The surgical management of ischaemic priapism

[Priapism]

Priapism is defined as penile erection lasting more than four hours that is unrelated to sexual arousal. Priapism is classified based on the oxygenation of the penile tissue into ischemic and non-ischemic subtypes. As the most common form, ischemic priapism is usually associated with pain and carries a significant risk of permanent loss of erectile function; thus, rapid intervention is necessary. Initial therapy consists of corporal aspiration and injection of sympathomimetic agents. If detumescence is not achieved, a cavernosal shunt is necessary. Non-ischemic priapism is less common than the ischemic type and is usually the result of perineal trauma. In this subtype, there is usually no pain and treatment is initially conservative. Recurrent (stuttering) priapism is a variant of the ischemic subtype, but is self-limiting and usually occurs during sleep with a duration of less than three to four hours. In the case of prolonged erection, therapy is analogous to that of the ischemic subtype.

Tissue Engineering for Penile Reconstruction

The penis is a complex organ with a development cycle from the fetal stage to puberty. In addition, it may suffer from either congenital or acquired anomalies. Penile surgical reconstruction has been the center of interest for many researchers but is still challenging due to the complexity of its anatomy and functionality. In this review, penile anatomy, pathologies, and current treatments are described, including surgical techniques and tissue engineering approaches. The self-assembly technique currently applied is emphasized since it is considered promising for an adequate tissue-engineered penile reconstructed substitute.

Current opinions on the management of prolonged ischemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?

Prolonged ischemic priapism presents a treatment challenge given the difficulty in achieving detumescence and effects on sexual function. To evaluate current practice patterns, an open, web-based multi-institutional survey querying surgeons' experience with and perceived efficacy of tunneling maneuvers (corporoglanular tunneling and penoscrotal decompression), as well as impressions of erectile recovery, was administered to members of societies specializing in male genital surgery. Following distribution, 141 responses were received. Tunneling procedures were the favored first-line surgical intervention in the prolonged setting (99/139, 71.2% tunneling vs. 14/139, 10.1% implant, p < .001). Although respondents were more likely to have performed corporoglanular tunneling than penoscrotal decompression (124/138, 89.9% vs. 86/137, 62.8%, p < .001), penoscrotal decompression was perceived as more effective among those who had performed both (47.3% Very or Extremely Effective for penoscrotal decompression vs. 18.7% for corporoglanular tunneling; p < .001). Many respondents who had performed both tunneling procedures felt that most regained meaningful sexual function after either corporoglanular tunneling or penoscrotal decompression (33/75, 44.0% vs. 33/74, 44.6%, p = .942). While further patient-centered investigation is warranted, this study suggests that penoscrotal decompression may outperform corporoglanular tunneling for prolonged priapism, and that recovery of sexual function may be higher than previously thought after tunneling procedures.

Penile implants in low flow priapism

Priapism is a persistent or prolonged erection, in the absence of sexual stimulation, that fails to subside. Prolonged ischaemic or low flow priapism is defined as a full or partial erection persisting for more than 4 h and unrelated to sexual interest or stimulation, characterised by little or no cavernous blood flow. Low flow priapism leads to progressive corporal fibrosis, which could, in turn, lead to long-lasting erectile dysfunction if left untreated. Penile prosthesis implantation is recognised as a management option in refractory and delayed low flow priapism for restoring erectile function with high patient satisfaction rates. However, the ensuing corporal fibrotic scarring poses a surgical challenge to clinicians, given the higher complication rates in this patient subset. Postoperative patient satisfaction has been closely linked to preoperative expectations and perceived loss of penile length. Therefore, thorough patient counselling concerning the risk and benefits of penile implants should be a priority for all clinicians. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus on the ideal prosthesis choice and procedural timing in refractory low flow priapism. In this review, we will examine the existing literature on penile implants in patients with priapism and discuss the options for managing complications associated with penile prosthesis surgery.

