A platform for oncogenomic reporting and interpretation

CDK6 as a Biomarker for Immunotherapy, Drug Sensitivity, and Prognosis in Bladder Cancer: Bioinformatics and Immunohistochemical Analysis

Background: CDK6 is linked to tumor progression and metastasis, although its molecular mechanism and prognostic value are unclear in bladder cancer. Materials and methods: In our study, raw data were obtained from public databases and Single-center retrospective case series. We conducted a bioinformatics analysis and immunohistochemistry to explore the biological landscape of CDK6 in tumors, with a particular focus on bladder cancer. We examined its expression characteristics and prognostic value and performed functional annotation analysis using gene function enrichment. We also assessed the association between bladder cancer molecular subtypes and mutation spectra and analyzed the landscape of the tumor immune microenvironment to predict treatment response sensitivity. Results: Our study found that CDK6 was a potential prognostic marker for bladder cancer. We discovered that bladder cancer patients with high CDK6 expression do not respond well to immunotherapy and have a poor prognosis. CDK6 regulates tumor immune status, metabolism, and cell cycle-related signaling pathways, thereby influencing tumor biological behavior. Furthermore, CDK6 mediated the suppression of the immune microenvironment to weaken anti-tumor immune responses. Finally, a comprehensive characterization of CDK6 was applied in the prognostic prediction of bladder cancer, suggesting that targeting CDK6 represents a potential therapeutic option. Conclusions: These results indicated that CDK6 is an independent biomarker for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy of bladder cancer. A deeper understanding of its specific molecular mechanisms may provide new treatment strategies.

Whole genome and transcriptome integrated analyses guide clinical care of pediatric poor prognosis cancers

The role for routine whole genome and transcriptome analysis (WGTA) for poor prognosis pediatric cancers remains undetermined. Here, we characterize somatic mutations, structural rearrangements, copy number variants, gene expression, immuno-profiles and germline cancer predisposition variants in children and adolescents with relapsed, refractory or poor prognosis malignancies who underwent somatic WGTA and matched germline sequencing. Seventy-nine participants with a median age at enrollment of 8.8 y (range 6 months to 21.2 y) are included. Germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants are identified in 12% of participants, of which 60% were not known prior. Therapeutically actionable variants are identified by targeted gene report and whole genome in 32% and 62% of participants, respectively, and increase to 96% after integrating transcriptome analyses. Thirty-two molecularly informed therapies are pursued in 28 participants with 54% achieving a clinical benefit rate; objective response or stable disease ≥6 months. Integrated WGTA identifies therapeutically actionable variants in almost all tumors and are directly translatable to clinical care of children with poor prognosis cancers.

A systematic review of computational approaches to understand cancer biology for informed drug repurposing

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, trailing only heart disease. In the United States alone, 1.9 million new cancer cases and 609,360 deaths were recorded for 2022. Unfortunately, the success rate for new cancer drug development remains less than 10%, making the disease particularly challenging. This low success rate is largely attributed to the complex and poorly understood nature of cancer etiology. Therefore, it is critical to find alternative approaches to understanding cancer biology and developing effective treatments. One such approach is drug repurposing, which offers a shorter drug development timeline and lower costs while increasing the likelihood of success. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of computational approaches for understanding cancer biology, including systems biology, multi-omics, and pathway analysis. Additionally, we examine the use of these methods for drug repurposing in cancer, including the databases and tools that are used for cancer research. Finally, we present case studies of drug repurposing, discussing their limitations and offering recommendations for future research in this area.

CIViCdb 2022: evolution of an open-access cancer variant interpretation knowledgebase

CIViC (Clinical Interpretation of Variants in Cancer; civicdb.org) is a crowd-sourced, public domain knowledgebase composed of literature-derived evidence characterizing the clinical utility of cancer variants. As clinical sequencing becomes more prevalent in cancer management, the need for cancer variant interpretation has grown beyond the capability of any single institution. CIViC contains peer-reviewed, published literature curated and expertly-moderated into structured data units (Evidence Items) that can be accessed globally and in real time, reducing barriers to clinical variant knowledge sharing. We have extended CIViC's functionality to support emergent variant interpretation guidelines, increase interoperability with other variant resources, and promote widespread dissemination of structured curated data. To support the full breadth of variant interpretation from basic to translational, including integration of somatic and germline variant knowledge and inference of drug response, we have enabled curation of three new Evidence Types (Predisposing, Oncogenic and Functional). The growing CIViC knowledgebase has over 300 contributors and distributes clinically-relevant cancer variant data currently representing >3200 variants in >470 genes from >3100 publications.

