 2022. Aggregation suggested that cataracts were associated with cognitive impairment (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.21-1.43; I 2 = 45.4.%; p = 0.000). The presence of cataracts is significantly associated with an increased risk of developing all-cause dementia (relative risk [RR] = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.08-1.26; I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.000). In subgroup analyses, having cataracts may increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.13-1.45; I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.000) and vascular dementia (HR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.06-1.73; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.015). The data from the Egger's test showed no significant evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataracts are associated with the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, including Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia.

The Association Between Eye Disease and Incidence of Dementia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To better demonstrate the relationship between common eye diseases and the risk of dementia, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies to investigate the relationship between common eye diseases and dementia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with common eye diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of articles published up to August 25, 2022, of online databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. We included cohort studies that evaluated the association of glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and cataracts with all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD). Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were pooled using random effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

In total, 25 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 11,410,709 participants. Pooled estimates suggested an increased risk of all-cause dementia associated with AMD (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.48), glaucoma (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32), DR (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.21-1.63), and cataract (RR,1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.40); an increased risk of AD associated with AMD (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06-1.52), glaucoma (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.38), DR (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.41), and cataracts (RR,1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.38). No association was observed between incident VaD and any eye diseases. The results of subgroup analyses were consistent with those in meta-analysis of DR and risk of all-cause dementia. Meta-regressions suggested geographic regions as potential sources of heterogeneity for the association between AMD and all-cause dementia, AMD and AD, glaucoma and dementia, glaucoma, and AD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

AMD, glaucoma, DR, and cataract may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause dementia and AD, but not VaD. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously because of the high heterogeneity and unstable findings in some subgroup analyses.