Reproducibility of blood pressure phenotypes identified by office and ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients. Data from the PHYLLIS study

Non-dipping blood pressure pattern is associated with cardiovascular events in a 21-year follow-up study

Non-dipping blood pressure (BP) pattern is a predictor for cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality. We evaluated dipping status change and its association with incidence of non-fatal CV events in middle-aged subjects. The OPERA study was carried out during the years 1991-1993, with a follow-up study 21.7 years later. In this study, we included 452 participants with 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM) available in both surveys. The study population was divided into four groups according to the dipping pattern change: dipping-dipping (n = 152/33.6%), dipping-non-dipping (n = 198/43.8%), non-dipping-dipping (n = 20/4.4%), and non-dipping-non-dipping (n = 82/18.1%). Sixty-five participants experienced a CV event (14.4%) during the 21.7 (SD 0.8) years of follow-up. The incidence of events was highest (28%) in the non-dipping-non-dipping group, and lowest (6.6%) in the dipping-dipping group (p < 0.001). In Cox regression analyses the covariates were age, sex, total cholesterol, hypertension and use of antihypertensive medication, systolic office BP and ambulatory mean or nighttime systolic BP, as well as the change in the variables during the follow-up period. After adjustments, the association of the non-dipping-non-dipping pattern with CV events compared with the dipping-dipping pattern remained significant (HR 4.01; 95% CI 1.89-8.67, p < 0.001). In summary, non-dipping-non-dipping pattern was associated with non-fatal CV events in the long term, and the effect was independent of the conventional risk factors including office and ambulatory BP levels.

Comparison between visit-to-visit office and 24-h blood pressure variability in treated hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVES

In any treated hypertensive patient office blood pressure (BP) values may differ between visits and this variability (V) has an adverse prognostic impact. However, little information is available on visit-to-visit 24-h BPV.

METHODS

In 1114 hypertensives of the ELSA and PHYLLIS trials we compared visit-to-visit office and 24-h mean BPV by coefficient of variation (CV) of the mean systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP obtained from yearly measurements during a 3-4 year treatment period. Visit-to-visit BPV during daytime and night-time were also compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour SBP-CV was about 20% less than office SBP-CV ( P  < 0.0001). SBP-CV was considerably greater for the night-time than for the daytime period (20%, P  < 0.0001). Results were similar for DBP and in males and females, older and younger patients, patients under different antihypertensive drugs or with different baseline or achieved BP values. In the group as a whole and in subgroups there was significant correlations between office and 24-h BP-CV but the correlation coefficients was weak, indicating that office SBP or DBP CV accounted for only about 1-4% of 24-h SBP or DBP-CV values.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-four-hour mean BP across visits is more stable than across visit office BP. Visit-to-visit office and 24-h BPV are significantly related to each other, but correlation coefficients are low, making visit-to-visit office BP variations poorly predictive of the concomitant 24-h BP variations and thus of on-treatment ambulatory BP stability.

2023 update and perspectives

Total 276 manuscripts were published in Hypertension Research in 2022. Here our editorial members picked up the excellent papers, summarized the current topics from the published papers and discussed future perspectives in the sixteen fields. We hope you enjoy our special feature, 2023 update and perspectives in Hypertension Research.

Control status of ambulatory blood pressure and its relationship with arterial stiffness in the China nationwide registry of treated hypertensive patients: the REACTION-ABP study

The control rate of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is unclear in Chinese hypertensive patients, and whether it would be associated with the ambulatory arterial stiffness indices is also unknown. From June 2018 until December 2022, 4408 treated hypertensive patients (52.8% men, average age 58.2 years) from 77 hospitals in China were registered. Ambulatory BPs were measured with validated monitors and analyzed with a web-based standardized Shuoyun system ( www.shuoyun.com.cn ). The BP control rate was the highest in the office (65.7%), moderate in the daytime (45.0%), low in the morning (34.1%), and the lowest in the nighttime (27.6%, P < 0.001). Only 21.0% had their 24 h BP perfectly controlled. The stepwise regression analyses identified that the factors associated with an imperfect 24 h BP control included male sex, smoking and drinking habits, a higher body mass index, serum total cholesterol and triglycerides, and the use of several specific types of antihypertensive drugs. After adjustment for the above-mentioned factors, the 24 h pulse pressure (PP) and its components, the elastic and stiffening PPs, were all significantly associated with an uncontrolled office and ambulatory BP status with the standardized odds ratios ranging from 1.09 to 4.68 (P < 0.05). The ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) was only associated with an uncontrolled nighttime and 24 h BP status. In conclusion, the control rates of 24 h ambulatory BP, especially that in the nighttime and morning time windows, were low in Chinese hypertensive patients, which might be associated with arterial stiffness in addition to other common risk factors.

Vascular contributions to Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and is characterized by progressive neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Understanding the pathophysiology underlying AD is paramount for the management of individuals at risk of and suffering from AD. The vascular hypothesis stipulates a relationship between cardiovascular disease and AD-related changes although the nature of this relationship remains unknown. In this review, we discuss several potential pathological pathways of vascular involvement in AD that have been described including dysregulation of neurovascular coupling, disruption of the blood brain barrier, and reduced clearance of metabolite waste such as beta-amyloid, a toxic peptide considered the hallmark of AD. We will also discuss the two-hit hypothesis which proposes a 2-step positive feedback loop in which microvascular insults precede the accumulation of Aß and are thought to be at the origin of the disease development. At neuroimaging, signs of vascular dysfunction such as chronic cerebral hypoperfusion have been demonstrated, appearing early in AD, even before cognitive decline and alteration of traditional biomarkers. Cerebral small vessel disease such as cerebral amyloid angiopathy, characterized by the aggregation of Aß in the vessel wall, is highly prevalent in vascular dementia and AD patients. Current data is unclear whether cardiovascular disease causes, precipitates, amplifies, precedes, or simply coincides with AD. Targeted imaging tools to quantitatively evaluate the intracranial vasculature and longitudinal studies in individuals at risk for or in the early stages of the AD continuum could be critical in disentangling this complex relationship between vascular disease and AD.

Diagnostic agreement of masked uncontrolled hypertension detected by ambulatory blood pressure and home blood pressure measured by an all-in-one BP monitoring device: The HI-JAMP study

Masked hypertension is defined by office blood pressure (BP) in the controlled-BP range while out-of-office BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM) is in the uncontrolled range. However, diagnosis of masked hypertension may differ if assessed by different out-of-office BP indices. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic agreement of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUHT) detected by ABPM indices (ABPM-MUHT) and HBPM indices (HBPM-MUHT) using the same all-in-one device (TM2441; A&D Company). The present study enrolled a total of 2322 treated hypertensive patients (males 53.2%, average age 69.2 ± 11.5 years) from the Home-Activity ICT-based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective (HI-JAMP) Study, who consecutively underwent office BP monitoring, 24-h ABPM (at 30-min intervals), and 5-day HBPM (twice each morning and evening) using the same device. When out-of-office BP control status was assessed only by 24-h average SBP or by the average of morning and evening SBP, the diagnostic agreement of MUHT detected by ABPM and HBPM was 29.7% among the 445 patients with any type of MUHT. When out-of-office BP indices in each time-window were simultaneously assessed, the diagnostic agreement increased to 40-45.7%. Our results indicated the importance of assessing BPs at various times of day, especially morning hours, for perfect hypertension management. Diagnosis of masked hypertension only by an averaged BP index, without considering specific time-windows, might underestimate cardiovascular risk.