Presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients who achieved intensive blood pressure reduction at the time of coronary computed tomography angiography

Association between pre-treatment with statin and its inhibitory effect on the onset of coronary artery disease at the time of coronary computed tomography angiography: a new look at an old medication

Coronary artery stenosis is often advanced by the time coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Statins are the most important anti-lipidemic medication for improving the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Although lipid-lowering therapy using statins appears to have been established as a method for preventing CAD, there remains the problem that CAD cannot be completely suppressed. In this study, we investigated whether pre-treatment with statin could significantly inhibit the onset of CAD when patients received CCTA for screening of CAD. The subjects were 1164 patients who underwent CCTA as screening for CAD. CAD was diagnosed when 50% or more coronary stenosis was present in the coronary arteries. Patient backgrounds were investigated by age, gender, body mass index, coronary risk factors [family history of cardiovascular diseases, smoking history, hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD) or metabolic sydrome] and medications. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presence or absence of statin pre-administration during CCTA [statin (-) group (n = 804) and (+) group (n = 360)]. Compared with the statin (-) group, the statin (+) group was significantly older and had higher rates of family history, HTN, and DM. The statin (+) group had a significantly higher % CAD than the statin (-) group. Serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were significantly lower in the statin (+) group than in the statin (-) group. There was no significant difference in either high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels or triglyceride levels between the two groups. Age, male gender, HTN, DM and pre-treatment with statin were all associated with CAD (+) in all patients. In addition, factors that contributed to CAD (+) in the statin (-) group were age, male gender, and DM, and factors that contributed to CAD (+) in the statin (+) group were age, smoking, HTN and % maximum dose of statin. At the time of CCTA, the statin (+) group had a high rate of CAD and coronary artery stenosis progressed despite a reduction of LDL-C levels. To prevent the onset of CAD, in addition to strict control of other coronary risk factors (HTN etc.), further LDL cholesterol-lowering therapy may be necessary.

Associations between blood pressure levels and diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: A population-based study

Purpose

To evaluate the associations of blood pressure levels with diabetic retinopathy (DR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Design

A cross-sectional, population-based study.

Subjects

A total of 152,844 patients with diabetes from 90 major cities in 19 provincial regions of mainland China during 2018-2021 were finally recruited.

Methods

Blood pressure was graded into 5 levels: normal (without hypertension and <120/80 mmHg), normal high (without hypertension and ≥120/80 mmHg), HT-intensive (hypertension and <120/80 mmHg), HT-moderate (hypertension and blood pressure between 120/80 mmHg and 140/90 mmHg) and HT-high (hypertension and ≥140/90 mmHg). Logistic regression was employed to verify the associations of hypertension and blood pressure levels with DR, PDR and DME. The impacts of blood pressure levels on the outcomes were qualified with nomogram models.

Main outcome measures

The main outcome was DR.

Results

There were 16,685 (10.92%) participants having DR, 2841 (1.86%) having PDR, and 1566 (1.02%) having DME. There were 8126 (5.32%) patients without hypertension and 1350 (0.88%) patients with hypertension having blood pressure <120/80 mmHg. When compared to the normal group with covariates adjusted, an increased prevalence of DR was observed in normal high (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.114, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.033-1.202), HT-moderate (adjusted OR = 1.163, 95% CI = 1.065-1.271), and HT-high (adjusted OR = 1.203, 95% CI = 1.114-1.300).

Conclusions

There were associations between hypertension and DR, PDR, and DME in the diabetic population. Increased prevalence of DR was found with blood pressure >120/80 mmHg in both patients with and without hypertension. A nomogram was developed for DR prediction based on blood pressure levels.