Successful Management of Prolonged Acute Ischemic Priapism With Penoscrotal Decompression: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Intracavernosal injection of Trimix (a combination of phentolamine, papaverine, and alprostadil) is used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. A rare but serious side effect of Trimix is priapism, a persistent erection lasting for more than four hours. Penoscrotal decompression is a newer technique being used to treat refractory and persistent ischemic priapism. Here, we report a unique case of priapism treated with penoscrotal decompression in a patient following an unmeasured injection of Trimix. A 36-year-old male presented to the emergency room complaining of a persistent painful erection over the previous five days following a Trimix injection and illicit methamphetamine use. At bedside, aspiration and irrigation were attempted without any improvement. Phenylephrine injection was contraindicated due to sinus tachycardia. The patient then underwent bilateral penoscrotal decompression on day six post-Trimix injection. The procedure was successful with a resolution of the erection, though some moderate corporal fibrosis was noted. At a 10-day follow-up, the patient reported moderate pain in his penis but had regained complete potency. Misuse of Trimix can cause persistent ischemic priapism. Penoscrotal decompression is a novel technique used to treat persistent ischemic priapism and has been shown to have positive efficacy in the resolution of priapism as well as in salvaging erectile function. To our knowledge, treatment of persistent priapism with penoscrotal decompression after using Trimix has not yet been reported in the literature. Given the rarity of this, our report highlights a unique case that has potential benefit for future practitioners who are faced with this clinical scenario.

Review of Ischemic and Non-ischemic Priapism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Priapism is a rare condition that has different presentations, etiologies, pathophysiology, and treatment algorithms. It can be associated with significant patient distress and sexual dysfunction. We aim to examine the most up-to-date literature and guidelines in the management of this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

Priapism is a challenging condition to manage for urologists, since the etiology is often multi-factorial and the suggested treatment algorithms are based on small studies and expert anecdotal experience, perhaps due to the rarity of the disorder. Ischemic priapism of less than 24 h can be managed non-surgically in most cases with excellent results. Ischemic priapism of more than 36 h is frequently associated with permanent erectile dysfunction. Management of prolonged priapism with penile shunting still may result in poor erectile function, so penile prosthesis can be discussed in these scenarios.

Penile Doppler ultrasound study in priapism: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Penile Doppler ultrasound (PDU) is suggested to be an alternative to blood gas analysis (BGA) from the corpora cavernosa in differentiating between high- and low-flow priapisms, with limited supportive evidence.

AIM

To compare penile Doppler ultrasound study and blood gas analysis in the diagnosis of priapism, through a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

Studies were identified by literature search of Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.Gov. Studies were included if their participants had priapism evaluated by Penile Doppler ultrasound, and reported data on the blood gas analysis or pudendal artery angiography (PAA). Two authors independently extracted the articles using predetermined datasets, including indicators of quality.

OUTCOMES

Correlation of penile Doppler ultrasound with blood gas analysis and pudendal artery angiography.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. Three studies compared Penile Doppler ultrasound to blood gas analysis and pudendal artery angiography. Penile Doppler ultrasound was used as adjunctive to blood gas analysis to differentiate low flow from high flow priapism, guidance for embolization, etiological diagnosis in three studies. Compared to pudendal artery angiography, penile Doppler ultrasound had a sensitivity of 40-100% and a specificity of 73%, to localize vascular injury and anatomical abnormalities (two studies). Penile Doppler ultrasound was also used for the follow-up after the treatment of priapism (two studies). No study reported an impact on functional results or a delay of management due to penile Doppler ultrasound use.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

We reviewed evidence on penile Doppler ultrasound study in priapism. Penile Doppler ultrasound study performance was comparable to blood gas from corpus cavernosum. It is recommended to use doppler as an alternative diagnostic tool.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Our systematic review had limitations. Firstly, the number of cases in the included studies was small. Secondly, these studies were all retrospective. Lastly, few data were reported with regards to hemodynamic parameters of penile Doppler ultrasound, and the majority of studies did not describe these in detail.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports that penile Doppler ultrasound is a reliable way for differentiating high-flow and low-flow priapism. We recommend penile Doppler ultrasound study as an alternative of blood gas analysis from corpus cavernosum, especially when the latter is not available.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Malignant Priapism - What Do We Know About It?

Malignancy as an etiological factor involved in priapism pathogenesis is rare. Malignant priapism (MP) can arise as a result of penile tumor invasion, either from primary penile tumors or from metastatic penile tumors, or due to hematological malignancies. Non-urological penile metastases are associated with significant worse prognosis compared to urological penile metastases, the appearance of priapism in such cases affecting even more the prognosis and the survival of these patients. Patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies and priapism present significant higher survival rates compared to those who develop MP in the context of a non-hematological malignancy, this being related to the fact that hematological malignancies are more sensitive to chemo- and radiotherapy. Most malignant priapism cases are ischemic; therefore the management should be based on the initial steps of the IP therapeutic protocol. Considering the trigger factor that has led to the priapic event specific oncologic treatment can be added as well.