Is Reddit a reliable source for information on erectile dysfunction treatment?

Size matters: characterizing penile augmentation content from the 100 most popular YouTube videos

Aesthetic penile augmentation is considered investigational and not shown to be safe or efficacious. This study sought to characterize the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on the topic of penile augmentation. A systematic search identifying the 100 most viewed YouTube videos on penile augmentation was conducted. The videos were then evaluated by two independent urologists for reliability and quality using a modified DISCERN scoring system and Global Quality Scale (GQS). The median total views were 530,612 (range 123,478-32,914,713). The median DISCERN and GQS scores for all 100 videos were generally poor at 1.75 (IQR 1-2.63) and 2.5 (IQR 1.5-3.5), respectively. A little under half of the videos had a physician present (44.7%). DISCERN and GQS scores were significantly higher in videos with physicians compared to those without one (p < 0.001 for both). The majority of videos discussed nonsurgical methods of penile augmentation (65.1%) with penile traction devices being the most frequently discussed (19.2%). Urologists and medical organizations should strive to have more of a presence in this space to ensure patients are appropriately educated and counseled before pursuing potentially ineffective or harmful treatments.

The natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related voiding symptoms following penile prosthesis implantation

Background

There is a rising prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)-related urinary symptoms along with erectile dysfunction in the aging male population. Therefore, assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is advised before penile prosthesis surgery with some men requiring preoperative transurethral surgical management to reduce the risk of post-procedure complications. However, less is known about the natural history of men with uncomplicated LUTS who do not require surgical management for BPH before penile prosthesis.

Objective

We sought to assess the natural history of BPH-related uncomplicated LUTS in men following penile prosthesis surgery.

Design

Single institution retrospective review.

Methods

Following institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective review of all adult males with a preoperative diagnosis of LUTS undergoing penile prosthesis surgery at our institution from January 2017 to November 2022. The primary outcome was progression to transurethral surgery.

Results

From 2017 to 2022, 211 patients with preexisting LUTS underwent penile prosthesis surgery and met all criteria for inclusion including no history of transurethral surgery. The median (interquartile range, IQR) AUA symptom score (AUA-SS) was 12 (12). Post-void residual was below 200 cc in 96.2% of patients preoperatively and 99.1% of patients after surgery. At a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 9 (23) months after surgery, 5.7% (12/211) of patients had progressed to bladder outlet surgery and 35.5% of patients endorsed LUTS bother with a median (IQR) AUA-SS of 14.5 (11.8).

Conclusion

The majority of patients with uncomplicated LUTS did not require bladder outlet surgery following penile prosthesis implantation and could be managed with conservative or pharmacologic measures alone. Prostate gland size was significantly larger in patients who progressed to bladder outlet surgery. While the results are overall reassuring, further study is needed to identify specific factors associated with pursuing bladder outlet surgery in this small subset of patients.

Quality and benefits of the erectile dysfunction information on websites, social-media, and applications

Erectile Dysfunction (ED) is defined as the persistent inability to obtain and maintain an erection that enables satisfactory sexual intercourse. ED prevalence vary across age groups, affecting approximately 1-9% of men under 40, 2-9% of those aged 40-59, and increasing to 20-40% for those aged 60-69. However, it remains a frequently untreated or insufficiently treated condition. Especially due to the feeling of discomfort and guilt, patients often avoid consulting their physicians; in this context, digital innovation could potentially play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of ED. This narrative review depicts the ongoing status of digital innovations in ED focusing on websites, social media platforms and mobile health applications (MHA). We examined Google, social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok), and the recently developed MHA apps on Google Play Store and Apple App Store. Websites provide readily available but sometimes difficult to understand information, while social media is easy to understand and act on. MHA apps are the most complete and trustworthy tool for self-care management. In conclusion, digital innovations are a continuously growing source of information and therapeutic tools.

Social Media and Apps in Urology

Purpose of Review

In this study, we aimed to review the common social media (SoMe) apps used and how they have impacted the practice and exchange of information, as well as the challenges of using SoMe in urology.

Recent Findings

SoMe has become increasingly popular in the urology community. Lay users often turn to SoMe to learn about urological health and share their own experiences, while medical professionals may use it for career development, networking, education, and research purposes.

Summary

It is important to recognize the power of SoMe and to use it responsibly and ethically, particularly given the potential risks of encountering low-quality or misleading information.