Thrombopoietin-based CAR-T cells demonstrate in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity to MPL positive acute myelogenous leukemia and hematopoietic stem cells

Alternative target recognition elements for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells: beyond standard antibody fragments

BACKGROUND AIMS

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells are a remarkably efficacious, highly promising and rapidly evolving strategy in the field of immuno-oncology. The precision of these targeted cellular therapies is driven by the specificity of the antigen recognition element (the "binder") encoded in the CAR. This binder redirects these immune effector cells precisely toward a defined antigen on the surface of cancer cells, leading to T-cell receptor-independent tumor lysis. Currently, for tumor targeting most CAR-T cells are designed using single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) derived from murine or human immunoglobulins. However, there are several emerging alternative binder modalities that are finding increasing utility for improved CAR function beyond scFvs.

METHODS

Here we review the most recent developments in the use of non-canonical protein binding domains in CAR design, including nanobodies, DARPins, natural ligands, and de novo-designed protein elements.

RESULTS

Overall, we describe how new protein binder formats, with their unique structural properties and mechanisms of action, may possess key advantages over traditional scFv CAR designs.

CONCLUSIONS

These alternative binder designs may contribute to enhanced CAR-T therapeutic options and, ultimately, improved outcomes for cancer patients.

Ligand-based targeting of c-kit using engineered γδ T cells as a strategy for treating acute myeloid leukemia

The application of immunotherapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy or bi-specific T cell engager (BiTE) therapy to manage myeloid malignancies has proven more challenging than for B-cell malignancies. This is attributed to a shortage of leukemia-specific cell-surface antigens that distinguish healthy from malignant myeloid populations, and the inability to manage myeloid depletion unlike B-cell aplasia. Therefore, the development of targeted therapeutics for myeloid malignancies, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), requires new approaches. Herein, we developed a ligand-based CAR and secreted bi-specific T cell engager (sBite) to target c-kit using its cognate ligand, stem cell factor (SCF). c-kit is highly expressed on AML blasts and correlates with resistance to chemotherapy and poor prognosis, making it an ideal candidate for which to develop targeted therapeutics. We utilize γδ T cells as a cytotoxic alternative to αβ T cells and a transient transfection system as both a safety precaution and switch to remove alloreactive modified cells that may hinder successful transplant. Additionally, the use of γδ T cells permits its use as an allogeneic, off-the-shelf therapeutic. To this end, we show mSCF CAR- and hSCF sBite-modified γδ T cells are proficient in killing c-kit+ AML cell lines and sca-1+ murine bone marrow cells in vitro. In vivo, hSCF sBite-modified γδ T cells moderately extend survival of NSG mice engrafted with disseminated AML, but therapeutic efficacy is limited by lack of γδ T-cell homing to murine bone marrow. Together, these data demonstrate preclinical efficacy and support further investigation of SCF-based γδ T-cell therapeutics for the treatment of myeloid malignancies.

Mutated Flt3Lg Provides Reduced Flt3 Recycling Compared to Wild-Type Flt3Lg and Retains the Specificity of Flt3Lg-Based CAR T-Cell Targeting in AML Models

The cells of acute myeloid leukemia are defined by clonal growth and heterogenous immunophenotypes. Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) commonly recognize molecular targets by single-chain antibody fragments (scFvs) specific to a tumor-associated antigen. However, ScFvs may form aggregates, thus stimulating tonic CAR T-cell activation and reducing CAR T-cell functioning in vivo. Harnessing natural ligands as recognition parts of CARs, specific targeting of membrane receptors can be achieved. Previously, we presented ligand-based Flt3-CAR T-cells targeting the Flt3 receptor. The extracellular part of Flt3-CAR consisted of full-size Flt3Lg. Meanwhile, upon recognition, Flt3-CAR may potentially activate Flt3, triggering proliferative signaling in blast cells. Moreover, the long-lasting presence of Flt3Lg may lead to Flt3 downregulation. In this paper, we present mutated Flt3Lg-based Flt3m-CAR ('m'-for 'mutant') T-cells targeting Flt3. The extracellular part of Flt3m-CAR consists of full-length Flt3Lg-L27P. We have determined that ED₅₀ for recombinant Flt3Lg-L27P produced in CHO cells is at least 10-fold higher than for the wild-type Flt3Lg. We show that the mutation in the recognizing domain of Flt3m-CAR did not affect the specificity of Flt3m-CAR T-cells when compared to Flt3-CAR T-cells. Flt3m-CAR T-cells combine the specificity of ligand-receptor recognition with reduced Flt3Lg-L27P bioactivity, leading to potentially safer immunotherapy.