OncoPubMiner: a platform for mining oncology publications

Updated and expert-quality knowledge bases are fundamental to biomedical research. A knowledge base established with human participation and subject to multiple inspections is needed to support clinical decision making, especially in the growing field of precision oncology. The number of original publications in this field has risen dramatically with the advances in technology and the evolution of in-depth research. Consequently, the issue of how to gather and mine these articles accurately and efficiently now requires close consideration. In this study, we present OncoPubMiner (https://oncopubminer.chosenmedinfo.com), a free and powerful system that combines text mining, data structure customisation, publication search with online reading and project-centred and team-based data collection to form a one-stop 'keyword in-knowledge out' oncology publication mining platform. The platform was constructed by integrating all open-access abstracts from PubMed and full-text articles from PubMed Central, and it is updated daily. OncoPubMiner makes obtaining precision oncology knowledge from scientific articles straightforward and will assist researchers in efficiently developing structured knowledge base systems and bring us closer to achieving precision oncology goals.

CCAS: One-stop and comprehensive annotation system for individual cancer genome at multi-omics level

Due to the explosion of cancer genome data and the urgent needs for cancer treatment, it is becoming increasingly important and necessary to easily and timely analyze and annotate cancer genomes. However, tumor heterogeneity is recognized as a serious barrier to annotate cancer genomes at the individual patient level. In addition, the interpretation and analysis of cancer multi-omics data rely heavily on existing database resources that are often located in different data centers or research institutions, which poses a huge challenge for data parsing. Here we present CCAS (Cancer genome Consensus Annotation System, https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/ccas/#/home), a one-stop and comprehensive annotation system for the individual patient at multi-omics level. CCAS integrates 20 widely recognized resources in the field to support data annotation of 10 categories of cancers covering 395 subtypes. Data from each resource are manually curated and standardized by using ontology frameworks. CCAS accepts data on single nucleotide variant/insertion or deletion, expression, copy number variation, and methylation level as input files to build a consensus annotation. Outputs are arranged in the forms of tables or figures and can be searched, sorted, and downloaded. Expanded panels with additional information are used for conciseness, and most figures are interactive to show additional information. Moreover, CCAS offers multidimensional annotation information, including mutation signature pattern, gene set enrichment analysis, pathways and clinical trial related information. These are helpful for intuitively understanding the molecular mechanisms of tumors and discovering key functional genes.

Whole genome and transcriptome analysis enhances precision cancer treatment options

BACKGROUND

Recent advances are enabling delivery of precision genomic medicine to cancer clinics. While the majority of approaches profile panels of selected genes or hotspot regions, comprehensive data provided by whole genome and transcriptome sequencing and analysis (WGTA) presents an opportunity to align a much larger proportion of patients to therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Samples from 570 patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of diverse types enrolled in the Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) program underwent WGTA. DNA-based data, including mutations, copy number, and mutation signatures, were combined with RNA-based data, including gene expression and fusions, to generate comprehensive WGTA profiles. A multidisciplinary molecular tumour board used WGTA profiles to identify and prioritize clinically actionable alterations and inform therapy. Patient responses to WGTA-informed therapies were collected.

RESULTS

Clinically actionable targets were identified for 83% of patients, 37% of whom received WGTA-informed treatments. RNA expression data were particularly informative, contributing to 67% of WGTA-informed treatments; 25% of treatments were informed by RNA expression alone. Of a total 248 WGTA-informed treatments, 46% resulted in clinical benefit. RNA expression data were comparable to DNA-based mutation and copy number data in aligning to clinically beneficial treatments. Genome signatures also guided therapeutics including platinum, PARP inhibitors, and immunotherapies. Patients accessed WGTA-informed treatments through clinical trials (19%), off-label use (35%), and as standard therapies (46%) including those which would not otherwise have been the next choice of therapy, demonstrating the utility of genomic information to direct use of chemotherapies as well as targeted therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating RNA expression and genome data illuminated treatment options that resulted in 46% of treated patients experiencing positive clinical benefit, supporting the use of comprehensive WGTA profiling in clinical cancer care.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT02155621.