Interpopulation spread of a parasitic B chromosome is unlikely through males in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans

Chromosomal and genomic analysis suggests single origin and high molecular differentiation of the B chromosome of Abracris flavolineata

Supernumerary chromosomes (B chromosomes) have been an intriguing subject of study. Our understanding of the molecular differentiation of B chromosomes from an interpopulation perspective remains limited, with most analyses involving chromosome banding and mapping of a few sequences. To gain insights into the molecular composition, origin, and evolution of B chromosomes, we conducted cytogenetic and next-generation sequencing analysis of the repeatome in the grasshopper Abracris flavolineata across various populations. Our results unveiled the presence of B chromosomes in two newly investigated populations and described new satellite DNA sequences. While we observed some degree of genetic connection among A. flavolineata populations, our comparative analysis of genomes with and without B chromosomes provided evidence of two new B chromosome variants. These variants exhibited distinct compositions of various repeat classes, including transposable elements and satellite DNAs. Based on shared repeats, their chromosomal location, and the C-positive heterochromatin content on the B chromosome, these variants likely share a common origin but have undergone distinct molecular differentiation processes, resulting in varying degrees of heterochromatinization. Our data serve as a detailed example of the dynamic and differentiated nature of B chromosome molecular content at the interpopulation level, even when they share a common origin.

Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions

Genome size (GS) variation is a fundamental biological characteristic; however, its evolutionary causes and consequences are the topic of ongoing debate. Whether GS is a neutral trait or one subject to selective pressures, and how strong these selective pressures are, may remain open questions. Fundamentally, the genomic sequences responsible for this variation directly impact the potential evolutionary outcomes and, equally, are the targets of different evolutionary pressures. For example, duplications and deletions of genic regions (large or small) can have immediate and drastic phenotypic effects, while an expansion or contraction of non-coding DNA is less likely to cause catastrophic phenotypic effects. However, in the long term, the accumulation or deletion of ncDNA is likely to have larger effects. Modern sequencing technologies are allowing for the dissection of these proximate causes, but a combination of these new technologies with more traditional evolutionary experiments and approaches could revolutionize this debate and potentially resolve many of these arguments. Here, I discuss an ambitious way forward for GS research, putting it in context of historical debates, theories and sometimes contradictory evidence, and highlighting the promise of combining new sequencing technologies and analytical developments with more traditional experimental evolution approaches.