Tumor buster - where will the CAR-T cell therapy 'missile' go?

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy based on gene editing technology represents a significant breakthrough in personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. This strategy uses genetic modification to enable T cells to target tumor-specific antigens, attack specific cancer cells, and bypass tumor cell apoptosis avoidance mechanisms to some extent. This method has been extensively used to treat hematologic diseases, but the therapeutic effect in solid tumors is not ideal. Tumor antigen escape, treatment-related toxicity, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) limit their use of it. Target selection is the most critical aspect in determining the prognosis of patients receiving this treatment. This review provides a comprehensive summary of all therapeutic targets used in the clinic or shown promising potential. We summarize CAR-T cell therapies’ clinical trials, applications, research frontiers, and limitations in treating different cancers. We also explore coping strategies when encountering sub-optimal tumor-associated antigens (TAA) or TAA loss. Moreover, the importance of CAR-T cell therapy in cancer immunotherapy is emphasized.

Therapeutic targets and biomarkers of tumor immunotherapy: response versus non-response

Cancers are highly complex diseases that are characterized by not only the overgrowth of malignant cells but also an altered immune response. The inhibition and reprogramming of the immune system play critical roles in tumor initiation and progression. Immunotherapy aims to reactivate antitumor immune cells and overcome the immune escape mechanisms of tumors. Represented by immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive cell transfer, tumor immunotherapy has seen tremendous success in the clinic, with the capability to induce long-term regression of some tumors that are refractory to all other treatments. Among them, immune checkpoint blocking therapy, represented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab) and CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab), has shown encouraging therapeutic effects in the treatment of various malignant tumors, such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma. In addition, with the advent of CAR-T, CAR-M and other novel immunotherapy methods, immunotherapy has entered a new era. At present, evidence indicates that the combination of multiple immunotherapy methods may be one way to improve the therapeutic effect. However, the overall clinical response rate of tumor immunotherapy still needs improvement, which warrants the development of novel therapeutic designs as well as the discovery of biomarkers that can guide the prescription of these agents. Learning from the past success and failure of both clinical and basic research is critical for the rational design of studies in the future. In this article, we describe the efforts to manipulate the immune system against cancer and discuss different targets and cell types that can be exploited to promote the antitumor immune response.

Ligand-based CAR-T cell: Different strategies to drive T cells in future new treatments

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-based therapies are presented as innovative treatments for multiple malignancies. Despite their clinical success, there is scientific evidence of the limitations of these therapies mainly due to immunogenicity issues, toxicities associated with the infusion of the product, and relapses of the tumor. As a result, novel approaches are appearing aiming to solve and/or mitigate the harmful effects of CAR-T therapies. These include strategies based on the use of ligands as binding moieties or ligand-based CAR-T cells. Several proposals are currently under development, with some undergoing clinical trials to assess their potential benefits. In addition to these, therapies such as chimeric autoantibody receptor (CAAR), B-cell receptor antigen for reverse targeting (BAR), and even chimeric human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody receptor (CHAR) have emerged, benefiting from the advantages of antigenic ligands as antibody-binding motifs. This review focuses on the potential role that ligands can play in current and future antitumor treatments and in other types of diseases, such as autoimmune diseases or problems associated with transplantation.

Natural Receptor- and Ligand-Based Chimeric Antigen Receptors: Strategies Using Natural Ligands and Receptors for Targeted Cell Killing

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been widely successful in the treatment of B-cell malignancies, including B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma; and three generations of CAR designs have led to effective FDA approved therapeutics. Traditionally, CAR antigen specificity is derived from a monoclonal antibody where the variable heavy (V_H) and variable light (V_L) chains are connected by a peptide linker to form a single-chain variable fragment (scFv). While this provides a level of antigen specificity parallel to that of an antibody and has shown great success in the clinic, this design is not universally successful. For instance, issues of stability, immunogenicity, and antigen escape hinder the translational application of some CARs. As an alternative, natural receptor- or ligand-based designs may prove advantageous in some circumstances compared to scFv-based designs. Herein, the advantages and disadvantages of scFv-based and natural receptor- or ligand-based CAR designs are discussed. In addition, several translational aspects of natural receptor- and ligand-based CAR approaches that are being investigated in preclinical and clinical studies will be examined.